Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Increased contact area of flange and decreased wedge volume of osteotomy site by open wedge distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy compared to the conventional technique

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange and wedge volume, in open wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO), distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy (DTO), and distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy (DTAO) using tibial sawbones. It was hypothesized that the area of the osteotomy surface, including the flange, in DTAO was larger than that in OWHTO and DTO and that the wedge volume in DTAO was smaller than that in OWHTO and DTO.

Methods

Fifteen tibial sawbones were divided equally into three groups: OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO. The total area of the osteotomy surface in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO was compared using image analysis software. The contact area of the flange and the wedge volume at wedge heights of 5, 10, and 15 mm were compared among osteotomy types. One-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare the total area of the osteotomy surface, the contact area of the flange, and the wedge volume at 5, 10, and 15 mm in OWHTO, DTO, and DTAO.

Results

The total area of the osteotomy surface in DTO and DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO (P < 0.05). The contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in OWHTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05). In addition, the contact area of the flange in DTAO was significantly larger than that in DTO at wedge heights of 5 and 15 mm (P < 0.05). The wedge volume in DTAO was significantly smaller than that in DTO at each wedge height (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that an increase in the flange contact area and a decrease in the wedge volume in the opening gap were found in DTAO compared to DTO. This would be an advantage for anteroposterior screw insertion from the flange to the distal tibial fragment and bone union at the osteotomy site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

OWHTO:

Open wedge high tibial osteotomy

OA:

Osteoarthritis

DTO:

Distal tibial tuberosity osteotomy

DTAO:

Distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

ICCs:

Intraclass correlation coefficients

References

  1. Akiyama T, Osano K, Mizu-Uchi H, Nakamura N, Okazaki K, Nakayama H, Takeuchi R (2019) Distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy in open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy to prevent patella infera. Arthrosc Tech 8:e655–e662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amis AA (2013) Biomechanics of high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R, Sasaki Y, Saito T (2010) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy affects both the lateral patellar tilt and patellar height. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:955–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brouwer RW, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA, van Koeveringe AJ, Verhaar JAN (2005) Patellar height and the inclination of the tibial plateau after high tibial osteotomy. The open versus the closed-wedge technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1227–1232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Azab H, Glabgly P, Paul J, Imhoff AB, Hinterwimmer S (2010) Patellar height and posterior tibial slope after open- and closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study on 100 patients. Am J Sports Med 38:323–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elmalı N, Esenkaya I, Can M, Karakaplan M (2013) Monoplanar versus biplanar medial open-wedge proximal tibial osteotomy for varus gonarthrosis: a comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:2689–2695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Esenkaya I, Unay K (2012) Proximal medial tibial biplanar retrotubercle open wedge osteotomy in medial knee arthrosis. Knee 19:416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gaasbeek RDA, Sonneveld H, van Heerwaarden RJ, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB (2004) Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open wedge high tibial osteotomy can prevent patella infera: a new technique. Knee 11:457–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Nakanishi A, Ueoka K (2017) Patellofemoral osteoarthritis progression and alignment changes after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy do not affect clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up. Arthroscopy 33:1832–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Horikawa T, Kubota K, Hara S, Akasaki Y (2019) Distal tuberosity osteotomy in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy does not exacerbate patellofemoral osteoarthritis on arthroscopic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05596-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim KI, Kim DK, Song SJ, Lee SH, Bae DK (2017) Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy may adversely affect the patellofemoral joint. Arthroscopy 33:811–816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kloos F, Becher C, Fleischer B, Feucht MJ, Hohloch L, Südkamp N, Niemeyer P, Bode G (2019) High tibial osteotomy increases patellofemoral pressure if adverted proximal, while open-wedge HTO with distal biplanar osteotomy discharges the patellofemoral joint: different open-wedge high tibial osteotomies compared to an extra-articular unloading device. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:2334–2344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Krause M, Drenck TC, Korthaus A, Preiss A, Frosch KH, Akoto R (2018) Patella height is not altered by descending medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared to ascending HTO. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1859–1866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Longino PD, Brimingham TB, Schultz WJ, Moyer RF, Giffin JR (2013) Combined tibial tubercle osteotomy with medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy minimizes changes in patellar height: a prospective cohort study with historical controls. Am J Sports Med 41:2849–2857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogawa H, Matsumoto K, Yoshioka H, Sengoku M, Akiyama H (2019) Distal tibial tubercle osteotomy is superior to the proximal one for progression of patellofemoral osteoarthritis in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05836-y1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pape D, Dueck K, Haag M, Lorbach O, Seil R, Madry H (2013) Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Saito T, Kumagai K, Akamatsu Y, Kobayashi H, Kusayama Y (2014) Five-to ten-year outcome following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with rigid plate fixation in combination with an artificial bone substitute. J Bone Joint Surg 96:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shim JS, Lee SH, Jung HJ, Lee HI (2013) High tibial open wedge osteotomy below the tibial tubercle: clinical and radiographic results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Staubli AE, Simoni CD, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury 34:B55–B62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tanaka T, Matsushita T, Miyaji N, Ibaraki K, Nishida K, Oka S, Araki D, Kanzaki N, Hoshino Y, Matsumoto T, Kuroda R (2019) Deterioration of patellofemoral cartilage status after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1347–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tigani D, Ferrari D, Trentani P, Barbanti-Brodano G, Trentani F (2001) Patellar height after high tibial osteotomy. Int Orthop 24:331–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. van Heerwaarden R, Najfeld M, Brinkman M, Seil R, Madry H, Pape D (2013) Wedge volume and osteotomy surface depend on surgical technique for distal femoral osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:206–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhim F, Laflamme GY, Viens H, Yahia L, Laflamme GH (2006) Biomechanical stability of a retrotubercle opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Knee Surg 19:28–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SN: study design, data collection, interpreting the data, and writing the paper. MS: data collection. KK, HF, SY, JM, and YI: interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken Kumagai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was not needed for the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nejima, S., Kumagai, K., Fujimaki, H. et al. Increased contact area of flange and decreased wedge volume of osteotomy site by open wedge distal tibial tuberosity arc osteotomy compared to the conventional technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3450–3457 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06296-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06296-8

Keywords

Navigation