Skip to main content
Log in

Relationship between bone plug position and morphological changes of tunnel aperture in anatomic rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

In animal studies after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) using the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), the graft-healing pattern was found to depend on the relationship between bone plug and the tunnel wall. This difference of graft-healing pattern could influence the postoperative morphological changes of the tunnel. However, no study has assessed the relationship between bone plug position and the change of tunnel morphology. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the bone plug position within femoral or tibial tunnel and morphological changes of each tunnel aperture in ACL-R using computed tomography.

Methods

Subjects were 30 consecutive patients (six females and 24 males; mean age, 20.4 ± 5.4 years) who underwent primary ACL-R using BTB. The distance from the tunnel aperture to the tendon-bone junction (TBJ) at 2 weeks postoperatively, and tunnel aperture enlargement and tunnel wall migration from 2 weeks to 6 months postoperatively, were evaluated.

Results

The distance from the femoral tunnel aperture to the TBJ in most cases was less than 2 mm, whereas the TBJ was located within the tibial tunnel. Femoral tunnel aperture was significantly enlarged (17.0 ± 11.7%) distally, and the tibial tunnel aperture was significantly enlarged (19.6 ± 12.5%) posterolaterally. Only the position at distal portion of femoral bone plug was correlated with femoral tunnel aperture enlargement (r = 0.454, p = 0.0015).

Conclusion

Both femoral and tibial tunnel aperture were significantly enlarged distally and posterolaterally 6 months postoperatively. Only correlation between the position at distal portion of femoral bone plug and femoral tunnel enlargement were found, suggesting the deep plug position in the tunnel is a risk factor for femoral tunnel enlargement, highlighting the importance of accurately locating the TBJ just at the femoral tunnel aperture. Another option is to deviate the harvest site in the patellar tendon to match the shape of the TBJ and the tunnel aperture.

Level of evidence

4 (case series).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amano H, Tanaka Y, Kita K, Uchida R, Tachibana Y, Yonetani Y, Mae T, Shiozaki Y, Horibe S (2018) Significant anterior enlargement of femoral tunnel aperture after hamstring ACL reconstruction, compared to bone-patellar tendon-bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5098-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Araki D, Kuroda R, Matsumoto T, Nagamune K, Matsushita T, Hoshino Y, Oka S, Nishizawa Y, Kurosaka M (2014) Threedimensional analysis of bone tunnel changes after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using multidetector-row computed tomography. Am J Sports Med 42(9):223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg EE, Pollard ME, Kang Q (2001) Interarticular bone tunnel healing. Arthroscopy 17(2):189–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL. Radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10(1):14–21 (discussion 21–22)

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burks R (1992) Practical considerations in cruciate graft fixation. Op Tech Orthop 2(12):71–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Choi NH, Son KM, Yoo SY, Victoroff BN (2012) Femoral tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable transfix. Am J Sports Med 40Z(2):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Drogset JO, Grøntvedt T, Myhr G (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging analysis of bioabsorbable interference screws used for fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts in endoscopic econstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med 34(7):1164–1169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fauno P, Kaalund S (2005) Tunnel widening after hamstring anterior cruciate igament reconstruction is influenced by the type of graft fixation used: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 21(11):1337–1341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoigne DJ, Ballmer PM (2010) Influence of the bone block position on the tunnel enlargement in ACL reconstruction. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 20(1):e12 2(

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Järvelä T, Moisala AS, Paakkala T, Paakkala A (2008) Tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized study. Arthroscopy 24(12):1349–1357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kusano M, Yonetani Y, Mae T, Nakata K, Yoshikawa H, Shino K (2017) Tibial insertions of the anterior cruciate ligament and the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus: a histological and computed tomographic study. Knee 24(4):782–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(4):206–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shino K, Mae T, Tachibana Y (2015) Anatomic ACL reconstruction: rectangular tunnel/bone-patellar tendon-bone or triple-bundle/semitendinosus tendon grafting. J Orthop Sci 20(3):457–468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Suzuki T, Shino K, Nakagawa S, Nakata K, Iwahashi T, Kinugasa K, Otsubo H, Yamashita T (2011) Early integration of a bone plug in the femoral tunnel in rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: a prospective computed tomography analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(Suppl 1):S29–S35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tachibana Y, Mae T, Shino K, Kanamoto T, Sugamoto K, Yoshikawa H, Nakata K (2015) Morphological changes in femoral tunnels after anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(12):3591–3600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taketomi S, Inui H, Sanada T, Yamagamai R, Tanaka S, Nakagawa T (2014) Eccentric femoral tunnel widening in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 30(6):701–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas NP, Kankate R, Wandless F, Pandit H (2005) Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel. Am J Sports Med 33(11):1701–1709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tomita F, Yasuda K, Mikami S, Sakai T, Yamazaki S, Tohyama H (2001) Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 17(5):461–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuda E, Ishibashi Y, Fukuda A, Yamamoto Y, Tsukada H, Ono S (2010) Tunnel position and relationship to postoperative knee laxity after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a transtibial technique. Am J Sports Med 38(4):698–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tsukada H, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Fukuda A, Toh S (2008) Anatomical analysis of the anterior cruciate ligament femoral and tibial footprints. J Orthop Sci 13(2):122–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Uchida R, Toritsuka Y, Mae T, Kusano M, Ohzono K (2016) Healing of tibial bone tunnels after bone grafting for staged revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: a prospective computed tomography analysis. Knee 23(5):830–836

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Webster KE, Feller JA, Hameister KA (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts with 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(2):86–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu Y, Ao Y, Wang J, Yu J, Cui G (2011) Relation of tunnel enlargement and tunnel placement after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(7):923–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yoshiya S, Nagano M, Kurosaka M, Muratsu H, Mizuno K (2000) Graft healing in the bone tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 376:278–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No author or related institution has received any financial benefit from research in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryohei Uchida.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

IRB approval was obtained (Seifu hospital, approval ID: 25-1).

Informed consent

All patients gave informed consent for study inclusion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uchida, R., Shiozaki, Y., Tanaka, Y. et al. Relationship between bone plug position and morphological changes of tunnel aperture in anatomic rectangular tunnel ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27, 2417–2425 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5224-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5224-8

Keywords

Navigation