Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative assessment of patellar vascularity following bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvest for ACL reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Recent anatomic studies have suggested that the dominant arterial supply of the patella enters through the inferior pole. Based upon these findings, we hypothesized that bone-patellar tendon-bone graft harvest can significantly diminish patellar vascularity.

Methods

Nine matched pair cadaveric knee specimens (mean age 47.4 years) were dissected and cannulated. A single knee was selected to undergo routine graft harvest, and the contralateral knee was left intact to serve as a control. Gadolinium was injected, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal enhancement was quantified to determine differences in uptake. Each matched pair was subsequently injected with a urethane polymer compound and dissected to correlate vessel disruption with MRI findings.

Results

We identified two predominating patterns of vessel entry. In one pattern, the vessel entered the inferomedial aspect (five o’clock/right, seven o’clock/left) of the patella and was disrupted by graft harvest in 2/9 (22.2 %) pairs. In the second pattern, the vessel entered further medial (four o’clock/right, eight o’clock/left) and was not disrupted (7/9, 78.8 %). The mean decrease in gadolinium uptake following disruption of the predominant vessel measured 56.2 % (range 42.6–69.5 %) compared to an average decrease of 18.3 % (range 7.1–29.1 %) when the dominant arterial supply to the inferior pole remained intact (p < 0.04).

Conclusion

Medial entry of the predominant vessel precluded vessel disruption. Disruption of the dominant arterial supply can result in a significant decrease in patellar vascularity. Modification of graft harvest techniques and areas of surgical dissection should be explored to minimize vascular insult. Further correlation with clinical studies/outcomes is necessary to determine a potential association between vascular insult and anterior knee pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker JU, Drakos MC, Maak TG, Warren RF, Williams RJ, Allen AA (2010) Effect of graft selection on the incidence of postoperative infection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(2):281–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beaufils P, Gaudot F, Drain O, Boisrenoult P, Pujol N (2011) Mini-invasive technique for bone patellar tendon bone harvesting: its superiority in reducing anterior knee pain following ACL reconstruction. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 4:45–51

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Biau DJ, Katcahian S, Kartus J, Harilainen A, Feller JA, Sajovic M, Ejerhed L, Zaffagnini S, Ropke M, Nizard R (2009) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts for reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis based on individual patient data. Am J Sports Med 37(12):2470–2478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bjorkstrom S, Goldie IF (1980) A study of the arterial supply of the patella in the normal state, in chondromalacia patellae and in osteoarthrosis. Acta Orthop Scand 51(1):63–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Hettrich C, Parker RJ, Miller A, Helfet D, Lorich D (2009) Assessment of vascularity of the femoral head using gadolinium (Gd-DTPA) enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):131–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brand J Jr, Weiler A, Caborn DN, Brown CH, Johnson DL (2000) Graft fixation in cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 28(5):761–764

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown CH, Hecker AT, Hipp JA, Myers ER, Hayes WC (1993) The biomechanics of interference screw fixation of patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament grafts. Am J Sports Med 21(6):880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cheung SC, Allen CR, Gallo RA, Ma CB, Feeley BT (2012) Patients’ attitudes and factors in their selection of grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 19(1):49–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cohen SB, Yucha DT, Ciccotti MC, Goldstein DT, Ciccotti MA, Ciccotti MG (2009) Factors affecting patient selection of graft type in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25(9):1006–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Poehling GG, Curl WW, Lee CA, Ginn TA, Rushing JT, Naughton MJ, Holden MB, Martin DF, Smith BP (2005) Analysis of outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament repair with 5-year follow-up: allograft versus autograft. Arthroscopy 21(7):774–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dunn WR, Lyman S, Lincoln AE, Amoroso PJ, Wickiewicz T, Marx RG (2004) The effect of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on the risk of knee reinjury. Am J Sports Med 32:1906–1914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freedman KB, D’Amato MJ, Nedeff DD, Kaz A, Bach BR (2003) Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 31:2–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfer Y, Pinkas L, Halperin N, Alk D, Robinson D (2003) Symptomatic transient patellar ischemia following total knee replacement as detected by scintigraphy: a prospective, randomized, double blind-study comparing the mid-vastus to the medial para-patellar approach. Knee 10:341–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Granan LP, Inacio MC, Maletis GB, Funahashi TT, Engebretsen L (2012) Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: an anterior cruciate ligament reconsruction registry comparison between Norway and the USA. Acta Orthop 83(6):577–582

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hettrich CM, Boraiah S, Dyke JP, Neviaser A, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2010) Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the proximal part of the humerus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(4):943–948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Inacio M, Paxton EW, Maletis GB, Csintalan RP, Granan LP, Fithian DC, Funahashi TT (2012) Patient and surgeon characteristics associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft selection. Am J Sports Med 40(2):339–345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Irrgang JJ, Harner CD (1995) Loss of motion following knee ligament reconstruction. Sports Med 19:150–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson DW, Schaefer RK (1990) Cyclops syndrome: loss of extension following intra-articular anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 6:171–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones KG (1963) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a technique using the central one-third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45A(5):925–932

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kapoor B, Clement DJ, Kirkley A, Maffulli N (2004) Current practice in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in the United Kingdom. Br J Sports Med 38:542–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kartus J, Magnusson L, Stener S, Brandsson S, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1999) Complications following arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2–5 year follow-up of 604 patients with special emphasis on anterior knee pain. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:2–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kartus J, Stener S, Lindahl S, Engstrom B, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (1997) Factors affecting donor-site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:222–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kleipool AE, van Loon T, Marti RK (1994) Pain after use of the central third of the patellar tendon for cruciate ligament reconstruction: 33 patients followed 2–3 years. Acta Orthop Scand 65(1):62–66

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kohl S, Evangelopoulos DS, Hartel M, Kohlhof H, Roeder C, Eggli S (2011) Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: does it correlate with patellar blood flow. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1453–1459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Andrish JT (1987) A biomechanical comparison of different surgical techniques of graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 15(3):225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Laxdal G, Kartus J, Hansson L, Heidvall M, Ejerhed L, Karlsson J (2005) A prospective randomized comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 21(1):34–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Pardee NC, Sculco PK, Berkes MB, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2013) Quantitative and qualitative assessment of bone perfusion and arterial contributions in a patellar fracture model using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(19):1401–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyman S, Koulouvaris P, Sherman S, Do H, Mandl LA, Marx RG (2009) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: trends, readmissions, and subsequent knee surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2321–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marx RG, Jones EC, Angel M, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2003) Beliefs and attitudes of members of the America Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons regarding the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury. Arthroscopy 19(7):762–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Miller AN, Prasarn ML, Dyke JP, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2011) Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the talus with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(12):1116–1121

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Muellner T, Kaltenbrunner W, Nikolic A, Mittlboeck M, Schabus R, Vecsei V (1998) Shortening of the patellar tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 14(6):592–596

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Niki Y, Hakozaki A, Iwamoto W, Kanagawa H, Matsumoto H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2012) Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1543–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Pakos E, Ntzani E, Trikalinos T (2005) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1438–1445

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rahr-Wagner L, Thillemann TM, Pedersen AB, Lind M (2014) Comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in a nationwide population-based cohort study: results from the Danish registry of knee ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42(2):278–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Garfein RF (1989) Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 17:760–765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Scapinelli R (1967) Blood supply of the human patella: its relation to ischaemic necrosis after fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br 49(3):563–570

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaieb MD, Kan DM, Chang SK, Marumoto JM, Richardson AB (2002) A prospective randomized comparison of patellar tendon versus semitendinosus and gracilis tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30(2):214–220

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Shelbourne KD, Nitz P (1990) Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 18:292–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Shelbourne KD, Trumper RV (1997) Preventing anterior knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 25:41–47

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Steiner ME, Hecker AT, Brown CH, Hayes WC (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament graft fixation: comparison of hamstring and patellar tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 22(2):240–246

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tsuda E, Okamura Y, Ishibashi Y, Otsuka H, Toh S (2001) Techniques for reducing anterior knee symptoms after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft. Am J Sports Med 29(4):450–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yunes M, Richmond JC, Engels EA, Pinczewski LA (2001) Patellar versus hamstring tendons in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 17:248–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was approved by the institutional review board at the Hospital for Special Surgery.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial disclosures relevant to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristofer J. Jones.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jones, K.J., Lazaro, L.E., Taylor, S.A. et al. Quantitative assessment of patellar vascularity following bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft harvest for ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24, 2818–2824 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3510-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3510-2

Keywords

Navigation