Skip to main content
Log in

Determining knee joint alignment using digital photographs

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The objective of this work is to find out how reliably knee joint alignment can be measured from a standardized photograph and what influence changes in the standing position have on the angles measured. The interrater, intrarater, and test–retest reliability were evaluated. The influence of image–object distance, the distance between the legs and leg rotation on the measured angles was evaluated. In addition to the digital photographs, 10 full-length radiographs were obtained in an upright position to determine whether the measured angles represent the anatomic axis or mechanical axis. There was high correlation between the interrater (ICC 0.997), intrarater (ICC 0.989) and test–retest reliability (ICC 0.904). Only slight deviation was found with the changes in radiograph–object distance (0°–1.8°). With feet together varus malalignment was greater. Leg rotation showed a strong influence on the measured results (ICC 0.658). The angle measured in the digital photographs reflects the mechanical axis with only slight deviation (0.12°–1.9°). The measurement of the clinical axis using standardized radiography is highly reliable and can be used for individual follow-up of varus and valgus malalignments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boewer M, Arndt H, Ostermann PAW, Petersein J, Mutze S (2005) Length and angle measurements of the lower extremity in digital composite overview images. Eur Radiol 15:158–164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Goker B, Block JA (2007) Improved precision in quantifying knee alignment angle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 458:145–149

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinman RS, May RL, Crossley KM (2006) Is there an alternative to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment in osteoarthritis? Arthritis Rheum 55:306–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang TL, Wu HAT, Liu JC, Chen WM, Chen TH (2004) Do we get a “real” alignment of knee in the preoperative planning of high tibia osteotomy: a prospective study of reproducibility. J Chin Med Assoc 67:185–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hunt MA, Fowler PJ, Birmingham TB, Jenkyn TR, Giffin JR (2006) Foot rotational effects on radiographic measures of lower limb alignment. Can J Surg 49:401–406

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keppler P, Strecker W, Kinzl L (1998) Analyse der Beingeometrie—Standardtechniken und Normwerte. Chirurg 69:1141–1152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Langenbach MR, Dohle J, Zirngibl H (2002) Achsvermessung bei Knie-TEP: Ganzbeinstandaufnahme als Golden Standard. Z Orthop 140:32–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McCann H, Stanitski DF, Barfield WR, Leupold JA (2006) The effect of tibial rotation on varus deformity measurement. J Pediatr Orthop 26:380–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McGraw KO, Wong SP (1996) Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol Methods 1:30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moreland JR, Bassett LW, Hanker GJ (1987) Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:745–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel DV, Ferris BD, Aichroth PM (1991) Radiological study of alignment after total knee replacement. Int Orthop 15:209–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rozzanigo U, Pizzoli A, Minari C, Caudana R (2005) Alignment and articular orientation of lower limbs: manual versus computer-aided measurements on digital radiograms. Radiol Med 109:234–238

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schmidt GL, Altman GT, Dougherty JT, DeMeo PJ (2004) Reproducibility and reliability of the anatomic axis of the lower extremity. J Knee Surg 17:141–143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siu D, Cooke TDV, Broekhoven LD, Lam M, Fisher B, Saunders G, Challis TW (1991) A standardized technique for lower limb radiography. Investigative Radiol 26:71–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, DaSilva JJ, Milner JS, Kerr J, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Jenkyn TR, Fowler PJ, Giffin JR (2004) Reliability of lower limb frontal plane alignment measurements using plain radiographs and digitized images. J Knee Surg 17:203–210

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Specogna AV, Birmingham TB, Hunt MA, Jones IC, Jenkyn TR, Fowler PJ, Giffin JR (2007) Radiographic measures of knee alignment in patients with varus gonarthrosis: effect of weightbearing status and associations with dynamic joint load. Am J Sports Med 35:65–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Schmitt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitt, H., Kappel, H., Moser, M.T. et al. Determining knee joint alignment using digital photographs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthr 16, 776–780 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0570-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0570-6

Keywords

Navigation