Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous optimization approach for combined control–structural design versus the conventional sequential optimization method

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although controller devices highly improve the seismic performance of civil structures, they usually incur enormous financial costs. A variety of sequential methods for minimizing the cost function have been proposed in the literature. In most of these methods, the control system is optimally designed after the best structural configuration is provided. However, such sequential procedures are unable to yield the best overall design. This paper discusses a combined structural and control optimization approach in which the structural mass and controlled system energy are simultaneously minimized. To this end, a twofold objective function is defined by linearly combining the structural mass and linear quadratic regulator (LQR) performance index. It is shown that the optimal value of this objective function depends on the initial condition, and to circumvent this problem, an alternative objective function is introduced which allows for solving the problem of initial condition dependency. Given the complexity of the problem, a variable neighborhood search (VNS) metaheuristic method is developed. The performance of the developed method is demonstrated through case studies involving the determination of structural responses for shear-type frames. The case studies are presented for evaluating and comparing the effectiveness of the proposed simultaneous technique and the conventional sequential method. The responses of the structures are determined under an array of strong ground motions. The results of the comparative analyses revealed that the simultaneously optimized cases using the proposed methodology had superior dynamic performance compared to the sequentially optimized cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper and the research behind it are sincerely devoted to Prof. Mohamad Ali Hajabasi, Faculty member of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Iran for his unstinting help and constructive suggestions while the idea was in gestation. His willingness to give his time so generously has been very much appreciated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehsan Noroozinejad Farsangi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Replication of results

Implementation of the proposed method was undertaken using the MATLAB R2015b (MATLAB R2015b 2015) platform. All developed codes and models supporting the findings of this study are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Nestor V Queipo

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alavi, A., Dolatabadi, M., Mashhadi, J. et al. Simultaneous optimization approach for combined control–structural design versus the conventional sequential optimization method. Struct Multidisc Optim 63, 1367–1383 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02765-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-020-02765-3

Keywords

Navigation