Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are wicked problems a lack of general collective intelligence?

GCI and wicked problems

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A recently developed model of general collective intelligence defines a method for organizing humans or artificially intelligent agents that is believed to create the potential to exponentially increase the general problem-solving ability of groups of such entities over that of any individual entity. An analysis based on this model suggests that many and perhaps all “wicked problems” are collective optimization problems that cannot reliably be addressed without a system of collective optimization, but that might be reliably addressed through such a system. This paper briefly introduces the concept of GCI as well as why it is a system of collective optimization, and explores why “wicked problems” from the perspective of GCI are collective optimization problems, and therefore why such problems might require GCI to be reliably solvable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agre PE (1995) Computational research on interaction and agency. Artif Intell 72(1–2):1–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis E, Marcus G (2015) Commonsense reasoning and commonsense knowledge in artificial intelligence. Commun ACM 58(9):92–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus HL (2018) Misrepresenting human intelligence. Artificial intelligence. Routledge, pp 41–54

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsh D (1991) Foundations of AI: the big issues. Artif Intell 47(1–3):3–30

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Last C (2020) Global brain: foundations of a distributed singularity. In: Korotayev A, LePoire D (eds) The 21st century singularity and global futures. World-systems evolution and global futures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33730-8_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW (2018) Superminds: the surprising power of people and computers thinking together. Little, Brown Spark

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters MMM, van Diggelen J, van den Bosch K et al (2020) Hybrid collective intelligence in a human–AI society. AI Soc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01005-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H (1992) Why functionalism didn’t work. Inference, explanation, and other frustrations: essays in the philosophy of science, vol 14. p 255

  • Wachowski WM (2018) Commentary: distributed cognition and distributed morality: agency, artifacts and systems. Front Psychol 9:490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AE (2019) The relationship between collective intelligence and one model of general collective intelligence. In: Nguyen N, Chbeir R, Exposito E, Aniorté P, Trawiński B (eds) Computational collective intelligence. ICCCI 2019. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 11683. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28377-3_49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AE (2020a) A model for artificial general intelligence. In: Goertzel B, Panov A, Potapov A, Yampolskiy R (eds) Artificial general intelligence. AGI 2020. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 12177. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52152-3_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Williams AE (2020b) Human intelligence and general collective intelligence as phase changes in animal intelligence. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/dr8qn

  • Williams AE (2020c) The collective intelligence based program to accelerate achievement of the sustainable development goals as a case study for Collectively Intelligent Program Design. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/r2dxq

  • Williams AE (2021a) General problem-solving ability in natural systems as a model for computation. https://doi.org/10.31730/osf.io/5x3g7

  • Williams AE (2021b) Defining a continuum from individual, to swarm, to collective intelligence, to general collective intelligence. (in print)

  • Winograd T (2006) Shifting viewpoints: artificial intelligence and human–computer interaction. Artif Intell 170(18):1256–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147 (Bibcode:2010Sci...330..686W)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nobeah Foundation, Nairobi, Kenya

    Andy E. Williams

Authors
  1. Andy E. Williams
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andy E. Williams.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, A.E. Are wicked problems a lack of general collective intelligence?. AI & Soc 38, 343–348 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01297-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01297-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation