Abstract
Objective: To describe current arrangements for postgraduate training and speciality status for intensive care medicine in Europe, and to compare these with three other geographical regions: the Middle East, North America, and Australia and New Zealand.
Methods: An iterative survey, by questionnaire and direct discussion, of council members of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, national specialist societies with involvement in intensive care, and national experts, representing four geographical regions and 47 countries.
Results: For the purposes of analysis, countries with common training structures have been grouped together; the denominator therefore includes both countries and regions. Formal training programmes in intensive care medicine (ICM) are available in 18 (85 %) of the 21 countries or regions surveyed. Twelve (57 %) offer multidisciplinary access to intensive care training with a common core curriculum. In six (28 %) training in ICM is available solely through anaesthesia. The duration of intensive care training required for recognition as a specialist in the 18 countries or regions with a formal programme ranges from 18 to 30 months, with a median of 24 months. All countries assess competence in intensive care, but methods for doing so vary widely. Eighteen countries or regions offer specialist registration (accreditation) in ICM; in 12 this is provided as dual accreditation in a base speciality and in ICM.
Conclusions: There is substantial support for multidisciplinary training in ICM, as demonstrated by collaborative interspeciality developments in many countries. We propose that these national developments should be strengthened within Europe by the recognition of ‘supra-speciality’ status for ICM by the European Commission, and by the establishment of a multidisciplinary Board for training in ICM, with international agreement on core competencies and duration of training programmes, and a common approach to the assessment of competence through formal examination.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lassen HCA (1953) A preliminary report on the 1952 epidemic of poliomyelitis in Copenhagen with special reference to the treatment of acute respiratory insufficiency. Lancet 1: 37–41
Garcia-Barbero M, Such JC (1996) Teaching critical care in Europe: Analysis of a survey. Crit Care Med 24: 696–704
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine & European Society of Paediatric Intensive Care (1996) Guidelines for a training programme in intensive care medicine. Int Care Med 22:166–172
EC Directive 97/50/CE, October 6th 1997
Calvin JE, Habet K, Parrillo JE (1997) Critical Care in the United States. In: Kvetan V, Vincent J-L, Dobb GJ (Eds). Cri Care Clin 13: 363–376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Additional information
Reprint requests to European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, 40 Ave. Joseph Wybran, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium E-mail esicm@pophost.eunet.be
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bion, J.F., Ramsay, G., Roussos, C. et al. Intensive care training and speciality status in Europe: international comparisons. Intensive Care Med 24, 372–377 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050584
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001340050584