References
Mebazaa A, Combes A, van Diepen S et al (2018) Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction. Intensive Care Med 44:760–773
de Chambrun MP, Donker DW, Combes A (2020) What’s new in cardiogenic shock? Intensive Care Med 46:1016–1019
Abrams D, Garan AR, Abdelbary A et al (2018) Position paper for the organization of ECMO programs for cardiac failure in adults. Intensive Care Med 44:717–729
Combes A, Price S, Slutsky AS et al (2020) Temporary circulatory support for cardiogenic shock. Lancet 396:199–212
Ostadal P, Rokyta R, Karasek J et al (2023) Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the therapy of cardiogenic shock: results of the ECMO-CS randomized clinical trial. Circulation 147:454–464
Banning AS, Sabaté M, Orban M et al (2023) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or standard care in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: the multicentre, randomised EURO SHOCK trial. EuroIntervention 19:482–492
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Akin I et al (2023) Extracorporeal life support in infarct-related cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 389:1286–1297
Zeymer U, Freund A, Hochadel M et al (2023) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with infarct-related cardiogenic shock: an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 402:1338–1346
Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ et al (2012) Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 367:1287–1296
Jentzer JC, van Diepen S, Barsness GW et al (2019) Cardiogenic shock classification to predict mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol 74:2117–2128
Berg DD, Bohula EA, van Diepen S et al (2019) Epidemiology of shock in contemporary cardiac intensive care units. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 12:e005618
Jozwiak M, Bougouin W, Geri G et al (2020) Post-resuscitation shock: recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment. Ann Intensive Care 10:170
Bréchot N, Hajage D, Kimmoun A et al (2020) Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to rescue sepsis-induced cardiogenic shock: a retrospective, multicentre, international cohort study. Lancet 396:545–552
Muller G, Flecher E, Lebreton G et al (2016) The ENCOURAGE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med 42:370–378
Low CJW, Ling RR, Lau M et al (2024) Mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity score-matched studies. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-023-07278-3
Grandin EW, Nunez JI, Willar B et al (2022) Mechanical left ventricular unloading in patients undergoing venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol 79:1239–1250
Schrage B, Becher PM, Bernhardt A et al (2020) Left ventricular unloading is associated with lower mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock treated with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: results from an international, multicenter cohort study. Circulation 142:2095–2106
Kim MC, Lim Y, Lee SH et al (2023) Early left ventricular unloading or conventional approach after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: the EARLY-UNLOAD randomized clinical trial. Circulation 148:1570–1581
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
AC reports grants from Getinge, and personal fees from Getinge, Baxter and Xenios outside the submitted work. SP reports reports no disclosures. BL reports grants from Getinge, BD and personal fees from Abiomed, Gettinge, Baxter, Novartis, Sanofi, Amomed, AOP Pharma and Orion.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Combes, A., Price, S. & Levy, B. What’s new in VA-ECMO for acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock. Intensive Care Med 50, 590–592 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07356-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07356-0