Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The evidence regarding community treatment order effectiveness has been conflicting. This systematic review aims to bring up to date the review performed by Churchill and colleagues in 2005 by assessing and interpreting evidence of CTO effectiveness defined by admission rates, number of inpatient days, community service use, and medication adherence published since 2006.

Method

Databases were searched to obtain relevant studies published from January 2006 to March 2013.

Results

18 studies including one randomised controlled trial were included. There remains lack of evidence from randomised and non-randomised studies that CTOs are associated with or affected by admission rates, number of inpatient days or community service use. The most recent and largest RCT is included in this review and found no significant impact on admission rate (RR = 1.0, 95 % CI 0.75–1.33) or number of days in hospital (IR = 0.90, 95 % CI 0.65–1.26). Results from the two largest longitudinal datasets included in this review do not concur. Studies using the New York dataset found that CTOs were associated with reduced admission rates and inpatient days, while studies using the Victoria dataset generally found that they were associated with increased admission rates and inpatient days.

Conclusion

There is now robust evidence in the literature that CTOs have no significant effects on hospitalisation and other service use outcomes. Non-randomised studies continue to report conflicting results. Distinguishing between CTO recall and revocation and different patterns of community contact is needed in future research to ensure differentiation between CTO process and outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Geller J (2006) The evolution of outpatient commitment in the USA: from conundrum to quagmire. Int J Law Psychiatry 29:234–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Churchill R, Owen G, Hotopf M, Singh S (2007) International experiences of using community treatment orders. Institute of Psychiatry, London. http://www.iop.kcl.ac.uk/news/downloads/final2ctoreport8march07.pdf

  3. Steadman H, Gounis K, Dennis D, Hopper K, Roche B, Swartz M et al (2001) Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program. Psychiatr Serv 52(3):330–336

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Wagner HR, Burns BJ, Hiday VA, Borum R (1999) Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals. Am J Psychiatry 156(12):1968–1975

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kisely S, Campbell LA, Preston N (2005) Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004408

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ridgely S, Borum R, Pertila J (2001) The effectiveness of involuntary outpatient treatment. Empirical evidence and the experience of 8 States. RAND, California

    Google Scholar 

  7. O’Reilly RL (2001) Does involuntary outpatient treatment work? Psychiatr Bull 25:3714

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bindman J (2002) Involuntary outpatient treatment in England and Wales. Curr Opin Psychiatry 15:595–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Swartz M, Swanson J (2004) Involuntary outpatient commitment, community treatment orders, and assisted out-patient treatment: what’s in the data? Can J Psychiatry 49:585–591

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson J (2005) Community treatment orders: international comparisons. The Law Foundation, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ingram G, Muirhead D, Harvey C (2009) Effectiveness of community treatment orders for treatment of schizophrenia with oral or depot antipsychotic medication: changes in problem behaviours and social functioning. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 43(11):1077–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Link B, Epperson M, Perron B, Castille D, Yang L (2011) Arrest outcomes associated with outpatient commitment in New York State. Psychiatr Serv 62(5):504–508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Compton S, Swanson J, Wagner H, Swartz M, Burns B, Elbogen E (2003) Involuntary outpatient commitment and homelessness in persons with severe mental illness. Ment Health Serv Res 5(1):27–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burns T, Rugkåsa J, Molodynski A, Dawson J, Yeeles K, Vazquez-Montes M, Voysey M, Sinclair J, Priebe S (2013) Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 381. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-510.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5

  15. Burgess P, Bindman J, Leese M, Henderson C, Szmukler G (2006) Do community treatment orders for mental illness reduce readmission to hospital? An epidemiological study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 41:574–579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Segal S, Burgess P (2006) Conditional release, a less restrictive alternative to hospitalization? Psychiatr Serv 57:1600–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Segal S, Burgess P (2006) Factors in the selection of patients for conditional release from their first psychiatric hospitalization. Psychiatr Serv 57:1614–1622

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Segal S, Burgess P (2008) Use of community treatment orders to prevent psychiatric hospitalization. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 42:732–739

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Segal S, Burgess P (2006) The utility of extended outpatient civil commitment. Int J Law Psychiatry 29(6):525–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Busch A, Wilder C, Van Dorn R, Swartz M, Swanson J (2010) Changes in guideline-recommended medication possession after implementing Kendra’s Law in New York. Psychiatr Serv 61:1000–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Swartz M, Wilder C, Swanson J, Van Dorn R, Robbins P, Steadman H et al (2010) Assessing outcomes for consumers in New York’s assisted outpatient treatment program. Psychiatr Serv 61:976–981

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Dorn R, Swanson J, Swartz M, Wilder C, Moser L, Gilbert A et al (2010) Continuing medication and hospitalization outcomes after assisted outpatient treatment in New York. Psychiatr Serv 61:982–987

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kisely S, Preston N, Xiao J, Lawrence D, Louise S, Crowe E, Segal S (2013) An eleven-year evaluation of the effect of community treatment orders on changes in mental health service use. J Psychiatr Res 47(5):650–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kisely S, Campbell LA, Preston NJ, Xiao J (2006) Can epidemiological studies assist in the evaluation of community treatment orders? - The experience of Western Australia and Nova Scotia. Int J Law Psychiatry 29(6):507–515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hunt A, da Silva A, Lurie S, Goldbloom D (2007) Community treatment orders in Toronto: the emerging data. Can J Psychiatry 52(10):647–655

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Segal S, Preston N, Kisely S, Xiao J (2009) Conditional release in Western Australia: effect on hospital length of stay. Psychiatr Serv 60(1):94–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Zanni G, Stavis P (2007) The effectiveness and ethical justification of psychiatric outpatient commitment. Am J Bioeth 7(11):31–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Muirhead D, Harvey C, Ingram G (2006) Effectiveness of community treatment orders for treatment of schizophrenia with oral or depot antipsychotic medication: clinical outcomes. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 40:596–605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. O’Brien A, Farrell S, Faulkner S (2009) Community treatment orders: beyond hospital utilization rates examining the association of community treatment orders with community engagement and supportive housing. Community Ment Health J 45:415–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nakhost A, Perry JC, Frank D (2012) Assessing the outcome of compulsory treatment orders on management of psychiatric patients at 2 McGill University-associated hospitals. Can J Psychiatry 57(6):359–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Christy A, Petrila J, McCranie M, Lotts V (2009) Involuntary outpatient commitment in Florida: case information and provider experience and opinions. Int J Forensic Ment Health 8:122–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Preston N, Kisely S, Xiao J (2002) Assessing the outcome of compulsory psychiatric treatment in the community: an epidemiological study in Western Australia. BMJ 324:1244–1246

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Huntley D, Cho D, Christman J, Csernansky J (1998) Predicting length of stay in an acute psychiatric hospital. Psychiatr Serv 49(8):1049–1053

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Burns T (2007) Hospitalisation as an outcome measure in schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 191(suppl. 50):37–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Knapp M, Chisholm D, Leese M, Amaddeo F, Tansella M, Schene A et al (2002) EPSILON Study Group. Comparing patterns and costs of schizophrenia care in five European countries: the EPSILON study. Acta Psychiatr Scand 105(1):42–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baglio G, Sera F, Cardo S, Romanini E, Guasticchi G, Labek G, Torre M (2009) The validity of hospital administrative data for outcome measurement after hip replacement. Ital J Public Health 6(2):114–127

    Google Scholar 

  37. Robbins P, Keator K, Steadman H, Swanson J, Wilder C, Swartz M (2010) Assisted outpatient treatment in New York: regional differences in New York’s assisted outpatient treatment program. Psychiatr Serv 61(10):970–975

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Evans R, Makala J, Humphreys M, Chitra R (2010) Supervised community treatment in Birmingham and Solihull: first 6 months. Psychiatrist 34:330–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Patel M, Matonhodze J, Baig M, Taylor D, Szmukler D, David A (2013) Naturalistic outcomes of community treatment orders: antipsychotic long-acting injections versus oral medication. J Psychopharmacol 27:629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Maughan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maughan, D., Molodynski, A., Rugkåsa, J. et al. A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 49, 651–663 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0781-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-013-0781-0

Keywords

Navigation