Abstract
Aim/hypothesis
To determine whether marine-derived n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFA) (also known as omega-3 fatty acids) have beneficial effects on haematological and thrombogenic risk markers in addition to dyslipidaemia, in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing dietary or non-dietary intake of n-3 PUFA with placebo in type 2 diabetes was conducted by systematically searching databases from 1966 to February 2006. Changes in C-reactive protein, IL-6, TNF-α, platelet function, fibrinogen, factor VII, von Willebrand factor, endothelial function, heart rate and blood pressure were recorded. Inclusion of studies, data extraction and quality were assessed independently in duplicate.
Results
Twelve trials involving 847 subjects with a mean treatment duration of 8.5 weeks included sufficient data to permit pooling. Compared with placebo, n-3 PUFA supplementation had a significant effect on two outcomes: reducing the level of diastolic blood pressure (five trials, 248 subjects) by a mean of 1.8 mm Hg (95% CI 0.0–3.6, p = 0.05) and increasing factor VII (two trials, 116 subjects) by 24.9% (95% CI 7.2–42.6, p = 0.006). There were no significant effects on systolic blood pressure, fibrinogen or heart rate.
Conclusions/interpretation
These results suggest that, in addition to the recognised effects on dyslipidaemia, n-3 PUFA decreases diastolic blood pressure, and appears to increase factor VII. Larger and more rigorously conducted clinical trials are required to establish conclusively the role of n-3 PUFA in cardiovascular risk markers and clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterised by multiple metabolic abnormalities, is associated with hypertension and results in a two- to four-fold increased risk of cardiovascular disease [1]. In patients without diabetes n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) (also known as omega-3 fatty acids) supplementation has been reported to have a range of potential cardioprotective effects including anti-inflammatory effects, stabilisation of atherosclerotic plaques, anti-thrombotic effects due to the inhibition of platelet aggregation and enhancing fibrinolysis, as well as anti-hypertensive effects [2], and might therefore be expected to confer specific therapeutic benefits in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. There are, however, few available clinical outcome data. Two prospective cohort studies among women with type 2 diabetes showed the risk of CHD to be much lower among those with high intakes of n-3 PUFA [3, 4], but no randomised controlled clinical outcome trials have been reported and the evidence from secondary prevention trials in non-diabetic populations is conflicting [2, 3] with a recent meta-analysis casting doubt on the strength of the evidence [5].
The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effects of marine-derived n-3 PUFA on established and emerging cardiovascular risk markers, other than lipids, in patients with type 2 diabetes in randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials, and, where possible, derive pooled estimates of effect size.
Subjects and methods
We searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials from 1986, MEDLINE from 1966, Embase from 1966, and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials to 20 February 2006 for the terms ‘fish oil,’ ‘omega-3 fatty acid,’ ‘polyunsaturated fatty acid,’ ‘eicosapentaenoic acid,’ ‘docosahexaenoic acid,’ ‘nutrition’ and ‘diet.’ A standard search filter was used to identify randomised controlled trials among people with diabetes [6]. Additional trials were identified by searching references cited in identified primary trials. We restricted our search to trials in humans and imposed no language restrictions.
Studies were included if they were randomised trials of marine-derived n-3 PUFA and had a control or comparison arm. Trials were excluded if they included multiple risk factor interventions on lifestyle factors other than diet and dietary supplements, unless their effect could be separated from other interventions. No restrictions were placed on trial duration. Trials were excluded from the pooled analysis if outcome or change data were not obtainable or data were only available from a single trial. Criteria for assessment of trial quality included the reporting of the method of randomisation, blinding or objective measurements, loss to follow-up, and systematic difference in care between intervention groups. Potential scores ranged from 0 to a maximum of 5 [7].
The outcomes evaluated were changes in fibrinogen, blood pressure, heart rate, factor VII, C-reactive protein (CRP), IL-6, TNF-α, platelet function, von Willebrand factor and endothelial function, as well as adhesion molecules and selectins.
Statistical analysis
In trials with a cross-over design, where outcomes were reported for each intervention period, only data from the first intervention period were pooled. Where serial measurement of an outcome was given during the intervention phase, change in the outcome was measured from beginning to final measurement. Where a trial compared two intervention groups with a control group, or compared an intervention with more than one control group, an analysis was carried out to determine the comparison with the smallest effect size [8], which was then included in the pooled analysis. A fixed-effect model with weighted mean difference was used except where heterogeneity was observed, when a random-effects model was applied. Where trials reported different units of measurement for the same outcome, the effect sizes were calculated from the standardised mean difference using a random-effects model and converted to a standardised unit for the outcome according to International System notation. Cohen’s d was calculated as the difference between the means of the two groups, divided by a sample-size-weighted average of the SDs of the scores in the two groups [9]. We evaluated potential publication bias using funnel plots.
For each trial, we recorded or calculated mean change for each outcome from beginning to end of the intervention. If the SD of change was not provided, it was derived from the 95% CI or SE, assuming a degree of correlation of 0.5 between the beginning and end of the intervention [9]. A p value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. All analyses used Review Manager (Version 4.2.7; Update Software, Oxford, UK).
Results
Description of studies
A total of 876 abstracts were identified from the electronic searches, of which 189 papers were considered appropriate for further consideration (Fig. 1). One hundred and fifty-seven were excluded because 49 were not randomised, 12 were not placebo controlled, 45 had multifactorial interventions from which n-3 PUFA effects could not be separated or did not use n-3 PUFA derivates, 47 included non-type-2 diabetic patients, two did not include human participants, and two lacked data or did not report on outcomes included in this review. A further 11 papers meeting the inclusion criteria were excluded as they did not report on outcomes included in the meta-analyses or this review. From 21 published papers we identified 12 trials of n-3 PUFA supplementation (Table 1), reporting results on 56 conventional and emerging cardiac risk markers in 847 subjects with type 2 diabetes [10–29]. Nine of the 12 trials involving 297 participants measured the same outcomes, including only sufficient data to allow pooling of five risk markers. Table 1 shows the quality score, trial size and dose of n-3 PUFA used in each trial. The mean dose was 4.3 g/day (median 3 g/day; range 0.9–10 g/day) with a mean trial duration of 8.5 weeks. The size of the trials included in the pooled analysis was small, with a median of 40 patients. The results of six trials were reported in more than one publication, accounting for 17 of the published papers [10, 13, 16–23, 25, 28–33]. Eight of the trials, contained in 14 publications, obtained a quality score ranging from 1 to 3 [10, 12–15, 17–21, 26, 28, 29, 34], while four trials, reporting results in seven publications, scored above 3 [11, 16, 22–25, 27]. Table 2 lists the 56 haemostatic, vascular and inflammatory markers studied, but most of these were measured only in one trial and in small numbers of patients.
One trial compared different preparations of n-3 PUFA with the same control group [28] and another two trials compared two different control groups with the same n-3 PUFA supplement [24, 35]. Three of the trials used a cross-over design, all of which presented data on the first experimental period [12, 17, 26], while the remaining nine trials used a parallel design. Eleven trials described measures undertaken to control for changes in diet during the trial [11, 15, 24, 28, 33, 35–40], and six trials advised the participants to keep their diet constant throughout the intervention [12, 14, 17, 25, 27, 32]. All of the trials included both male and female participants but two trials excluded pre-menopausal women [25, 28]. Having carried out funnel plots, the results for systolic blood pressure, but not diastolic, were found to be scattered asymmetrically.
Fibrinogen
Four trials measured changes in plasma fibrinogen [12, 14, 24, 27]. The pre-specified pooled mean difference using a random-effects model based on data reported by two trials [14, 24] was −0.91 μmol/l (95% CI −3.11 to 1.28, p = 0.42, Fig. 2) when compared with a fibre control group, but in an exploratory analysis was significant at −1.96 μmol/l (95% CI −3.13 to −0.79, p = 0.001) when compared with an olive oil control group. The two trials [12, 27] in which the mean change and SD could not be calculated showed no change in fibrinogen (Table 2) in the n-3 PUFA group compared with controls.
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure
Ten trials measured changes in blood pressure between groups [10–12, 14, 15, 19, 25, 26, 28, 34], but only five of these, involving 253 subjects [10, 14, 15, 19, 28] reported data that could be pooled. The pooled analysis showed n-3 PUFA reduced both diastolic and systolic blood pressure compared with control groups by 1.79 mmHg (95% CI −3.56 to −0.02, p = 0.05) and 1.69 mmHg (95% CI −5.04 to 1.65, p = 0.32), respectively (Fig. 2). There was no heterogeneity (p > 0.10) between the results of trials measuring systolic or diastolic blood pressure (Fig. 2). The outcomes for systolic blood pressure were found to be scattered asymmetrically on a funnel plot.
Of the three trials measuring systolic blood pressure that were not pooled, two showed no change [25, 34] and one showed a statistically significant decrease after n-3 PUFA [11]. Three of the four trials measuring diastolic blood pressure that were not pooled showed no change [11, 25, 34], and one showed a statistically significant reduction in diastolic blood pressure [26].
Heart rate
Heart rate was assessed in two trials [19, 28], which included a total of 54 subjects. Heart rate in the n-3 PUFA group compared with the control group was 2.0 beats/min lower (95% CI −8.1 to 4.1, p = 0.52) with no significant heterogeneity between the trials (Fig. 2).
Other risk markers and factor VII
Seven studies reported outcomes on 51 measures of thrombotic factors, endothelial and vascular function and inflammation (Table 2) [11, 12, 14, 17, 24, 27, 28]. Of these, 37 individual thrombotic factors were measured by six trials [11, 12, 14, 24, 27, 28]. However, the only risk maker for which data were available from more than one trial was factor VII measured by two trials [14, 24], which had a pooled effect size of 24.9% (95% CI 7.2 to 42.6, p = 0.006) after n-3 PUFA when compared with a fibre and olive oil supplemented control group (Fig. 2). There was no heterogeneity between the trials (p > 0.10). Factor VII was unchanged in a third trial [12] but data were not reported. One trial, reported in two papers, measured the inflammatory markers IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, CRP, P-selectin, tissue plasminogen activator and von Willebrand factor [21, 29], as well as plasminogen activator inhibitor, but reported no significant changes, although the latter risk marker was increased in another trial [12]. Another trial measured plasma viscosity, platelet adhesion and bleeding time but reported no significant change after n-3 PUFA [27]. However, a second study measured bleeding time after n-3 PUFA and noted a significant increase [24].
Discussion
Our systematic review provides the most comprehensive assessment to date of the possible effects of n-3 PUFA on established and emerging cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetes. The results suggest that n-3 PUFA supplementation significantly reduces diastolic blood pressure by about 2 mm Hg. The impact on systolic blood pressure, fibrinogen and heart rate may be clinically important, although these changes did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance.
The limitations of our systematic review include the small number of trials available, with a median trial size of only 40 participants. Some of the trials failed to describe the methods of randomisation or blinding used. It was not possible to pool all the outcomes due to variability between the trials in the outcomes measured, non-standardised measurement units, failure to report change, and, importantly, a lack of two or more trials to pool for a specific outcome. The number of included trials was too few to allow us to draw firm conclusions or to undertake any subgroup analyses, and we did not obtain individual patient data. Although we included trials reported in any language to reduce selection bias, and assessed their quality, funnel plots showed that outcomes for some trials were scattered asymmetrically, which may indicate bias regarding reporting, selection or methodology of the trials. However, the funnel–plot analysis needs to be interpreted cautiously because of the small number of trials.
We are not aware of other systematic reviews including only randomised control trials that have evaluated the effect of n-3 PUFA on established and emerging cardiovascular risk factors in type 2 diabetes. A recent review included patients with diabetes as part of a high-risk-group analysis, but also included non-randomised control trials [41]. There are three previous systematic reviews evaluating the effect of n-3 PUFA on cardiovascular events, lipid and glycaemic markers in type 2 diabetes [42–44], which found n-3 PUFA reduced triacylglycerol, modestly increased LDL-cholesterol, and had no significant effect on fasting glucose, HbA1c, or total cholesterol and HDL-cholesterol. However, unlike previous systematic reviews, we also assessed the effects on other established and emerging cardiovascular risk factors.
An earlier systematic review reported the effect of n-3 PUFA on blood pressure [45] in a subgroup analysis of three trials of patients with diabetes, but that analysis included a trial that was not placebo-controlled and two of the trials had subjects with type 1 diabetes. Our pooled blood pressure results are consistent with this and an additional meta-analysis on controlled trials of the effect of n-3 PUFA on blood pressure in normotensive and hypertensive subjects [46], both showing a similar reduction in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure of about 2 mmHg would be expected to produce small clinical effects, it would substantially reduce population risk of cardiovascular disease [47], and even more so in patients with type 2 diabetes [48]. Tight blood pressure control has also been shown to reduce the risk of diabetes-related micro- and macrovascular complications [49].
There was a non-significant reduction in heart rate of 2 beats/min with n-3 PUFA, which is consistent with the results in a cross-sectional analysis of healthy men [50], a randomised control trial of overweight hypertensive subjects [51], and a prospective population-based study [52]. A recent systematic review measured changes in heart rate after n-3 PUFA combining all patients groups, and including two trials with patients with type 2 diabetes, showing pooled reductions of about 2 beats/min [53]. In the population-based study, 4 beats/min was shown to be the difference between patients who died a sudden death and the controls. Even small reductions in heart rate may lead to a significant public health impact because of the linear relationship between heart rate and the risk of sudden cardiac death [54], especially in type 2 diabetes [55]. However, larger trials are required to confirm whether n-3 supplementation in type 2 diabetes reduces heart rate.
Although our prospective analysis plan did not indicate that n-3 PUFA reduced plasma fibrinogen levels in type 2 diabetes compared with a fibre control, there was significant heterogeneity between the trials. An exploratory pooled comparison with an olive oil group showed a statistically significant change without heterogeneity. The heterogeneity in the pooled analysis using the fibre controls could be due to methodological differences, small study populations and high intra- and inter-individual variation. Non-significant changes in fibrinogen levels were reported by trials of hyperlipidaemic [56], hypertensive [57] and healthy subjects [58], but fibrinogen was significantly reduced in a trial on healthy individuals with genetic variations leading to high baseline fibrinogen levels [59], and significantly increased in a trial of patients with type 1 diabetes [60]. Even minor reductions in fibrinogen levels are potentially clinically important in reducing the risk of atherosclerosis [61], especially as this risk is high in diabetes [62]. It was not possible to pool the results of other reported thrombotic factors to explore the reported hypocoagulating effect of n-3 PUFA [2].
Increased fasting coagulant factor VII after n-3 PUFA supplementation has been reported in two other trials in healthy subjects [63, 64]. However, one of these two trials found a simultaneous reduction in prothrombin factor X required in the process of clotting [64], and the authors suggested that clotting was therefore not necessarily activated. An earlier study [65] also found that postprandial elevation of activated factor VII did not cause a concomitant activation of factor X, thereby not confirming enhanced coagulation. Factors IV and X and thromboglobulin were measured in one of the trials identified in our pooled analysis [14], and were reported not to be significantly changed after n-3 PUFA supplementation. The increase of coagulant factor VII observed in this review may be due to chance but might indicate an adverse effect of n-3 PUFA. This requires further research as increased plasma activity of factor VIIc is associated with CHD risk factors such as hypertriacylglycerolaemia, reduced glucose tolerance, overweight and hyperinsulinaemia, but may also be an independent risk factor for CHD [66–68], and higher levels were observed in healthy subjects with coronary events [69]. However, the independent association with CHD was not shown in another cohort study [70].
More rigorously designed and conducted large randomised controlled trials of longer duration reporting details of randomisation are required that measure both established and emerging cardiovascular risk markers in type 2 diabetes using standardised assays to provide sufficient statistical power to assess outcomes convincingly. Larger population samples will also improve the precision of the effect size estimates and establish conclusively the role of n-3 PUFA in CHD risk reduction in type 2 diabetes. One trial subgroup analysis awaits reporting [71], and four additional trials are in progress [72–75].
Abbreviations
- CRP:
-
C-reactive protein
- PUFA:
-
polyunsaturated fatty acids
References
Bonora E, Kiechl S, Willeit J et al (2004) Population-based incidence rates and risk factors for type 2 diabetes in white individuals: the Bruneck study. Diabetes 53:1782–1789
Din JN, Newby DE, Flapan AD (2004) Omega 3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease—fishing for a natural treatment. Br Med J 328:30–35
Erkkila AT, Lichtenstein AH, Mozaffarian D, Herrington DM (2004) Fish intake is associated with a reduced progression of coronary artery atherosclerosis in postmenopausal women with coronary artery disease. Am J Clin Nutr 80:626–632
Hu FB, Cho E, Rexrode KM, Albert CM, Manson JE (2003) Fish and long-chain omega-3 fatty acid intake and risk of coronary heart disease and total mortality in diabetic women. Circulation 107:1852–1857
Hooper L, Thompson RL, Harrison RA et al (2006) Risks and benefits of omega 3 fats for mortality, cardiovascular disease, and cancer: systematic review. Br Med J 332:752–760
Dickersin K, Scherer R, Lefebvre C (1994) Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. Br Med J 309:1286–1291
Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D et al (1996) Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 17:1–12
Tramer MR, Reynolds DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ (1997) Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study. Br Med J 315:635–640
Rice JA (1995) Mathematical statistics and data analysis. Duxbury, California
Alekseeva RI, Sharafetdinov K, Plotnikova OA, Meshcheriakova VA, Mal’tsev GI, Kulakova SN (2000) Effects of diet therapy including eiconol on clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vopr Pitan 69:36–39
Axelrod L, Camuso J, Williams E, Kleinman K, Briones E, Schoenfeld D (1994) Effects of a small quantity of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular risk factors in NIDDM. A randomized, prospective, double-blind, controlled study. Diabetes Care 17:37–44
Boberg M, Pollare T, Siegbahn A, Vessby B (1992) Supplementation with n-3 fatty acids reduces triglycerides but increases PAI-1 in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Eur J Clin Investig 22:645–650
Brennan GM, McVeigh GE, Johnston GD, Hayes JR (1992) Dietary fish oil augments EDRF production or release in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Br J Clin Pharmacol 33:531P (Abstract)
Hendra TJ, Britton ME, Roper DR et al (1990) Effects of fish oil supplements in NIDDM subjects. Controlled study. Diabetes Care 13:821–829
Jain S, Gaiha M, Bhattacharjee J, Anuradha S (2002) Effects of low-dose omega-3 fatty acid substitution in type-2 diabetes mellitus with special reference to oxidative stress—a prospective preliminary study. J Assoc Phys India 50:1028–1033
Maffettone A (1996) Long-term effects (six months) of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on insulin sensitivity and lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertriglyceridemia. G Ital Diabetol 16:185–193
McGrath LT, Brennan GM, Donnelly JP, Johnston GD, Hayes JR, McVeigh GE (1996) Effect of dietary fish oil supplementation on peroxidation of serum lipids in patients with non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 121:275–283
McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD et al (1993) Dietary fish oil augments nitric oxide production or release in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 36:33–38
McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Cohn JN, Finkelstein SM, Hayes RJ, Johnston GD (1994) Fish oil improves arterial compliance in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Arterioscler Thromb 14:1425–1429
Meshcheriakova VA, Plotnikova OA, Sharafetdinov KH, Alekseeva RI, Mal’tsev GI, Kulakova SN (2001) Comparative study of effects of diet therapy including eiconol or linseed oil on several parameters of lipid metabolism in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Vopr Pitan 70:28–31
Mori TA, Woodman RJ, Burke V, Puddey IB, Croft KD, Beilin LJ (2003) Effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in treated-hypertensive type 2 diabetic subjects. Free Radic Biol Med 35:772–781
Patti L, Maffettone A, Iovine C et al (1999) Long-term effects of fish oil on lipoprotein subfractions and low density lipoprotein size in non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Atherosclerosis 146:361–367
Rivellese AA, Maffettone A, Iovine C et al (1996) Long-term effects of fish oil on insulin resistance and plasma lipoproteins in NIDDM patients with hypertriglyceridemia. Diabetes Care 19:1207–1213
Silvis N, Vorster HH, Mollentze WF, Jager JD, Huisman HW (1988) Metabolic and haemostatic consequences of dietary fibre and n-3 fatty acids in black type 2 (NIDDM) diabetic subjects: a placebo controlled study. Int Clin Nutr Rev 10:362–380
Sirtori CR, Paoletti R, Mancini M et al (1997) n-3 Fatty acids do not lead to an increased diabetic risk in patients with hyperlipidemia and abnormal glucose tolerance. Italian Fish Oil Multicenter Study. Am J Clin Nutr 65:1874–1881
Vessby B, Boberg M (1990) Dietary supplementation with n-3 fatty acids may impair glucose homeostasis in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Intern Med 228:165–171
Westerveld HT, de Graaf JC, van Breugel HH et al (1993) Effects of low-dose EPA-E on glycemic control, lipid profile, lipoprotein (a), platelet aggregation, viscosity, and platelet and vessel wall interaction in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 16:683–688
Woodman RJ, Mori TA, Burke V, Puddey IB, Watts GF, Beilin LJ (2002) Effects of purified eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids on glycemic control, blood pressure, and serum lipids in type 2 diabetic patients with treated hypertension. Am J Clin Nutr 76:1007–1015
Woodman RJ, Mori TA, Burke V et al (2003) Effects of purified eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on platelet, fibrinolytic and vascular function in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients. Atherosclerosis 166:85–93
Pedersen H, Petersen M, Major-Pedersen A et al (2003) Influence of fish oil supplementation on in vivo and in vitro oxidation resistance of low-density lipoprotein in type 2 diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 57:713–720
Pelikanova T, Kohout M, Valek J et al (1992) The effect of fish oil on the secretion and effect of insulin in patients with type II diabetes). Cas Lek Ces 131:668–672 (Czech)
Pelikanova T, Kohout M, Valek J, Kazdova L, Base J (1993) Metabolic effects of omega-3 fatty acids in type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetic patients. Ann N Y Acad Sci 683:272–278
Petersen M, Pedersen H, Major-Pedersen A, Jensen T, Marckmann P (2002) Effect of fish oil versus corn oil supplementation on LDL and HDL subclasses in type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 25:1704–1708
Morgan WA, Raskin P, Rosenstock J (1995) A comparison of fish oil or corn oil supplements in hyperlipidemic subjects with NIDDM. Diabetes Care 18:83–86
Goh YK, Jumpsen JA, Ryan EA, Clandinin MT (1997) Effect of omega 3 fatty acid on plasma lipids, cholesterol and lipoprotein fatty acid content in NIDDM patients. Diabetologia 40:45–52
Borkman M, Chisholm DJ, Furler SM et al (1989) Effects of fish oil supplementation on glucose and lipid metabolism in NIDDM. Diabetes 38:1314–1319
Connor WE, Prince MJ, Ullmann D et al (1993) The hypotriglyceridemic effect of fish oil in adult-onset diabetes without adverse glucose control. Ann N Y Acad Sci 683:337–340
Luo J, Rizkalla SW, Vidal H et al (1998) Moderate intake of n-3 fatty acids for 2 months has no detrimental effect on glucose metabolism and could ameliorate the lipid profile in type 2 diabetic men. Results of a controlled study. Diabetes Care 21:717–724
McManus RM, Jumpson J, Finegood DT, Clandinin MT, Ryan EA (1996) A comparison of the effects of n-3 fatty acids from linseed oil and fish oil in well-controlled type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 19:463–467
Schectman G, Kaul S, Kissebah AH (1988) Effect of fish oil concentrate on lipoprotein composition in NIDDM. Diabetes 37:1567–1573
Balk E, Chung M, Lichtenstein A et al (2004) Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on cardiovascular risk factors and intermediate markers of cardiovascular disease. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 93. Prepared by Tufts–New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD
Farmer A, Montori V, Dinneen S, Clar C (2001) Fish oil in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD003205
Friedberg CE, Janssen MJ, Heine RJ, Grobbee DE (1998) Fish oil and glycemic control in diabetes. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 21:494–500
Montori VM, Farmer A, Wollan PC, Dinneen SF (2000) Fish oil supplementation in type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic review. Diabetes Care 23:1407–1415
Morris MC, Sacks F, Rosner B (1993) Does fish oil lower blood pressure? A meta-analysis of controlled trials. Circulation 88:523–533
Geleijnse JM, Giltay EJ, Grobbee DE, Donders AR, Kok FJ (2002) Blood pressure response to fish oil supplementation: metaregression analysis of randomized trials. J Hypertens 20:1493–1499
Cook NR, Cohen J, Hebert PR, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH (1995) Implications of small reductions in diastolic blood pressure for primary prevention. Arch Intern Med 155:701–709
Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration (2005) Effects of different blood pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus: results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized Trials. Arch Intern Med 165:1410–1419
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. Br Med J 317:703–713
Dallongeville J, Yarnell J, Ducimetiere P et al (2003) Fish consumption is associated with lower heart rates. Circulation 108:820–825
Bao DQ, Mori TA, Burke V, Puddey IB, Beilin LJ (1998) Effects of dietary fish and weight reduction on ambulatory blood pressure in overweight hypertensives. J Hypertens 32:710–717
Jouven X, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetiere P (1999) Predicting sudden death in the population: The Paris Prospective Study I. Circulation 99:1978–1983
Mozaffarian D, Geelen A, Brouwer IA, Geleijnse JM, Zock PL, Katan MB (2005) Effect of fish oil on heart rate in humans: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Circulation 112:1945–1952
Jouven X, Zureik M, Desnos M, Guerot C, Ducimetiere P (2001) Resting heart rate as a predictive risk factor for sudden death in middle-aged men. Cardiovasc Res 50:373–378
Balkau B, Jouven X, Ducimetiere P, Eschwege E (1999) Diabetes as a risk factor for sudden death. Lancet 354:1968–1969
Finnegan YE, Howarth D, Minihane AM et al (2003) Plant and marine derived (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids do not affect blood coagulation and fibrinolytic factors in moderately hyperlipidemic humans. J Nutr 133:2210–2213
Norris PG, Jones CJ, Weston MJ (1986) Effect of dietary supplementation with fish oil on systolic blood pressure in mild essential hypertension. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 293:104–105
Marckmann P, Bladbjerg EM, Jespersen J (1997) Dietary fish oil (4 g daily) and cardiovascular risk markers in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3384–3391
Vanschoonbeek K, Feijge MAH, Paquay M et al (2004) Variable hypocoagulant effect of fish oil intake in humans: modulation of fibrinogen level and thrombin generation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24:1734–1740
Haines AP, Sanders TA, Imeson JD et al (1986) Effects of a fish oil supplement on platelet function, haemostatic variables and albuminuria in insulin-dependent diabetics. Thromb Res 43:643–655
Thompson SG, Kienast J, Pyke SDM, Haverkate F, van de Loo JCW, The European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group (1995) Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. N Engl J Med 332:635–641
Wattanakit K, Folsom AR, Selvin E et al (2005) Risk factors for peripheral arterial disease incidence in persons with diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Atherosclerosis 180:389–397
Sanders TAB, Oakley FR, Miller GJ, Mitropoulos KA, Crook D, Oliver MF (1997) Influence of n-6 versus n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in diets low in saturated fatty acids on plasma lipoproteins and hemostatic factors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:3449–3460
Agren JJ, Vaisanen S, Hanninen O, Muller AD, Hornstra G (1997) Hemostatic factors and platelet aggregation after a fish-enriched diet or fish oil or docosahexaenoic acid supplementation. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 57:419–421
Kapur R, Hoffman CJ, Bhushan V, Hultin MB (1996) Postprandial elevation of activated factor VII in young adults. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16:1327–1332
Andersen P (1992) Hypercoagulability and reduced fibrinolysis in hyperlipidemia: relationship to the metabolic cardiovascular syndrome. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 20(Suppl 8):S29–S31
Hawe E, Talmud PJ, Miller GJ, Humphries SE (2003) Family history is a coronary heart disease risk factor in the Second Northwick Park Heart Study. Ann Hum Genet 67:97–106
Meade TW, Mellows S, Brozovic M et al (1986) Haemostatic function and ischaemic heart disease: principal results of the Northwick Park Heart Study. Lancet 2:533–537
Junker R, Heinrich J, Schulte H, van de Loo J, Assmann G (1997) Coagulation factor VII and the risk of coronary heart disease in healthy men. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 17:1539–1544
Salomaa V, Rasi V, Kulathinal S et al (2002) Hemostatic factors as predictors of coronary events and total mortality: The FINRISK ’92 Hemostasis Study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 22:353–358
The GISSI Prevenzione Trial (1999) Dietary supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and vitamin E after myocardial infarction: results of the GISSI–Prevenzione trial. Lancet 354:447–455
The AFORRD Trial (Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-3 risk Reduction in Diabetes) (2004) Register for randomised controlled trials, http://www.controlled-trials.com/isrctn/trial/|/0-76737502.html
The ORIGIN Trial (Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention) (2005) ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00069784,http://www.controlledrials.com/mrct/trial/OMEGA%2D3%7CDIABETES/1059/61673.html
The ASCEND Trial (2005) Oxford Clinical Trials Service Unit, http://www.ctsu.ox.ac.uk/ascend/
Galan P, de Bree A, Mennen L et al (2003) Background and rationale of the SU.FOL.OM3 study: double-blind randomized placebo-controlled secondary prevention trial to test the impact of supplementation with folate, vitamin B6 and B12 and/or omega-3 fatty acids on the prevention of recurrent ischemic events in subjects with atherosclerosis in the coronary or cerebral arteries. J Nutr Health Aging 7:428–435
Acknowledgements
We thank R. Perera for statistical assistance.
Duality of interest
The authors declare no duality of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hartweg, J., Farmer, A.J., Holman, R.R. et al. Meta-analysis of the effects of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on haematological and thrombogenic factors in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 50, 250–258 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0486-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0486-y