Skip to main content
Log in

Hochdosischemotherapie und Residualtumorresektion bei Patienten mit Hodentumor

High-dose chemotherapy and residual tumor resection in male germ cell tumors

  • Übersichten
  • Published:
Der Urologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Die unbefriedigenden Ergebnisse konventionell dosierter Salvagechemotherapien besonders bei Patienten mit ungünstigem Risikoprofil im Rezidiv und/oder multiplen Rezidiven führten Ende der 1980er Jahre zur Einführung der Hochdosischemotherapie (HDCT). Bis heute bleibt die Kombination von Carboplatin und Etoposid (CE) das Grundgerüst aller HDCT-Kombinationen. In der Vergangenheit wurden vielfache Therapiemodifikationen mit Dosissteigerungen oder Hinzunahme von weiteren Substanzen untersucht, ohne dass das Nutzen-Nebenwirkungs-Profil des Verfahrens dadurch gesteigert werden konnte. Durch verbesserte supportive Therapie und dem Einsatz autologer peripherer Blutstammzellen (PBSC) wurden die hämatopoetischen Rekonstitutionszeiten signifikant verkürzt und somit die initial hohe behandlungsbedingte Letalität von >10% auf etwa 3% gesenkt. Durch den Einsatz der HDCT konnten bei Patienten mit ungünstigen Prognosemerkmalen oder mehrfachen Rezidiven regelhaft anhaltende Remissionen erzielt werden. Einen hohen Stellenwert dabei hat die Resektion der Tumorresiduen, z. T. in multiplen Lokalisationen. Der Anteil residuellen vitalen Tumors ist dabei wesentlich höher als bei der Residualtumorresektion (RTR) nach primärer konventioneller Chemotherapie. Umstritten ist bis heute v. a. der Stellenwert einer HDCT in der Primärbehandlung metastasierter Poor-prognosis-Patienten aber auch der Einsatz als erste „Salvagebehandlung“ rezidivierter und refraktärer Patienten. Eine HDCT außerhalb von Studien findet aktuell nur bei Patienten mit ungünstigen Prognosemerkmalen im 1. Rezidiv sowie bei Patienten mit 2. oder nachfolgendem Rezidiv breite Akzeptanz.

Abstract

As a consequence of the unsatisfactory results of conventional dose salvage regimens, in particular for patients with poor prognostic features at the time of relapse or in patients with refractory disease, high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) was introduced into clinical practice in the late 1980s. The combination of carboplatin and etoposide (CE) still remains the backbone of most high-dose regimens. Multiple modifications with more dose escalations or addition of further drugs have been explored, most often with increased toxicity. With improved expertise in supportive care and the use of peripheral blood stem cells, hematopoetic recovery has been significantly shortened and the initial high treatment-related mortality reduced from more than 10% to about 3%. Since the incorporation of HDCT, even patients with unfavorable prognostic features or patients with second or subsequent relapses can achieve long-term remission. Following HDCT residual tumor resection plays a major role in achieving these long-term results. The proportion of vital residual tumor after HDCT is much higher than in patients after conventional chemotherapy. The role of HDCT remains controversial particularly as a first-line treatment and less so in the first salvage setting. As these patients are rare HDCT and residual tumor resection should only be be provided by high-volume centers with sufficient expertise in performing these complex procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Anonymous (1997) International Germ Cell Consensus Classification: a prognostic factor-based staging system for metastatic germ cell cancers. International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. J Clin Oncol 15:594–603

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anonymous (2010) Prognostic factors in patients with metastatic germ cell tumors who experienced treatment failure with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 28:4906–4911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beyer J, Schwella N, Zingsem J et al (1995) Hematopoietic rescue after high-dose chemotherapy using autologous peripheral-blood progenitor cells or bone marrow: a randomized comparison. J Clin Oncol 13:1328–1335

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyer J, Stenning S, Gerl A et al (2002) High-dose versus conventional-dose chemotherapy as first-salvage treatment in patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors: a matched-pair analysis. Ann Oncol 13:599–605

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bokemeyer C, Oechsle K, Honecker F et al (2008) Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, and paclitaxel in patients with cisplatin-refractory or multiply relapsed germ-cell tumors: a study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. Ann Oncol 19:448–453

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bokemeyer C, Schmoll HJ, Harstrick A et al (1993) A phase I/II study of a stepwise dose-escalated regimen of cisplatin, etoposide and ifosfamide plus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients with advanced germ cell tumours. Eur J Cancer 29:2225–2231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daugaard G, Skoneczna I, Aass N et al (2011) A randomized phase III study comparing standard dose BEP with sequential high-dose cisplatin, etoposide, and ifosfamide (VIP) plus stem-cell support in males with poor-prognosis germ-cell cancer. An intergroup study of EORTC, GTCSG, and Grupo Germinal (EORTC 30974). Ann Oncol 22:1054–1061

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Einhorn LH, Williams SD, Chamness A et al (2007) High-dose chemotherapy and stem-cell rescue for metastatic germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med 357:340–348

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman DR, Bosl GJ, Sheinfeld J et al (2008) Medical treatment of advanced testicular cancer. JAMA 299:672–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Donadio A et al (2005) Combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin is an effective second-line therapy for patients with relapsed testicular germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 23:6549–6555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kondagunta GV, Bacik J, Sheinfeld J et al (2007) Paclitaxel plus Ifosfamide followed by high-dose carboplatin plus etoposide in previously treated germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 25:85–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kondagunta GV, Motzer RJ (2006) Chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 24:5493–5502

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kondagunta V, Galsky MD, Sonpavde G (2007) Germ-cell tumors. N Engl J Med 357:1774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lorch A, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2011) Conventional-dose versus high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment in male patients with metastatic germ cell tumors: evidence from a large international database. J Clin Oncol 29:2178–2184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lorch A, Kleinhans A, Kramar A et al (2011) Superior survival after sequential high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as compared to single HDCT in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors (GCT): six-year long-term follow-up of a prospective, randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:4507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lorch A, Neubauer A, Hackenthal M et al (2010) High-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as second-salvage treatment in patients with multiple relapsed or refractory germ-cell tumors. Ann Oncol 21:820–825

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Motzer RJ, Mazumdar M, Sheinfeld J et al (2000) Sequential dose-intensive paclitaxel, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide salvage therapy for germ cell tumor patients. J Clin Oncol 18:1173–1180

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Motzer RJ, Nichols CJ, Margolin KA et al (2007) Phase III randomized trial of conventional-dose chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous hematopoietic stem-cell rescue as first-line treatment for patients with poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell tumors. J Clin Oncol 25:247–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nichols CR, Tricot G, Williams SD et al (1989) Dose-intensive chemotherapy in refractory germ cell cancer – a phase I/II trial of high-dose carboplatin and etoposide with autologous bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 7:932–939

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Pfister DJ, Busch J, Winter C et al (2011) Pathohistologic findings in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) who undergo postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) for small tumors. J Clin Oncol 29:4669

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pico JL, Rosti G, Kramar A et al (2005) A randomised trial of high-dose chemotherapy in the salvage treatment of patients failing first-line platinum chemotherapy for advanced germ cell tumours. Ann Oncol 16:1152–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Powles T, Bascoul-Mollevi C, Kramar A et al (2011) LDH levels in patients with relapsed/refractory seminoma have prognostic significance and improve the score from the international prognostic factors study group. J Clin Oncol 29:4580

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rick O, Bokemeyer C, Weinknecht S et al (2004) Residual tumor resection after high-dose chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3713–3719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sammler C, Beyer J, Bokemeyer C et al (2008) Risk factors in germ cell tumour patients with relapse or progressive disease after first-line chemotherapy: evaluation of a prognostic score for survival after high-dose chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 44:237–243

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schmoll HJ, Kollmannsberger C, Metzner B et al (2003) Long-term results of first-line sequential high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy plus autologous stem cell support for patients with advanced metastatic germ cell cancer: an extended phase I/II study of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:4083–4091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Winter C, Pfister DJ, Bingoel C et al (2011) Predictive factors for additional vascular procedures in patients with germ cell tumors (GCT) and residual tumor resection (RTR): A multicenter analysis of the German Testicular Cancer Study Groups (GTCSG). J Clin Oncol 29:15050

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Lorch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lorch, A., Albers, P., Winter, C. et al. Hochdosischemotherapie und Residualtumorresektion bei Patienten mit Hodentumor. Urologe 50, 1047–1054 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-011-2683-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-011-2683-7

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation