Skip to main content
Log in

Maligne Lymphome: Klinik, Klassifikation, Therapie und Prognose

Malignant lymphomas: clinical appearance, classification, therapy and prognosis

  • Leitthema
  • Published:
Der Radiologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Klinisches Problem

Maligne Lymphome sind die häufigsten Krebserkrankungen des hämatopoetischen Systems.

Therapeutische Standardverfahren

Die Therapie besteht in der Regel aus einer Chemotherapie, die bei indolenten Lymphomen erst bei klinischen Symptomen, bei aggressiven Lymphomen sofort begonnen wird. Lokale Maßnahmen wie z. B. Strahlentherapie werden meist nur ergänzend eingesetzt.

Neue Therapieverfahren

Mit zielgerichteten Therapieverfahren kann die Prognose weiter verbessert werden. Ein Prototyp hierfür ist der monoklonale, gegen Lymphome gerichtete Antikörper Rituximab.

Diagnostik

Zur Diagnose ist immer eine Biopsie notwendig. Oft werden aus immunhistologischen und molekulargenetischen Untersuchungen prognostische Informationen gewonnen. Bildgebende Untersuchungen wie CT, PET oder Sonographie werden am Anfang, im Verlauf und in der Nachsorge eingesetzt. Eine PET-Untersuchung am Ende der Chemotherapie kann bei Morbus-Hodgkin-Patienten diejenigen identifizieren, die keine Nachbestrahlung benötigen.

Leistungsfähigkeit

Viele aggressive Lymphome sind heilbar. Bei Morbus Hodgkin liegen die Überlebensraten über 90%, bei diffus-großzelligen Lymphomen zwischen 60 und 90%. Indolente Lymphome gelten mit Standardverfahren als unheilbar, die Überlebenswahrscheinlichkeit ist aber dennoch hoch.

Bewertung

Durch Rituximab konnten die Überlebensraten bei indolenten wie aggressiven Lymphomen um mindestens 10% verbessert werden. Weitere Verbesserungen gibt es durch neuere zielgerichtete Therapien und den Einsatz der autologen und allogenen Transplantation.

Empfehlung für die Praxis

Aufgrund des raschen Wissenszuwachses ist es sinnvoll, Patienten mit malignen Lymphome in Zentren und nach Möglichkeit in Studien zu behandeln. Durch genaue molekulargenetische Untersuchungen, aber auch durch funktionelle Bildgebung ist eine zunehmende Individualisierung der Therapie möglich.

Abstract

Clinical issue

Malignant lymphomas are the most common cancers of the hematopoietic system.

Standard treatment

The treatment is usually cytotoxic chemotherapy after the appearance of symptoms in indolent lymphoma and immediately in aggressive lymphoma. Local therapy, such as radiotherapy is sometimes required in addition to systemic treatment.

Treatment innovations

By the introduction of targeted therapies the prognosis has improved. The monoclonal antilymphoma antibody rituximab is a prototype for many other cancers.

Diagnostic work-up

A biopsy is mandatory for diagnosis. Additional immunohistological and molecular genetic analyses may provide prognostic information. Imaging techniques, such as computed tomography (CT), ultrasound or positron emission tomography (PET) are used for staging, restaging and follow-up. Following chemotherapy for Hodgkin’s disease PET can be considered to identify patients who do not require additional radiotherapy.

Performance

Aggressive lymphomas are often curable. In Hodgkin’s disease the long-term survival rate is over 90% and in diffuse large cell lymphoma between 60–90%. Indolent lymphomas are not curable by standard therapy, however, the survival rate is also high.

Achievements

After introduction of rituximab, the survival chance has improved by at least 10% in both indolent and aggressive lymphomas. Other targeted therapies and autologous or allogeneic transplantation have made additional contributions.

Practical recommendations

Due to the rapid increase of knowledge patients should be treated in experienced centers and whenever possible, in clinical trials. Using molecular genetic analyses and functional imaging, the treatment can be individualized even more.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4
Abb. 5
Abb. 6

Literatur

  1. Gesellschaft der epidemiologischen Krebsregister e. V. und Robert-Koch-Institut (2010) Krebs in Deutschland 2005/2006, Häufigkeiten und Trends

  2. Morton LM, Wang SS, Cozen W et al (2008) Etiologic heterogeneity among non-Hodgkin lymphoma subtypes. Blood 112:5150–5160

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL et al (eds) (2008) WHO classification of tumours of haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 4th edn. IARC Press, New York

  4. Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Rajkumar SV et al (2006) Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. N Engl J Med 354:1362–1369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rawstron AC, Bennett FL, O’Connor SJ et al (2008) Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 359:575–583

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schüler F, Dölken L, Hirt C et al (2009) Prevalence and frequency of circulating t(14;18)-MBR translocation carrying cells in healthy individuals. Int J Cancer 124:958–963

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wotherspoon AC, Ortiz-Hidalgo C, Falzon MR et al (1991) Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis and primary B-cell gastric lymphoma. Lancet 338:1175–1176

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reshef R, Vardhanabhuti S, Luskin MR et al (2011) Reduction of immunosuppression as initial therapy for posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorder. Am J Transplant 11:336–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project (1993) Development of a predictive model for aggressive lymphoma: the international NHL Prognostic Factors Project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guadagnolo BA, Punglia RS, Kuntz KM et al (2006) Cost-effectiveness analysis of computerized tomography in the routine follow-up of patients after primary treatment for Hodgkin’s disease. J Clin Oncol 24:4116–4122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Engert A, Eichenauer DA, Dreyling M, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2010) Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kobe C, Dietlein M, Franklin J et al (2008) Positron emission tomography has a high negative predictive value for progression or early relapse for patients with residual disease after first-line chemotherapy in advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 112:3989–3994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Engert A, Schiller P, Josting A et al (2003) Involved-field radiotherapy is equally effective and less toxic compared with extended-field radiotherapy after four cycles of chemotherapy in patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin’s lymphoma: results of the HD8 trial of the German Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 21:3601–3608

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Younes A, Bartlett NL, Leonard JP et al (2010) Brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) for relapsed CD30-positive lymphomas. N Engl J Med 363:1812–1821

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J et al (2003) CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 346:235–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ziepert M, Hasenclever D, Kuhnt E et al (2010) Standard international prognostic index remains a valid predictor of outcome for patients with aggressive CD20+B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 28:2373–2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gisselbrecht C, Glass B, Mounier N et al (2010) Salvage regimens with autologous transplantation for relapsed large B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 28:4184–4190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ardeshna KM, Smith P, Norton A et al (2003) Long-term effect of a watch and wait policy versus immediate systemic treatment for asymptomatic advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 362:516–522

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rummel M, Gruenhagen U von, Niederle N et al (2009) Bendamustine plus rituximab versus CHOP plus rituximab in the first-line-treatment of patients with follicular, indolent and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a randomized phase III study of the Study Group Indolent Lymphomas (StiL). Blood 112:2569 (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Salles G, Seymour JF, Offner F et al (2011) Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:42–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Döhner H, Stilgenbauer S, Benner A et al (2000) Genomic aberrations and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med 343:1910–1916

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kröber A, Seiler T, Benner A et al (2002) V(H) mutation status, CD38 expression level, genomic aberrations, and survival in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 100:1410–1416

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hallek M, Fischer K, Fingerle-Rowson G et al (2010) Addition of rituximab to fludarabine and cyclophosphamide in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet 376:1164–1174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Eichhorst BF, Busch R, Stilgenbauer S et al (2009) First-line therapy with fludarabine compared with chlorambucil does not result in a major benefit for elderly patients with advanced chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 114:3382–3391

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stilgenbauer S, Zenz T (2010) Understanding and managing ultra high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmitz N, Trümper L, Ziepert M et al (2010) Treatment and prognosis of mature T-cell and NK-cell lymphoma: an analysis of patients with T-cell lymphoma treated in studies of the German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Blood 116:3418–3425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Illerhaus G, Marks R, Ihorst G (2006) High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation and hyperfractionated radiotherapy as first-line treatment of primary CNS lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3865–3870

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Viardot.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Viardot, A. Maligne Lymphome: Klinik, Klassifikation, Therapie und Prognose. Radiologe 52, 321–329 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-011-2258-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00117-011-2258-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation