Abstract
Social insects often use olfactory cues from their environment to coordinate colony tasks. We investigated whether leaf-cutting ants use volatiles as cues to guide the deposition of their copious amounts of colony refuse. In the laboratory, we quantified the relocation of a small pile of colony waste by workers of Atta laevigata towards volatiles offered at each side of the pile as a binary choice, consisting of either waste volatiles, fungus volatiles, or no volatiles. Fungus volatiles alone did not evoke relocation of waste. Waste volatiles alone, by contrast, led to a strong relocation of waste particles towards them. When fungus and waste volatiles were tested against each other, waste particles were also relocated towards waste volatiles, and in a high percentage of assays completely moved away from the source of fungus volatiles as compared to the previous series. We suggest that deposition and accumulation of large amounts of refuse in single external heaps or a few huge underground waste chambers of Atta nests is due to both olfactory preferences and stigmergic responses towards waste volatiles by waste-carrying workers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The dataset of this study is available in the supplementary material.
References
Andryszak NA, Payne TL, Dickens JC, Moser JC, Fisher RW (1990) Antennal olfactory responsiveness of the Texas leaf cutting ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to trail pheromone and its two alarm substances. J Entomol Sci 25:593–598
Arenas A, Roces F (2016) Learning through the waste: olfactory cues from the colony refuse influence plant preferences in foraging leaf-cutting ants. J Exp Biol 219:2490–2496. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.139568
Arenas A, Roces F (2017) Avoidance of plants unsuitable for the symbiotic fungus in leaf-cutting ants: learning can take place entirely at the colony dump. PLoS One 12:e0171388. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171388
Arenas A, Roces F (2018) Appetitive and aversive learning of plants odors inside different nest compartments by foraging leaf-cutting ants. J Insect Physiol 109:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2018.07.001
Arenas A, Fernández VM, Farina WM (2007) Floral odor learning within the hive affects honeybees’ foraging decisions. Naturwissenschaften 94:218–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-006-0176-0
Ballari SA, Farji-Brener AG (2006) Refuse dumps of leaf-cutting ants as a deterrent for ant herbivory : does refuse age matter ? Entomol Exp Appl 121:215–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.2006.00475.x
Bollazzi M, Forti LC, Roces F (2012) Ventilation of the giant nests of Atta leaf-cutting ants : does underground circulating air enter the fungus chambers ? Insect Soc 59:487–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-012-0243-9
Bot ANM, Currie CR, Hart AG, Boomsma JJ (2001) Waste management in leaf-cutting ants. Ethol Ecol Evol 13:225–237
Côté IM, Poulin R (1995) Parasitism and group-size in social animals: a meta-analysis. Behav Ecol 6:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/6.2.159
Currie CR, Stuart AE (2001) Weeding and grooming of pathogens in agriculture by ants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1605
Currie CR, Mueller UG, Malloch D (1999) The agricultural pathology of ant fungus gardens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:7998–8002
Farji-Brener AG, Elizalde L, Fernández-Marín H, Amador-Vargas S (2016) Social life and sanitary risks: evolutionary and current ecological conditions determine waste management in leaf-cutting ants. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 283:20160625. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0625
Forti LC, de Andrade APP, Camargo R d S et al (2017) Discovering the giant nest architecture of grass-cutting ants, Atta capiguara (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insects 8:39. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects8020039
Grassé P-P (1959) La reconstruction du nid et les coordinations interindividuelles chez Bellicositermes natalensis et Cubitermes sp. La theorie de la stigmergie: Essai d’interpretation du comportement des termites constructeurs. Insect Soc 6:41–83
Hart AG, Ratnieks FLW (2002) Waste management in the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica. Behav Ecol 13:224–231
Heyman Y, Shental N, Brandis A, Hefetz A, Feinerman O (2017) Ants regulate colony spatial organization using multiple chemical road-signs. Nat Commun 8:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15414
Howard DF, Tschinkel WR (1976) Aspects of necrophoric behavior in the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Behaviour 56:157–178
Jaffé K (1982) Chemical communication systems in the ant Atta cephalotes. From: social insects in the tropics. In: Jaisson P (ed) Proceedings of the first international symposium by the International Union for the Study of social insects and the Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología. Université Paris-Nord, Paris, pp 165–180
Jonkman JCM (1980) The external and internal structure and growth of nests of the leaf-cutting ant Atta vollenweideri Forel, 1893 (Hym.: Formicidae), part II. Z Angew Entomol 89:217–246
Kelber C, Rössler W, Roces F, Kleineidam CJ (2009) The antennal lobes of fungus-growing ants (Attini): neuroanatomical traits and evolutionary trends. Brain Behav Evol 73:273–284. https://doi.org/10.1159/000230672
Kleineidam CJ, Rössler W, Hölldobler B, Roces F (2007) Perceptual differences in trail-following leaf-cutting ants relate to body size. J Insect Physiol 53:1233–1241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2007.06.015
Moreira AA, Forti LC, Andrade APP et al (2004) Nest architecture of Atta laevigata (F. Smith, 1858) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Stud Neotropical Fauna Environ 39:109–116
Pielström S, Roces F (2013) Sequential soil transport and its influence on the spatial organisation of collective digging in leaf-cutting ants. PLoS One 8:e57040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057040
Provecho Y, Josens R (2009) Olfactory memory established during trophallaxis affects food search behaviour in ants. J Exp Biol 212:3221–3227. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.033506
Ribeiro PL, Navas CA (2007) The leaf-cutting ant Atta sexdens rubropilosa, FOREL, 1908 prefers drier chambers for garbage disposal. J Insect Behav 20:19–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10905-006-9052-1
Rifkin JL, Nunn CL, Garamszegi LZ (2012) Do animals living in larger groups experience greater parasitism? A meta-analysis. Am Nat 180:70–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/666081
Roces F (1990) Olfactory conditioning during the recruitment process in a leaf-cutting ant. Oecologia 83:261–262
Sachse S, Krieger J (2011) Olfaction in insects. e-Neuroforum 17:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13295-011-0020-7
Stahel G, Geijskes DC (1939) Ueber den Bau der Nester von Atta cephalotes L. und Atta sexdens L. (Hym. Formicidae). Rev Entomol 10:27–78
Wilson EO, Durlach NI, Roth LM (1958) Chemical releasers of necrophoric behavior in ants. Psyche (Stuttg) 65:108–114
Wilson-Rich N, Spivak M, Fefferman NH, Starks PT (2009) Genetic, individual, and group facilitation of disease resistance in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 54:405–423. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093301
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Isabel Reuter and Annette Laudahn for their help during the experiments, and Bo Leberecht for video editing. Special thanks to Prof. L. Forti (UNESP Botucatu, Brazil) for providing the colonies and two anonymous reviewers, whose comments improved the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All international, national, and institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by: Rumyana Jeleva
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(XLSX 11 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Römer, D., Roces, F. Waste deposition in leaf-cutting ants is guided by olfactory cues from waste. Sci Nat 106, 3 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1599-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-018-1599-0