Skip to main content
Log in

Der Video-Kopfimpulstest

Erste klinische Erfahrungen

The video head impulse test

First clinical experiences

  • Originalien
  • Published:
HNO Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Funktion der vestibulären Bogengangsrezeptoren und die Integrität der vestibulookulären Reflexwege lassen sich neuerdings mit dem Video-Kopfimpulstest (vKIT) seitenspezifisch analysieren. Es gibt bisher nur geringe klinische Erfahrungen an einer größeren Patientenzahl.

Material und Methoden

In dieser Studie wurde mithilfe des vKIT der horizontale VOR (hVOR) bei 142 Patienten mit einer akuten oder chronischen Schwindelsymptomatik (68,4% peripher-vestibulärer Schwindel, 7% zentraler Schwindel, 24,6% unklare Ursache) sowie bei Gesunden (n = 20) als Kontrollgruppe untersucht.

Ergebnisse

Bei Gesunden (n = 20) war ein Verstärkungsfaktor (Gain) von 0,97 ± 0,09 normal, als pathologisch wurde ein Gain von < 0,79 ermittelt. Ein regelrechter vKIT fand sich in 47,6%, in 52,4% fand sich ein pathologischer vKIT. Bei einer peripher-vestibulären Schwindelursache traten isolierte Rückstellsakkaden als offene (37%) und als verdeckte Rückstellsakkaden (13,7%) auf, am häufigsten fanden sich kombinierte Rückstellsakkaden (49,3%).

Schlussfolgerung

Mithilfe des vKIT ist es möglich, in kürzester Zeit eine seitenspezifische und quantitative Aussage über den hVOR zu erhalten. Die Methode ist bettseitig durchführbar und prüft den hVOR unter dynamischen bzw. physiologischen Bedingungen.

Abstract

Background

Side-specific test procedures are mandatory in order to assess the function of peripheral vestibular receptors. Semicircular canals (SCC) and vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) can be tested by the Halmagyi and Curthoy head impulse test (HIT) and recently by means of the video head impulse test (vHIT). The vHIT procedure is a new method to measure eye and head velocity during brief and rapid head impulses. This method provides objective information of VOR and detects both overt and covert catch-up saccades.

Materials and methods

As clinical experiences with vHIT are limited, in this study the horizontal VOR (hVOR) was examined by means of the vHIT in 142 consecutive patients with acute or chronic vestibular syndrome.

Results

A total of 20 healthy volunteers served as a control group and exhibited a normal average VOR gain of 0.97 ± 0.09 without re-fixation saccades. In patients, 47.6% showed a pathological vHIT whereas 52.4% revealed a normal test result. Covert catch-up saccades could be revealed in 13.7% by means of vHIT whereas in 86.3% overt catch-up saccades alone or in combination with covert catch-up saccades were found in the majority of catch-up saccades in peripheral vestibular disorders.

Conclusions

By means of the vHIT it is possible to obtain a side-specific and quantitative assessment of hVOR. Video-head impulse test is a reliable tool for vestibular testing even in bedside examinations of patients suffering from dizziness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2
Abb. 3
Abb. 4

Literatur

  1. Aw ST, Haslwanter T, Halmagyi GM et al (1996) Three-dimensional vector analysis of the human vestibulo-ocular reflex in response to high-acceleration head rotations. I. Responses in normal subjects. J Neurophysiol 76:4009–4020

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aw ST, Halmagyi GM, Haslwanter T et al (1996) Three-dimensional vector analysis of the human vestibule-ocular reflex in response to high-acceleration head rotations. II. Responses in subjects with unilateral vestibular loss and selective semicircular canal occlusion. J Neurophysiol 76:4021–4030

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aw ST, Fetter M, Cremer PD et al (2001) Individual semicircular canal function in superior and inferior vestibular neuritis. Neurology 57:768–774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartl K, Lehnen N, Kohlbecher S, Schneider E (2009) Headimpulse testing using video-oculography. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1164:331–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Black RA, Halmagyi GM, Thurtell MJ et al (2005) The active head-impulse test in unilateral peripheral vestibulopathy. Arch Neurol 62:290–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brandt T (1999) Vertigo: ist multisensorysyndromes, 2. Aufl. Springer, Berlin

  7. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation (1995) Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the diagnosis and evaluation of therapy in Meniere’s disease. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 113(3):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bhattacharyya N et al, American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Foundation (2008) Clinical practice guideline: Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139:S47–S81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (1988) A clinical sign of canal paresis. Arch Neurol 45:737–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HA, Lee H (2010) Isolated vestibular nucleus infarction mimicking acute peripheral vestibulopathy. Stroke 41(7):1558–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Leigh RJ, Zee DS (2006) The neurology of eye movements, 4. Aufl. F. A. Davis, Philadelphia

  12. MacDougall HG, Weber KP, McGarvie LA et al (2009) The video head impulse test: diagnostic accuracy in peripheral vestibulopathy. Neurology 73:1134–1141

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Newman-Toker DE, Kattah JC, Alvernia JE, Wang DZ (2008) Normal head impulse test differentiates acute cerebellar strokes from vestibular neuritis. Neurology 70(24 Pt 2):2378–2385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Olszewski J, Pietkiewicz P, Miłoński J, Bielińska M (2010) The use of VHIT (videonystagmography head impulse test) in the diagnostics of semicircular canal injuries. Otolaryngol Pol 64(7):32–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robinson DA (1975) Oculomotor control signals. In: Lennerstrand G, Bach-y-Rita P (Hrsg) Basic mechanisms of ocular motility and their clinical implications. Pergamon, Oxford New York Toronto Sidney Braunschweig, S 337–378

  16. Schmid-Priscoveanu A, Bohmer A, Obzina H, Straumann D (2001) Caloric and search-coil head-impulse testing in patients after vestibular neuritis. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2:72–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ullman E, Edlow JA (2010) Complete heart block complicating the head impulse test. Arch Neurol 67(10):1272–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Weber KP, Aw ST, Todd MJ et al (2008) Head impulse test in unilateral vestibular loss: vestibulo-ocular reflex and catch-up saccades. Neurology 70:454–463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Weber KP, MacDougall HG, Halmagyi GM, Curthoys IS (2009) Impulsive testing of semicircular-canal function using video-oculography. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1164:486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber KP, Aw ST, Todd MJ et al (2009) Horizontal head impulse test detects gentamicin vestibulotoxicity. Neurology 72:1417–1424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seine Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Blödow.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blödow, A., Helbig, R., Wichmann, N. et al. Der Video-Kopfimpulstest. HNO 61, 327–334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-012-2592-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-012-2592-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation