Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TaTME ist ein experimentelles Verfahren

TaTME is an experimental procedure

  • Kommentare
  • Published:
Der Chirurg Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Schwäbische Zeitung (2019) Sana mit neuer OP-Methode bei Darmkrebs. https://www.schwaebische.de/landkreis/landkreis-biberbach/biberbach_artikel,-sana-mit-neuer-op-methode-bei-darmkrebs-_arid,11011335.html (Erstellt: 20. Febr. 2019). Zugegriffen: 17. Apr. 2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP, TaTME Registry Collaborative (2017) Transanal total Mesorectal excision: international registry results of the first 720 cases. Ann Surg 266:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Penna M, Hompes R, Arnold S, Wynn G, Austin R, Warusavitarne J, Moran B, Hanna GB, Mortensen NJ, Tekkis PP, TaTME Registry Collaborative (2019) Incidence and risk factors for Anastomotic failure in 1594 patients treated by Transanal total Mesorectal excision: results from the international TaTME registry. Ann Surg 269(4):700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Persiani R, Biondi A, Pennestri F, Fico V, De Simone V, Tirelli F et al (2018) Transanal total Mesorectal excision vs Laparoscopic total Mesorectal excision in the treatment of low and middle rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 61(7):809–816

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Perdawood SK, Thinggaard BS, Bjoern MX (2018) Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries. Surg Endosc 32(5):2312–2321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lelong B, Meillat H, Zemmour C, Poizat F, Ewald J, Mege D et al (2017) Short- and mid-term outcomes after endoscopic Transanal or Laparoscopic Transabdominal total Mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a single institutional case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 224(5):917–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeong SY, Park JW, Nam BH, Kim S, Kang SB, Lim SB, Choi HS, Kim DW, Chang HJ, Kim DY, Jung KH, Kim TY, Kang GH, Chie EK, Kim SY, Sohn DK, Kim DH, Kim JS, Lee HS, Kim JH, Oh JH (2014) Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-rectal or low-rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (COREAN trial): survival outcomes of an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 15:767–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevenson AR, Solomon MJ, Lumley JW, Hewett P, Clouston AD, Gebski VJ et al (2015) Effect of Laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection on pathological outcomes in rectal cancer: the ALaCaRT randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1356–1363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fleshman J, Branda M, Sargent DJ, Boller AM, George V, Abbas M et al (2015) Effect of Laparoscopic-assisted resection vs open resection of stage II or III rectal cancer on pathologic outcomes: the ACOSOG Z6051 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 314(13):1346–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu W, Xu Z, Cheng H, Ying J, Cheng F, Xu W, Cao J, Luo J (2016) Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes between transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for the treatment of mid and low rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(12):1841–1850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Denost Q, Adam JP, Rullier A, Buscail E, Laurent C, Rullier E (2014) Perineal transanal approach: a new standard for laparoscopic sphincter-saving resection in low rectal cancer, a randomized trial. Ann Surg 260:993–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rasulov AO, Mamedli ZZ, Dzhumabaev KE, Kulushev VM, Kozlov NA (2016) Total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer management: laparoscopic or transanal? Khirurgiia (Mosk) 5:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rubinkiewicz M, Nowakowski M, Wierdak M, Mizera M, Dembinski M, Pisarska M, Major P, Malczak P, Budzynski A, Pedziwiatr M (2018) Transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: a case-matched study comparing TaTME versus standard laparoscopic TME. Cancer Manag Res 10:5239–5245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen YT, Kiu KT, Yen MH, Chang TC (2018) Comparsion of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME. Asian J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.09.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. van der Pas MH, Haglind E, Cuesta MA, Furst A, Lacy AM, Hop WC et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14(3):210–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ruppert R, Junginger T, Ptok H, Strassburg J, Maurer CA, Brosi P, Sauer J, Baral J, Kreis M, Wollschlaeger D, Hermanek P, Merkel S, OCUM group (2018) Oncological outcome after MRI-based selection for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in the OCUMRectal Cancer Trial. Br J Surg 105(11):1519–1529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rausa E, Bianco F, Kelly ME, Aiolfi A, Petrelli F, Bonitta G, Sgroi G (2019) Systemic review and network meta-analysis comparing minimal surgical techniques for rectal cancer: quality of total mesorectum excision, pathological, surgical, and oncological outcomes. J Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.25410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bondeven P, Hagemann-Madsen RH, Laurberg S, Pedersen BG (2013) Extent and completeness of mesorectal excision evaluated by postoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Surg 100(10):1357–1367

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Veltcamp Helbach M, Koedam TWA, Knol JJ, Diederik A, Spaargaren GJ, Bonjer HJ, Tuynman JB, Sietses C (2019) Residual mesorectum on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging following transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LapTME) in rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 33(1):94–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. The 2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group (2018) An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME). Colorectal Dis 20(Suppl 6):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rink AD, Kauff DW, Paschold M, Vestweber KH, Lang H, Kneist W (2016) Hybrid TAMIS total mesorectal excision. A new perspective in treatment of distal rectal cancer—technique and results. Chirurg 87(3):225–232

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Muratore A, Mellano A, Marsanic P, De Simone M (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for cancer located in the lower rectum: short- and mid-term results. Eur J Surg Oncol 41(4):478–483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tuech JJ, Karoui M, Lelong B, De Chaisemartin C, Bridoux V, Manceau G, Delpero JR, Hanoun L, Michot F (2015) A step toward NOTES total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: endoscopic transanal proctectomy. Ann Surg 261(2):228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Adamina M, Buchs NC, Penna M, Hompes R (2018) on behalf of the st.Gallen Colorectal.st.Gallen consensus on safe implementation of transanal total mes orectal excision. Consensus expert group. Surg Endosc 32(3):1091–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Holmer C, Benz S, Fichtner-Feigl S, Jehle EC, Kienle P, Post S, Schiedeck T, Weitz J, Kreis ME (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision—a critical appraisal. Chirurg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-019-0945-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Larsen S (2019) Is taTME the final solution? 9th Ahus colorectal symposium, University of Oslo, Norway, 24–25 January

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ramage L, Mclean P, Simillis C, Qiu S, Kontovounisios C, Tan E, Tekkis P (2018) Functional outcomes with handsewn versus stapled anastomoses in the treatment of ultralow rectal cancer. Updates Surg 70(1):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-017-0507-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Emmertsen KJ, Laurberg S, Rectal Cancer Function Study Group. (2013) Impact of bowel dysfunction on quality of life after sphincter-preserving resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 100(10):1377–1387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Muehldorfer S, Hohenberger W (1997) Continence after colorectal reconstruction following resection: impact of level o f anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 12(2):82–87

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fernández-Hevia M, Delgado S, Castells A, Tasende M, Momblan D, Díaz del Gobbo G, DeLacy B, Balust J, Lacy AM (2015) Transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: short-term outcomes in comparison with laparoscopic surgery. Ann Surg 261:221–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sparreboom CL, Komen N, Rizopoulos D, van Westreenen HL, Doornebosch PG, Dekker JWT, Menon AG, Tuynman JB, Daams F, Lips D, van Grevenstein WMU, Karsten TM, Lange JF, D’Hoore A, Wolthuis AM (2019) Transanal total mesorectal excision: how are we doing so far? Colorectal Dis. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.14601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Simillis C, Hompes R, Penna M, Rasheed S, Tekkis PP (2016) A systematic review of transanal total mesorectal excision: is this the future of rectal cancer surgery? Colorectal Dis 18:19–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gachabayov M, Chudner A, Bergamaschi R (2018) A succinct critical appraisal of indications to transanal total mesorectal excision. Ann Surg 268(6):e94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gachabayov M, Bergamaschi R (2019) Is taTME delivering? Updates Surg 71:13–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bjoern MX, Nielsen S, Perdawood SK (2019) Quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: a comparison of functional outcomes after Transanal and Laparoscopic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4057-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rosen HR, Kneist W, Fürst A, Krämer G, Hebenstreit J, Schiemer JF (2019) Randomized clinical trial of prophylactic transanal irrigation versus supportive therapy to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome after rectal resection. Br J Surg open. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50160

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Campus Benjamin Franklin, Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12200, Berlin, Deutschland

    C. Holmer &  M. E. Kreis

  2. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Joseph Krankenhaus Berlin Tempelhof, Berlin, Deutschland

    C. Holmer

  3. Klinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen, Klinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Kinderchirurgie, Klinikverbund Südwest, Böblingen, Deutschland

    S. Benz

  4. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Department Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Deutschland

    S. Fichtner-Feigl

  5. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, St. Elisabethen-Klinikum, Ravensburg, Deutschland

    E. C. Jehle

  6. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Theresienkrankenhaus, Mannheim, Deutschland

    P. Kienle

  7. Chirurgische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland

    S. Post

  8. Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Deutschland

    T. Schiedeck

  9. Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus der TU Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland

    J. Weitz

Authors
  1. C. Holmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Benz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. Fichtner-Feigl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. C. Jehle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Kienle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. T. Schiedeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. J. Weitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. M. E. Kreis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. E. Kreis.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Holmer, S. Benz, S. Fichtner-Feigl, E.C. Jehle, P. Kienle, S. Post, T. Schiedeck, J. Weitz und M.E. Kreis geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Holmer, C., Benz, S., Fichtner-Feigl, S. et al. TaTME ist ein experimentelles Verfahren. Chirurg 90, 489–492 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-019-0979-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-019-0979-0

Search

Navigation