Skip to main content
Log in

Fokus Neurochirurgische Intensivmedizin 2021/2022

Zusammenfassung ausgewählter intensivmedizinischer Studien

Focus neurosurgical intensive care medicine

Summary of selected intensive medical care studies

  • Journal Club
  • Published:
Die Anaesthesiologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  1. Spaite DW, Hu C, Bobrow BJ, Chikani V, Barnhart B, Gaither JB et al (2017) The effect of combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia on mortality in major traumatic brain injury. Ann Emerg Med 69(1):62–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Okonkwo DO, Shutter LA, Moore C, Temkin NR, Puccio AM, Madden CJ et al (2017) Brain oxygen optimization in severe traumatic brain injury phase-II: a phase II randomized trial. Crit Care Med 45(11):1907–1914

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Beynon C, Kiening KL, Orakcioglu B, Unterberg AW, Sakowitz OW (2012) Brain tissue oxygen monitoring and hyperoxic treatment in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 29(12):2109–2123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meixensberger J, Jaeger M, Väth A, Dings J, Kunze E, Roosen K (2003) Brain tissue oxygen guided treatment supplementing ICP/CPP therapy after traumatic brain injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74(6):760–764

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Narotam PK, Morrison JF, Nathoo N (2009) Brain tissue oxygen monitoring in traumatic brain injury and major trauma: outcome analysis of a brain tissue oxygen-directed therapy. J Neurosurg 111(4):672–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernard F, Barsan W, Diaz-Arrastia R, Merck LH, Yeatts S, Shutter LA (2022) Brain Oxygen Optimization in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (BOOST-3): a multicentre, randomised, blinded-endpoint, comparative effectiveness study of brain tissue oxygen and intracranial pressure monitoring versus intracranial pressure alone. BMJ Open 12(3):e60188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Carney N, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GWJ, Bell MJ et al (2017) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, fourth edition. Neurosurgery 80(1):6–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Asehnoune K, Lasocki S, Seguin P, Geeraerts T, Perrigault PF, Dahyot-Fizelier C et al (2017) Association between continuous hyperosmolar therapy and survival in patients with traumatic brain injury—a multicentre prospective cohort study and systematic review. Crit Care 21(1):328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Roquilly A, Moyer JD, Huet O, Lasocki S, Cohen B, Dahyot-Fizelier C et al (2021) Effect of continuous infusion of Hypertonic saline vs standard care on 6‑month neurological outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: the COBI randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325(20):2056–2066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawryluk GWJ, Rubiano AM, Totten AM, O’Reilly C, Ullman JS, Bratton SL et al (2020) Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury: 2020 update of the decompressive craniectomy recommendations. Neurosurgery 87(3):427–434

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hutchinson PJ, Kolias AG, Timofeev IS, Corteen EA, Czosnyka M, Timothy J et al (2016) Trial of decompressive craniectomy for traumatic intracranial hypertension. N Engl J Med 375(12):1119–1130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cherian I, Yi G, Munakomi S (2013) Cisternostomy: Replacing the age old decompressive hemicraniectomy? Asian J Neurosurg 8(3):132–138

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chandra VVR, Mowliswara Prasad BC, Banavath HN, Chandrasekhar Reddy K (2022) Cisternostomy versus decompressive craniectomy for the management of traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial. World Neurosurg 162:e58–e64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Volovici V, Haitsma IK (2022) Cisternostomy in Traumatic Brain Injury: Time for the World to Listen—Cerebrospinal Fluid Release: Possibly the Missing Link in Traumatic Brain Injury. World Neurosurg 162:3–5

  15. Eaton JC, Greil ME, Nistal D, Caldwell DJ, Robinson E, Aljuboori Z et al (2022) Complications associated with early cranioplasty for patients with traumatic brain injury: a 25-year single-center analysis. J Neurosurg. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.11.JNS211557

  16. GBD 2016 Traumatic Brain Injury and Spinal Cord Injury Collaborators (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol 18(1):56–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Riew KD, Middleton JW, Aarabi B, Arnold PM et al (2017) A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy: Recommendations for patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease and Nonmyelopathic patients with evidence of Cord compression. Spine J 7(3 Suppl):70S–83S

    Google Scholar 

  18. Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, Harrop JS, Vaccaro AR, Aarabi B et al (2021) The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol 20(2):117–126

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grossman RG, Toups EG, Frankowski RF, Burau KD, Howley S (2012) North American clinical trials network for the treatment of spinal Cord injury: goals and progress. J Neurosurg Spine 17(1):6–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fehlings MG, Vaccaro A, Wilson JR, Singh A, Cadotte DW, Harrop JS et al (2012) Early versus delayed decompression for traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: results of the Surgical Timing in Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (STASCIS). Plos One 7(2):e32037

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Geisler FH, Coleman WP, Grieco G, Poonian D, Sygen Study Group (2001) The Sygen multicenter acute spinal cord injury study. Spine 26(24):S87–98

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bracken MB, Shepard MJ, Holford TR, Leo-Summers L, Aldrich EF, Fazl M et al (1997) Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. JAMA 277(20):1597–1604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Maas AIR, Peul W, Thomé C (2021) Surgical decompression in acute spinal cord injury: earlier is better. Lancet Neurol 20(2):84–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Fernandes HM, Murray GD, Teasdale GM, Hope DT et al (2005) Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haematomas in the International Surgical Trial in Intracerebral Haemorrhage (STICH): a randomised trial. Lancet Lond Engl 365(9457):387–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendelow AD, Gregson BA, Rowan EN, Murray GD, Gholkar A, Mitchell PM et al (2013) Early surgery versus initial conservative treatment in patients with spontaneous supratentorial lobar intracerebral haematomas (STICH II): a randomised trial. Lancet 382(9890):397–408

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sondag L, Schreuder FHBM, Boogaarts HD, Rovers MM, Vandertop WP, Dammers R et al (2020) Neurosurgical intervention for supratentorial Intracerebral hemorrhage. Ann Neurol 88(2):239–250

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Kellner CP, Song R, Ali M, Nistal DA, Samarage M, Dangayach NS et al (2021) Time to evacuation and functional outcome after minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. Stroke 52(9):e536–9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kellner CP, Chartrain AG, Nistal DA, Scaggiante J, Hom D, Ghatan S et al (2018) The Stereotactic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Underwater Blood Aspiration (SCUBA) technique for minimally invasive endoscopic intracerebral hemorrhage evacuation. J Neurointervent Surg 10(8):771–776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gregson BA, Broderick JP, Auer LM, Batjer H, Chen XC, Juvela S et al (2012) Individual patient data subgroup meta-analysis of surgery for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. Stroke 43(6):1496–1504

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilson D, Seiffge DJ, Traenka C, Basir G, Purrucker JC, Rizos T et al (2017) Outcome of intracerebral hemorrhage associated with different oral anticoagulants. Neurology 88(18):1693–1700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Steiner T, Unterberg A (2021) Behandlung von spontanen intrazerebralen Blutungen, S2k-Leitlinie. Leitlinien Diagn Ther Neurol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Connolly SJ, Crowther M, Eikelboom JW, Gibson CM, Curnutte JT, Lawrence JH et al (2019) Full study report of Andexanet alfa for bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors. N Engl J Med 380(14):1326–1335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Huttner HB, Gerner ST, Kuramatsu JB, Connolly SJ, Beyer-Westendorf J, Demchuk AM et al (2022) Hematoma expansion and clinical outcomes in patients with factor-Xa inhibitor-related atraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage treated within the ANNEXA‑4 trial versus real-world usual care. Stroke 53(2):532–543

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davis SM, Broderick J, Hennerici M, Brun NC, Diringer MN, Mayer SA et al (2006) Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage. Neurology 66(8):1175–1181

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Beynon.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

C. Beynon erhielt Beratungshonorare und Vortragshonorare von AstraZeneca und CSL Behring GmbH. M. Bernhard, T. Brenner, M. Dietrich, M.O. Fiedler, C. Nusshag, M.A. Weigand, C.J. Reuß, D. Michalski und C. Jungk geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beynon, C., Bernhard, M., Brenner, T. et al. Fokus Neurochirurgische Intensivmedizin 2021/2022. Anaesthesiologie 72, 518–525 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01287-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-023-01287-z

Navigation