Abstract
Introduction
This study assessed the prognostic impact of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with surgically resected malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).
Methods
MPM patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2013 were identified from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) database. A propensity-matched analysis was performed considering baseline characteristics (age, gender, race, histology, TNM stage, and type of surgery).
Results
A total of 2166 patients were identified. The median age was 60 years (range 25–85 years), and 469 patients received postoperative radiotherapy. Both before and after propensity score matching, overall survival (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.012, respectively) was better in the postoperative radiotherapy group. When the overall survival was stratified by histology, postoperative radiotherapy did not improve the survival in sarcomatoid histology patients both before and after matching (P = 0.424 and P = 0.281, respectively). In multivariate analysis of the matched population, not receiving postoperative radiotherapy did not correlate with worse survival (hazard ratio: 1.175; P = 0.12). Factors associated with worse survival include sarcomatoid histology, nodal positivity, and age ≥70.
Conclusion
Evidence from this analysis is insufficient on its own to routinely recommend postoperative radiotherapy for surgically resected MPM. However, large-scale prospective clinical trials are warranted to further evaluate this intervention in nonsarcomatoid histology.
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund
In der vorliegenden Studie wurde der prognostische Einfluss der postoperativen Strahlentherapie bei Patienten mit chirurgisch reseziertem malignem Pleuramesotheliom (MPM) untersucht.
Methoden
In der SEER-Datenbank (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) wurden Patienten ermittelt, bei denen zwischen 2000 und 2013 die Diagnose eines MPM gestellt worden war. Unter Berücksichtigung der Ausgangsmerkmale (Alter, Geschlecht, Ethnizität, Histologie, TNM-Stadium und Art des chirurgischen Eingriffs) wurde eine Vergleichsgruppenanalyse („propensity-matched analysis“) durchgeführt.
Ergebnisse
Es wurden insgesamt 2166 entsprechende Patienten ermittelt. Das Durchschnittsalter betrug 60 Jahre (Spanne: 25–85 Jahre), bei 469 Patienten erfolgte eine postoperative Strahlentherapie. Sowohl vor als auch nach dem „propensity score matching“ war das Gesamtüberleben (p < 0,0001 bzw. p = 0,012) in der Gruppe mit postoperativer Strahlentherapie besser. Bei Stratifizierung des Gesamtüberlebens gemäß der Histologie führt die postoperative Strahlentherapie vor und nach dem Matching nicht zu einer Verbesserung des Überlebens bei Patienten mit sarkomatoider Histologie (p = 0,424 bzw. p = 0,281). In der multivariaten Analyse der gematchten Population war der Nichterhalt einer postoperativen Strahlentherapie nicht mit einem schlechteren Überleben korreliert (Hazard-Ratio: 1,175; p = 0,12). Zu den Faktoren, die mit einem schlechteren Überleben vergesellschaftet waren, gehörten eine sarkomatoide Histologie, nodale Positivität und ein Alter ≥70 Jahre.
Schlussfolgerung
Die Evidenz der vorliegenden Auswertung an sich ist unzureichend, daher kann die postoperative Strahlentherapie bei chirurgisch entferntem MPM nicht routinemäßig empfohlen werden. Prospektive klinische Studien von großem Umfang sind erforderlich, um diese Intervention bei nichtsarkomatoider Histologie näher zu untersuchen.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Panou V, Vyberg M, Weinreich U, Meristoudis C, Falkmer U, Røe O (2015) The established and future biomarkers of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cancer Treat Rev. doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2015.05.001
Lin RT, Takahashi K, Karjalainen A, Hoshuyama T, Wilson D, Kameda T et al (2007) Ecological association between asbestos-related diseases and historical asbestos consumption: an international analysis. Lancet 369(9564):844–849
Blomberg C, Nilsson J, Holgersson G, Edlund P, Bergqvist M, Adwall L et al (2015) Randomized trials of systemic medically-treated malignant mesothelioma: A systematic review. Anticancer Res 35(5):2493–2501
Røe OD, Stella GM (2015) Malignant pleural mesothelioma: history, controversy and future of a manmade epidemic. Eur Respir Rev 24(135):115–131
Faig J, Howard S, Levine EA, Casselman G, Hesdorffer M, Ohar JA (2015) Changing pattern in malignant mesothelioma survival. Transl Oncol 8(1):35–39
Davidson B (2015) Prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Hum Pathol 46(6):789–804
Robinson BW, Musk AW, Lake RA (2005) Malignant mesothelioma. Lancet 366(9483):397–408
Scherpereel A, Astoul P, Baas P, Berghmans T, Clayson H, de Vuyst P et al (2010) Guidelines of the European Respiratory Society and the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons for the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Eur Respir J 35(3):479–495
Thieke C, Nicolay NH, Sterzing F, Hoffmann H, Roeder F, Safi S et al (2015) Long-term results in malignant pleural mesothelioma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, extrapleural pneumonectomy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 10:267
Vogelzang NJ, Rusthoven JJ, Symanowski J, Denham C, Kaukel E, Ruffie P et al (2003) Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Clin Oncol 21(14):2636–2644
Abdel-Rahman O, Kelany M (2015) Systemic therapy options for malignant pleural mesothelioma beyond first line therapy. Expert Rev Respir Med. doi:10.1586/17476348.2015.1083426
Taioli E, Wolf AS, Flores RM (2015) Meta-analysis of survival after pleurectomy decortication versus extrapleural pneumonectomy in mesothelioma. Ann Thorac Surg 99(2):472–480
Robinson BW, Lake RA (2005) Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med 353(15):1591–1603
Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program. About the SEER Program. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/about. Accessed 25 June 2016
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1983) The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70(1):41–55
Rosenbaum PR, Rubin DB (1985) Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. Am Stat 39(1):33–38
Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behav Res 46(3):399–424
Flores RM, Riedel E, Donington JS, Alago W, Ihekweazu U, Krug L et al (2010) Frequency of use and predictors of cancer-directed surgery in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma in a community-based (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results [SEER]) population. J Thorac Oncol 5(10):1649–1654
Chapman E, Berenstein EG, Dieguez M, Ortiz Z (2006) Radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD003880
Nagendran M, Pallis A, Patel K, Scarci M (2011) Should all patients who have mesothelioma diagnosed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery have their intervention sites irradiated? Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 13(1):66–69
Clive AO, Taylor H, Dobson L, Wilson P, de Winton E, Panakis N et al (2016) Prophylactic radiotherapy for the prevention of procedure-tract metastases after surgical and large-bore pleural procedures in malignant pleural mesothelioma (SMART): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 17(8):1094-1104
Treasure T, Lang-Lazdunski L, Waller D, Bliss JM, Tan C, Entwisle J et al (2011) Extra-pleural pneumonectomy versus no extra-pleural pneumonectomy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: clinical outcomes of the Mesothelioma and Radical Surgery (MARS) randomised feasibility study. Lancet Oncol 12(8):763–772
Stahel RA, Riesterer O, Xyrafas A, Opitz I, Beyeler M, Ochsenbein A et al (2015) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma with or without hemithoracic radiotherapy (SAKK 17/04): a randomised, international, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16(16):1651–1658
Rimner A, Simone CB 2nd, Zauderer MG, Cengel KA, Rusch VW (2016) Hemithoracic radiotherapy for mesothelioma: lack of benefit or lack of statistical power? Lancet Oncol 17(2):e43–e44
Meyerhoff RR, Yang CF, Speicher PJ, Gulack BC, Hartwig MG, D’Amico TA et al (2015) Impact of mesothelioma histologic subtype on outcomes in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. J Surg Res 196(1):23–32
Taioli E, Wolf AS, Camacho-Rivera M, Kaufman A, Lee D‑S, Nicastri D et al (2015) Determinants of survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) study of 14,228 patients. PLOS ONE 10(12):e0145039
Minatel E, Trovo M, Bearz A, Di Maso M, Baresic T, Drigo A et al (2015) Radical radiation therapy after lung-sparing surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma: survival, pattern of failure, and prognostic factors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 93(3):606–613
Funding
This study has not been funded.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
O. Abdel-Rahman declares that he has no competing interests.
Ethical standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Caption Electronic Supplementary Material
66_2016_1092_MOESM1_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Fig. 1: Kaplan–Meier curve of overall survival according to whether or not postoperative radiation therapy has been given in the two histological subtypes: a nonsarcomatoid, b sarcomatoid.
66_2016_1092_MOESM2_ESM.jpg
Supplemental Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier curve of cancer-specific survival according to whether or not postoperative radiation therapy has been given in the matched population (after propensity score matching).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abdel-Rahman, O. Role of postoperative radiotherapy in the management of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Strahlenther Onkol 193, 276–284 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1092-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-016-1092-7