Skip to main content
Log in

The midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty

  • Orthopedics And Traumatology
  • Published:
Orthopedics and Traumatology

Abstract

Objective

Approach to the knee for total knee arthroplasty with the goal to avoid tendency to lateralization and extension lag.

Indications

Implantation of total knee components.

Revision surgery after total knee arthroplasty.

Contraindications

Morbid obesity.

For revision surgery: preoperative knee flexion of <60°.

Surgical Technique

Anterior midline incision, blunt separation of the distal part of the obliquely running fibers of the vastus medialis over an extent of at least 5 cm. The muscle incision ends at the proximal and medial corner of the patella and is continued distally along the medial patellar border ending at the tibial tuberosity. After opening of the joint, the patella is dislocated laterally thus exposing the articular surfaces. After insertion of the components, superficial adaptation of the muscle fibers and wound closure in layers.

Results

Of 297 total knee implants 276 knees (92.9%) could be followed up for an average of 36.2 (19–56) months. 153 knees were in women and 123 in men with an average age of 66.3 (33–81) years. In none of the operations a lateral release became necessary. The results were based on the score of the American Knee Society. The score showed 52.3 points preoperatively and 90.6 at follow-up. 95% of the patients had an excellent or good functional result. Tangential radiographs of the patella with the knee in 30° of flexion showed in 91% a central position in the patellar groove.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akagi M, Matsusue Y, Mata T, Asada Y, Horiguchi M, Iida H, Nakamura T. Effect of rotational alignment on patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1999;366:155–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ayers DC, Dennis DA, Johanson, NA, Pellegrini VD Jr. Instructional course lectures. Common complications of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:278–311.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bindelglass DF, Vince KG. Patellar tilt and subluxation following subvastus and parapatellar approach in total knee arthroplasty. Implication for surgical technique. J Arthroplasty 1996;11:507–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB. Long term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993;75:674–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper RE Jr, Trinidad G, Buck WR. Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric study determining the distance of the popliteal artery from the patellar margin of the incision. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:505–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalury DF, Jiranek WA. A comparison of the midvastus and paramedian approaches for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:33–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dennis DA. Patellofemoral complications in total knee arthroplasty. In: Callaghan JJ, Dennis DA, Paprosky WG, Rosenberg AG, eds. Orthopaedic knowledge update: hip and knee reconstruction. Rosemont/IL: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 1995:283–90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Engh GA, Holt BT, Parks NL. A midvastus muscle splitting approach for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1997;12:322–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Engh GA, Parks NL. Surgical technique of the midvastus arthrotomy. Clin Orthop 1998;351:270–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Engh GA, Parks NL, Ammeen DJ. Influence of surgical approach on lateral retinacular releases in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1996;331:56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hassenpflug J. Das Patellofemoralgelenk beim künstlichen Kniegelenkersatz. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hassenpflug J. Biologische und biomechanische Besonderheiten des Patellofemoralgelenkes beim künstlichen Kniegelenksersatz. In: Hassenpflug J, Hrsg. Die Blauth-Knieendoprothese. Grundlagen, gegenwärtiger Stand und Ausblick. Bern-Göttingen-Toronto-Seattle: Huber, 1992:62–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jerosch J. Komplikationen des Extensionsapparates. In: Jerosch J, Heisel J, Hrsg. Knieendoprothetik. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larson CM, Lachiewicz PF. Patellofemoral complications with the Insall-Burstein II posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:288–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Laskin RS, van Steeijn M. Total knee replacement for patients with patellofemoral arthritis. Clin Orthop 1999;367:89–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laughlin RT, Werries BA, Verhulst SJ, Hayes JM. Patellar tilt in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop 1996;25:300–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Levitzky KA, Harris WJ, McManus J, Scott RD. Total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. Clinical outcomes and long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop 1993;286:116–21.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lonner JH, Lotke PA. Aseptic complications after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1999;7:311–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Matsueda M, Gustilo RB. Subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 2000;371:161–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nebelung W, Awiszus F, Mahlfeld K, Neumann HW. Beeinflussen Patellahochstand, Patellaventralisation und Patellalateralisation das patellare Schmerzsyndrom nach Implantation von GSB-Totalendoprothesen? Z Orthop 1995;133:535–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nelissen RG, Weidenheim L, Mikhail WE. The influence of the position of the patellar component on tracking in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 1995;19:224–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Reed MR, Farhan MJ, Chaudhuri C. Patellar stress fracture: a complication of knee joint arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Arthroplasty 1999;14:383–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Reithmeier E, Plitz W. Theoretical and numerical approach to optimal positioning of the patellar surface replacement in a total knee endoprosthesis. J Biomech 1990;23:883–892

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritter MA, Pierce MJ, Zhou H, Meding JP, Faris PM, Keating EM. Patellar complications (total knee arthroplasty). Effect of lateral release and thickness. Clin Orthop 1999;367:149–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Scuderi GR, Insall JN, Scott NW. Patellofemoral pain after total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1994;2:239–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. White RE Jr, Allman JK, Trauger JA, Dales BH. Clinical comparison of the midvastus and medial parapatellar surgical approaches. Clin Orthop 1999;367:117–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Windsor RE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN. Patellar fractures in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1989;4:63–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiko Reichel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hube, R., Sotereanos, N.G. & Reichel, H. The midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol 10, 235–244 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00065-002-1052-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00065-002-1052-x

Key Words

Navigation