Zusammenfassung
Eine hochgradige Mitralinsuffizienz (MI) ist mit erhöhter Morbidität und Mortalität vergesellschaftet. Die korrekte Evaluation von Ätiologie, Pathomechanismus und Schweregrad ist entsprechend entscheidend für eine optimale Behandlung. Die Echokardiographie ist die wesentliche Diagnosemodalität im klinischen Alltag; sie ermöglicht die Bestimmung des Schweregrads häufig bereits mittels einfach zu erhebender, qualitativer Parameter. Ergänzend bietet sie verschiedene Verfahren, um die hämodynamische Bedeutung der MI zu quantifizieren. Der am besten mit klinischen Ereignissen korrelierte quantitative Parameter ist die EROA („effective regurgitant orifice area“); ihre Berechnung wird in amerikanischen und europäischen Leitlinien empfohlen. Gleichwohl besteht Uneinigkeit über die Grenzwerte für eine hochgradige, sekundäre MI. Die Evaluation einer MI muss immer auch die Beurteilung der angrenzenden Herzhöhlen beinhalten – einerseits, um die Auswirkung der MI auf Größe und Funktion beurteilen zu können, andererseits auch, weil die Bedeutung der quantitativen Parameter von Ventrikelgröße und Auswurfvolumen abhängig ist. Neue 3‑D-echokardiographische Ansätze zur Quantifizierung der MI haben in Studien überzeugende Ergebnisse gezeigt, ihre Parameter sind allerdings noch nicht hinreichend klinisch validiert. Als Alternative zur Echokardiographie hat sich für ausgewählte Indikationen die kardiale Magnetresonanztomographie (MRT) als systematische und untersucherunabhängige Methode zur Quantifizierung der MI bewährt.
Abstract
Severe mitral regurgitation (MR) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Thus, the correct evaluation of the underlying etiology, pathomechanism and severity is crucial for optimal treatment. Echocardiography is the predominant diagnostic modality in the clinical routine as it enables grading of mitral regurgitation, which can frequently be achieved by readily available qualitative parameters. Additionally, echocardiography provides several methods to quantify the hemodynamic significance of MR. The effective regurgitation orifice area (EROA) is the quantitative parameter best correlated with clinical events. American and European imaging guidelines both recommend the use of quantitative parameters even though they disagree on the cut-off values for secondary MR. The evaluation of MR should always include an assessment of the adjacent heart chambers in order to be able to assess the impact of volume overload on size and function of the left ventricle and left atrium. The final interpretation of the quantitative parameters requires knowledge of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Newer 3D-echocardiographic approaches to quantify MR are less dependent on mathematical assumptions and have shown convincing results in several studies but still lack sufficient clinical validation. As an alternative to echocardiography, for specific indications cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has proven to be a systematic and observer-independent method for quantification of MR.
Abbreviations
- EROA:
-
Effektive Regurgitationsöffnungsfläche
- LVEDV:
-
Linksventrikuläres enddiastolisches Volumen
- LVEF:
-
Linksventrikuläre Ejektionsfraktion
- LVESV:
-
Linksventrikuläres endsystolisches Volumen
- MI:
-
Mitralinsuffizienz
- PISA:
-
„Proximal isovelocity surface area“
- RF:
-
Regurgitationsfraktion
- RVol:
-
Regurgitationsvolumen
- SV:
-
Schlagvolumen
- TEE:
-
Transösophageale Echokardiographie
- TSV:
-
Totales Schlagvolumen
- TTE:
-
Transthorakale Echokardiographie
- VCA:
-
Vena-contracta-Fläche
Literatur
Nkomo VT et al (2006) Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet 368:1005–1011
Lancellotti P et al (2013) Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14:611–644
Zoghbi WA et al (2017) Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30:303–371
Grayburn PA et al (2014) Defining “severe” secondary mitral regurgitation: emphasizing an integrated approach. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:2792–2801
Biner S et al (2012) Acute effect of percutaneous MitraClip therapy in patients with haemodynamic decompensation. Eur J Heart Fail 14:939–945
Fehske W et al (1994) Color-coded Doppler imaging of the vena contracta as a basis for quantification of pure mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 73:268–274
Hall SA et al (1997) Assessment of mitral regurgitation severity by Doppler color flow mapping of the vena contracta. Circulation 95:636–642
Kahlert P et al (2008) Direct assessment of size and shape of noncircular vena contracta area in functional versus organic mitral regurgitation using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:912–921
Antoine C et al (2018) Clinical outcome of degenerative mitral regurgitation. Circulation 138:1317–1326
Enriquez-Sarano M et al (2005) Quantitative determinants of the outcome of asymptomatic mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 352:875–883
Grigioni F, Enriquez-Sarano M, Zehr KJ, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ (2001) Ischemic mitral regurgitation: long-term outcome and prognostic implications with quantitative Doppler assessment. Circulation 103:1759–1764
Rossi A et al (2011) Independent prognostic value of functional mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure. A quantitative analysis of 1256 patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Heart 97:1675–1680
Bargiggia GS et al (1991) A new method for quantitation of mitral regurgitation based on color flow Doppler imaging of flow convergence proximal to regurgitant orifice. Circulation 84:1481–1489
Dujardin KS et al (1997) Grading of mitral regurgitation by quantitative Doppler echocardiography: calibration by left ventricular angiography in routine clinical practice. Circulation 96:3409–3415
Yosefy C et al (2007) Proximal flow convergence region as assessed by real-time 3‑dimensional echocardiography: challenging the hemispheric assumption. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20:389–396
Lang RM et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the american society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28:1–39.e14
Grayburn PA, Sannino A, Packer M (2019) Proportionate and disproportionate functional mitral regurgitation: a new conceptual framework that reconciles the results of the MITRA-FR and COAPT trials. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 12:353–362
Little SH et al (2008) Three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for direct measurement of vena contracta area in mitral regurgitation: in vitro validation and clinical experience. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 1:695–704
Little SH (2012) Three-dimensional echocardiography to quantify mitral valve regurgitation. Curr Opin Cardiol 27:477–484
Shanks M et al (2010) Quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation: comparison between three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 3:694–700
Zeng X et al (2011) Diagnostic value of vena contracta area in the quantification of mitral regurgitation severity by color Doppler 3D echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 4:506–513
Goebel B et al (2018) Vena contracta area for severity grading in functional and degenerative mitral regurgitation: a transoesophageal 3D colour Doppler analysis in 500 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19:639–646
Avenatti E et al (2019) Diagnostic value of 3‑dimensional vena contracta area for the quantification of residual mitral regurgitation after Mitraclip procedure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 12:582–591
Alessandrini H et al (2017) Prognostic implication of post-MitraClip vena contracta area in heart failure patients with functional mitral regurgitation. EuroIntervention 12:1946–1953
Gorodisky L, Agmon Y, Porat M, Abadi S, Lessick J (2018) Assessment of mitral regurgitation by 3‑dimensional proximal flow convergence using magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with echo-Doppler. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 34:793–802
Schmidt FP et al (2014) Usefulness of 3D-PISA as compared to guideline endorsed parameters for mitral regurgitation quantification. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 30:1501–1508
Choi J et al (2014) Differential effect of 3‑dimensional color Doppler echocardiography for the quantification of mitral regurgitation according to the severity and characteristics. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 7:535–544
de Agustín JA et al (2012) Direct measurement of proximal isovelocity surface area by single-beat three-dimensional color Doppler echocardiography in mitral regurgitation: a validation study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:815–823
Thavendiranathan P et al (2012) Automated quantification of mitral inflow and aortic outflow stroke volumes by three-dimensional real-time volume color-flow doppler transthoracic Echocardiography: comparison with pulsed-wave doppler and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25:56–65
Uretsky S et al (2018) A comparative assessment of echocardiographic parameters for determining primary mitral regurgitation severity using magnetic resonance imaging as a reference standard. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 31:992–999
Blanken CPS et al (2018) Advanced cardiac MRI techniques for evaluation of left-sided valvular heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 48:318–329
Nordmeyer S et al (2013) Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 37:208–216
Uretsky S et al (2015) Discordance between echocardiography and MRI in the assessment of mitral regurgitation severity: a prospective multicenter trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 65:1078–1088
Capoulade R, Piriou N, Serfaty JM, Le Tourneau T (2017) Multimodality imaging assessment of mitral valve anatomy in planning for mitral valve repair in secondary mitral regurgitation. J Thorac Dis 9:S640–S660
Delgado V et al (2009) Assessment of mitral valve anatomy and geometry with multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:556–565
Izumo M et al (2013) Comparison of real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography to two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for quantification of mitral valve prolapse in patients with severe mitral regurgitation. Am J Cardiol 111:588–594
Kovalova S, Necas J (2011) RT-3D TEE: characteristics of mitral annulus using mitral valve quantification (MVQ) program. Echocardiography 28:461–467
Kagiyama N et al (2016) Efficacy and accuracy of novel automated mitral valve quantification: three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study. Echocardiography 33:756–763
Noack T et al (2015) Four-dimensional modelling of the mitral valve by real-time 3D transoesophageal echocardiography: proof of concept. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 20:200–208
Lee AP et al (2013) Quantitative analysis of mitral valve morphology in mitral valve prolapse with real-time 3‑dimensional echocardiography: importance of annular saddle shape in the pathogenesis of mitral regurgitation. Circulation 127:832–841
Cong T et al (2018) Quantitative analysis of mitral valve morphology in atrial functional mitral regurgitation using real-time 3‑dimensional echocardiography atrial functional mitral regurgitation. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 16:13
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Interessenkonflikt
F. Kreidel, T. Ruf, A. Tamm, M. Geyer, T. Emrich und R.S. von Bardeleben geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.
Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autoren keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kreidel, F., Ruf, T., Tamm, A. et al. Diagnostik der Mitralinsuffizienz. Herz 44, 574–585 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-04857-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00059-019-04857-3