Abstract
Central-place foragers must learn the resource and visual landscapes around them when they are in a new environment, to facilitate efficient foraging and navigation. We investigated how the colony-level exploration strategy of Temnothorax rugatulus ants changes over time. For this study, we introduced ants to a novel environment by placing them in a foraging arena and tracking their movements over 3 days for 5 h per day, prohibiting access to the arena at other times. To test whether any changes in movement behavior are due to chemical markings, we replaced the paper floor on the third day. We found that colony-level exploration activity decreased with time, but only within a roughly 1 m radius around the nest, possibly reflecting a shift from familiarization or marking walks to searching. Individuals’ movements overall also became slightly straighter and faster across and within days. However, unlike learning walks of other ant species, T. rugatulus ants did not pause more often when facing toward the nest. Reactions to chemical markings seem to play a minor role in our observed effects, as the exploratory behavior did not reset after the floor cover had been replaced. Thus, ant colony exploration and search behaviors adapt to the familiarity of their environment by becoming more dispersive, possibly aiding in search efficiency. This must be considered in lab studies on the foraging activity and behavior of ants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Open Science Foundation repository, https://osf.io/gc89p/?view_only=6ed42f0828c842d0a8fe02e7002b66db
References
Adorisio M (2018) Search, navigation and foraging: an optimal decision-making perspective. PhD, Scuola Internazionale Superiore di Studi Avanzi
Alloway TM, Buschinger A, Talbot M et al (1982) Polygyny and polydomy in three North American species of the ant genus Leptothorax Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche A J Entomol 89:249–274
Aron S, Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL, Boeve JL (1986) Foraging recruitment in Leptothorax unifasciatus: The influence of foraging area familiarity and the age of the nest-site. Ins Soc 33:338–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02224249
Aron S, Deneubourg J-L, Pasteels JM (1988) Visual cues and trail-following idiosyncrasy in Leptothorax unifasciatus: an orientation process during foraging. Insectes Soc 35:355–366
Baddeley B, Philippides A, Graham P et al (2009) What can be learnt from analysing insect orientation flights using probabilistic SLAM? Biol Cybern 101:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-009-0327-4
Bartumeus F, da Luz MGE, Viswanathan GM, Catalan J (2005) Animal search strategies: a quantitative random-walk analysis. Ecology 86:3078–3087. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-1806
Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67(1):1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bengston SE, Dornhaus A (2013) Colony size does not predict foraging distance in the ant Temnothorax rugatulus: a puzzle for standard scaling models. Insect Soc 60:93–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-012-0272-4
Benhamou S, Collet J (2015) Ultimate failure of the Lévy Foraging Hypothesis: two-scale searching strategies outperform scale-free ones even when prey are scarce and cryptic. J Theor Biol 387:221–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2015.09.034
Beros S, Lenhart A, Scharf I et al (2021) Extreme lifespan extension in tapeworm-infected ant workers. R Soc Open Sci 8:202118. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.202118
Bläßle A, Tyson RC (2016) First capture success in two dimensions: The search for prey by a random walk predator in a comprehensive space of random walks. Ecol Complex 28:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.09.004
Bolivar VJ, Caldarone BJ, Reilly AA, Flaherty L (2000) Habituation of activity in an open field: a survey of inbred strains and F1 hybrids. Behav Genet 30:285–293. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026545316455
Bowens SR, Glatt DP, Pratt SC (2013) Visual navigation during colony emigration by the ant Temnothorax rugatulus. PLoS ONE 8:e64367. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064367
Brebner JS, Makinson JC, Bates OK et al (2021) Bumble bees strategically use ground level linear features in navigation. Anim Behav 179:147–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.07.003
Buehlmann C, Graham P, Hansson BS, Knaden M (2015) Desert ants use olfactory scenes for navigation. Anim Behav 106:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.04.029
Cao TT, Dornhaus A (2012) Ants use pheromone markings in emigrations to move closer to food-rich areas. Insect Soc 59:87–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-011-0192-8
Chapin KJ, Paat VA, Dornhaus A (2022) Brood as booty: the effect of colony size and resource value in social insect contests. Behav Ecol 33:549–555. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac019
Clement L, Schwarz S, Wystrach A (2022) An intrinsic oscillator underlies visual navigation in ants. Curr Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2022.11.059
Collett TS, Zeil J (2018) Insect learning flights and walks. Curr Biol 28:R984–R988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2018.04.050
Cox AS, Kesler DC (2012) Prospecting behavior and the influenceof forest cover on natal dispersal in a resident bird. Behav Ecol 23:1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars076
Degen J, Kirbach A, Reiter L et al (2015) Exploratory behaviour of honeybees during orientation flights. Anim Behav 102:45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.030
Dornhaus A, Franks NR, Hawkins RM, Shere HNS (2004) Ants move to improve: colonies of Leptothorax albipennis emigrate whenever they find a superior nest site. Anim Behav 67:959–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2003.09.004
Dyer FC (1998) 5 - Spatial Cognition: Lessons from Central-place Foraging Insects. In: Balda RP, Pepperberg IM, Kamil AC (eds) Animal cognition in nature. Academic Press, London, pp 119–154
Fagan WF, Lewis MA, Auger-Méthé M et al (2013) Spatial memory and animal movement. Ecol Lett 16:1316–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12165
Fleischmann PN, Christian M, Müller VL et al (2016) Ontogeny of learning walks and the acquisition of landmark information in desert ants, Cataglyphis fortis. J Exp Biol 219:3137–3145. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.140459
Fleischmann PN, Grob R, Wehner R, Rössler W (2017) Species-specific differences in the fine structure of learning walk elements in Cataglyphis ants. J Exp Biol 220:2426–2435. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.158147
Fowler SL, Costa DP, Arnould JPY (2007) Ontogeny of movements and foraging ranges in the Australian Sea Lion. Mar Mamm Sci 23:598–614. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-7692.2007.00134.x
Franklin EL (2014) The journey of tandem running: the twists, turns and what we have learned. Insect Soc 61:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-013-0325-3
Franks NR, Dornhaus A, Hitchcock G et al (2007) Avoidance of conspecific colonies during nest choice by ants. Anim Behav 73:525–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.05.020
Hunt ER, Baddeley RJ, Worley A et al (2016) Ants determine their next move at rest: motor planning and causality in complex systems. Open Sci 3:150534. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150534
Hunt ER, Kendall C, Stanbury E et al (2018) Complementary landmarks facilitate ant navigation. Behav Proc 157:702–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2018.03.004
James A, Plank MJ, Brown R (2008) Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: ballistic versus Lévy versus Brownian strategies. Phys Rev E 78:051128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.051128
Jayatilaka P, Murray T, Narendra A, Zeil J (2018) The choreography of learning walks in the Australian jack jumper ant Myrmecia croslandi. J Exp Biol 221:jeb185306. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.185306
Landler L, Ruxton GD, Malkemper EP (2021) Advice on comparing two independent samples of circular data in biology. Sci Rep 11:20337. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99299-5
Lenoir A, Depickère S, Devers S et al (2009) Hydrocarbons in the Ant Lasius niger: from the cuticle to the nest and home range marking. J Chem Ecol 35:913–921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-009-9669-6
Lenth RV, Bolker B, Buerkner P, Herve M (2023) emmeans: estimated marginal means, aka Least-Squares Means. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Accessed 15 Feb 2023
Maschwitz U, Lenz S, Buschinger A (1986) Individual specific trails in the ant Leptothorax affinis (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Experientia 42:1173–1174. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01941298
McGlynn TP (2012) The ecology of nest movement in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 57:291–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-120710-100708
McLeman MA, Pratt SC, Franks NR (2002) Navigation using visual landmarks by the ant Leptothorax albipennis. Insectes Soc 49:203–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-002-8302-2
Müller M, Wehner R (2010) Path integration provides a scaffold for landmark learning in desert ants. Curr Biol 20:1368–1371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.035
Murray T, Kócsi Z, Dahmen H et al (2020) The role of attractive and repellent scene memories in ant homing (Myrmecia croslandi). J Exp Biol 223:jeb210021. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.210021
Narendra A, Reid SF, Greiner B et al (2010) Caste-specific visual adaptations to distinct daily activity schedules in Australian Myrmecia ants. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.1378
Nicholson DJ, Judd SP, Cartwright BA, Collett TS (1999) Learning walks and landmark guidance in wood ants (Formica rufa). J Exp Biol 202:1831–1838. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.202.13.1831
Osborne JL, Smith A, Clark SJ et al (2013) The Ontogeny of bumblebee flight trajectories: from naïve explorers to experienced foragers. PLoS ONE 8:e78681. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0078681
Paulissen MA (2008) Spatial learning in the little brown skink, Scincella lateralis: the importance of experience. Anim Behav 76:135–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.017
Philippides A, de Ibarra NH, Riabinina O, Collett TS (2013) Bumblebee calligraphy: the design and control of flight motifs in the learning and return flights of Bombus terrestris. J Exp Biol 216:1093–1104. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.081455
Popp S, Dornhaus A (2023) Ants combine systematic meandering and correlated random walks when searching for unknown resources. iScience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105916
Pratt SC, Brooks SE, Franks NR (2001) The Use of Edges in Visual Navigation by the Ant Leptothorax albipennis. Ethology 107:1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0310.2001.00749.x
R Core Team (2022) R: a language and environment for statistical computing
Ramirez MD, Speiser DI, Pankey MS, Oakley TH (2011) Understanding the dermal light sense in the context of integrative photoreceptor cell biology. Vis Neurosci 28:265–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952523811000150
Russell JC, McMorland AJC, MacKay JWB (2010) Exploratory behaviour of colonizing rats in novel environments. Anim Behav 79:159–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.10.020
Sasaki T, Pratt SC (2021) Tandem running recruitment by Temnothorax ants as a model system for social learning. In: Kaufman AB, Kaufman JC, Call J (eds) The Cambridge handbook of animal cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 472–485
Sasaki T, Danczak L, Thompson B et al (2020) Route learning during tandem running in the rock ant Temnothorax albipennis. J Exp Biol 22:3. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.221408
Schafer RJ, Holmes S, Gordon DM (2006) Forager activation and food availability in harvester ants. Anim Behav 71:815–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.024
Soibam B, Shah S, Gunaratne GH, Roman GW (2013) Modeling novelty habituation during exploratory activity in Drosophila. Behav Proc 97:63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2013.04.005
Steck K, Knaden M, Hansson BS (2010) Do desert ants smell the scenery in stereo? Anim Behav 79:939–945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.01.011
Sturgis SJ, Greene MJ, Gordon DM (2011) Hydrocarbons on Harvester Ant (Pogonomyrmex barbatus) middens guide foragers to the nest. J Chem Ecol 37:514–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-9947-y
Vaes O, Detrain C (2022) Colony specificity and starvation-driven changes in activity patterns of the red ant Myrmica rubra. PLoS ONE 17:e0273087. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0273087
Voss R, Zeil J (1998) Active vision in insects: an analysis of object-directed zig-zag flights in wasps (Odynerus spinipes, Eumenidae). J Comp Physiol A 182:377–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003590050187
Walter T, Couzin ID (2021) TRex, a fast multi-animal tracking system with markerless identification, and 2D estimation of posture and visual fields. Elife 10:e64000. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64000
Wong K, Elegante M, Bartels B et al (2010) Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res 208:450–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.023
Woodgate JL, Makinson JC, Lim KS et al (2016) Life-long radar tracking of bumblebees. PLoS ONE 11:e0160333. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160333
Zeil J, Fleischmann PN (2019) The learning walks of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News 29:93–110
Zollikofer C, Wehner R, Fukushi T (1995) Optical scaling in conspecific Cataglyphis ants. J Exp Biol 198:1637–1646. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.198.8.1637
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the undergraduate students Tahsin Rasheed, Salsabeal Jarrah, Brandy Snow Hadley-Nihiser, and Katie Perotti for their diligent manual processing of tracking data.
Funding
This work was supported by National Science Foundation (IOS-1455983 and DBI 156452); and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (4024140).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SP & AD: conceptualization, methodology, and project administration; SP: software, formal analysis, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—original draft, and visualization; AD: writing—review & editing, supervision, and funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Popp, S., Dornhaus, A. Ant colonies explore novel environments with more slower, curvier walks, particularly near the nest. Insect. Soc. 70, 463–474 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-023-00938-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-023-00938-z