Skip to main content
Log in

Nest relocation in the slavemaking ants Formica subintegra and Formica pergandei: a response to host nest availability that increases raiding success

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Insectes Sociaux Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social insects typically occupy spatially fixed nests which may thus constrain their mobility. Nevertheless, colony movements are a frequent component of the life cycle of many social insects, particularly ants. Nest relocation in ants may be driven by a variety of factors, including nest deterioration, seasonality, disturbances, changes in microclimate, and local depletion of resources. The colony movements of slavemaking ants have been noted anecdotally, and in recent studies such relocations were primarily attributed to nest deterioration or shifts to overwintering locations. In this study we explore nest relocations in large colonies of formicine slavemakers which occupy stable and persistent earthen nest mounds. We investigate the hypothesis that colony relocations of these slavemakers are best explained by efforts to improve raiding success by seeking areas of higher host availability. Five summers of monitoring the raiding behavior of 11–14 colonies of the slavemakers Formica subintegra and Formica pergandei revealed relatively frequent nest relocations: of 14 colonies that have been tracked for at least three of 5 years, all but one moved at least once by invading existing host nests. Movements tended to occur in the middle of the raiding season and were typically followed by continued raiding of nearby host colonies. Spatial patterns of movements suggest that their purpose is to gain access to more host colonies to raid: the distance moved is typically farther than the mean raiding distance before the move, which may indicate an effort to escape their local neighborhood. Furthermore, the mean distance of raids after relocation is shorter than the distance before relocation. For many slavemaking ant colonies, particularly those on the verge of relocating, raiding distance increased as the raiding season progressed. In addition, movements tended to be toward areas of higher local host density. Nest relocation is likely an important component of the ecology of slavemaking ants that contributes to the dynamic nature of their interaction with the host ant population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Referencess

  • Alloway T.M. 1979. Raiding behaviour of two species of slave-making ants, Harpagoxenus americanus (Emery) and Leptothorax duloticus Wesson (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Anim. Behav. 27: 202–210

  • Baddeley A. and Turner R. 2005. Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. J. Stat. Soft. 12: 1–42

  • Banschbach V.S. and Herbers J.M.1999. Nest movements and population spatial structure of the forest ant Myrmica punctiventris (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 92: 414–423

  • Bono J.M., Antolin M.F. and Herbers J.M. 2006a. Parasite virulence and host resistance in a slave-making ant community. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8: 1117–1128

  • Bono J.M., Gordon E.R., Antolin M.F. and Herbers J.M. 2006b. Raiding activity of an obligate (Polyergus breviceps) and two facultative (Formica puberula and F. gynocrates) slave-making ants. J. Insect Behav. 19: 429–446

  • Buschinger A. 2009. Social parasitism among ants: a review (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 12: 219–235

  • Cool-Kwait E. and Topoff H. 1984. Raid organization and behavioral development in the slave-making ant Polyergus lucidus Mayr. Insect. Soc. 31: 361–374

  • D’Ettorre P. and Heinze J. 2001. Sociobiology of slave-making ants. Acta Etholog. 3: 67–82

  • Droual R. 1983. The organization of nest evacuation in Pheidole desertorum Wheeler and P. hyatti Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 203–208

  • Droual R. and Topoff H. 1981. The emigration behavior of two species of the genus Pheidole (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Psyche 88: 135–150

  • Fisher B.L. and Cover S.P. 2007. Ants of North America: A Guide to the Genera. University of California Press, Berkeley CA. 194 pp

  • Foitzik S., Achenbach A. and Brandt M. 2009. Locally adapted social parasite affects density, social structure, and life history of its ant hosts. Ecology 90: 1195–1206

  • Foitzik S. and Heinze J. 1998. Nest site limitation and colony takeover in the ant Leptothorax nylanderi. Behav. Ecol. 9: 367–375

  • Gibb H. and Hochuli D.F. 2003.Nest relocation in the golden spiny ant, Polyrhachis ammon: environmental cues and temporal castes. Insect. Soc. 50: 323–329

  • Gordon D.M. 1992. Nest relocation in harvester ants. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85: 44–47

  • Herbers J.M. 1985. Seasonal structuring of a north temperate ant community. Insect. Soc. 32: 224–240

  • Hölldobler B. and Wilson E.O. 1990. The Ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

  • Johnson C. A. and Herbers J.M. 2006. Impact of parasite sympatry on the geographic mosaic of coevolution. Ecology 87: 382–394

  • Kwait E.C. and Topoff H. 1983. Emigration raids by slave-making ants: a rapid-transit system for colony relocation (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 90: 307–312

  • Marlin A.J.C. 1971. The mating, nesting and ant enemies of Polyergus lucidus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Am. Midl. Nat. 86: 181–189

  • McGlynn T.P. 2012. The ecology of nest movement in social insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 57: 291–308

  • Mori A., Grasso D.A. and Le Moli F. 2000. Raiding and foraging behavior of the blood-red ant, Formica sanguinea Latr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). J. Insect Behav. 13: 421–430

  • R Core Team. 2012. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/

  • Regnier F.E. and Wilson E.O. 1971. Chemical communication and “propaganda” in slave-maker ants. Science 172: 267–269

  • Savolainen R. and Deslippe R.J. 1996. Facultative and obligate slavery in formicine ants: frequency of slavery, and proportion and size of slaves. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 57: 47–58

  • Savolainen R. and Deslippe R.J. 2001. Facultative and obligate slave making in Formica ants. Naturwissenschaften 88: 347–350

  • Savolainen R. and Seppä P. 1996. Genetic relatedness among worker nestmates of 3 three formicine slave-making ants. Insect. Soc. 43: 31–36

  • Scharf I., Fischer-Blass B. and Foitzik S. 2011. Spatial structure and nest demography reveal the influence of competition, parasitism and habitat quality on slavemaking ants and their hosts. BMC Ecol. 11: 9

  • Smallwood J.1982a. Nest relocations in ants. Insect. Soc. 29: 138–147

  • Smallwood J. 1982b. The effect of shade and competition on emigration rate in the ant Aphaenogaster rudis. Ecology 63: 124–134

  • Snelling R.R. and Buren W.F. 1985. Description of a new species of slave-making ant in the Formica sanguinea group (Hymenoptera: Formicidae. Gt. Lakes Entomol. 18: 69–78

  • Stuart R.J. and Alloway T.M. 1982. Territoriality and the origin of slave raiding in Leptothoracine ants. Science 215: 1262–1263

  • Sundström L., Seppä P. and Pamilo P. 2005. Genetic population structure and dispersal patterns in Formica ants—a review. Annal. Zool. Fenn. 42: 163–177

  • Talbot M. and Kennedy C.H. 1940. The slave-making ant, Formica sanguinea subintegra Emery, its raids, nuptial flights and nest structure. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 33: 560–577

  • Topoff H., Inez-Pagani M., Mack L. and Goldstein M. 1985. Behavioral ecology of the slave-making ant, Polyergus breviceps, in a desert habitat. Southwest Nat. 30: 289–295

  • Trager J.C. and Johnson C. 1985. A slave-making ant in Florida: Polyergus lucidus with observations on the natural history of its host Formica archboldi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Fla. Entomol. 68: 261–266

  • Wheeler W.M. 1908. Ants of Casco Bay, Maine, with observations on two races of Formica sanguinea Latreille. Bull. Am. Museum Nat. Hist. 24: 619–645

  • Wheeler W.M. 1910. Ants: Their Structure, Behavior, and Development. Columbia University Press, New York

  • Yasuno M. 1964. The study of the ant population in the grassland at Mt Hakkoda. III. the effect of the slave making ant, Polyergus samurai, upon the nest distribution pattern of the slave ant, Formica fusca japonica. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV 30: 167–170

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to SUNY Geneseo students Joe Aladeen, Alexa Brodsky, Hannah Doherty, Erica Leicht, Diana McGrath, Dillon Meier, Matthew Nanos, Kristin Schwab, Brianna Shares, Vincent Stowell, and especially Sarah Dzara and Daniel Kane for help in monitoring slavemaking ant raiding behavior and mapping colony locations. We appreciate the support of Dr. Gregg Hartvigsen, former chair of the Roemer Arboretum Advisory Board at SUNY Geneseo. Stefan Cover (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University) identified the ant species. Some summer funding for students was supported through a National Science Foundation Interdisciplinary Training in Undergraduate Biology and Mathematics (UBM) grant (PI: A. Macula, Co-PIs: G. Hartvigsen, C. Leary, and W. Pogozelski, SUNY Geneseo). The Geneseo Foundation, the SUNY Geneseo Student Association, and the SUNY Geneseo Department of Biology provided funding for supplies and equipment. Comments from two anonymous reviewers greatly improved this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. L. Apple.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Apple, J.L., Lewandowski, S.L. & Levine, J.L. Nest relocation in the slavemaking ants Formica subintegra and Formica pergandei: a response to host nest availability that increases raiding success. Insect. Soc. 61, 347–356 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-014-0359-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-014-0359-1

Keywords

Navigation