Skip to main content
Log in

Asymptotic limits and attractors for a laminated beam model

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für angewandte Mathematik und Physik Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with long-time dynamics of nonlinear laminated beams modeled under the assumptions of Timoshenko beam theory. The model considered here is composed of two-layered beams and was proposed by Hansen and Spies. It describes the slip produced by a thin adhesive layer uniting the structure. As the adhesive stiffness \(\gamma \) tends to infinity (effectively causing a no-slip condition between the two layers), we get the convergence (in some sense) to the Timoshenko beam system. The existence of smooth finite-dimensional global attractors and exponential attractors is proved using the recent quasi-stability theory. We also established that the long-time behavior of solutions of the nonlinear system is completely determined by the dynamics of large finite number of functionals. Finally, we compare the laminated beam model with the Timoshenko model in the sense of the upper semicontinuity of its attractors as \(\gamma \rightarrow \infty \).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnold, L., Chueshov, I.: Order-preserving random dynamical systems: equilibria, attractors, applications. Dyn. Stab. Syst. 13, 265–280 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Araruna, F.D., Zuazua, E.: Controllability of the Kirchhoff system for beams as limit of the Mindlin–Timoshenko system. SIAM J. Control Optim. 47(4), 1909–1938 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonheure, D., Gazzola, F., Lasiecka, I., Webster, J.: Long-time dynamics of a hinged-free plate driven by a nonconservative force. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Lináire 39, 457–500 (2022)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chueshov, I.: The theory of functionals that uniquely determine the asymptotic dynamics of infinite-dimensional dissipative systems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 53, 77–124 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chueshov, I.: Long-time dynamics of Kirchhoff wave models with strong nonlinear damping. J. Differ. Equ. 252, 1229–1262 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chueshov, I.: Approximate inertial manifolds of exponential order for semilinear parabolic equations subjected to additive white noise. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 7, 549–566 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chueshov, I.: Invariant manifolds and nonlinear master-slave synchronization in coupled systems. Appl. Anal. 86, 269–286 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Chueshov, I.: A squeezing property and its applications to a description of long-time behaviour in the three-dimensional viscous primitive equations. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. Sect. A 144, 711–729 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Chueshov, I.: Monotone Random Systems Theory and Applications. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1779. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Chueshov, I.: The theory of functionals that uniquely determine the asymptotic dynamics of infinite-dimensional dissipative systems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 53, 77–124 (1998)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chueshov, I.: Dynamics of Quasi-Stable Dissipative Systems. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Caraballo, T., Chueshov, I., Langa, J.A.: Existence of invariant manifolds for coupled parabolic and hyperbolic stochastic partial differential equations. Nonlinearity 18, 747–767 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chueshov, I., Lasiecka, I.: On global attractor for 2D Kirchhoff–Boussinesq model with supercritical nonlinearity. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 36, 67–99 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chueshov, I., Lasiecka, I.: Long-Time Behavior of Second Order Evolution Equations with Nonlinear Damping. Memoirs of AMS 912, AMS, Providence (2008)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Chueshov, I., Lasiecka, I.: Global attractors for Mindlin–Timoshenko plates and for their Kirchhoff limits. Milan J. Math. 74, 117–138 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Chueshov, I., Lasiecka, I.: Von Karman Evolution Equations. Well-Posedness and Long Time Dynamics. Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, New York (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chueshov, I., Lasiecka, I.: Determining functionals for a class of second order in time evolution equations with applications to von Karman equations. In: Analysis and Optimization of Differential Systems, Constanta, 2002. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp. 109–122 (2003)

  18. Chueshov, I., Rezounenko, A.: Finite-dimensional global attractors for parabolic nonlinear equations with state-dependent delay. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 14, 1685–1704 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Chueshov, I., Scheutzow, M.: On the structure of attractors and invariant measures for a class of monotone random systems. Dyn. Syst. 19, 127–144 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Chueshov, I., Eller, M., Lasiecka, I.: Finite dimensionality of the attractor for a semilinear wave equation with nonlinear boundary dissipation. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 29, 1847–1876 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Fator, L.H., Jorge Silva, M.A., Narciso, V.: Quasi-stability property and attractors for a semilinear Timoshenko system. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 36, 6117–6132 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Feng, B., Cabanillas, V.R., Coayla-Teran, E.A., Raposo, C.A.: Nonuniform laminated beam of Lord–Shulman type. Stud. Appl. Math. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/sapm.12530

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Feng, B., Ma, T.F., Monteiro, R.N., Raposo, C.A.: Dynamics of laminated Timoshenko beams. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. 30, 1489–1507 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Geredeli, P.G., Lasiecka, I.: Asymptotic analysis and upper semicontinuity with respect to rotational inertia of attractors to von Karman plates with geometrically localized dissipation and critical nonlinearity. Nonlinear Anal. 91, 72–92 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Girya, T.V., Chueshov, I.D.: Inertial manifolds and stationary measures for stochastically perturbed dissipative dynamical systems. Mat. Sb. 186, 29–46 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hale, J.K.: Asymptotic Behavior of Dissipative Systems. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2010)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Hale, J.K., Raugel, G.: Upper semicontinuity of the attractor for a singulary perturbed hyperbolic equation. J. Differ. Equ. 73, 197–214 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Han, S.M., Benaroya, H., Wei, T.: Dynamics of transversely vibration beams using four engineering theories. J. Sound Vib. 225, 935–988 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen, S.W.: A model for a two-layered plate with interfacial slip. In: Desch, W., Kappel, F., Kunisch, K. (eds.) Control and Estimation of Distributed Parameter Systems: Nonlinear Phenomena, pp. 143–170. Birkhäuser Basel, Basel (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Hansen, S.W., Spies, R.: Structural damping in a laminated beams due to interfacial slip. J. Sound Vib. 204, 183–202 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Khalili, Z., Ouchenane, D., El Hamidi, A.: Stability results for laminated beam with thermo-visco-elastic effects and localized nonlinear damping Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 67, 103555 (2022)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lagnese, J., Lions, J.-L.: Modelling Analysis and Control of Thin Plates. Recherches en Mathématiques Appliquées, vol. 6. Masson, Paris (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, G., Kong, X., Liu, W.: General decay for a laminated beam with structural damping and memory: the case of non-equal wave speeds. J. Integral Equ. Appl. 30(1), 95–116 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Lions, J.L.: Contrôlabilité Exacte, Pertubations et Estabilisation de Systèmes Distribuées, Tome I, Contrôlabilité Exacte, RMA 8. Masson, Paris (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Menzala, G.P., Zuazua, E.: The beam equation as a limit of 1-D nonlinear Von Kármán model. Appl. Math. Lett. 12, 47–52 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Pazy, A.: Semigroups of Linear Operators and Applications to Partial Differential Equations, vol. 44. Springer, Berlin (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Raposo, C.A.: Exponential stability for a structure with interfacial slip and frictional damping. Appl. Math. Lett. 53, 85–91 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Raposo, C.A., Ayala, Y.S.S., Nonato, C.A.S.: Laminated beams with time-varying delay. Osaka J. Math. 58(4), 929–945 (2021)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Raposo, C.A., Villagrán, O.V., Muñoz Rivera, J.E., Alves, M.S.: Hybrid laminated Timoshenko beam. J. Math. Phys. 58, 101512 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Simon, J.: Compact sets in the space \(L^p(0, T;B)\). Ann. Math. Pura Appl. 148, 5–96 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Timoshenko, S.P.: On the correction for shear of the differential equation for transverse vibrations of prismatic bars. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 41, 744–746 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, J.M., Xu, G.Q., Yung, S.P.: Exponential stabilization of laminated beams with structural damping and boundary feedback controls. SIAM J. Control Optim. 44, 1575–1597 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

M. M. Freitas thanks the CNPq for financial support through the project # 313081/2021-2, Brazil;

A. J. A. Ramos thanks the CNPq for financial support through the project # 310729/2019-0, Brazil.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MMF and CAR conceived of the presented idea. MMF and LGRM performed the computations. AJAR and JF have an extensive search of the literature and introduced the problem. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. M. Freitas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Long-time behavior of quasi-stable gradient systems

Appendix A: Long-time behavior of quasi-stable gradient systems

In this appendix, we present some definitions related to global attractors for quasi-stable gradient systems that can be found in recent references such as [11, 16]. A dynamical system is a pair (HS(t)), where H is a Banach space and S(t) is a continuous semigroup defined on H. We recall that a set \(\mathcal {A}\subset H\) is a global attractor for (HS(t)) if it is compact, invariant, that is, \(S(t)\mathcal {A}=\mathcal {A}\) for all \(t\geqslant 0\), and uniformly attracting, that is,

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \lim _{t\rightarrow \infty } \textrm{dist}_H(S(t)B,\mathcal {A})=0, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

for any bounded set \(B\subset H\), where \(\textrm{dist}_H\) is the Hausdorff semi-distance in H.

As is well known in the literature, the existence of a global attractor is granted under suitable dissipativeness and compactness conditions. A dynamical system is called dissipative if it admits a bounded absorbing set, that is, a bounded set \(\mathcal {B}\subset H\) such that, for any bounded set \(B\subset H\), there exists a time \(T_B>0\) satisfying

$$\begin{aligned}\begin{aligned} S(t)B\subset \mathcal {B},\quad \forall t\geqslant T_B. \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$

A dynamical system is called asymptotically smooth if, for any bounded set \(B\subset H\) forward invariant \((S(t)B\subset B, t \geqslant 0)\), there exists a compact set \(K\subset \overline{B}\) that uniformly attracts B. Then, we have the following classical result (see [11, 16] and references therein).

Theorem A.1

Let (HS(t)) be a dynamical system dissipative and asymptotically smooth. Then, it possesses a unique compact global attractor.

To obtain the asymptotically smooth property, we shall introduce the concept of quasi-stability [16, Chapter 7, Definition 7.9.2].

Definition A.2

Let X and Y be three reflexive Banach spaces with X compactly embedded in Y. We consider the space \(H=X\times Y\) and the dynamical system (HS(t)) given by

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} S(t)y=(u(t),u_t(t)),\quad \quad y=(u(0),u_t(0))\in H, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(A.80)

where the function u has the regularity

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} u\in C\big ([0,\infty );X\big )\cap C^1\big ([0,\infty );Y\big ). \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(A.81)

The dynamical system (HS(t)) is called quasi-stable on a set \(B\subset H\) if there exists a compact seminorm \(n_X\) on the space X and nonnegative scalar functions a and c, locally bounded in \([0,\infty )\), and \(b\in L^1(0,\infty )\), with \(\displaystyle \lim _{t\rightarrow \infty }b(t)=0\), such that

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \Vert S(t)y_1-S(t)y_2\Vert _{H}^2\leqslant a(t)\Vert y_1-y_2\Vert _{H}^2, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(A.82)

and

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \Vert S(t)y_1-S(t)y_2\Vert _{H}^2\leqslant b(t)\Vert y_1-y_2\Vert _{H}^2+c(t)\sup _{0\leqslant s\leqslant t}[n_X(u^1(s)-u^2(s))]^2, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$
(A.83)

for any \(y_1,y_2\in B\). Here, we denote \(S(t)y_i=(u^i(t),u_t^i(t))\), \(i=1,2\).

The following result, which can be found in [16, Proposition 7.9.4], shows that the quasi-stability implies the asymptotic smoothness of the dynamical system.

Theorem A.3

Let (HS(t)) be a dynamical system given by (A.80) and satisfying (A.81). Then, (HS(t)) is asymptotically smooth if it is quasi-stable on every bounded positively invariant set of H.

The quasi-stability also implies the smoothness and finite dimensionality of the attractor (see [16, Theorems 7.9.6 and 7.9.8]).

Theorem A.4

Let (HS(t)) be a dynamical system given by (A.80) and satisfying (A.81). If (HS(t)) possesses a compact global attractor \(\mathcal {A}\) and is quasi-stable on \(\mathcal {A}\), then \(\mathcal {A}\) has finite fractal dimension, i.e., \(\dim _f^H\mathcal {A}<+\infty \). Moreover, any full trajectory \(\{(u(t),u_t(t)): t\in \mathbb {R}\}\subset \mathcal {A}\) has the following regularity property (in time)

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} u_t\in L^\infty (\mathbb {R}; X)\cap C(\mathbb {R};Y),\quad u_{tt}\in L^\infty (\mathbb {R};Y), \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

with bound

$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} \Vert u_t(t)\Vert _X^2+\Vert u_{tt}(t)\Vert _Y^2\leqslant R^2,\quad \forall t\in \mathbb {R}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$

where the constant R depends on \(\displaystyle \sup _{t\geqslant 0}c(t)\).

Definition A.5

A compact set \(\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\subset H\) is called an fractal exponential attractor for (HS(t)) if

  • \(\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\) is a positively invariant set, that is, \(S(t)\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\subset \mathcal {A}^{\exp }\) for all \(t\geqslant 0;\)

  • \(\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\) has finite fractal dimension in H

  • \(\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\) attracts bounded sets of H at an exponential rate; that is, for any bounded set \(D\subset H\) there exist \(t_{D}, C_{D}, \gamma _{D}>0\) such that

    $$\begin{aligned} \textrm{dist}_H(S(t)D,\mathcal {A}^{\exp })\leqslant C_{D} e^{-\gamma _{D}(t-t_{D})},\quad \forall t\geqslant t_{D}. \end{aligned}$$

If there exists an exponential attractor only having finite dimension in some extended space \(\widetilde{H}\supseteq H\), i.e., \(\dim _f^{\widetilde{H}}\mathcal {A}^{\exp }<+\infty \), then this exponentially attracting set is called generalized fractal exponential attractor.

Remark A.6

The word “generalized” is included to indicate that the finite dimensionality requirement is allowed in a topology weaker than H.

The following theorem concerns fractal exponential attractors to quasi-stable systems.

Theorem A.7

[16, Theorem 7.9.9] Let (HS(t)) be a dynamical system given by (A.80) and satisfying (A.81). Assume that (HS(t)) is dissipative and quasi-stable on some bounded absorbing set B. Assume also that there exists an extended space \(\widetilde{H}\supseteq H\) such that \(t\mapsto S(t)\) is Hölder continuous in \(\widetilde{H}\) for every \(y\in B\); that is, there exist \(0< \sigma \leqslant 1\) and \(C_{B,T}>0\) such that

$$\begin{aligned}\begin{aligned}\Vert S(t_1)y-S(t_2)y\Vert _{{\widetilde{H}}}\leqslant C_{B,T}|t_1-t_2|^\sigma ,\quad t_1,t_2\in [0,T], \ y\in B. \end{aligned}\end{aligned}$$

Then, the dynamical system possesses a generalized fractal exponential attractor \(\mathcal {A}^{\exp }\) whose dimension is finite in the space \(\widetilde{H}\).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Freitas, M.M., Raposo, C.A., Ramos, A.J.A. et al. Asymptotic limits and attractors for a laminated beam model. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 74, 147 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-02033-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-023-02033-6

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation