Abstract
In this paper, we consider the low Mach number limit of the weak solutions to the viscous compressible two-fluid model with one velocity and a pressure of two components in three spatial dimensions. For well-prepared initial data, we prove rigorously that the weak solutions of the compressible two-fluid model converge to the strong solution of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations as the Mach number tends to zero. Here, we allow that the two densities converge to different limits. Furthermore, the rates of convergence are also obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alazard, T.: Low Mach number limit of the full Navier–Stokes equations. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 180, 1–73 (2006)
Desjardins, B., Grenier, E.: Low Mach number limit of viscous compressible flows in the whole space. Proc. Ser. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 455, 2271–2279 (1999)
Desvillettes, L.: Some aspects of the modeling at different scales of multiphase flows. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 199, 1265–1267 (2010)
Danchin, R.: Zero Mach number limit in critical spaces for compressible Navier–Stokes equations. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. 35, 27–75 (2002)
Evje, S., Karlsen, K.H.: Global existence of weak solutions for a viscous two-fluid model. J. Differ. Equ. 245, 2660–2703 (2008)
Evje, S., Wen, H.-Y.: Analysis of a compressible two-fluid stokes system with constant viscosity. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 17, 423–436 (2015)
Evje, S., Wen, H.-Y., Zhu, C.-J.: On globalsolutions to the viscous liquid–gas model with unconstrained transition to single-phase flow. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 27(2), 323–346 (2017)
Feireisl, E., Nečasová, Š., Sun, Y.: Inviscid incompressible limits on expanding domains. Nonlinearity 27, 2465–2477 (2014)
Hoff, D.: The zero-Mach limit of compressible flows. Commun. Math. Phys. 192, 543–554 (1998)
Hartle, R.E., Sturrock, P.A.: Two-fluid model of the solar wind. Astrophys. J. 151, 95–98 (1968)
Ishimoto, J.: Numerical study of cryogenic micro-slush particle production using a two-fluid nozzle. Cryogenics 49, 39–50 (2009)
Jiang, S., Ou, Y.-B.: Incompressible limit of the non-isentropic Navier–Stokes equations with well-prepared initial data in three-dimensional bounded domains. J. Math. Pures Appl. 96, 1–28 (2011)
Kwon, Y.S., Li, F.-C.: Incompressible inviscid limit of the viscous two-fluid model with general initial data. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 70, 94 (2019)
Lions, P.L.: Mathematical Topics in Fluid Mechanics, Compressible Models, vol. 2. Clarendon, Oxford (1998)
Lions, P.L., Masmoudi, N.: Incompressible limit for a viscous compressible fluid. J. Math. Pures Appl. 77, 585–627 (1998)
Mellet, A., Vasseur, A.: Asymptotic analysis for a Vlasov–Fokker–Planck/compressible Navier–Stokes system of equations. Commun. Math. Phys. 281(3), 573–596 (2008)
Masmoudi, N.: Incompressible, inviscid limit of the compressible Navier–Stokes system. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré, Anal. Non linéaire 18, 199–224 (2001)
Ou, Y.-B.: Low Mach number limit for the non-isentropic Navier–Stokes equations. J. Differ. Equ. 246, 4441–4465 (2009)
Vasseur, A., Wen, H.-Y., Yu, C.: Global weak solution to the viscous two-fluid model with finite energy. J. Math. Pures Appl. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpur.2018.06.019
Wen, H.-Y.: On global solutions to a viscous compressible two-fluid model with unconstrained transition to single-phase flow in three dimensions, preprint, arXiv:1902.05190, (2019)
Yao, L., Zhu, C.-J., Zi, R.-Z.: Incompressible limit of viscous liquid–gas two-phase flow model. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 44, 3324–3345 (2012)
Acknowledgements
J. Yang’s research was partially supported by the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. U1204103).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, J., Cheng, P. Low Mach number limit of compressible two-fluid model. Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 71, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-019-1233-9
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00033-019-1233-9