Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Lessons from water scarcity of the 2008–2009 Gwangdong reservoir: needs to address drought management with the adaptiveness concept

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Aquatic Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous publications document increasing consensus in the scientific community that climate change will increase the severity and frequency of drought. However, constructing large infrastructures is often viewed as an unreliable and inefficient option in dealing with the problem of drought, owing to unpredictability of climate change. This study aims at illustratively presenting that there is much room to improve drought management without resorting solely to infrastructure options. The adaptiveness concept is first explained to examine the reasons of failure in drought management and appropriate options from the viewpoint of a systems approach. Thereafter, a Korean water scarcity case is defined as the system dynamics model. The model is implemented to include movement of water via the reservoir and water supply facilities, the operating rules of the reservoir, and the relation between water scarcity and customer stress. Simulation results demonstrate that adaptiveness of drought management was low because of untimely or limited options of the reservoir operator. They also show that most customer stress could be largely mitigated by two options chosen from the adaptiveness concept. It is finally concluded that drought management needs to be addressed with consideration of the adaptiveness concept before deciding solely on expansion of infrastructure upon facing challenges due to climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff RL (1971) Towards a system of systems concepts. Manage Sci 17:661–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn C (2008) 2009 Dam operation plan for preparation of drought. Water Future 41:66–73 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby WR (1956) An introduction to cybernetics, 1st edn. Chapman and Hall, London

  • Ashby WR (1958) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1:83–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlas Y (1996) Formal aspects of model validity and validation in system dynamics. Syst Dyn Rev 12:183–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates B, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu S, Palutikof J et al (2008) Climate change and water, technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Water (2007) A manual on analysis of cost-effectiveness for waterworks, chapter 5. Data. Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/topics/bukyoku/kenkou/suido. Accessed 4 May 2009 (in Japanese)

  • Dracup JA, Vicuna S, Leonardson R, Dale L, Hanneman M (2005) Climate change and water supply reliability. California Energy Commission, PIER Energy-Related Environmental Research, CEC-500-2005-053

  • Ford A (1999) Modeling the environment: an introduction to system dynamics modeling of environmental systems, 1st edn. Island Press, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester JW (1961) Industrial dynamics, 1st edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick KD (1997) Adapting to climate impacts on the supply and demand for water. Clim Change 37:141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaines BR (1972) Axioms for adaptive behavior. Int J Man Mach Stud 4:169–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick P (2003) Global freshwater resources: soft-path solutions for the 21st century. Science 302:1524–1528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory R, Failing L, Higgins P (2005) Adaptive management and environmental decision making: a case study application to water use planning. Eco Econ 58:434–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigg NS (1975) Interactive simulation for water system dynamics. J Urban Plan D-ASCE 101:77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Holling CS, Light S (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley Centre (2005) Stabilizing climate to avoid dangerous climate change—a summary of relavant research at the Hadley Centre. Met Office. http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/. Accessed 7 January 2010

  • Holling CS (ed) (1978) Adaptive environmental assessment and management. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton JT, Ding Y, Griggs DJ, Noguer M, van der Linden PJ, Dai X, Maskell K, Johnson CA (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis, contribution of working group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeon M, Han Y (2009) Mitigation measures of water scarcity in southern Gangwon province. Gangwon Development Research Institute. http://www.gdri.re.kr. Accessed 6 May 2009 (in Korean)

  • Jeongseon County (2008) Annual statistics. http://www.jeongseon.go.kr. Accessed 21 April 2009

  • Jones RN (2000) Managing uncertainty in climate change projections—issues for impact assessment. Clim Change 45:403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KN (1999) Appraising adaptive management. Eco Soc 3: Art.3

  • Levine J (2004) Adaptive management in river restoration: theory vs. practice in western North America. Water Resources Center Archives. University of California, Multi-Campus Research Unit. http://repositories.cdlib.org/wrca/restoration/levine. Accessed 6 Oct 2010

  • Li L, Simonovic SP (2002) System dynamics model for predicting floods from snowmelt in North American prairie watersheds. Hydrol Process 16:2645–2666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lints T (2010) The essentials of defining adaptation. System Conference, 2010 4th Annual IEEE, pp 113–116

  • Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Eco Soc 13:art29

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD, Boers R, Feddes R, Fritsch JM, Hoff H, Kabat P, Können G, Kundzewicz Z (2003) Brief overview of the science on water and climate. In: Kabat P, Schulze RE, Hellmuth ME, Veraart JA (eds) Coping with impacts of climate variability and climate change in water management: a scoping paper. International Secretariat of the Dialogue on Water and Climate, DWC-Report no. DWCSSO-01, Wageningen, pp 2–28

  • Nash LL, Gleick PH (1993) The Colorado river basin and climatic change: the sensitivity of streamflow and water supply to variations in temperature and precipitation. US EPA, EPA 230-R-93-009

  • Ortolano L (1997) Environmental regulation and impact assessment, 1st edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resour Manage 21:49–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Sendzimir J, Jeffrey P, Aerts J, Berkamp G, Cross K (2007) Managing change toward adaptive water management through social learning. Ecol Soc 12(2):30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlidou MT (1978) Dynamic control of hierarchical public systems. In: Klir GJ (ed) Applied general systems research: recent developments and trends, 1st edn. Springer, pp 811–819

  • Radif AA (1999) Integrated water resources management (IWRM): an approach to face the challenges of the next century and to avert future crises. Desalination 124:145–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Samcheok City (2008) Annual statistics. http://www.samcheok.go.kr. Accessed 20 April 2009

  • Savenije HHG, van der Zaag P (2008) Integrated water resources management: concepts and issues. Phys Chem Earth 33:290–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim G, Lee W (2009) Mitigation measures to overcome drought. 2009 Drought Symposium, Sustainable Water Resources Research Center (in Korean)

  • Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell VC, Passell HD, Conrad SH, Thomas RP (2004) System dynamics modeling for community-based water planning: application to the Middle Rio Grande. Aquat Sci 66:357–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of renewable resources, 1st edn. McMillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener N (1950) The human use of human beings, 1st edn. Houghton Mifflin, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangeun Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Abdul-Talib, S. & Park, H. Lessons from water scarcity of the 2008–2009 Gwangdong reservoir: needs to address drought management with the adaptiveness concept. Aquat Sci 74, 213–227 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0213-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-011-0213-8

Keywords

Navigation