Skip to main content
Log in

The Floating Ball Paradox

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

In capillary theory there are two kinds of surface tension. There is the surface tension at the interface between two immiscible fluids. Thomas Young [9] also allowed for there to be a surface tension associated with a liquid-solid interface. He proceeded to use a balance of forces argument to derive the well-known contact angle condition along a liquid-liquid-solid intersection. The validity of this argument has recently been called into question by R. Finn [6]. A floating ball experiment discussed in that paper leads to an apparent paradox. We address this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry C. Wente.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Finn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wente, H.C. The Floating Ball Paradox. J. math. fluid mech. 10, 569–582 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-007-0251-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00021-007-0251-0

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000).

Keywords.

Navigation