Abstract
Background and objective
COVID-19 infection poses a special challenge to patients with dialysis patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical manifestations of dialysis patients with COVID-19 and the protective effect of the vaccine.
Methods
We included 41 studies based on big data, mainly analyzing the clinical symptoms of dialysis patients with COVID-19, the proportion of severe patients before and after vaccination, and the humoral reaction of vaccine in the body.
Results
6.1% to 35.7% of dialysis patients with COVID-19 developed respiratory distress symptoms and needed to be admitted to an intensive care unit for mechanical ventilation. The incidence and mortality of COVID-19 in dialysis patients before vaccination were 5.5% and 1.1%, respectively, and decreased to 4.5% and 0.6% in breakthrough infected patients. There was no statistical difference in serum conversion rates between dialysis patients and healthy controls, but the neutralizing antibody titer in the control group was 1922 (IQR 533 to 3186) AU/mL, and the neutralizing antibody titer in dialysis patients significantly decreased to 367 (IQR 171 to 1650) AU/mL (P=0.046).
Conclusions
Dialysis is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19, and generally has a poor seroconversion response to vaccines. It also confirms the protective effect of vaccines on high-risk populations such as dialysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
At present, the pandemic of novel coronavirus pneumonia has become a major international threat. Globally, as of May 25, 2022, more than 500 million confirmed cases of coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19) have been reported to the World Health Organization (WHO), including 6 million deaths. As of May 23, 2022, 10 billion doses of vaccine had been vaccinated (https://covid19.who.int). The high-risk groups of COVID-19-mediated critical diseases include obesity, diabetes, old age and chronic kidney disease (CKD) [1, 2]. The Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guideline group divided CKD into five stages according to the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and further subdivided stage 5 into dialysis dependent and dialysis independent [3]. The Global Burden of Disease (GBD) Collaboration identified CKD as the most common risk factor by estimating the number of people at increased risk for COVID-19 in 188 countries [4, 5]. The proportion of severe patients in patients with different CKD stages and even renal transplantation was higher than that in other groups [6]. Through the analysis of risk factors of death caused by severe COVID-19 on OpenSAFELY platform, it is suggested that the risk ratio of COVID-19-related death increases with the severity of CKD, and advanced CKD is one of the diseases with the highest risk of death [7]. The results of ERA-EDTA (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association) registration also support the high mortality caused by COVID-19 in dialysis and transplantation patients in Europe [8]. It was reported that the mortality rate of hemodialysis patients was 14% compared with that of patients without COVID-19 infection [9]. Although patients with CKD stage 4–5, dialysis or renal transplant are not included in these trials or the number of patients included is small [10], it is still necessary to directly protect CKD patients through rapid vaccination trials, because uremia and immunosuppressants may have a negative impact on vaccination response [11].
Mechanism of increased susceptibility of dialysis patients
CKD, especially end stage renal disease (ESRD), can cause functional defects in innate and adaptive immune cell populations, as well as uremia-related damage to monocytes, neutrophil phagocytosis, T lymphocytes, B lymphocytes and cytokines [12]. Among them, the increase in the level of proinflammatory factors, the imbalance of oxidative stress and inflammatory response, the increased susceptibility to viral infection, and the promotion of viral replication and expansion are the main reasons for the increased risk of pulmonary inflammation [13, 14]. Hemodialysis patients are easily infected with COVID-19 due to other comorbidities, older age and low immune function. At the same time, patients often need to go to the hospital for dialysis, which will increase contact and cannot maintain social distance. The increased risk of symptomatic infections is due to impaired immune status, chronic inflammation, high oxidative stress, accumulated uremic toxins and endothelial dysfunction [15].
Angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE 2), the main receptor of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the human body, is highly expressed in the kidney, so the renal tubules of CKD patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 may be attacked first [16, 17]. Figure 1 describes the mechanism of CKD patients' susceptibility after COVID-19 attacks the human body. Uremic toxins can affect the function of immune cells. For example, the accumulation of phenylacetic acid, indole sulfate and p-cresol sulfate promotes the inflammatory state and oxidative stress of uremia. Among them, the effect of p-cresol sulfate on phagocytes impairs the adaptive immune response of CKD patients. An important immune modulator in patients with renal failure is oxidant and antioxidant. The excessive production of oxidant promotes the expression of proinflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of immune cells. This balance is produced excessively in active oxygen and active nitrogen, and the antioxidant is broken after excessive consumption. Under normal circumstances, the kidney plays an immune regulatory role by producing vitamin D and erythropoietin (EPO). Vitamin D regulates the proliferation and differentiation of immune cells by promoting the tolerance of dendritic cells, promoting the production of anti-inflammatory IL-10, and regulating the production of Th1 and Th2 cytokines. EPO can inhibit effector T cells and memory T cells, and promote the differentiation of regulatory T cells. The lack of vitamin D and EPO in dialysis patients changes the immune status of patients, leading to an increase in proinflammatory effect and a decrease in anti-inflammatory effect [18,19,20]. The increase of intestinal permeability in uremic patients leads to the transfer of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) endotoxin from intestinal tract to systemic circulation. As an immunostimulator, LPS can promote the release of various proinflammatory cytokines. Some of these immunomodulatory mediators will inhibit innate and adaptive immunity, leading to "immune paralysis", and damaging the specific immune response of patients with renal failure to pathogens [21]. At the same time, COVID-19 will attack some small arteries and capillaries of the kidney. Compared with ordinary people, these factors directly lead to increased damage to the kidney caused by viruses and inflammatory cytokines in the blood [22]. Moreover, biological materials such as dialysate membranes and replacement fluids of dialysis patients have an impact on cell activation and the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines [23, 24]. In dialysis population, the development of COVID-19 may worsen the damaged renal function, and further lead to rapid deterioration of renal function and even death [22]. The main goal of COVID-19 vaccine is to produce immunity to the virus spike protein, so as to prevent the interaction between the spike protein and ACE2 [25].
Clinical manifestations and severity of disease
Several current studies show that the COVID-19-related mortality rate in the general population is 1.4–8% [26,27,28]. It is reported that among patients with severely impaired renal function, the risk of COVID-19-related death in patients receiving dialysis and kidney transplantation is three to four times higher than that in the general population [7]. Since the beginning of the pandemic, the study on the prevalence and mortality of dialysis patients has been carried out in the form of isolated observation or small case series. The advantage of our research is that we expanded the search scope to different geographical regions, collected data from multiple national registries, and finally searched 19 reports and analyzed the results of more than 100 dialysis centers registered on the European Renal Association COVID-19 database (ERACODA), and found that the incidence and mortality of COVID-19 infection in dialysis patients were 7.1% and 25.4%, respectively (Table 1) [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]. This is comparable to the mortality reported by 207 dialysis centers in Brazil (27.7%), 14 dialysis centers in Poland (30.4%), Scotland (26.7%), the Belgian Nephrological Society (29.6%), the Ontario Renal Reporting System (28.3%) and the British Renal Registry [47,48,49,50,51]. In general, our data are mainly from Asian and European populations, and there are differences in the incidence rate of patients. However, due to the lack of data in some cohorts, we cannot evaluate whether it is statistically significant. Although coming from different regions, the most common clinical manifestations of patients are still fever and respiratory symptoms, as well as the initial manifestations of atypical gastrointestinal symptoms. Bilateral and multifocal exudates are common in chest imaging. Some patients may have pleural effusion. Some patients have respiratory distress symptoms and need to enter the intensive care unit (ICU) and receive mechanical ventilation, which increases the risk of death. No significant difference in mortality was observed in different cohorts.
Most of the patients were not seriously infected, 81% of the cases were mild and 14% were severe [52]. To explore the severity of symptoms of dialysis patients, we listed 10 series of observed dialysis cases in Table 2 [12, 34, 37, 53,54,55,56,57,58,59]. The primary diseases of these patients are diabetes nephropathy and hypertensive nephropathy, and most of them are over 50 years. We found that the progression and poor prognosis of COVID-19 are not only related to complex underlying diseases, but also closely related to age and gender, with statistical significance. It has been proved that age is an important risk factor for dialysis patients. After stratified analysis according to different age groups, it is found that the mortality of dialysis patients is significantly higher than that of the general population [13, 14]. Similarly, a report by Jager also confirmed that the mortality rate of dialysis patients in different age groups was significantly different, especially in patients over 75 years, the 28-day mortality rate could be as high as 31.4% [8]. On the contrary, for the general population, the Italian report confirmed that the mortality rate of people aged 70–79 was 12.8%, while the mortality rate of people aged 60–69 was only 3.5% [60]. More than half of dialysis patients diagnosed with COVID-19 are male. Male patients seem to have a higher infection rate, but their progression and prognosis are not clear compared with women. Our results show that in different dialysis cohorts, the positive rate of COVID-19 PCR is as high as 32.8%, and the mortality rate is as high as 31.3%. This was similar to mortality in other smaller cohorts from New York, Spain, and Italy, where mortality ranged from 28 to 31% [28, 30, 43, 61]. Moreover, compared with the European population, the proportion of patients with severe and critical illness in the Asian population is low.
There is little information on the topic of peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Although the physiological basis of peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis is similar, their exposure risks and clinical reactions are different. The main advantage of patients receiving PD treatment is that they can carry out dialysis treatment in their own homes, reduce interpersonal contact, avoid contact with viruses due to taking tools on the way to see a doctor, and reduce the advantage of close contact with medical staff, who may be affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection [62, 63]. Therefore, PD seems to be the best kidney replacement therapy (KRT) for patients with end-stage renal disease during COVID-19 outbreak [63]. SARS-CoV-2 was recently found in PD effluents, but it is not clear whether the virus is likely to replicate [64]. These findings suggest that dialysate is the potential source of the most serious coronavirus strains, so it should be carefully managed [64]. The study of Ronco in Italian dialysis population has confirmed that the incidence of COVID-19 in PD patients is significantly lower than HD [65]. However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of hospitalization due to SARS-CoV-2 infection, admission to intensive care unit, need for mechanical ventilation and mortality. This was confirmed in Yavuz's research [66]. The prevalence, hospitalization rate and mortality of COVID-19 in HD and PD were 12.7% and 14% (P = 0.83), 50% and 46.2% (P = 0.79), 13.0% and 26.1% (P = 0.06), respectively [66]. In terms of respiratory symptoms of patients, PD removes fluid more continuously than HD, thus reducing the risk of high blood volume to a greater extent, but intraperitoneal fluid perfusion may increase intraperitoneal pressure and may damage lung function [67]. HD is prone to liquid accumulation, which may aggravate the impact on oxygenation [67].
COVID-19 vaccination of dialysis patients
At present, the success of the vaccine depends on the fact that the frequency of breakthrough infection of COVID-19 is lower than that of the unvaccinated population, and the performance is milder (the admission rate and mortality rate are lower) [68, 69]. This is due to the ability of the vaccine to induce the production of antibodies and cytotoxic T cells, which can resist subsequent infection [67]. The mRNA-based vaccine, after producing antigen in the host cell, is presented by antigen presenting cell and triggers the primary immune response. This leads to the differentiation of memory B and T cells, and the long-term protective immunity is achieved through the cytotoxicity mediated by antigen-specific antibody and antigen reactivation (Fig. 2) [70, 71]. The above immune changes in CKD patients interfere with the production of protective immunity during natural infection or after vaccination, which increases the incidence and severity of infectious diseases in these patients (Fig. 2) [18, 70, 71]. So far, few studies have investigated the protective effect of vaccines by estimating the prevention of COVID-19 infection and related hospitalization or mortality. In Table 3 [72,73,74,75,76,77], after receiving two doses of COVID-19 vaccine, the positive rate of COVID-19 PCR in dialysis patients was 4.5%, and the highest rate was 20.5% in different cohorts. The mortality rate of dialysis patients accounted for 0.6% of the total cohort, and the highest mortality rate among PCR positive patients in different cohorts was 4.3%. The data are heterogeneous, which may be caused by differences in the size of the cohort, the prevalence of complications, the control cohort and vaccination strategy. According to the research report of Canada, one dose of vaccine can reduce the risk of infection and serious consequences by 41% and 46%, respectively, compared with hemodialysis patients who have not been vaccinated. The two doses of vaccine reduced the risk of infection and serious consequences by 69% and 83%, respectively. The results of this study suggest that one dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine has a moderate effect in preventing COVID-19 infection, and the two doses are very effective in preventing infection and related serious consequences in maintenance dialysis population [72]. According to the report on vaccine types pointed out that the infection risk of dialysis population was reduced by 31–79% after BNT162b2 vaccine and 49–73% after mRNA-1273 vaccine [78].
In Table 4 [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86], we compared dialysis patients who received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine with the control group, which refers to healthy people or medical personnel without impaired renal function. To investigate the humoral response of patients to antibodies after two doses of vaccine, we defined seroconversion as an IgG antibody that can detect the receptor binding domain of S1 spinous process antigen (anti-S1-RBD IgG) against COVID-19. Compared with the control group, the response of hemodialysis patients to the vaccine was weaker, the serum conversion rate was lower (73–99% and 94–100%, respectively), and the antibody titer decreased rapidly. Almost all dialysis patients showed seroconversion after vaccination. Although the antibody concentration of patients decreased significantly, it was not as serious as that of renal transplant recipients. Data from vaccine experiments and observational studies showed that the anti-S1-RBD IgG titer of patients decreased with the passage of time, although the magnitude of the decline varied greatly between studies. This is consistent with the large-scale research results of Anand et al. The median index of anti-S1-RBD IgG in dialysis patients who were successfully vaccinated was 91.9 at 14–30 days after the completion of the vaccine. By 5–6 months, the median index value of the whole cohort decreased to 8.4 [87]. In patients with CKD stage 3–5, the main cause of CKD may affect the efficacy of the vaccine on COVID-19, because immunosuppressants may in turn affect adaptive immunity, thus affecting the IgG titer after vaccination [88]. In CKD patients who do not use immunosuppressants, the efficacy of the vaccine may be hindered, because the uremic environment, older age, and lack of vitamin D and erythropoietin (EPO) will change the innate immunity. Vaccines play roles in protecting dialysis patients mainly through cellular and humoral immunity, but the lack of EPO and vitamin D, the attack from cytokines, and the use of immunosuppressants will affect the immune process of the vaccine, which is shown in Fig. 2 [18, 89]. It is speculated that EPO and vitamin D supplementation at different stages of CKD may be crucial to maintain the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccine [90].
The neutralizing antibody against S1 protein can bind to the RBD region of COVID-19, block the binding of RBD to ACE2 receptor, and thus block the virus from invading human cells. Some neutralizing antibodies target the NTD region of S1 protein and may be involved in the interaction with C-type lectin [91]. In addition to being used as a standard to evaluate the effectiveness of vaccines, neutralizing antibodies can also be used as another passive immune weapon, which can block infection and eliminate pathogens, which is crucial for providing long-term immunity [95]. High serum conversion rates were observed within 14 days after infection and the first COVID-19 vaccine inoculation [92]. When given early after diagnosis and/or symptom onset, the effective SARS CoV-2 neutralizing antibody can reduce the risk of disease progression by about 70–80%, and reduce the incidence rate of symptomatic diseases in asymptomatic individuals [93]. Antibody combination can accelerate virus clearance in respiratory tract samples [94]. Subcutaneous use of antibodies also reduced the incidence rate of COVID-19 in uninfected, unvaccinated residents at baseline [94]. Since it has been observed that mutations related to drug resistance occur during single antibody treatment, while the frequency appears to be relatively low during combined treatment, it is necessary to develop new antibodies with cross-variant activity and high escape barrier to provide more options for antibody combination [95, 96].
Prevention of infection
Dialysis patients should reduce going out on non-dialysis days, avoid personal contact, and receive education and publicity about COVID-19 from dialysis institutions [62]. The treatment and waiting area of dialysis institutions should have good air conditioning and ventilation [97]. The temperature should be strictly monitored at the beginning and end of dialysis, and the symptomatic infected people should be identified early [62, 97]. The symptomatic infected people should try to wait in a separate isolation room, otherwise they should wait in a separate isolation room, and receive dialysis in the last shift of the day until the infection is eliminated [62]. The patient should wear an appropriate (surgical or N95) mask to filter 95% < 2.5 µm particles in the exhaled aerosol [97]. If the dialysis center finds a newly diagnosed or highly suspected COVID-19 infection case, it should be disinfected immediately [62]. Under the current global containment, PD and HD are the best methods of KRT which can reduce the transmission rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Similarly, for patients undergoing dialysis and kidney transplant recipients, in addition to giving the booster vaccine dose after the immunity of the primary immunization-enhanced vaccination begins to weaken, we also recommend that they receive additional primary vaccine dose to improve their initial vaccination response, and we can also consider temporarily stopping the immunosuppressive drug treatment that has a strong inhibitory effect on vaccine-induced immunity [98, 99]. Some studies have also supported the recommendation of a fourth dose of primary vaccine in such populations [100]. Importantly, compared with BNT162b2, mRNA-1273 vaccine has higher immunogenicity, and additional adjuvants and intradermal vaccine may also improve the immunogenicity of the vaccine [101].
Conclusion
COVID-19 infection presents a special challenge to patients with CKD, especially those with central hemodialysis. By summarizing the relevant literature, this paper summarizes the severity of CKD patients after COVID-19 infection, especially in dialysis population, the mortality and the proportion of severe patients are significantly higher than those without kidney disease. Dialysis is associated with an increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection and usually shows a less favorable seroconversion response to vaccines. Therefore, we summarized observational studies of breakthrough infection after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and the humoral response of patients to anti-S1-RBD IgG antibody. Finally, the protective effect of the vaccine on high-risk groups such as dialysis was confirmed. With the enhancement of the vaccine dose, a higher proportion of dialysis patients could maintain a higher titer of anti-S1-RBD IgG antibody. Unfortunately, according to the results of big data analysis, this paper cannot better distinguish between HD patients and peritoneal dialysis patients, so our results have certain limitations. At the same time, we also expect more large-scale experiments to be carried out in these two groups.
Data availability
The data supporting the results of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author of Park SH, Husain SA, Goicoechea M, Wu J, Kocak SY, Xiong F, Wald R, Zaidan M, Alberici F, Broseta JJ, Gansevoort RT, Sahin B, Westhoff TH, Zhang C, Ahmed W, Mehedinti AM, Keller N, Arici M, Oliver MJ, Broseta JJ, Cohen-Hagai K, Bell S, Cristelli MP, Anand S, Israel M, Yanay NB, Jahn M, Simon B, Gansevoort RT, Stegbauer J, Matsunami M, Piscitani L, Coritsidis GN, Sánchez-Álvarez JE, Westhoff TH, Zou R, Zhang C, Lano G, Carlier S, Gansevoort RT, Couchoud C according to reasonable requirements.
Abbreviations
- COVID-19:
-
Coronavirus disease in 2019
- SARS-CoV-2:
-
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2
- WHO:
-
World Health Organization
- GBD:
-
Global Burden of Disease
- KDIGO:
-
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
- CKD:
-
Chronic kidney disease
- KRT:
-
Kidney replacement therapy
- ERSD:
-
End stage renal disease
- ACE2:
-
Angiotensin converting enzyme 2
- ICU:
-
Intensive care unit
- EPO:
-
Erythropoietin
- LPS:
-
Lipopolysaccharide
- DPP-4:
-
Dipeptidyl peptidase-4
- Treg:
-
Regulatory T cells
- Tconv:
-
Conventional T cell
- WBC:
-
White blood cell
- EPOR:
-
Erythropoietin receptor
- DC:
-
Dendritic cell
- APC:
-
Antigen presenting cells
- MHC:
-
Major histocompatibility complex
- TCR:
-
T cell receptor
- BCR:
-
B cell receptor
- TLR:
-
Toll-like receptor
- ERACODA:
-
European Renal Association COVID-19 database
- PD:
-
Peritoneal dialysis
- HD:
-
Hemodialysis
References
Alam MR, Kabir MR, Reza S. Comorbidities might be a risk factor for the incidence of COVID-19: Evidence from a web-based survey. Prev Med Rep. 2021;21: 101319.
Huang C, Soleimani J, Herasevich S, et al. Clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19: a scoping review. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021;96(1):183–202.
Levey AS, Eckardt KU, Dorman NM, et al. Nomenclature for kidney function and disease: report of a Kidney Disease: improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Consensus Conference. Kidney Int. 2020;97(6):1117–29.
Clark A, Jit M, Warren-Gash C, et al. Global, regional, and national estimates of the population at increased risk of severe COVID-19 due to underlying health conditions in 2020: a modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8(8):e1003–17.
Murray CJ, Ezzati M, Flaxman AD, et al. GBD 2010: a multi-investigator collaboration for global comparative descriptive epidemiology. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2055–8.
Kant S, Menez SP, Hanouneh M, et al. The COVID-19 nephrology compendium: AKI, CKD, ESKD and transplantation. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):449.
Williamson EJ, Walker AJ, Bhaskaran K, et al. Factors associated with COVID-19-related death using OpenSAFELY. Nature. 2020;584(7821):430–6.
Jager KJ, Kramer A, Chesnaye NC, et al. Results from the ERA-EDTA Registry indicate a high mortality due to COVID-19 in dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients across Europe. Kidney Int. 2020;98(6):1540–8.
Navarrete JE, Tong DC, Cobb J, et al. Epidemiology of COVID-19 infection in hospitalized end-stage kidney disease patients in a predominantly African-American population. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(3):190–8.
Makar AB, McMartin KE, Palese M, Tephly TR. Formate assay in body fluids: application in methanol poisoning. Biochem Med. 1975;13(2):117–26.
Einollahi B, Cegolon L, Zhao S, Ghadian A, Javanbakht M. Chronic kidney disease major risk factor for COVID-19 severity and mortality, a scoping review. Iran J Kidney Dis. 2021;15(5):323–6.
Sahin B, Kose S, Eren G, Yoruk G. Clinical features, management, and outcome of hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2. Ther Apher Dial. 2022;26(1):171–7.
Pecly I, Azevedo RB, Muxfeldt ES, et al. COVID-19 and chronic kidney disease: a comprehensive review. J Bras Nefrol. 2021;43(3):383–99.
Carlson N, Nelveg-Kristensen KE, Freese Ballegaard E, et al. Increased vulnerability to COVID-19 in chronic kidney disease. J Intern Med. 2021;290(1):166–78.
Syed-Ahmed M, Narayanan M. Immune dysfunction and risk of infection in chronic kidney disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2019;26(1):8–15.
Zou X, Chen K, Zou J, Han P, Hao J, Han Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front Med. 2020;14(2):185–92.
Naicker S, Yang CW, Hwang SJ, Liu BC, Chen JH, Jha V. The Novel Coronavirus 2019 epidemic and kidneys. Kidney Int. 2020;97(5):824–8.
Babel N, Hugo C, Westhoff TH. Vaccination in patients with kidney failure: lessons from COVID-19. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2022;11:1–16.
Daenen K, Andries A, Mekahli D, Van Schepdael A, Jouret F, Bammens B. Oxidative stress in chronic kidney disease. Pediatr Nephrol. 2019;34(6):975–91.
Massry S, Smogorzewski M. Dysfunction of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in uremia: role of parathyroid hormone. Kidney Int Suppl. 2001;78:S195–6.
Steiger S, Rossaint J, Zarbock A, Anders HJ. Secondary immunodeficiency related to kidney disease (SIDKD)-definition, unmet need, and mechanisms. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(2):259–78.
Li J, Li SX, Zhao LF, Kong DL, Guo ZY. Management recommendations for patients with chronic kidney disease during the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic. Chron Dis Transl Med. 2020;6(2):119–23.
Libetta C, Sepe V, Dal Canton A. Bio-incompatibility and Th2 polarization during regular dialysis treatment. Int Rev Immunol. 2010;29(6):608–25.
Kourtzelis I, Markiewski MM, Doumas M, et al. Complement anaphylatoxin C5a contributes to hemodialysis-associated thrombosis. Blood. 2010;116(4):631–9.
Scialo F, Daniele A, Amato F, et al. ACE2: the major cell entry receptor for SARS-CoV-2. Lung. 2020;198(6):867–77.
Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the `Cytokine Storm’ in COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;80(6):607–13.
Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574–81.
Goicoechea M, Sánchez Cámara LA, Macías N, et al. COVID-19: clinical course and outcomes of 36 hemodialysis patients in Spain. Kidney Int. 2020;98(1):27–34.
Jung HY, Lim JH, Kang SH, et al. Outcomes of COVID-19 among patients on in-center hemodialysis: an experience from the epicenter in South Korea. J Clin Med. 2020;9(6):1688.
Valeri AM, Robbins-Juarez SY, Stevens JS, et al. Presentation and outcomes of patients with ESKD and COVID-19. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(7):1409–15.
Weiss S, Bhat P, Del Pilar FM, Bhat JG, Coritsidis GN. COVID-19 infection in ESKD: findings from a prospective disease surveillance program at dialysis facilities in New York City and Long Island. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(11):2517–21.
Broseta JJ, Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Cuadrado E, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in a Spanish cohort of CKD-5D patients: prevalence, clinical presentation, outcomes, and de-isolation results. Blood Purif. 2021;50(4–5):531–8.
Sánchez-Álvarez JE, Pérez Fontán M, Jiménez Martín C, et al. SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients on renal replacement therapy. Report of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology (SEN). Nefrologia (Engl Ed). 2020;40(3):272–8.
Seidel M, Hölzer B, Appel H, Babel N, Westhoff TH. Impact of renal disease and comorbidities on mortality in hemodialysis patients with COVID-19: a multicenter experience from Germany. J Nephrol. 2020;33(5):871–4.
Wu J, Li J, Zhu G, et al. Clinical features of maintenance hemodialysis patients with 2019 novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia in Wuhan. China Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;15(8):1139–45.
Zou R, Chen F, Chen D, Xu CL, Xiong F. Clinical characteristics and outcome of hemodialysis patients with COVID-19: a large cohort study in a single Chinese center. Ren Fail. 2020;42(1):950–7.
Xiong F, Tang H, Liu L, et al. Clinical characteristics of and medical interventions for COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients in Wuhan, China. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020;31(7):1387–97.
Min Y, Cheng L, Tu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of deceased hemodialysis patients affected by COVID-19. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(4):797–802.
Kocak SY, Kayalar AO, Karaosmanoglu HK, Yilmaz M. COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients: a single-center experience in Istanbul. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021;53(11):2385–97.
Yau K, Muller MP, Lin M, et al. COVID-19 outbreak in an urban hemodialysis unit. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76(5):690-695.e1.
Tortonese S, Scriabine I, Anjou L, et al. COVID-19 in patients on maintenance dialysis in the Paris region. Kidney Int Rep. 2020;5(9):1535–44.
Lano G, Braconnier A, Bataille S, et al. Risk factors for severity of COVID-19 in chronic dialysis patients from a multicentre French cohort. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13(5):878–88.
Alberici F, Delbarba E, Manenti C, et al. A report from the Brescia Renal COVID Task Force on the clinical characteristics and short-term outcome of hemodialysis patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Kidney Int. 2020;98(1):20–6.
Mazzoleni L, Ghafari C, Mestrez F, et al. COVID-19 outbreak in a hemodialysis center: a retrospective monocentric case series. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2020;7:2054358120944298.
Hilbrands LB, Duivenvoorden R, Vart P, et al. COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and dialysis patients: results of the ERACODA collaboration. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2020;35(11):1973–83.
Goffin E, Candellier A, Vart P, et al. COVID-19-related mortality in kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients: a comparative, prospective registry-based study. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2021;36(11):2094–105.
Pio-Abreu A, do Nascimento MM, Vieira MA, de Menezes Neves P, Lugon JR, Sesso R. High mortality of CKD patients on hemodialysis with Covid-19 in Brazil. J Nephrol. 2020;33(5):875–77.
Puchalska-Reglińska E, Dębska-Ślizień A, Biedunkiewicz B, et al. Extremely high mortality rates among hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 before the era of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: results from a large database from the North of Poland. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2021;131(7–8):643–8.
Bell S, Campbell J, McDonald J, et al. COVID-19 in patients undergoing chronic kidney replacement therapy and kidney transplant recipients in Scotland: findings and experience from the Scottish renal registry. BMC Nephrol. 2020;21(1):419.
De Meester J, De Bacquer D, Naesens M, Meijers B, Couttenye MM, De Vriese AS. Incidence, characteristics, and outcome of COVID-19 in adults on kidney replacement therapy: a regionwide registry study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(2):385–96.
Taji L, Thomas D, Oliver MJ, et al. COVID-19 in patients undergoing long-term dialysis in Ontario. CMAJ. 2021;193(8):E278–84.
Huang C, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan. China Lancet. 2020;395(10223):497–506.
Ahmed W, Al Obaidli A, Joseph P, et al. Outcomes of patients with end stage kidney disease on dialysis with COVID-19 in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates; from PCR to antibody. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):198.
Stefan G, Mehedinti AM, Andreiana I, et al. Clinical features and outcome of maintenance hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 from a tertiary nephrology care center in Romania. Ren Fail. 2021;43(1):49–57.
Keller N, Chantrel F, Krummel T, et al. Impact of first-wave COronaVIrus disease 2019 infection in patients on haemoDIALysis in Alsace: the observational COVIDIAL study. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2020;35(8):1338–411.
Turgutalp K, Ozturk S, Arici M, et al. Determinants of mortality in a large group of hemodialysis patients hospitalized for COVID-19. BMC Nephrol. 2021;22(1):29.
Ozturk S, Turgutalp K, Arici M, et al. Mortality analysis of COVID-19 infection in chronic kidney disease, haemodialysis and renal transplant patients compared with patients without kidney disease: a nationwide analysis from Turkey. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2020;35(12):2083–95.
Ozturk S, Turgutalp K, Arici M, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of hospitalised older patients with chronic kidney disease and COVID-19: a multicenter nationwide controlled study. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(9): e14428.
Couchoud C, Bayer F, Ayav C, et al. Low incidence of SARS-CoV-2, risk factors of mortality and the course of illness in the French national cohort of dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2020;98(6):1519–29.
Onder G, Rezza G, Brusaferro S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(18):1775–6.
Fisher M, Yunes M, Mokrzycki MH, Golestaneh L, Alahiri E, Coco M. Chronic hemodialysis patients hospitalized with COVID-19: short-term outcomes in the Bronx, New York. Kidney360. 2020;1(8):755–62.
Basile C, Combe C, Pizzarelli F, et al. Recommendations for the prevention, mitigation and containment of the emerging SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic in haemodialysis centres. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2020;35(5):737–41.
Alfano G, Fontana F, Ferrari A, et al. Peritoneal dialysis in the time of coronavirus disease 2019. Clin Kidney J. 2020;13(3):265–8.
Vischini G, D’Alonzo S, Grandaliano G, D’Ascenzo FM. SARS-CoV-2 in the peritoneal waste in a patient treated with peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int. 2020;98(1):237–8.
Ronco C, Manani SM, Giuliani A, Tantillo I, Reis T, Brown EA. Remote patient management of peritoneal dialysis during COVID-19 pandemic. Perit Dial Int. 2020;40(4):363–7.
Yavuz D, Karagöz Özen DS, Demirağ MD. COVID-19: mortality rates of patients on hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022;54(10):2713–8.
Chen TH, Wen YH, Chen CF, et al. The advantages of peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Semin Dial. 2020;33(5):369–71.
Nanduri S, Pilishvili T, Derado G, et al. Effectiveness of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among nursing home residents before and during widespread circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) variant—National Healthcare Safety Network, March 1–August 1, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(34):1163–66.
Fowlkes A, Gaglani M, Groover K, Thiese MS, Tyner H, Ellingson K. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection among frontline workers before and during B.1.617.2 (delta) variant predominance—eight U.S. locations, December 2020-August 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70(34):1167–69.
Stavropoulou E, Kantartzi K, Tsigalou C, et al. Microbiome, immunosenescence, and chronic kidney disease. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8: 661203.
Akchurin OM, Kaskel F. Update on inflammation in chronic kidney disease. Blood Purif. 2015;39(1–3):84–92.
Oliver MJ, Thomas D, Balamchi S, et al. Vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe outcomes in the maintenance dialysis population in Ontario, Canada. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(4):839–49.
Rodríguez-Espinosa D, Montagud-Marrahi E, Cacho J, et al. Incidence of severe breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in vaccinated kidney transplant and haemodialysis patients. J Nephrol. 2022;35(3):769–78.
Wand O, Nacasch N, Fadeela A, et al. Humoral response and breakthrough infections with SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 variant in vaccinated maintenance hemodialysis patients. J Nephrol. 2022;35:1–9.
Bell S, Campbell J, Lambourg E, et al. The impact of vaccination on incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with kidney failure in Scotland. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(4):677–86.
Medina-Pestana J, Teixeira CM, Viana LA, et al. Immunogenicity, reactogenicity and breakthrough infections after two doses of the inactivated CoronaVac vaccine among patients on dialysis: phase 4 study. Clin Kidney J. 2022;15(4):816–7.
Anand S, Montez-Rath ME, Han J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody response and breakthrough infection in patients receiving dialysis. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(3):371–8.
Sibbel S, McKeon K, Luo J, et al. Real-world effectiveness and immunogenicity of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients on hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022;33(1):49–57.
Grupper A, Sharon N, Finn T, et al. Humoral response to the Pfizer BNT162b2 vaccine in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;16(7):1037–42.
Yanay NB, Freiman S, Shapira M, et al. Experience with SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in dialysis patients. Kidney Int. 2021;99(6):1496–8.
Jahn M, Korth J, Dorsch O, et al. Humoral response to SARS-CoV-2-vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in patients on hemodialysis. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(4):360.
Simon B, Rubey H, Treipl A, et al. Haemodialysis patients show a highly diminished antibody response after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination compared with healthy controls. Nephrol Dial Transpl. 2021;36(9):1709–16.
Sanders JF, Bemelman FJ, Messchendorp AL, et al. The RECOVAC immune-response study: the immunogenicity, tolerability, and safety of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with chronic kidney disease, on dialysis, or living with a kidney transplant. Transplantation. 2022;106(4):821–34.
Kolb T, Fischer S, Müller L, et al. Impaired immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in dialysis patients and in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney360. 2021;2(9):1491–8.
Matsunami M, Suzuki T, Fukuda J, et al. Comparison of antibody response following the second dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in elderly patients with late-stage chronic kidney disease. Ren Replace Ther. 2022;8(1):13.
Piscitani L, Del Pinto R, Basili A, Tunno M, Ferri C. Humoral immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in hemodialysis patients: a retrospective, observational case-control pilot study. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2022;29(2):163–7.
Anand S, Montez-Rath ME, Han J, et al. SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antibody response and breakthrough infection in dialysis. medRxiv. 2021;55:1.
Glenn DA, Hegde A, Kotzen E, et al. Systematic review of safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with kidney disease. Kidney Int Rep. 2021;6(5):1407–10.
Hou YC, Lu KC, Kuo KL. The efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in chronic kidney disease and kidney transplantation patients: a narrative review. Vaccines (Basel). 2021;9(8):885.
Mahallawi WH, Ibrahim NA, Mumena WA. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines in patients under maintenance hemodialysis. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:5081–8.
Gupta SL, Jaiswal RK. Neutralizing antibody: a savior in the Covid-19 disease. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(3):2465–74.
Gudbjartsson DF, Norddahl GL, Melsted P, et al. Humoral immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in Iceland. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(18):1724–34.
Dougan M, Nirula A, Azizad M, et al. Bamlanivimab plus etesevimab in mild or moderate Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(15):1382–92.
Cohen MS, Nirula A, Mulligan MJ, et al. Effect of bamlanivimab vs placebo on incidence of COVID-19 among residents and staff of skilled nursing and assisted living facilities: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(1):46–55.
Gruell H, Vanshylla K, Weber T, Barnes CO, Kreer C, Klein F. Antibody-mediated neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. Immunity. 2022;55(6):925–44.
Copin R, Baum A, Wloga E, et al. The monoclonal antibody combination REGEN-COV protects against SARS-CoV-2 mutational escape in preclinical and human studies. Cell. 2021;184(15):3949-3961.e11.
Wei L, Wang J, Mei Z, et al. Managing the dialysis mode for people infected with COVID-19. Ren Fail. 2020;42(1):587–9.
Aslam S, Adler E, Mekeel K, Little SJ. Clinical effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in solid organ transplant recipients. Transpl Infect Dis. 2021;23(5): e13705.
Qin CX, Moore LW, Anjan S, et al. Risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections in adult transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2021;105(11):e265–6.
Bertrand D, Lemée V, Laurent C, et al. Waning antibody response and cellular immunity 6 months after third dose SARS-Cov-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transpl. 2022;22(5):1498–500.
Van Praet J, Reynders M, De Bacquer D, et al. Predictors and dynamics of the humoral and cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in hemodialysis patients: a multicenter observational study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32(12):3208–20.
Funding
This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81970583 and 82060138), the Key Project of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (no. 20224ACB206008), and the Kidney Disease Engineering Technology Research Centre Foundation of Jiangxi Province (no. 20164BCD40095).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
XZ performed the data analysis, wrote the manuscript, and reviewed articles. GX and QC devised the study and revised the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author claims that there is no conflict of interest in this article.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Anatolii Kubyshkin.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Chen, Q. & Xu, G. Clinical manifestations of COVID-19 infection in dialysis patients and protective effect of COVID-19 vaccine. Inflamm. Res. 72, 989–1000 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01723-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-023-01723-1