Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of Grasshopper Plugins for Topology Optimization in Varied Architectural Design Domains

  • Research
  • Published:
Nexus Network Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Topology optimization is a structural optimization method that aims to distribute material within a defined design domain. With the advancement of technology, topology optimization has become more popular in fields such as architecture. However, with the variety of tools available, users may find it challenging to decide which tool best suits their needs. Although grasshopper is widespread in architectural design, grasshopper plugins for topology optimization are one of the tools that are under-researched. This research uses four domain variations to explore their efficiency to conduct a comparative study of the grasshopper plugins: Millipede, tOpos, and Ameba. The setup process, resulting geometry, computation time, and volume fractions were used as comparison parameters. Each plugin was superior in one of these parameters. tOpos was, however, the fastest plugin and, along with Ameba, achieved target volume fractions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreassen, Erik, Anders Clausen, Mattias Schevenels, Boyan S. Lazarov and Ole Sigmund. 2011. Efficient topology optimization in MATLAB using 88 lines of code. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 43(1): 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-010-0594-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao, Ding Wen, Xin Yan and Yi Min Xie. 2022. Encoding topological optimisation logical structure rules into multi-agent system for architectural design and robotic fabrication. International Journal of Architectural Computing 20(1): 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/14780771221082257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendsøe, Martin P. and Ole Sigmund. 2003. Topology optimization: theory, methods and applications. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bialkowski, Sebastian. 2016. Structural optimisation methods as a new toolset for architects. 34th eCAADe Conference - Complexity & Simplicity.

  • Bialkowski, Sebastian. 2017. tOpos GPGPU accelerated structural optimisation utility for architects. 35th eCAADe Conference.

  • Bialkowski, Sebastian. 2018. Topology optimisation influence on architectural design process - enhancing form finding routine by tOpos toolset utilisation. 36th eCAADe Conference.

  • Dapogny, Charles, Alexis Faure, Georgios Michailidis, Grégoire Allaire, Agnes Couvelas and Rafael Estevez. 2017. Geometric constraints for shape and topology optimization in architectural design. Computational Mechanics 59(6): 933–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1383-6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Deaton, Joshua D. and Ramana V. Grandhi. 2014. A survey of structural and multidisciplinary continuum topology optimization: post 2000. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 49(1): 1-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0956-z

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Eren, Oğulcan and H. Kursad Sezer. 2019. Üretken tasarım ve topoloji optimizasyonu yaklaşımlarıyla ürün tasarımı. Uluslararası Bilim, Teknoloji Ve Sosyal Bilimlerde Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu.

  • Harmankaya, Zeynep and Mehmet Tuna. 2011. Effects of number of storeys and concrete strength on the building cost of the multi storied buildings produced by using tunnel form in turkey. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 26: 427-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • İlerisoy, Zeynep Yeşim and Merve Pekdemir Başeğmez. 2018. Conceptual research of movement in kinetic architecture. Gazi University Journal of Science 31: 342-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • İlerisoy, Zeynep Yeşim, Ali Aycı, Hilal Ayci and Esra Kınacı. 2021. Impacts of architectural education on entrepreneurial intention: a case study of senior architects from six universities in Turkey. International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2020-0269

  • Kurucu, Aybala Tuba and Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy. 2023. Structural performance of topologically interlocked flat vaults according to joint details. Periodica Polytechnica Architecture. https://doi.org/10.3311/PPar.19509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Kangqiang, Yongpeng He, Yang Yang and Lei Xiong. 2021. From topology optimization to complex digital architecture: A new methodology for architectural morphology generation. Advances in Civil Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6839627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Kai and Andrés Tovar. 2014. An efficient 3D topology optimization code written in Matlab. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 50(6): 1175-1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-014-1107-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Mizobuti, Vinicius and Luiz C. M. Vieira Junior. 2020. Bioinspired architectural design based on structural topology optimization. Frontiers of Architectural Research 9(2): 264-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naboni, Roberto, Anja Kunic and Luca Breseghello. 2020. Computational design, engineering and manufacturing of a material-efficient 3D printed lattice structure. International Journal of Architectural Computing 18(4): 404-423. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478077120947990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naboni, Roberto and Ingrid Paoletti. 2018. Architectural morphogenesis through topology optimization. In Handbook of research on form and morphogenesis in modern architectural contexts, ed. Domenico D'Uva: 69–92. Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.

  • Oliveira, Charles, Luna Steffen, Carlos Vasconcellos and Pablo Sanchez. 2018. Structural topology optimization as a teaching tool in the Architecture. Revista de Ensino de Engenharia 37(3). https://doi.org/10.5935/2236-0158.20180039

  • Preisinger, Clemens. 2013. Linking Structure and Parametric Geometry. Architectural Design 83. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1564

  • Rodríguez, René, Maicon Nágera, Pedro Toniasso and Guilherme Slaviero 2019. Topological optimization software tools: literature review and real application. Proceedings of the XL Ibero-Latin-American Congress on Computational Methods in Engineering, Natal/RN, Brazil, ABMEC.

  • Selmi, Mariam and Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy. 2022. A comparative study of different grasshopper plugins for topology optimization in architectural design. Gazi University Journal of Science Part B: Art Humanities Design and Planning 10(3): 323-334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selmi, Mariam and Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy. 2024. Evaluation of Tree-Like Structures Using Topology Optimization as a Design Method. Nexus Network Journal 26(1): 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00749-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao, Gefan. 2020. Comparison of BESO and SIMP to do structural topology optimization in discrete digital design, and then combine them into a hybrid method. In Architectural intelligence: selected papers from the 1st International conference on computational design and robotic fabrication (CDRF 2019), eds. Philip F. Yuan, Mike Xie, Neil Leach, Jiawei Yao and Xiang Wang: 219–232. Singapore: Springer Singapore.

  • Sigmund, Ole and Kurt Maute. 2013. Topology optimization approaches. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 48(6): 1031-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0978-6

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Takva, Çağatay and Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy. 2023. Structural analysis of steel load-bearing systems using tessellation method in geometric architectural design. Sādhanā 48(3): 118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02185-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyflopoulos, Evangelos and Martin Steinert. 2022. A Comparative Study of the Application of Different Commercial Software for Topology Optimization. Applied Sciences 12(2): 611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlah, D., R. Žavbi and N. Vukašinović. 2020. Evaluation of topology optimization and generative design tools as support for conceptual design. Proceedings of the Design Society 1: 451-460. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsd.2020.165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie, Yi Min. 2022. Generalized topology optimization for architectural design. Architectural Intelligence 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44223-022-00003-y

  • Yan, Xin, Dingwen Bao, Yufang Zhou, Yimin Xie and Tong Cui. 2022. Detail control strategies for topology optimization in architectural design and development. Frontiers of Architectural Research 11(2): 340-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Qiang, Wei Shen, Jin Wang, Yi Yi Zhou and Yi Min Xie. 2018. Ameba: A new topology optimization tool for architectural design. IASS Annual Symposium.

  • Zhu, Jihong, Han Zhou, Chuang Wang, Lu Zhou, Shangqin Yuan and Weihong Zhang. 2021. A review of topology optimization for additive manufacturing: Status and challenges. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics 34(1): 91-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2020.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Gazi University, 06570, Ankara, Turkey

    Mariam Selmi & Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy

Authors
  1. Mariam Selmi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zeynep Yeşim İlerisoy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariam Selmi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest and no authorship of the plugins or relation to their developers.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selmi, M., İlerisoy, Z.Y. Assessment of Grasshopper Plugins for Topology Optimization in Varied Architectural Design Domains. Nexus Netw J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-024-00782-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation