Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Varagavank Monastery’s Khachkar Motifs: Understanding Production Through Parametric Methods

  • Research
  • Published:
Nexus Network Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the traditional religious architecture through the examination of Armenian Khachkar motifs at Varagavank Monastery in Van, Turkey. “Khachkar” is pivotal within Armenian religious architecture, denoting a minor architectural style and symbolising “cross-stone.” The study employs a parametric identification method to extract the fundamental unit of Khachkar motifs and develop a model to explore various variations. By utilising a mathematical analysis, the research showcases the practicality of this approach in facilitating diverse transformations within intricate designs. The study offers a comprehensive analysis of the built heritage found in Armenian religious architecture, enhancing the understanding and appreciation of these cultural artefacts. The findings of this study on Khachkars make valuable contributions to architectural research and deepen our comprehension of their significance in Armenian religious art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdullahi, Y. and Embi, M. R. B. (2013). Evolution of Islamic geometric patterns. Frontiers of Architectural Research 2(2): 243-251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agirbas, A. (2020). Algorithmic decomposition of geometric Islamic patterns: a case study with star polygon design in the tombstones of Ahlat. Nexus Network Journal 22: 113–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alaçam, S., Güzelci, O. Z., Gürer, E. and Bacınoğlu, S. Z. (2017). Reconnoitring computational potentials of the vault-like forms: Thinking aloud on muqarnas tectonics. International Journal of Architectural Computing 15(4): 285-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alani, M. W. H. (2018). Computational investigation of the morphological design dimensions of historic hexagonal-based Islamic geometric patterns. PhD Thesis, Clemson University.

  • Alani, M. W. and Barrios, C. R. (2015). A parametric description for metamorphosis of Islamic geometric patterns. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia CAADRIA (pp. 20–22).

  • Alani, M. and Alaçam, S. (2023). Beyond Flat Surfaces Parametrıc Derıvatıons of Hıstorıcal Islamıc Geometrıc Desıgns. Architecture and Planning Journal (APJ), 28(3), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, F., Gomis, J. M., Blasco, J., Valiente, J. M. and Aleixos, N. (2015). A new method to analyse mosaics based on Symmetry Group theory applied to Islamic Geometric Patterns. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 130, 54-70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arik, M. and M. Sancak, (2007). Turkish-Islamic Art and Penrose Tilings. Balkan Physics Letters 15 (3): 84–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, J. (2003). Three traditions of self-similarity in fourteenth and fifteenth century Islamic geometric ornament. In Meeting Alhambra, ISAMA-BRIDGES Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–12).

  • Cenani, S. and Çağdas, G. (2007). A shape grammar study: form generation with geometric Islamic patterns. In Generative Art Conference (Vol. 10, p. 2).

  • Demiriz, Y. (2017). İslam Sanatında Geometrik Süsleme: Bir Envanter Denemesi. HayalPerest Kitap.

  • Donabédian, P. (2018). Can we call" khachkar" the Sudak cross-stones?

  • Erbaş, S. K. (2013). Mimaride Parametrik Tasarım ve Eğitimi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (4): 119-124

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgopoulos, A. (2018). CIPA’s perpectives on cultural heritage. Communications in Computer and Information Science, pp. 215–245

  • Hamzaoğlu, B. and Özkar, M. (2018). Zanaatın Sayısallaştırılması: Selçuklu Dönemi Oyma Taş Desenlerin Sayısal Üretim Araçları ile Yapımı. International Art Craft Space Congress.

  • Kaplan, M. and Cohen, E. (2003). Computer-Generated Celtic Design. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering, 3, 9-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karaca, Y. and Kızgın, E. E. (2021). Yedikilise Manastırı (Varagavank) Girişleri ve Süsleme Özellikleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Uluslararası Sanat ve Estetik Dergisi. (6), 127-174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khamjane, A. and Benslimane, R. (2018). A Computerized Method for Generating Islamic Star Patterns. Computer-Aided Design, 97, 15-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kızgın, E. E. (2018). Van Yedikilise Manastırı (Varagavank) Saint Croix Kilisesi Haçkar Örnekleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (40), 319-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolarevic, B. (Ed.). (2004). Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing. Taylor & Francis.

  • Lionel, M. and Philip, S. (1974). Geometry of Environment: An Introduction to Spatial Organisation in Design.

  • Mkhitaryan, N. E. and Avedian, S. A. (2022). Architecture Stages and Features of Compositional Formations of Khachkars. Journal of Architectural and Engineering Research, 2, pp. 52–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naserabad, A. A. and Ghanbaran, A. (2023). Presenting a Method to Generate Existing and Novel Girihs (Islamic Geometric Patterns) for All Systems and Families Based on 7-Fold Patterns. Computer-Aided Design, 154, 103418.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Necipoğlu, G. (1996). The Topkapi Scroll: Geometry and Ornament in Islamic Architecture. Getty Publications.

  • Ocón, D. (2021). Digitalising endangered cultural heritage in Southeast Asian cities: preserving or replacing? International Journal of Heritage Studies, 27 (10), 975–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, R. and Oxman, R. (2014). Theories of the Digital in Architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ögel, S. (1987). Anadolu Selçukluları’nın Taş Tezyinatı. Türk Tarih Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara, s.123.

  • Pérez-Gómez, R. (1987). The four regular mosaics missing in the Alhambra. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 14 (2), 133–137.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rhino, Rhinoceros® Design, Model, Present, Analyze, Realize, (2022). https://www.rhino3d.com/mcneel/about/.

  • Rigby, J. (2005). A Turkish Interlacing Pattern and the Golden Ratio: Whirling Dervishes and a Geometry Lecture in Konya. Mathematics in School 34 (1): 16–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, T. (2007). Extended Pasting Scheme for Kolam Pattern Generation. Forma, 22(1), 55–64.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed, Z., Ugail, H., Palmer, I., Purdy, J. and Reeve, C. (2015). Parameterized shape grammar for generating n-fold Islamic geometric motifs. In 2015 International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW) (pp. 79–85). IEEE.

  • Seppälä, S. (2021). The Struggle for Memory: The Khachkar Field of Julfa and Other Armenian Sacred Spaces in Azerbaijan. Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu, 13(2), 185–213.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, A. (2010). Oxford Dictionary of English. Oxford University Press, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, L. D. (2009). Decorative Knotting Using Trigonometric Parametrizations. In Visual Mathematics (No. 42, pp. 0–0). Mathematical Institute SASA.

  • Waring, T. M. (2012). Sequential encoding of Tamil kolam patterns. Forma, 27, 83–92.

  • Wilson, E. (1988). Islamic Designs. London: The British Museum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yanagisawa, K. and Nagata, S. (2007). Fundamental Study on Design System of Kolam Pattern. Forma, 22(1), 31-46.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldız, E. (2017). Van Çarpanak Adası Ktouts-Ktuc Manastırı Saint Jean Baptiste Kilisesi Kubbe Kasnağı Plastik Süslemeleri. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (34).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Semih Bayer

    Present address: Van Yuzuncu Yil University Muradiye Vocational School, Van, Turkey

  2. Neşe Çakici Alp

    Present address: Department of Architecture, Architecture and Design Faculty, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli, 41000, Turkey

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Graduate Studies, Department of Architecture, Istanbul Kultur University, Istanbul, 34158, Turkey

    Semih Bayer

  2. Gebze Institude of Technology Architecture Faculty, Çayırova, Turkey

    Neşe Çakici Alp

  3. Istanbul Technical University (ITU), Istanbul, Turkey

    Neşe Çakici Alp

Authors
  1. Semih Bayer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Neşe Çakici Alp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Semih Bayer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors are working on a doctoral thesis as part of the study's scope.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayer, S., Çakici Alp, N. Varagavank Monastery’s Khachkar Motifs: Understanding Production Through Parametric Methods. Nexus Netw J 26, 257–274 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00753-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00004-023-00753-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation