Skip to main content
Log in

Robust estimation of between and within laboratory standard deviation with measurement results below the detection limit

  • Announcements and Reports
  • Published:
Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

Download references

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Uhlig.

Appendix

Appendix

The computation of reproducibility and repeatability parameters according to the Q method can be broken down into several steps. The first step is the determination of the jump discontinuities of the function

$$ H_{1} \left( y \right) = \frac{1}{{\left( {\begin{array}{*{20}c} J \\ 2 \\ \end{array} } \right)}}\mathop \sum \limits_{{1 \le j_{1} < j_{2} \le J}} \frac{1}{{n_{{j_{1} }} \cdot n_{{j_{2} }} }}\mathop \sum \limits_{{i_{1} = 1}}^{{n_{{j_{1} }} }} \mathop \sum \limits_{{i_{2} = 1}}^{{n_{{j_{2} }} }} 1_{{\left\{ {\left| {x_{{j_{1} i_{1} }} - x_{{j_{2} i_{2} }} } \right| \le y} \right\}}} , $$
(1)

where x ji denotes the ith result of laboratory j, n j denotes the number of replicates for laboratory j and 1 A denotes the indicator function for the set A. J denotes the number of laboratories. The function H 1 maps a (positive) real number y to the percentage of pairwise absolute differences between results from different laboratories which are less than or equal to y, i.e. it is an empirical cumulative distribution function. Let \( y_{1} , \ldots , y_{k} \) denote the jump discontinuities of H 1 (in ascending order). A linear interpolation G 1 is then computed on the basis of values defined at the jump discontinuities:

$$ G_{1} \left( {y_{i} } \right) = \left\{ {\begin{array}{ll} {0.5 \cdot \left( {H_{1} \left( {y_{i} } \right) + H_{1} \left( {y_{i - 1} } \right)} \right)} & \text{for}\quad i \ge 2 \\ {0.5 \cdot H_{1} \left( {y_{1} } \right) } & \text{for}\quad i = 1 \quad {\rm and} \quad y_{1} > 0 \\ 0 & \text{for}\quad i = 1\quad {\rm and} \quad y_{1} = 0. \\ \end{array} } \right.$$
(2)

Having defined

$$ q = 0.25 + 0.75 \cdot H_{1} \left( 0 \right), $$
(3)

the reproducibility sd s R is obtained as

$$ s_{R} = \frac{{G_{1}^{ - 1} (q)}}{{\sqrt 2 \cdot \Phi^{ - 1} (0.5 + 0.5 \cdot q)}}, $$
(4)

where Φ denotes the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution. It should be noted that, if no rounding takes place, the values H 1(0) = 0 and q = 0.25 are obtained. The denominator in Eq. 4 is defined in such a way that, in the case of a standard normal distribution, s R  = 1 will be obtained on average.

For the estimation of the repeatability sd, absolute differences between results within each laboratory constitute the basis for the definition of the empirical cumulative distribution function:

$$ H_{2} \left( y \right) = \frac{1}{J}\mathop \sum \limits_{j = 1}^{J} \frac{2}{{n_{j} (n_{j} - 1)}}\mathop \sum \limits_{{1 \le i_{1} < i_{2} \le n_{j} }} 1_{{\left\{ {\left| {x_{{ji_{1} }} - x_{{ji_{2} }} } \right| \le y} \right\}}} $$
(5)

Just as in the case of the reproducibility sd, a linear interpolation is then performed to obtain the function G 2. The repeatability sd s r is then obtained in the same way as s R (see Eq. 4), the only difference being the definition

$$ q = 0.5 + 0.5 \cdot H_{2} \left( 0 \right). $$
(6)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uhlig, S. Robust estimation of between and within laboratory standard deviation with measurement results below the detection limit. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 10, 385–391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-015-0967-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-015-0967-3

Keywords

Navigation