Abstract
The quest for new physics beyond the Standard Model is boosted by the recently observed deviation in the anomalous magnetic moments of muon and electron from their respective theoretical prediction. In the present work, we have proposed a suitable extension of the minimal Lμ − Lτ model to address these two experimental results as the minimal model is unable to provide any realistic solution. In our model, a new Yukawa interaction involving first generation of leptons, a singlet vector like fermion (χ±) and a scalar (either an SU(2)L doublet \( {\Phi}_4^{\prime } \) or a complex singlet \( {\Phi}_4^{\prime } \)) provides the additional one loop contribution to ae only on top of the usual contribution coming from the Lμ − Lτ gauge boson (Zμτ) to both electron and muon. The judicious choice of Lμ − Lτ charges to these new fields results in a strongly interacting scalar dark matter in \( \mathcal{O} \) (MeV) range after taking into account the bounds from relic density, unitarity and self interaction. The freeze-out dynamics of dark matter is greatly influenced by 3 → 2 scatterings while the kinetic equilibrium with the SM bath is ensured by 2 → 2 scatterings with neutrinos where Zμτ plays a pivotal role. The detection of dark matter is possible directly through scatterings with nuclei mediated by the SM Z bosons. Moreover, our proposed model can also be tested in the upcoming e+e− colliders by searching opposite sign di-electron and missing energy signal i.e. at the final state.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Y. Sofue and V. Rubin, Rotation curves of spiral galaxies, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 39 (2001) 137 [astro-ph/0010594] [INSPIRE].
M. Bartelmann and P. Schneider, Weak gravitational lensing, Phys. Rept. 340 (2001) 291 [astro-ph/9912508] [INSPIRE].
D. Clowe, A. Gonzalez and M. Markevitch, Weak lensing mass reconstruction of the interacting cluster 1E0657-558: Direct evidence for the existence of dark matter, Astrophys. J. 604 (2004) 596 [astro-ph/0312273] [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6 [Erratum ibid. 652 (2021) C4] [arXiv:1807.06209] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Precise measurement of the positive muon anomalous magnetic moment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2227 [hep-ex/0102017] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Final Report of the Muon E821 Anomalous Magnetic Moment Measurement at BNL, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 072003 [hep-ex/0602035] [INSPIRE].
F. Jegerlehner and A. Nyffeler, The Muon g-2, Phys. Rept. 477 (2009) 1 [arXiv:0902.3360] [INSPIRE].
M. Davier, A. Hoecker, B. Malaescu and Z. Zhang, A new evaluation of the hadronic vacuum polarisation contributions to the muon anomalous magnetic moment and to α(\( {m}_Z^2 \)), Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020) 241 [Erratum ibid. 80 (2020) 410] [arXiv:1908.00921] [INSPIRE].
T. Aoyama et al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model, Phys. Rept. 887 (2020) 1 [arXiv:2006.04822] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the anomalous precession frequency of the muon in the Fermilab Muon g − 2 Experiment, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 072002 [arXiv:2104.03247] [INSPIRE].
M. Abe et al., A New Approach for Measuring the Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment and Electric Dipole Moment, PTEP 2019 (2019) 053C02 [arXiv:1901.03047] [INSPIRE].
R.H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey and H. Müller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science 360 (2018) 191 [arXiv:1812.04130] [INSPIRE].
L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Cladé and S. Guellati-Khélifa, Determination of the fine-structure constant with an accuracy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature 588 (2020) 61 [INSPIRE].
J.S. Bell and J.M. Leinaas, Electrons as accelerated thermometers, Nucl. Phys. B 212 (1983) 131 [INSPIRE].
A. Anghel, F. Ardana-Lamas, F. Le Pimpec and C.P. Hauri, Large Charge Extraction from Metallic Multifilamentary Nb Sn-3 Photocathode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 194801 [INSPIRE].
X.G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, New Z′ phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 22 [INSPIRE].
X.-G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, Simplest Z′ model, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2118 [INSPIRE].
E. Ma, D.P. Roy and S. Roy, Gauged L(mu)-L(tau) with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 525 (2002) 101 [hep-ph/0110146] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus, S. Kaneko, L. Lavoura, H. Sawanaka and M. Tanimoto, mu-tau antisymmetry and neutrino mass matrices, JHEP 01 (2006) 110 [hep-ph/0510326] [INSPIRE].
W. Rodejohann and M.A. Schmidt, Flavor symmetry L(mu)-L(tau) and quasi-degenerate neutrinos, Phys. Atom. Nucl. 69 (2006) 1833 [hep-ph/0507300] [INSPIRE].
I. Aizawa and M. Yasue, A New type of complex neutrino mass texture and mu-tau symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 015002 [hep-ph/0510132] [INSPIRE].
Z.-z. Xing, H. Zhang and S. Zhou, Nearly Tri-bimaximal Neutrino Mixing and CP-violation from mu-tau Symmetry Breaking, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 189 [hep-ph/0607091] [INSPIRE].
B. Adhikary, Soft breaking of L(mu)-L(tau) symmetry: Light neutrino spectrum and Leptogenesis, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 033002 [hep-ph/0604009] [INSPIRE].
K. Fuki and M. Yasue, What does mu-tau symmetry imply in neutrino mixings?, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 055014 [hep-ph/0601118] [INSPIRE].
N. Haba and W. Rodejohann, A Supersymmetric contribution to the neutrino mass matrix and breaking of mu-tau symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 017701 [hep-ph/0603206] [INSPIRE].
A.S. Joshipura, B.P. Kodrani and K.M. Patel, Fermion Masses and Mixings in a mu-tau symmetric SO(10), Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 115017 [arXiv:0903.2161] [INSPIRE].
B. Adhikary, A. Ghosal and P. Roy, mu tau symmetry, tribimaximal mixing and four zero neutrino Yukawa textures, JHEP 10 (2009) 040 [arXiv:0908.2686] [INSPIRE].
A.S. Joshipura and W. Rodejohann, Scaling in the Neutrino Mass Matrix, mu-tau Symmetry and the See-Saw Mechanism, Phys. Lett. B 678 (2009) 276 [arXiv:0905.2126] [INSPIRE].
Z.-z. Xing and Y.-L. Zhou, A Generic Diagonalization of the 3 × 3 Neutrino Mass Matrix and Its Implications on the μ − τ Flavor Symmetry and Maximal CP-violation, Phys. Lett. B 693 (2010) 584 [arXiv:1008.4906] [INSPIRE].
T. Araki and C.Q. Geng, μ − τ symmetry in Zee-Babu model, Phys. Lett. B 694 (2011) 113 [arXiv:1006.0629] [INSPIRE].
H.-J. He and F.-R. Yin, Common Origin of μ − τ and CP Breaking in Neutrino Seesaw, Baryon Asymmetry, and Hidden Flavor Symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 033009 [arXiv:1104.2654] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck and W. Rodejohann, Gauged Lμ − Lτ Symmetry at the Electroweak Scale, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 075007 [arXiv:1107.5238] [INSPIRE].
W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, mu-tau Interchange symmetry and lepton mixing, Fortsch. Phys. 61 (2013) 535 [arXiv:1207.1678] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, M. Pospelov and I. Yavin, Neutrino Trident Production: A Powerful Probe of New Physics with Neutrino Beams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 091801 [arXiv:1406.2332] [INSPIRE].
Z.-z. Xing and Z.-h. Zhao, A review of μ-τ flavor symmetry in neutrino physics, Rept. Prog. Phys. 79 (2016) 076201 [arXiv:1512.04207] [INSPIRE].
K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi and N. Nagata, Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 763 [arXiv:1705.00419] [INSPIRE].
A. Dev, Gauged Lμ-Lτ Model with an Inverse Seesaw Mechanism for Neutrino Masses, arXiv:1710.02878 [INSPIRE].
C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Neutrino mass in a gauged Lμ − Lτ model, Nucl. Phys. B 940 (2019) 292 [arXiv:1705.10620] [INSPIRE].
T. Nomura and H. Okada, Zee-Babu type model with \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) gauge symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 095023 [arXiv:1803.04795] [INSPIRE].
T. Nomura and H. Okada, Neutrino mass generation with large SU(2)L multiplets under local \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 783 (2018) 381 [arXiv:1805.03942] [INSPIRE].
H. Banerjee, P. Byakti and S. Roy, Supersymmetric gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model for neutrinos and the muon (g − 2) anomaly, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075022 [arXiv:1805.04415] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, S. Profumo and F.S. Queiroz, Explaining dark matter and B decay anomalies with an Lμ − Lτ model, JHEP 12 (2016) 106 [arXiv:1609.04026] [INSPIRE].
S. Patra, S. Rao, N. Sahoo and N. Sahu, Gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model in light of muon g − 2 anomaly, neutrino mass and dark matter phenomenology, Nucl. Phys. B 917 (2017) 317 [arXiv:1607.04046] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, S. Choubey and S. Khan, Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter and Anomalous Magnetic Moment of Muon in a \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) Model, JHEP 09 (2016) 147 [arXiv:1608.04194] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, S. Choubey and S. Khan, FIMP and Muon (g − 2) in a \( U{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) Model, JHEP 02 (2017) 123 [arXiv:1612.03067] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, S. Choubey, L. Covi and S. Khan, Explaining the 3.5 keV X-ray Line in a Lμ − Lτ Extension of the Inert Doublet Model, JCAP 02 (2018) 002 [arXiv:1711.00553] [INSPIRE].
G. Arcadi, T. Hugle and F.S. Queiroz, The Dark Lμ − Lτ Rises via Kinetic Mixing, Phys. Lett. B 784 (2018) 151 [arXiv:1803.05723] [INSPIRE].
S. Singirala, S. Sahoo and R. Mohanta, Exploring dark matter, neutrino mass and \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)},\phi } \) anomalies in Lμ − Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035042 [arXiv:1809.03213] [INSPIRE].
P. Foldenauer, Light dark matter in a gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 035007 [arXiv:1808.03647] [INSPIRE].
M. Escudero, D. Hooper, G. Krnjaic and M. Pierre, Cosmology with A Very Light Lμ-Lτ Gauge Boson, JHEP 03 (2019) 071 [arXiv:1901.02010] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas and A. Shaw, Reconciling dark matter, \( {R}_{K^{\left(\ast \right)}} \) anomalies and (g − 2)μ in an Lμ − Lτ scenario, JHEP 05 (2019) 165 [arXiv:1903.08745] [INSPIRE].
N. Okada and O. Seto, Inelastic extra U(1) charged scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020) 023522 [arXiv:1908.09277] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah, S. Mahapatra, D. Nanda and N. Sahu, Inelastic fermion dark matter origin of XENON1T excess with muon (g − 2) and light neutrino mass, Phys. Lett. B 811 (2020) 135933 [arXiv:2007.10754] [INSPIRE].
K. Asai, S. Okawa and K. Tsumura, Search for \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) charged dark matter with neutrino telescope, JHEP 03 (2021) 047 [arXiv:2011.03165] [INSPIRE].
D. Borah, M. Dutta, S. Mahapatra and N. Sahu, Lepton anomalous magnetic moment with singlet-doublet fermion dark matter in a scotogenic U(1)Lμ − Lτ model, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 015029 [arXiv:2109.02699] [INSPIRE].
M. Drees and W. Zhao, \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) for Light Dark Matter, gμ − 2, the 511 keV excess and the Hubble Tension, Phys. Lett. B 827 (2022) 136948 [arXiv:2107.14528] [INSPIRE].
T. Hapitas, D. Tuckler and Y. Zhang, General kinetic mixing in gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model for muon g-2 and dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 105 (2022) 016014 [arXiv:2108.12440] [INSPIRE].
A. Tapadar, S. Ganguly and S. Roy, Non-adiabatic evolution of dark sector in the presence of \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) gauge symmetry, JCAP 05 (2022) 019 [arXiv:2109.13609] [INSPIRE].
Borexino collaboration, First Simultaneous Precision Spectroscopy of pp, 7Be, and pep Solar Neutrinos with Borexino Phase-II, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 082004 [arXiv:1707.09279] [INSPIRE].
W. Altmannshofer, S. Gori, J. Martín-Albo, A. Sousa and M. Wallbank, Neutrino Tridents at DUNE, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 115029 [arXiv:1902.06765] [INSPIRE].
SHiP collaboration, A facility to Search for Hidden Particles (SHiP) at the CERN SPS, arXiv:1504.04956 [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel, Hunting All the Hidden Photons, JHEP 07 (2018) 094 [arXiv:1803.05466] [INSPIRE].
H. Davoudiasl and W.J. Marciano, Tale of two anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 075011 [arXiv:1806.10252] [INSPIRE].
A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter and P. Schmidt-Wellenburg, Combined explanations of (g − 2)μ,e and implications for a large muon EDM, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 113002 [arXiv:1807.11484] [INSPIRE].
J. Liu, C.E.M. Wagner and X.-P. Wang, A light complex scalar for the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments, JHEP 03 (2019) 008 [arXiv:1810.11028] [INSPIRE].
X.-F. Han, T. Li, L. Wang and Y. Zhang, Simple interpretations of lepton anomalies in the lepton-specific inert two-Higgs-doublet model, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 095034 [arXiv:1812.02449] [INSPIRE].
M. Bauer, M. Neubert, S. Renner, M. Schnubel and A. Thamm, Axionlike Particles, Lepton-Flavor Violation, and a New Explanation of aμ and ae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 211803 [arXiv:1908.00008] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo and W. Yin, Explaining electron and muon g − 2 anomaly in SUSY without lepton-flavor mixings, JHEP 08 (2019) 122 [arXiv:1906.08768] [INSPIRE].
M. Badziak and K. Sakurai, Explanation of electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in the MSSM, JHEP 10 (2019) 024 [arXiv:1908.03607] [INSPIRE].
G. Hiller, C. Hormigos-Feliu, D.F. Litim and T. Steudtner, Anomalous magnetic moments from asymptotic safety, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 071901 [arXiv:1910.14062] [INSPIRE].
I. Bigaran and R.R. Volkas, Getting chirality right: Single scalar leptoquark solutions to the (g − 2)e,μ puzzle, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075037 [arXiv:2002.12544] [INSPIRE].
M. Endo, S. Iguro and T. Kitahara, Probing eμ flavor-violating ALP at Belle II, JHEP 06 (2020) 040 [arXiv:2002.05948] [INSPIRE].
I. Doršner, S. Fajfer and S. Saad, μ → eγ selecting scalar leptoquark solutions for the (g − 2)e,μ puzzles, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075007 [arXiv:2006.11624] [INSPIRE].
N. Haba, Y. Shimizu and T. Yamada, Muon and electron g − 2 and the origin of the fermion mass hierarchy, PTEP 2020 (2020) 093B05 [arXiv:2002.10230] [INSPIRE].
L. Calibbi, M.L. López-Ibáñez, A. Melis and O. Vives, Muon and electron g − 2 and lepton masses in flavor models, JHEP 06 (2020) 087 [arXiv:2003.06633] [INSPIRE].
C.-H. Chen and T. Nomura, Electron and muon g − 2, radiative neutrino mass, and ℓ′ − ℓγ in a U(1)e−μ model, Nucl. Phys. B 964 (2021) 115314 [arXiv:2003.07638] [INSPIRE].
B. Dutta, S. Ghosh and T. Li, Explaining (g − 2)μ,e, the KOTO anomaly and the MiniBooNE excess in an extended Higgs model with sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 055017 [arXiv:2006.01319] [INSPIRE].
W. Abdallah, R. Gandhi and S. Roy, Understanding the MiniBooNE and the muon and electron g − 2 anomalies with a light Z′ and a second Higgs doublet, JHEP 12 (2020) 188 [arXiv:2006.01948] [INSPIRE].
K.-F. Chen, C.-W. Chiang and K. Yagyu, An explanation for the muon and electron g − 2 anomalies and dark matter, JHEP 09 (2020) 119 [arXiv:2006.07929] [INSPIRE].
F.J. Botella, F. Cornet-Gomez and M. Nebot, Electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in general flavour conserving two Higgs doublets models, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 035023 [arXiv:2006.01934] [INSPIRE].
S. Jana, P.K. Vishnu, W. Rodejohann and S. Saad, Dark matter assisted lepton anomalous magnetic moments and neutrino masses, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 075003 [arXiv:2008.02377] [INSPIRE].
C. Hati, J. Kriewald, J. Orloff and A.M. Teixeira, Anomalies in 8Be nuclear transitions and (g − 2)e,μ: towards a minimal combined explanation, JHEP 07 (2020) 235 [arXiv:2005.00028] [INSPIRE].
E.J. Chun and T. Mondal, Explaining g − 2 anomalies in two Higgs doublet model with vector-like leptons, JHEP 11 (2020) 077 [arXiv:2009.08314] [INSPIRE].
S.-P. Li, X.-Q. Li, Y.-Y. Li, Y.-D. Yang and X. Zhang, Power-aligned 2HDM: a correlative perspective on (g − 2)e,μ, JHEP 01 (2021) 034 [arXiv:2010.02799] [INSPIRE].
H. Banerjee, B. Dutta and S. Roy, Supersymmetric gauged \( \mathrm{U}{(1)}_{L_{\mu }-{L}_{\tau }} \) model for electron and muon (g − 2) anomaly, JHEP 03 (2021) 211 [arXiv:2011.05083] [INSPIRE].
J. Cao, Y. He, J. Lian, D. Zhang and P. Zhu, Electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments in the inverse seesaw extended NMSSM, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 055009 [arXiv:2102.11355] [INSPIRE].
L. Delle Rose, S. Khalil and S. Moretti, Explaining electron and muon g − 2 anomalies in an Aligned 2-Higgs Doublet Model with right-handed neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136216 [arXiv:2012.06911] [INSPIRE].
P. Escribano, J. Terol-Calvo and A. Vicente, (g − 2)e,μ in an extended inverse type-III seesaw model, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 115018 [arXiv:2104.03705] [INSPIRE].
M. Frank, Y. Hiçyılmaz, S. Mondal, O. Özdal and C.S. Ün, Electron and muon magnetic moments and implications for dark matter and model characterisation in non-universal U(1)′ supersymmetric models, JHEP 10 (2021) 063 [arXiv:2107.04116] [INSPIRE].
H. Bharadwaj, S. Dutta and A. Goyal, Leptonic g − 2 anomaly in an extended Higgs sector with vector-like leptons, JHEP 11 (2021) 056 [arXiv:2109.02586] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J.G. Wacker, Mechanism for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 171301 [arXiv:1402.5143] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, H. Murayama, T. Volansky and J.G. Wacker, Model for Thermal Relic Dark Matter of Strongly Interacting Massive Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 021301 [arXiv:1411.3727] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik and H. Murayama, SIMP Spectroscopy, JHEP 05 (2016) 090 [arXiv:1512.07917] [INSPIRE].
N. Daci, I. De Bruyn, S. Lowette, M.H.G. Tytgat and B. Zaldivar, Simplified SIMPs and the LHC, JHEP 11 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1503.05505] [INSPIRE].
N. Bernal and X. Chu, ℤ2 SIMP Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2016) 006 [arXiv:1510.08527] [INSPIRE].
N. Bernal, C. Garcia-Cely and R. Rosenfeld, WIMP and SIMP Dark Matter from the Spontaneous Breaking of a Global Group, JCAP 04 (2015) 012 [arXiv:1501.01973] [INSPIRE].
H.M. Lee and M.-S. Seo, Communication with SIMP dark mesons via Z′-portal, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 316 [arXiv:1504.00745] [INSPIRE].
S.-M. Choi and H.M. Lee, SIMP dark matter with gauged Z3 symmetry, JHEP 09 (2015) 063 [arXiv:1505.00960] [INSPIRE].
S.-M. Choi, Y.-J. Kang and H.M. Lee, On thermal production of self-interacting dark matter, JHEP 12 (2016) 099 [arXiv:1610.04748] [INSPIRE].
S.-M. Choi et al., Vector SIMP dark matter, JHEP 10 (2017) 162 [arXiv:1707.01434] [INSPIRE].
S.-M. Choi, H.M. Lee and M.-S. Seo, Cosmic abundances of SIMP dark matter, JHEP 04 (2017) 154 [arXiv:1702.07860] [INSPIRE].
S.-Y. Ho, T. Toma and K. Tsumura, A Radiative Neutrino Mass Model with SIMP Dark Matter, JHEP 07 (2017) 101 [arXiv:1705.00592] [INSPIRE].
J.H. Davis, Probing Sub-GeV Mass Strongly Interacting Dark Matter with a Low-Threshold Surface Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 211302 [arXiv:1708.01484] [INSPIRE].
Y. Hochberg, E. Kuflik, R. Mcgehee, H. Murayama and K. Schutz, Strongly interacting massive particles through the axion portal, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 115031 [arXiv:1806.10139] [INSPIRE].
S. Bhattacharya, P. Ghosh and S. Verma, SIMPler realisation of Scalar Dark Matter, JCAP 01 (2020) 040 [arXiv:1904.07562] [INSPIRE].
J. Smirnov and J.F. Beacom, New Freezeout Mechanism for Strongly Interacting Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 131301 [arXiv:2002.04038] [INSPIRE].
A. Katz, E. Salvioni and B. Shakya, Split SIMPs with Decays, JHEP 10 (2020) 049 [arXiv:2006.15148] [INSPIRE].
S.-M. Choi, J. Kim, P. Ko and J. Li, A multi-component SIMP model with U(1)X → Z2 × Z3, JHEP 09 (2021) 028 [arXiv:2103.05956] [INSPIRE].
A. Bilal, Lectures on Anomalies, arXiv:0802.0634 [INSPIRE].
S.L. Adler, Axial vector vertex in spinor electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2426 [INSPIRE].
W.A. Bardeen, Anomalous Ward identities in spinor field theories, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1848 [INSPIRE].
R. Delbourgo and A. Salam, The gravitational correction to pcac, Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972) 381 [INSPIRE].
T. Eguchi and P.G.O. Freund, Quantum Gravity and World Topology, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37 (1976) 1251 [INSPIRE].
D. Hanneke, S. Fogwell and G. Gabrielse, New Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment and the Fine Structure Constant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 120801 [arXiv:0801.1134] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for an Lμ − Lτ gauge boson using Z → 4μ events in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 792 (2019) 345 [arXiv:1808.03684] [INSPIRE].
BaBar collaboration, Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 011102 [arXiv:1606.03501] [INSPIRE].
Muon Collider collaboration, The physics case of a 3 TeV muon collider stage, arXiv:2203.07261 [INSPIRE].
G. Krnjaic, G. Marques-Tavares, D. Redigolo and K. Tobioka, Probing Muonphilic Force Carriers and Dark Matter at Kaon Factories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 041802 [arXiv:1902.07715] [INSPIRE].
S.N. Gninenko, N.V. Krasnikov and V.A. Matveev, Muon g − 2 and searches for a new leptophobic sub-GeV dark boson in a missing-energy experiment at CERN, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095015 [arXiv:1412.1400] [INSPIRE].
Y. Kahn, G. Krnjaic, N. Tran and A. Whitbeck, M3: a new muon missing momentum experiment to probe (g − 2)μ and dark matter at Fermilab, JHEP 09 (2018) 153 [arXiv:1804.03144] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
P. Minkowski, μ → eγ at a Rate of One Out of 109 Muon Decays?, Phys. Lett. B 67 (1977) 421 [INSPIRE].
T. Yanagida, Horizontal gauge symmetry and masses of neutrinos, Conf. Proc. C 7902131 (1979) 95 [INSPIRE].
R.N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanović, Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912 [INSPIRE].
J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle, Neutrino Masses in SU(2) × U(1) Theories, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 2227 [INSPIRE].
Planck collaboration, Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 594 (2016) A13 [arXiv:1502.01589] [INSPIRE].
P.F. de Salas, D.V. Forero, C.A. Ternes, M. Tortola and J.W.F. Valle, Status of neutrino oscillations 2018: 3σ hint for normal mass ordering and improved CP sensitivity, Phys. Lett. B 782 (2018) 633 [arXiv:1708.01186] [INSPIRE].
E.D. Carlson, M.E. Machacek and L.J. Hall, Self-interacting dark matter, Astrophys. J. 398 (1992) 43 [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, S. Ganguly and S. Roy, When freeze-out occurs due to a non-Boltzmann suppression: a study of degenerate dark sector, JHEP 06 (2021) 108 [arXiv:2011.02499] [INSPIRE].
A. Berlin, D. Hooper and G. Krnjaic, Thermal Dark Matter From A Highly Decoupled Sector, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 095019 [arXiv:1609.02555] [INSPIRE].
A. Belyaev, N.D. Christensen and A. Pukhov, CalcHEP 3.4 for collider physics within and beyond the Standard Model, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1729 [arXiv:1207.6082] [INSPIRE].
A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
M. Markevitch et al., Direct constraints on the dark matter self-interaction cross-section from the merging galaxy cluster 1E0657-56, Astrophys. J. 606 (2004) 819 [astro-ph/0309303] [INSPIRE].
S. Tulin and H.-B. Yu, Dark Matter Self-interactions and Small Scale Structure, Phys. Rept. 730 (2018) 1 [arXiv:1705.02358] [INSPIRE].
H.-Y. Cheng and C.-W. Chiang, Revisiting Scalar and Pseudoscalar Couplings with Nucleons, JHEP 07 (2012) 009 [arXiv:1202.1292] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Constraining the spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections with XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 141301 [arXiv:1902.03234] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. Volansky, Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 076007 [arXiv:1108.5383] [INSPIRE].
R. Essig, M. Fernandez-Serra, J. Mardon, A. Soto, T. Volansky and T.-T. Yu, Direct Detection of sub-GeV Dark Matter with Semiconductor Targets, JHEP 05 (2016) 046 [arXiv:1509.01598] [INSPIRE].
V.A. Rubakov and D.S. Gorbunov, Introduction to the Theory of the Early Universe: Hot big bang theory, World Scientific, Singapore (2017) [INSPIRE].
P. Gondolo, J. Hisano and K. Kadota, The Effect of quark interactions on dark matter kinetic decoupling and the mass of the smallest dark halos, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 083523 [arXiv:1205.1914] [INSPIRE].
A. Biswas, D. Borah and D. Nanda, Light Dirac neutrino portal dark matter with observable ∆Neff, JCAP 10 (2021) 002 [arXiv:2103.05648] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Search for invisible decays of a Higgs boson produced through vector boson fusion in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 520 [arXiv:1809.05937] [INSPIRE].
NEWS-G collaboration, The search for Light Dark Matter with NEWS-G, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2156 (2021) 012059 [arXiv:2111.02796] [INSPIRE].
SuperCDMS collaboration, Low-mass dark matter search with CDMSlite, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 022002 [arXiv:1707.01632] [INSPIRE].
DarkSide collaboration, Low-Mass Dark Matter Search with the DarkSide-50 Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 081307 [arXiv:1802.06994] [INSPIRE].
XENON collaboration, Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 111302 [arXiv:1805.12562] [INSPIRE].
DARWIN collaboration, DARWIN: towards the ultimate dark matter detector, JCAP 11 (2016) 017 [arXiv:1606.07001] [INSPIRE].
CLIC Physics Working Group collaboration, Physics at the CLIC multi-TeV linear collider, in 11th International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2005), CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs [hep-ph/0412251] [INSPIRE].
D. Dannheim, P. Lebrun, L. Linssen, D. Schulte, F. Simon, S. Stapnes et al., CLIC e+e− Linear Collider Studies, arXiv:1208.1402 [INSPIRE].
L. Linssen, A. Miyamoto, M. Stanitzki and H. Weerts, eds., Physics and Detectors at CLIC: CLIC Conceptual Design Report, arXiv:1202.5940 [INSPIRE].
CLIC Detector, Physics Study collaboration, Physics at the CLIC e+e− Linear Collider – Input to the Snowmass process 2013, in Community Summer Study 2013: Snowmass on the Mississippi, Minneapolis, U.S.A. (2013) [arXiv:1307.5288] [INSPIRE].
CLICdp collaboration, CLICdet: The post-CDR CLIC detector model, CLICdp-Note-2017-001 (2017).
CLIC accelerator collaboration, The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) — Project Implementation Plan, arXiv:1903.08655 [INSPIRE].
T. Behnke et al. eds., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Volume 1: Executive Summary, arXiv:1306.6327 [INSPIRE].
C. Adolphsen et al. eds., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Volume 3.II: Accelerator Baseline Design, arXiv:1306.6328 [INSPIRE].
H. Abramowicz et al., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Volume 4: Detectors, arXiv:1306.6329 [INSPIRE].
H. Baer et al. eds., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Volume 2: Physics, arXiv:1306.6352 [INSPIRE].
C. Adolphsen et al. eds., The International Linear Collider Technical Design Report — Volume 3.I: Accelerator R&D in the Technical Design Phase, arXiv:1306.6353 [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall et al., The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP 07 (2014) 079 [arXiv:1405.0301] [INSPIRE].
J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5: Going Beyond, JHEP 06 (2011) 128 [arXiv:1106.0522] [INSPIRE].
CMS collaboration, Searches for pair production of charginos and top squarks in final states with two oppositely charged leptons in proton-proton collisions at \( \sqrt{s} \) = 13 TeV, JHEP 11 (2018) 079 [arXiv:1807.07799] [INSPIRE].
T. Sjöstrand, S. Mrenna and P.Z. Skands, PYTHIA 6.4 Physics and Manual, JHEP 05 (2006) 026 [hep-ph/0603175] [INSPIRE].
DELPHES 3 collaboration, DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP 02 (2014) 057 [arXiv:1307.6346] [INSPIRE].
M. Selvaggi, DELPHES 3: A modular framework for fast-simulation of generic collider experiments, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 523 (2014) 012033 [INSPIRE].
A. Mertens, New features in Delphes 3, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 608 (2015) 012045 [INSPIRE].
J.P. Leveille, The Second Order Weak Correction to (G-2) of the Muon in Arbitrary Gauge Models, Nucl. Phys. B 137 (1978) 63 [INSPIRE].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2112.08393
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Biswas, A., Khan, S. (g − 2)e, μ and strongly interacting dark matter with collider implications. J. High Energ. Phys. 2022, 37 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)037
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2022)037