Abstract
The described Dark Abelian Sector Model (DASM) extends the Standard Model (SM) by a “dark” sector containing a spontaneously broken U(1)d gauge group. Keeping this dark sector quite generic we only add one additional Higgs boson, one Dirac fermion, and right-handed SM-like neutrinos to the SM. Using the only two singlet operators of the SM with dimension less than 4 (the U(1)Y field-strength tensor and the SM Higgs mass operator |Φ|2) as well as the right-handed neutrino fields we open up three portals to the dark sector. Dark sectors, such as the one of the DASM, that introduce an additional Higgs boson H as well as an additional Z′ gauge boson can have a large influence on the predictions for electroweak precision observables and even accommodate possible dark matter candidates. We consider one of the two Higgs bosons to be the known 125 GeV Higgs boson and parameterize the extension of the scalar sector by the mass of the second Higgs boson, the Higgs mixing angle, and a Higgs self-coupling. We do not assume any mass hierarchy in the gauge sector and use the mass of the additional Z′ boson and a corresponding gauge-boson mixing angle to parameterize the extension of the gauge sector. The fermion sector is parameterized by the mass of the additional fermion and a fermion mixing angle. We describe an on-shell as well as an \( \overline{\textrm{MS}} \) renormalization scheme for the DASM sectors and give explicit results for the renormalization constants at the 1-loop level, and, thus, prepare the ground for full NLO predictions for collider observables in the DASM. As a first example, we provide the DASM prediction for the W-boson mass derived from muon decay.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
CMS collaboration, Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
Muon g-2 collaboration, Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.46 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) 141801 [arXiv:2104.03281] [INSPIRE].
CDF collaboration, High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CDF II detector, Science 376 (2022) 170.
Particle Data Group collaboration, Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01 [INSPIRE].
G. Chalons, D. Lopez-Val, T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, The Higgs singlet extension at LHC Run 2, PoS DIS2016 (2016) 113 [arXiv:1606.07793] [INSPIRE].
V. Silveira and A. Zee, Scalar Phantoms, Phys. Lett. B 161 (1985) 136 [INSPIRE].
V. Barger et al., Complex Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 015018 [arXiv:0811.0393] [INSPIRE].
D. O’Connell, M.J. Ramsey-Musolf and M.B. Wise, Minimal Extension of the Standard Model Scalar Sector, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 037701 [hep-ph/0611014] [INSPIRE].
R.M. Schabinger and J.D. Wells, A minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 093007 [hep-ph/0509209] [INSPIRE].
M. Pospelov, Secluded U(1) below the weak scale, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 095002 [arXiv:0811.1030] [INSPIRE].
H. Davoudiasl, H.-S. Lee and W.J. Marciano, Dark Side of Higgs Diphoton Decays and Muon g − 2, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 095009 [arXiv:1208.2973] [INSPIRE].
M. Cadeddu et al., Muon and electron g-2 and proton and cesium weak charges implications on dark Zd models, Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 011701 [arXiv:2104.03280] [INSPIRE].
K. Sakurai, F. Takahashi and W. Yin, Singlet extensions and W boson mass in light of the CDF II result, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137324 [arXiv:2204.04770] [INSPIRE].
W.-Z. Feng and P. Nath, Cogenesis in a universe with vanishing B − L within a gauged U(1)x extension, Phys. Lett. B 731 (2014) 43 [arXiv:1312.1334] [INSPIRE].
J. Heeck, Unbroken B − L symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 739 (2014) 256 [arXiv:1408.6845] [INSPIRE].
M. Sajjad Athar et al., Status and perspectives of neutrino physics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 124 (2022) 103947 [arXiv:2111.07586] [INSPIRE].
X.G. He, G.C. Joshi, H. Lew and R.R. Volkas, New Z′ phenomenology, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) R22.
K.S. Babu, C.F. Kolda and J. March-Russell, Implications of generalized Z-Z′ mixing, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 6788 [hep-ph/9710441] [INSPIRE].
S. Gopalakrishna, S. Jung and J.D. Wells, Higgs boson decays to four fermions through an abelian hidden sector, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 055002 [arXiv:0801.3456] [INSPIRE].
B. Holdom, Oblique electroweak corrections and an extra gauge boson, Phys. Lett. B 259 (1991) 329 [INSPIRE].
Z. Trócsányi, Super-weak force and neutrino masses, Symmetry 12 (2020) 107 [arXiv:1812.11189] [INSPIRE].
Z. Péli and Z. Trócsányi, Precise prediction for the mass of the W boson in gauged U(1) extensions of the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) L031704 [arXiv:2305.11931] [INSPIRE].
M.P. Bento, H.E. Haber and J.P. Silva, Tree-level Unitarity in SU(2)L × U(1)Y × \( U{(1)}_{Y^{\prime }} \) Models, JHEP 10 (2023) 083 [arXiv:2306.01836] [INSPIRE].
M. Algueró, J. Matias, A. Crivellin and C.A. Manzari, Unified explanation of the anomalies in semileptonic B decays and the W mass, Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) 033005 [arXiv:2201.08170] [INSPIRE].
Z. Chen, K. Ye and M. Zhang, Asymmetric dark matter with a spontaneously broken U(1)’: Self-interaction and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023) 095027 [arXiv:2303.11820] [INSPIRE].
K.N. Abazajian, Sterile neutrinos in cosmology, Phys. Rept. 711–712 (2017) 1 [arXiv:1705.01837] [INSPIRE].
A. Boyarsky et al., Sterile neutrino Dark Matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 104 (2019) 1 [arXiv:1807.07938] [INSPIRE].
S. Glaus et al., Electroweak Corrections to Dark Matter Direct Detection in a Vector Dark Matter Model, JHEP 10 (2019) 152 [arXiv:1908.09249] [INSPIRE].
A.L. Foguel, G.M. Salla and R.Z. Funchal, (In)Visible signatures of the minimal dark abelian gauge sector, JHEP 12 (2022) 063 [arXiv:2209.03383] [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, Techniques for calculation of electroweak radiative corrections at the one loop level and results for W physics at LEP-200, Fortsch. Phys. 41 (1993) 307 [arXiv:0709.1075] [INSPIRE].
M.E. Peskin and D.V. Schroeder, An introduction to quantum field theory, CRC Press (1995) [https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429503559].
M.D. Schwartz, Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press (2014) [https://doi.org/10.1017/9781139540940].
M. Böhm, A. Denner and H. Joos, Gauge theories of the strong and electroweak interaction, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag (2001) [https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80160-9].
A. Denner and S. Dittmaier, Electroweak Radiative Corrections for Collider Physics, Phys. Rept. 864 (2020) 1 [arXiv:1912.06823] [INSPIRE].
L. Altenkamp, M. Boggia and S. Dittmaier, Precision calculations for h → WW/ZZ → 4 fermions in a Singlet Extension of the Standard Model with Prophecy4f, JHEP 04 (2018) 062 [arXiv:1801.07291] [INSPIRE].
D.A. Ross and M.J.G. Veltman, Neutral Currents in Neutrino Experiments, Nucl. Phys. B 95 (1975) 135 [INSPIRE].
M.J.G. Veltman, Limit on Mass Differences in the Weinberg Model, Nucl. Phys. B 123 (1977) 89 [INSPIRE].
M. Böhm, H. Spiesberger and W. Hollik, On the One Loop Renormalization of the Electroweak Standard Model and Its Application to Leptonic Processes, Fortsch. Phys. 34 (1986) 687 [INSPIRE].
J. Fleischer and F. Jegerlehner, Radiative Corrections to Higgs Decays in the Extended Weinberg-Salam Model, Phys. Rev. D 23 (1981) 2001 [INSPIRE].
S. Dittmaier and H. Rzehak, Electroweak renormalization based on gauge-invariant vacuum expectation values of non-linear Higgs representations. Part I. Standard Model, JHEP 05 (2022) 125 [arXiv:2203.07236] [INSPIRE].
S. Dittmaier and H. Rzehak, Electroweak renormalization based on gauge-invariant vacuum expectation values of non-linear Higgs representations. Part II. Extended Higgs sectors, JHEP 08 (2022) 245 [arXiv:2206.01479] [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, S. Dittmaier and J.-N. Lang, Renormalization of mixing angles, JHEP 11 (2018) 104 [arXiv:1808.03466] [INSPIRE].
L. Altenkamp, S. Dittmaier and H. Rzehak, Precision calculations for h → WW/ZZ → 4 fermions in the Two-Higgs-Doublet Model with Prophecy4f, JHEP 03 (2018) 110 [arXiv:1710.07598] [INSPIRE].
A. Denner, J.-N. Lang and S. Uccirati, NLO electroweak corrections in extended Higgs Sectors with RECOLA2, JHEP 07 (2017) 087 [arXiv:1705.06053] [INSPIRE].
M. Krause et al., Gauge-independent Renormalization of the 2-Higgs-Doublet Model, JHEP 09 (2016) 143 [arXiv:1605.04853] [INSPIRE].
A. Freitas and D. Stöckinger, Gauge dependence and renormalization of tan β in the minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 095014 [hep-ph/0205281] [INSPIRE].
F. Bojarski, G. Chalons, D. Lopez-Val and T. Robens, Heavy to light Higgs boson decays at NLO in the Singlet Extension of the Standard Model, JHEP 02 (2016) 147 [arXiv:1511.08120] [INSPIRE].
S. Dittmaier, Electric charge renormalization to all orders, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021) 053006 [arXiv:2101.05154] [INSPIRE].
S. Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields. Volume 2: Modern Applications, Cambridge University Press (1996) [https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139644174].
A. Denner, G. Weiglein and S. Dittmaier, Application of the background field method to the electroweak standard model, Nucl. Phys. B 440 (1995) 95 [hep-ph/9410338] [INSPIRE].
A. Sirlin, Radiative Corrections in the SU(2)L × U(1) Theory: A Simple Renormalization Framework, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 971 [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun. 140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
T. Hahn and M. Perez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun. 118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].
W.F.L. Hollik, Radiative Corrections in the Standard Model and their Role for Precision Tests of the Electroweak Theory, Fortsch. Phys. 38 (1990) 165 [INSPIRE].
M.S. Chanowitz, M.A. Furman and I. Hinchliffe, Weak Interactions of Ultraheavy Fermions, Phys. Lett. B 78 (1978) 285 [INSPIRE].
A. Sirlin, \( \mathcal{O} \)(α2) corrections to muon lifetime, mW, and mZ in the SU(2)L × U(1) theory, Phys. Rev. D 29 (1984) 89 [INSPIRE].
M. Consoli, W. Hollik and F. Jegerlehner, The effect of the Top Quark on the MW-MZ Interdependence and Possible Decoupling of Heavy Fermions from Low-Energy Physics, Phys. Lett. B 227 (1989) 167 [INSPIRE].
M. Awramik, M. Czakon, A. Freitas and G. Weiglein, Precise prediction for the W boson mass in the standard model, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 053006 [hep-ph/0311148] [INSPIRE].
M. Steinhauser, Leptonic contribution to the effective electromagnetic coupling constant up to three loops, Phys. Lett. B 429 (1998) 158 [hep-ph/9803313] [INSPIRE].
B.W. Lee and J. Zinn-Justin, Spontaneously Broken Gauge Symmetries Part 3: Equivalence, Phys. Rev. D 5 (1972) 3155 [INSPIRE].
C. Grosse-Knetter and R. Kögerler, Unitary gauge, Stuckelberg formalism and gauge invariant models for effective lagrangians, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993) 2865 [hep-ph/9212268] [INSPIRE].
Acknowledgments
S.D. and J.R. thank the Research Training Group GRK2044 of the German Research Foundation (DFG) for financial support. H.R.’s research is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) — project no. 442089526; 442089660.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
ArXiv ePrint: 2308.07845
Rights and permissions
Open Access . This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Dittmaier, S., Rehberg, J. & Rzehak, H. Renormalization of a Standard Model extension with a Dark Abelian Sector and predictions for the W-boson mass. J. High Energ. Phys. 2024, 37 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)037
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)037