Skip to main content

How triadic diagrams represent conceptual structures

  • Formal Concept Analysis
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream (ICCS 1997)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 1257))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper is devoted to explain different kinds of information and knowledge which can be read off triadic diagrams (cf. Fig. 3). Such labelled line diagrams graphically represent the conceptual structure of triadic contexts which can be represented as three dimensional data tables. In greater detail it is elaborated how to read such diagrams and how ordinary (dyadic) conceptual structures can be determined within the triadic diagrams. For the complete order-theoretic understanding of the triadic diagrams, the necessary formal definitions are gradually introduced and illustrated in the discussion of the example about the three synoptic Gospels St. Matthew, St. Mark, and St. Luke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. K. Biedermann: Triadic Galois Connections. In: Proceedings of the Conference on General Algebra and Discrete Mathematics (52. Arbeitstagung Allgemeine Algebra), Potsdam 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. Biedermann: An Equational Theory for Trilattices (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Brink: Power Structures. Algebra Universalis, 30 (1993), 177–216.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. Ganter, R. Wille: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Mathematische Grundlagen. Springer, Heidelberg 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  5. F. Lehmann, R. Wille: A Triadic Approach to Formal Concept Analysis. In: G. Ellis, R. Levinson, W. Rich and J.G. Sowa (ed.). Conceptual structures: applications, implementations and theorey. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 954. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1995, 32–43.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ch. S. Peirce: Collected Papers. Harvard Univ. Press, Camebridge 1931–35.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Wille: Bedeutung von Begriffsverbänden. In: B. Ganter, R. Wille, K. E. Wolff (Hrsg.): Beiträge zur Begriffsanalyse. B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim 1987, 161–211.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Wille: The Basic Theorem of Triadic Concept Analysis. Order 12 (1995), 149–158.

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Wille: Conceptual landscapes of knowledge: A pragmatic paradigm for knowledge processing. FB4-Preprint, TH Darmstadt 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Wille: Conceptual Structures of Multicontexts, In: P. W. Eklund, G. Ellis, G. Mann (eds.), Conceptual structures: representation as interlingua. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York, 1996, 23–39

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Wille, M. Zickwolff: Grundlagen einer Triadischen Begriffsanalyse (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Dickson Lukose Harry Delugach Mary Keeler Leroy Searle John Sowa

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Biedermann, K. (1997). How triadic diagrams represent conceptual structures. In: Lukose, D., Delugach, H., Keeler, M., Searle, L., Sowa, J. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Fulfilling Peirce's Dream. ICCS 1997. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1257. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027879

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0027879

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-63308-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69424-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics