Abstract
The need to expand traditional, print-based versions of literacy to also incorporate attention to multimodal forms of text and literacy in the English curriculum is now well established. Much can be learnt about students and their literacy practices from the exploration of their engagement with digital culture - particularly videogames -from their out-of-school lifeworlds. However, the emerging set of skills and competencies or, the ‘new’ literacies and literacy practices associated with multiple and ever-emerging genres generated through information and communications technologies, present challenges in terms of how they might be conceptualised as literacy (or not) and how the multiple dimensions entailed in gameplay are increasingly a part of what it means to be literate in the 21st century. Drawing on two case studies of classroom work, the paper describes approaches to conceptualising the complexity of digital texts and their access, production and distribution and the opportunity to create spaces where students could interact, socialise and learn in both the real and virtual world. Dimensions such as play, interactivity, action, movement and time raise challenging questions about the limits and possibilities of constructing games and gameplay as texts and literacy practices that push the boundaries of literacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alverman, D. (2008). Why bother theorising adolescents online literacies for classroom practice and Research? Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 52(1): 8–19.
Aarseth, E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Brand, J. (2007). Interactive Australia 2007, Bond University. Retrieved June 19, 2009 from http://www.ieaa.com.au/research/Interactive%20Australia%202007.pdf
Burn, A. and Parker, D. (2005). Analysing Media Texts. London: Continuum.
Consalvo, M. (2007). Cheating: Gaining Advantage in Videogames. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Corio, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. and Leu, D. (Eds) (2008). Handbook of Research on New Literacies. New York and London: Erlbaum.
Frasca, G. (2003). Ludologists love stories too: Notes from a debate that never took place. Retrieved December 31, 2008 from www.ludology.org
Galloway, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gee, J. (2003). What Videogames have to Teach us about Learning and Literacy. New York and Houndmills: Palgreave Macmillan.
Juul, J. (2001). Games telling stories? A brief note on games and narratives. In Game Studies 1. Retrieved April 1, 2009 from http://www.gamestudies.org/0101/juul-gts/
Kress, G. (2006). Communication now and in the future, qualifications and curriculum Authority. Retrieved June 3, 2009 from http://www.qca.org.uk/downloads/12292_commun_now_and_in_the_future.pdf
New London Group (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
Salen, K. and Zimmerman, E. (2003). Rules of Play MIT Press Mass
Walsh, C. S. and Apperley, T. (2009). ‘Gaming capital: Rethinking literacy’, in P. Jeffrey (Ed.) Changing Climates: Education for sustainable futures. Proceedings of the 2008 AARE. Coldstream, Victoria: AARE.
Games and software cited
Microsoft Games Studios (2007). Halo 3http://halo.xbox.com/halo3/
Rockstar Games (2001). Grand Theft Auto IIIhttp://www.rockstargames.com/grandtheftauto/
Rockstar Games (2008). Grand Theft Auto IVhttp://www.rockstargames.com/grandtheftauto/
Vivendi Universal (2003). The Simpsons Hit and Run, http://www.vivendi.com/vivendi/-accueil-en-
YoYo games (2008). Gamemaker 7http://www.yoyogames.com/mak
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beavis, C., O’Mara, J. Computer games — pushing at the boundaries of literacy. AJLL 33, 65–76 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651822
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651822