Abstract
The article outlines the aspects of the research design that engage with teachers in schools and discusses some of the challenges and affordances that the relationships (between the teachers, the schools, the research partners and the researchers) experienced in the project, Literacy in the 21st Century: Learning from Computer Games. The article has a particular focus on the teachers’ work as co-researchers, their descriptions of working in the project and some of the issues for teachers and researchers in working in this way. The data used for the analysis includes the teacher writing, interview data and researcher observations. The teachers who participated in the project designed and delivered curriculum using computer games in various ways including making their own games, evaluating games, analyzing game structures, and examining the culture around games and the ways in which games and other technologies are merging. Some of these curriculum units are described elsewhere in this issue (Beavis & O’Mara, 2010). This article’s purpose is to follow the teachers’ professional learning experiences rather than detail these curriculum designs, which the teachers will describe elsewhere. The paper concludes with our personal reflections on the affordances and challenges of working this way for us in our different roles in the research team.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beavis, C. (2001). Digital Culture, Digital Literacies: Expanding Notions of Text. In C. Beavis & C. Durrant (Eds.), P(lCT)ures of English: teachers, learners and technology (pp. 145–11). Kent Town, S. Aust.: Wakefield Press.
Beavis, C., & O’Mara, J. (2006). Preparing English teachers for a changing world. In B. Doecke, M. Howie & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Only connect: English teaching, schooling and community (pp. ix, 379). Kent Town, South Australia: Wakefield Press in association with The Australian Association for the Teaching of English.
Beavis, C. and O’Mara, J. (2010). Computer games - pushing at the boundaries of literacy, Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(1), 65–76.
Bogost, I. (2006). Unit Operation: An Approach to Videogame Criticism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2005). Designing turn-around pedagogies and contesting deficit assumptions. In B. Comber & B. Kamler (Eds.), Turn-around Pedagogies: literacy interventions for at-risk students. Newtown: PETA.
Comber, B., & Kamler, B. (2008). Sustaining the next generation of teacher-researchers to work for social justice. In B. Somekh & S. Noffke (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Action Research. Sage Publications.
Doecke, B., Green, B., Kostogris, A., Reid, J., & Sawyer, W. (2007). Knowing practice in English teaching? Research challenges in representing the professional practice of English teachers, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(3), 4–21.
Eisner, E.W. & Ebook Library. (2005). Reimagining schools: the selected works of Elliot Eisner. London, New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Firkins, A., & Wong, C. (2005). From the basement of the ivory tower: English teachers as collaborative researchers, English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(2), 62–71.
Freebody, P. & Luke, A. (2003). Literacy as Engaging with New Forms of Life: The ‘Four Roles’ model. In G. Bull & M. Anstey (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (pp. 53–64). Frenchs Forest, N.S.W.: Pearson Education.
Galloway, A. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Gee, J.P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goswami, D., & Stillman, P. (1987). Preface. In D. Goswami & P. Stillman (Eds.), Reclaiming the Classroom: teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Boynton/Cook
Green, B. (1999). The New Literacy Challenge? Literacy Learning: Secondary Thoughts 7, pp. 36–46.
Honan, E. (2003). Teachers as researchers: using the four resources model as a map of practices. In Teachers as leaders: teacher education for a global profession: ICET 2003 International yearbook on teacher education, 48th world assembly, Vol. 1 (pp. 1–11). Melbourne: ICET.
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Deakin University, School of Education, Open Campus Program. (1988). The Action research planner. Waurn Ponds, Vic: Deakin University Press.
Kincheloe, J.L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2004). A handbook for teacher researcher: from design to implementation. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Loughran, J. (1996). Developing Reflective Practice: Learning about Teaching and Learning Through Modelling. London: Falmer Press.
O’Mara, J. (2006). Capturing the Ephemeral: Reflection-in-action as research. N.J.:Drama Australia Journal Special Research Edition, 30 41–51.
Ryan, J. (2004). Lecturer as teacher. Teacher as researcher: Making theory practical. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 3(2), 113–121.
Schön, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
O’Mara, J., Gutierrez, A. Classroom teachers as co-researchers: The affordances and challenges of collaboration. AJLL 33, 41–53 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651820
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03651820