Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior

  • Published:
The Behavior Analyst Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent developments in the analysis of derived relational responding, under the rubric of relational frame theory, have brought several complex language and cognitive phenomena within the empirical reach of the experimental analysis of behavior. The current paper provides an outline of relational frame theory as a new approach to the analysis of language, cognition, and complex behavior more generally. Relational frame theory, it is argued, also provides a suitable paradigm for the analysis of a wide variety of social behavior that is mediated by language. Recent empirical evidence and theoretical interpretations are provided in support of the relational frame approach to social behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, R. A., Detrich, R., & Weninger, J. M. (1988). On the functional role of the verbalization in correspondence training procedures. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 345–356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, D., & Roche, B. (1997). A behavior-analytic approach to behavioral reflexivity. The Psychological Record, 47, 543–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2000). Understanding complex human behavior: Two approaches to the concept of generalized operant classes. The Psychological Record, 50, 251–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51, 287–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (in press). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry: II. The Psychological Record.

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Hayes, S. C., Barnes Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. In H. W. Reese & R. Kail (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 28, pp. 101–138). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bush, K. M., Sidman, M., & de Rose, T. (1989). Contextual control of emergent equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 29–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C., Shimoff, E., & Matthews, B. A. (1987). Correspondence between definitions and procedures: A reply to Stokes, Osnes, and Guevremont. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 401–404.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P. N., & Danforth, J. S. (1991). The role of rules in concept learning. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 205–225). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cota, A. A., Evans, C. R., Dion, K. L., Kilik, L., & Longman, R. S. (1995). The structure of group cohesion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 572–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullinan, V., Barnes, D., Hampson, P. J., & Lyddy, F. (1994). The contribution of behaviour analysis to a connectionist model of basic syntax. In G. Orchard (Ed.), Neural computing research and applications (Part 2, pp. 33–45). Belfast, Northern Ireland: INNA.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Freitas Ribeiro, A. (1989). Correspondence in children’s self-report: Tacting and manding aspects. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 361–367.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1995). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions through the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness, more than, and less than. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 163–184.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S., & Barnes, D. (1996). A transformation of self-discrimination response functions in accordance with the arbitrarily applicable relations of sameness and opposition. The Psychological Record, 46, 271–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, L., Adams, B. J., Verhave, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, M. M. (1988). Towards a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In M. M. Gergen (Ed.), Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge (pp. 87–104). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goethals, G. R., & Darley, J. (1977). Social comparison theory: An attributional approach. In J. M. Suls & R. L. Miller (Eds.), Social comparison processes: Theoretical and empirical perspectives (pp. 259–278). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey, I., & Barnes, D. (1996). Stimulus equivalence and attitudes. The Psychological Record, 46, 243–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerin, B. (1994). Analyzing social behavior: Behavior analysis and the social sciences. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. H. (1977). Cannibals and kings. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. J., & Green, G. (1990). Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 225–237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1984). Making sense of spirituality. Behaviorism, 12, 99–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1994). Relational frame theory: A functional approach to verbal events. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, O. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 9–30). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Blackledge, J. T., & BarnesHolmes, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3–20). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Gifford, E. V., & Ruckstuhl, L. E. (1996). Relational frame theory and executive function: A behavioral approach. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory, and executive function (pp. 279–306). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1989). The verbal action of the listener as the basis for rule-governance. In S. C. Hayes (Ed.), Rule-governed behavior: Cognition, contingencies and instructional control (pp. 153–190). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, O., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (2000). Derived relational responding as generalized operant behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 207–227.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Hains, S. C. (1996). Intergroup relations and group solidarity: Effects of group identification and social beliefs on depersonalized attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self categorisation and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houmanfar, R., Hayes, L. J., & Fredericks, D. W. (2001). Religion and cultural survival. The Psychological Record, 51, 19–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., & Mandell, W. (1952). An experimental comparison of conclusion-drawing by the communicator and by the audience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 581–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, J. R. (1982). Cultural psychology. Chicago: Principia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., Diaz, Y. E., Stevenson, L. Y., Hauth, A. C., Brasfield, T. L., et al. (1991). HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of a population: An experimental community-level analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 168–171.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. A., St. Lawrence, J. S., Stevenson, L. Y., Hauth, A. C., Kalichman, S. C., Diaz, Y. E., et al. (1992). Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: The effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities. American Journal of Public Health, 82, 1483–1489.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, J. H. (1997). The analysis of rule-governed behavior in social psychology. The Psychological Record, 47, 699–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzetta, J. T. (1955). Group behavior under stress. Human Relations, 8, 29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, G., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of derived stimulus relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, K. E. (1980). Do as I say, not as I do. New Zealand Psychologist, 9, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moxon, P. D., Keenan, M., & Hine, L. (1993). Gender role stereotyping and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 381–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). The referential nature of rules and instructions: A response to Instructions, Rules, and Abstractions: A Misconstrued Relation by Emilio Ribes-Iñesta. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hora, D., Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (in press). Response latencies to multiple derived stimulus relations: Testing two predictions of relational frame theory. The Psychological Record.

  • Paniagua, F. A. (1985). Development of self-care skills and helping behaviors in adolescents in a group home through correspondence training. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 16, 237–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence I. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225–238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., Jackson, J., & Galizio, M. (2000). Acquisition of arbitrary conditional discriminations by young normally developing children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 177–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Riegler, H. C., & Baer, D. M. (1989). A developmental analysis of rule-following. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 21, pp. 191–219). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1996). Arbitrarily applicable relational responding and sexual categorization: A critical test of the derived difference relation. The Psychological Record, 46, 451–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1997). A transformation of respondently conditioned stimulus functions in accordance with arbitrarily applicable relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 275–301.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., & Barnes, D. (1998). The experimental analysis of human sexual arousal: Some recent developments. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 37–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., Barnes, D., & Smeets, P. M. (1997). Incongruous stimulus pairing and conditional discrimination training: Effects on relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68, 143–160.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & McGeady, S. (2000). Contextual control over the derived transformation of discriminative and sexual arousal functions. The Psychological Record, 50, 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schauss, S. L., Chase, P. N., & Hawkins, R. P. (1997). Environment-behavior relations, behavior therapy and the process of persuasion and attitude change. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 28, 31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schlinger, H., & Blakely, E. (1987). Function-altering effects of contingency-specifying stimuli. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 41–45.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1992). Equivalence relations: Some basic considerations. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 15–27). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appelton-Century-Crofts.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spradlin, J. E., Saunders, K. J., & Saunders, R. R. (1992). The stability of equivalence classes. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 29–43). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S. C., & Lipkens, R. (2001). Relations among relations: Analogy, metaphor, and allegory. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 73–86). New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001). Generating derived relational networks via the abstraction of common physical properties: A possible model of analogical reasoning. The Psychological Record, 51, 381–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M. E., Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watt, A., Keenan, M., Barnes, D., & Cairns, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, D. A., & Shapiro, P. (1991). Facilitation of outgroup stereotypes by enhanced ingroup identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 431–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. G., & Hayes, S. C. (1996). Resurgence of derived stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 66, 267–281.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wulfert, E., & Biglan, A. (1994). A contextual approach to research on AIDS prevention. The Behavior Analyst, 17, 353–363.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zacarro, S. J., & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 75, 268–273.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland, Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland

    Bryan Roche, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes, Dermot Barnes-Holmes, Ian Stewart & Denis O’Hora

Authors
  1. Bryan Roche
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dermot Barnes-Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ian Stewart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Denis O’Hora
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Roche.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roche, B., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D. et al. Relational frame theory: A new paradigm for the analysis of social behavior. BEHAV ANALYST 25, 75–91 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392046

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392046

Key words

Search

Navigation