Abstract
This paper describes a research study where constructivism was used as the rationale for the design, implementation and evaluation of four technology-based investigations for Year 12 Applicable Mathematics students. Analysis is given of the successes and difficulties encountered by students and teachers of four classes, including my own, in which the investigations were implemented. The results showed that, for learning activities involving school assessment, many students chose not to work collaboratively — a strategy suggested by social constructivism. The extent to which this may have been detrimental to their learning is discussed. The study illustrates how engaging in research can be a means for teachers to understand theory. In particular, the paper describes the meaning made of constructivism through this example of teaching practice and research activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Apple, M. W. (1988). Teaching and technology: The hidden effects of computers on teachers and students. In L. E. Beyer, & M. W. Apple (Eds.),The curriculum: Problems, politics and possibilities (pp. 289–311). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., Yackel, E., & McNeal, B. (1995). Characteristics of classroom mathematics traditions: An interactional analysis.American Education Research Journal, 29 (3), 573–604.
Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994).Research methods in education (4th ed.). London: Routlege.
Confrey, J. (1990). What constructivism implies for teaching. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.),Journal for research in mathematics education (pp. 107–122). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. L. (1994). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Duit, R., & Confrey, J. (1996). Reorganising the curriculum and teaching to improve learning in science and mathematics. In D. F. Treagust, R. Duit, & B. J. Fraser (Eds.),Teaching and learning in science and mathematics (pp. 79–93). New York, NY: Teachers College.
Ernest, P. (1995). The one and the many. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),Constructivism in education (pp. 459–486). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Forster, P. A. (1996).The development and evaluation of four mathematics investigations which use electronic tools and a constructivist approach. Unpublished Masters project. Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.
Forster, P. A. (1997). Teaching through technology.Australian Senior Mathematics Journal, 11 (1), 54–61.
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice.Educational Researcher 26 (7), 4–12.
Maor, D., & Taylor, P. C. (1995). Teacher epistemology and scientific inquiry in computerised classroom environments.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32 (8), 839–854.
Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate?Educational Researcher, 17 (2), 13–17.
Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.),Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 7–18). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Polkinghorne, D. E. (1997). Reporting qualitative research as practice. In W. G. Tierney, & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.),Representation and the text (pp. 3–22). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Roth, W.-M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 145–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Taylor, P. C. (1996). Mythmaking and mythbreaking in the mathematics classroom.Educational Studies in Mathematics 31, 151–173.
Tobin, K., & Imwold, D. (1992). The mediational role of constraints in the reform of mathematics curricula. In J. A. Malone, & P. C. S. Taylor (Eds.),Constructivist interpretations of teaching and learning mathematics (pp. 15–34). Perth, WA: Curtin University of Technology.
Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1993). Constructivism as a referent for teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.),The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Voigt, J. (1994). Negotiation of mathematical meaning and learning mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 275–298.
Von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Mayer & N. Noddings (Eds.),Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19–29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wood, T. Cobb, P., & Yackel. E. (1995). Reflections on learning and teaching mathematics in elementary school. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.),Constructivism in education (pp. 401–422). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Forster, P. Applying constructivist theory to practice in a technology-based learning environment. Math Ed Res J 11, 81–93 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217062
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217062