Skip to main content
Log in

Behavioral modification in choice process ofDrosophila

  • Published:
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In visual operant conditioning ofDrosophila at the flight simulator, only motor output of flies—yaw torque—is recorded, which is involved in the conditioning process. The current study used a newly-designed data analysis method to study the torque distribution ofDrosophila. Modification of torque distribution represents the effects of operant conditioning on flies’ behavioral mode. Earlier works[10] showed that, when facing contradictory visual cues, flies could make choices based upon the relative weightiness of different cues, and it was demonstrated that mushroom bodies might play an important role in such choice behavior. The new “torque-position map” method was used to explore the CS-US associative learning and choice behavior inDrosophila from the aspect of its behavioral mode. Finally, this work also discussed various possible neural bases involved in visual associative learning, choice processing and modification processing of the behavioral mode in the visual operant conditioning ofDrosophila.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Waddell, S., Quinn, W. G., What can we teachDrosophila? What can they teach us? Trends Genet., 2001, 17: 719–726.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wolf, R., Heisenberg, M., Basic organization of operant behavior as revealed inDrosophila flight orientation, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1991, 169: 699–705.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Guo, A. K., Liu, L., Xia, S. Z. et al., Conditioned visual flight orientation inDrosophila: Dependence on age, practice and diet, Learn Mem., 1996, 3: 49–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Xia, S. Z., Liu, L., Feng, C. H. et al., Memory consolidation inDrosophila operant visual learning, Learn Mem., 1997, 4: 205–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolf, R., Wittig, T., Liu, L. et al.,Drosophila mushroom bodies are dispensable for visual, tactile, and motor learning, Learn Mem., 1998, 5: 166–178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wang, X., Liu, L., Xia, S. Z. et al., Relationship between visual learning/memory ability and brain camp level inDrosophila, Sci. in China, Ser. C, 1998, 41(5): 503–511.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brembs, B., Heisenberg, M., The operant and the classical in conditioned orientation inDrosophila melanogaster, at the flight simulator, Learn Mem., 2000, 7: 104–115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heisenberg, M., Wolf, R., Brembs, B., Flexibility in a single behavioral variable ofDrosophila, Learn Mem., 2001, 8: 1–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu, L., Wolf, R., Ernst, R. et al., Context generalization inDrosophila visual learning requires mushroom bodies, Nature, 1999, 400: 753–756.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tang, S. M., Guo, A. K., Choice behavior ofDrosophila facing contradictory visual cues, Science, 2001, 294: 1543–1547.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu, Z.H., Gong, Z. F., Feng, C. H. et al., An emergent mechanism of selective visual attention inDrosophila, Biol. Cybern., 2000, 82: 61–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. de Belle, J. S., Heisenberg, M., Expression ofDrosophila mushroom body mutations in alternative genetic background: A case study of themushroom body miniature gene (mbm), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 1996, 93: 9875–9880.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heisenberg, M., Wolf, R., Vision inDrosophila: Genetics of Microbehavior, Berlin: Springer, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. DeZazzo, J., Tully, T., Dissection of memory formation: From behavioral pharmacology to molecular genetics, Trends Neurosci., 1995, 18: 212–218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Milner, B., Squire, L. R., Kandel, E. R., Cognitive neuroscience and the study of memory, Neuron, 1998, 20: 445–468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tully, T., Quinn, W. G., Classical conditioning and retention in normal and mutantDrosophila melanogaster, J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1985, 157: 263–277.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dubnau, J., Grady, L., Kitamoto, T. et al., Disruption of neurotransmission inDrosophila mushroom body blocks retrieval but not acquisition of memory, Nature, 2001, 411: 476–480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McGuire, S. E., Le, P. T., Davis, R. L., The role ofDrosophila mushroom body signaling in olfactory memory, Science, 2001, 293(5533): 1330–1333.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Martin, J. R., Ernst, R., Heisenberg, M., Mushroom bodies suppress locomotor activity inDrosophila melanogaster, Learn Mem., 1998, 5: 179–191.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aike Guo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, S., Tang, S., Li, Y. et al. Behavioral modification in choice process ofDrosophila . Sci. China Ser. C.-Life Sci. 46, 399–413 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192583

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192583

Keywords

Navigation