Abstract
Ropalidia marginata, the most common Indian social wasp, belongs to a crucial stage of social evolution showing no obvious morphological caste differentiation but a behavioural caste differentiation and a dominance hierarchy that appears to influence division of labour. The nests consist of a single open comb that can sometimes have up to 500 cells and 10 pedicels. Nests are initiated and abandoned all round the year. Initiation is by 1–20 foundresses, 1–4 being the most common number. There is a great deal of variation in brood developmental times both within and between nests. Male progeny disappear from the nest soon after emergence while daughters stay on at the parent nest for a mean period of about a month. Small nests have a single egg layer while large nests have two or more females with well developed ovaries that presumably lay eggs. Most nests are short-lived, small nests being highly susceptible to failure. Large nests are less susceptible to failure but the emergence of multiple egg layers reduces the average relatedness of workers to the brood which presumably is the cause for large scale emigrations from these nests. An interaction of ecological and soical factors therefore appears to determine the growth of a nest.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander R D 1974 The evolution of social behaviour;Ann. Rev. Ecoi. Syst. 5 325–383
Belvadi V V and Govindan R 1981 Nesting habits and behaviour ofRopalidia Icariola) marginata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) in South India;Colemania 1 95–101
Carl J 1934Ropalidia montana sp. et son nid. Un type nouveau d’ architecture vespienne;Rev. Suisse. Zool. 41 677–691
Darchen R 1976Ropalidia cincta, guepe sociale de la savane de Lamto (Cote-D’Ivoire);Awl Soc. EntomoL Fr. (NS)12 579–601
Evans H E and West-Eberhard M J 1970The wasps Ann Arbor, The Univ. of Michigan press: pp. 265
Gadagkar R 1980 Dominance hierarchy and division of labour in the social wasp,Ropalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae);Curr. Sci. 49 772–775
Gadagkar R and Joshi N V 1982a Behaviour of the Indian Social WaspRopalidia cyathiformis (Fab.) on a nest of separate combs (Hymenoptera: Vespidae);J. Zool 198 27–37
Gadagkar R and Joshi N V 1982b A Comparative study of social structure in colonies ofRopalidia, inThe Biology of the Social Insects, (eds) M D Breed, C D Michener and H E Evans, Proc. IX congress of the International Union for the study of social Insects, Boulder, Colorado USA pp. 187–191
Gadagkar R and Joshi N V 1982c When a wasp colony splits InThe Biology of the Social Insects, (eds) M D Breed, C D Michener and H E Evans Proc. IX congress of the International union for the Study of Social Insects, Boulder Colorado USA pp. 217
Gadagkar R and Joshi N V 1983a Quantitative ethology of social wasps: Time-activity budgets and caste differentiation inRopalidia marginata (Lep.) (Hymenoptera: Vespide);Animal Behaviour 31 26–31
Gadagkar R and Joshi N V 1983b Sociai organization in the Indian waspRopalidia cyathiformis (Fab.) (Hymenoptera: Vespidae);Z. Tierpsychol (in Press)
Gadgil M and Mahabal A S 1974 Caste differentiation in the paper waspRopalidia marginata (Lep.);Curr. Sci. 43 482
Hamilton W D 1964a The genetical evolution of social behaviour I;J. Theor. Biol. 7 1–16
Hamilton W D 1964b The genetical evolution of social behaviour II;J. Theor. Biol. 7 17–52
Hamilton W D 1972 Altruism and related phenomena mainly in the social insects;Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3 193–232
Jeanne R L 1972 Social biology of the Neo-tropical waspMischocyttarus drewseni;Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool Harv. Univ. 144 63–150
Jeanne R L 1980 Evolution of social behaviour in the Vespidae;Ann. Rev. Entomol. 25 371–396
Lin N and Michener C D 1972 Evolution of sociality in insects;Q. Rev. Biol. 47 131–159
Litte M 1977 Behavioural ecology of the social wasp,Mischocyttarus mexicanus;Beh. Ecol Sociobiol. 2 229–246
Litte M 1979Mischocyttarus flavitarsis in Arizona: social and nesting biology of a polistine wasp;Z. Tierpsychol. 50 282–312
Litte M 1981 Social biology of the Polistine waspMischocyttarus labiatus: survival in a Colombian rain forest;Smiths. Contr. Zool. No. 327
Michener C D 1969 Comparative social behaviour of bees;Ann. Rev. Entomol. 14 299–342
Michener C D 1974The social behaviour of the bees; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press xii + 404 pp.
Richards O W and Richards M J 1951 Observations on the social wasps of South America (Hymenoptera: Vespidae);Trans. Roy. Entomol. Soc. Lond. 102 1–170
Ross N M and Gamboa G J 1981 Nestmate discrimination in social wasps (Pollsters metricus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae);Beh. Ecol. Sociobiol. 9 163–165
Roubaud E 1916 Recherches biologiques sur les guspes sociales et cosales d’Afrique. La guese de la vie social et F evolution de l’instinct maternal chez les vespides;Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. 1 1–160
Saussure H de 1853–59Monographie de quepes sociales, ou de la tribu des Vespiens, onvrage faisant suite a la monogrophie des guiepes solitaires V. Masson Paris
Starr C K 1979 Origin and evolution of insect sociality; A review of modern theory; InSocial Insects, (ed) H R Hermann (New York: Academic Press) Vol. I pp. 35–79
Trivers R L and Hare H 1976 Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects;Science 191 249–263
Vecht J Van der 1962 The Indo-Australian species of the genusRopalidia (Icarid) (Second part);Zool. Verhand. Leiden 57 1–72
West-Eberhard M J 1969 Social biology of polistine wasps;Misc. Publ Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 140 1–101
West-Eberhard M J 1975 The evolution of social behaviour by kin selection;Q. Rev. Biol 50 1–33
Wilson E O 1971The insect societies; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press x + 548 pp.
Wilson E O 1975Sociobiology; Massachusetts: Harvard University Press ix + 697 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gadagkar, R., Gadgil, M., Joshi, N.V. et al. Observations on the natural history and population ecology of the social waspRopalidia marginata (Lep.) from Peninsular India (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Proc Ani Sci 91, 539–552 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186154
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03186154