Abstract
Pure systematics of Agromyzids attracted the attention of many entomologists quite early in the century, but investigations on their biosystematics is still to gain the necessary attention and recognition from entomologists. Their life history and feeding habits being so closely interelated with the chemical nature of their host plant, investigations into their capability to select the right host plant become all the more important. It has become very essential to critically reassess their systematic position and the characters governing this sensitive interspecific relationship. Factors which require special attention in this regard are: (i) the organs and devices responsible for host recognition and host selection, (ii) correlation between the structure of these organs and the behaviour of these flies, (iii) recognition of special features in their biology and (iv) the study on the interrelationship between ecological factors and the special features in their biology.
Though agromyzid infestation causes damage to varied plant parts such as root, stem, leaf and seed etc there is striking structural similarity in the organs and devices responsible for host selection. This is mainly due to the fact that in all cases it is the adult fly which is responsible for choosing the host. As very little information is available on the correlations between structural adaptations for host recognition, selection and the behaviour of Agromyzids, an attempt has been made to highlight these aspects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agarwal N S and Pandey N D 1961 Bionomics ofMelanagromyza phaseoli Cog. Diptera: Agromyzidae;Indian J. Entomol. 23 293–98
Ahmad T 1938 The Tur-Pod fly,Agromyza obtusa Mall. a pest ofCajanus cajan;Indian J. Agric. Sci. 8 63–76
Ahmad T and Gupta R L 1941 The pea leaf minerPhytomyza atricornis (Meigen) in India;Indian J. Entomol. 31 37–49
Bindra O S and Harcharan Sing 1972 Tur-pod flyMelanagromyza obtusa (Malloch) (Diptera: Agromyzidae);Pesticides 6 11–22
Gangrade G A 1962 The biology and morphology of immature stages ofEuderus agromyzae Gangrade (Eulophidae: Hymenoptera);Indian J. Entomol. 24 265–273
Gangrade G A 1964 Losses to tur (Cajanus cajan) byMelanagromyza obtusa Mall.;Indian J. Entomol. 26 264–265
Griffiths G C D 1967 Revision of thePhytomyza syngenesiae group (Diptera: Agromyzidae) including species hitherto known as “Phytomyza atricornis Meigen”;Stuttg. Beitr. Naturkd. 177 1–23
Ipe I M 1974 Morphological, behavioural and biological studies ofMelanagromyza obtusa (Malloch), (Diptera: Agromyzidae) onCajanus indicus Spreng;Z. Ang. Entomol. 75 89–98
Ipe I M 1978 Generic composition and distributional patterns of Agromyzidae from India;Orient. Insects 12 339–346
Ipe I M 1985 The Agromyzidae: Infestation, Host-plant selection, Host chemistry and interactions;Mem. Sch. Entomol. 9 104
Ipe I M and Bhati Y K S 1977 Studies on the biology ofMelanagromyza sojae (Zehnt.) (Agromyzidae: Diptera) and its incidence of infestation on five cultivated pulse crops in and around Agra;Anz. Schaedlingskd. 50 104–106
Sasakawa M 1977 Family Agromyzidae; inCatalog of the Diptera of the Oriental region (eds) M D Delfinado and D E Hardy (Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii) Vol 3, pp 343–269
Sehgal V K 1965 Studies on Indian Agromyzidae (Diptera)-2;Beitr. Z. Entomol. 15 3–10
Singh Santokh 1983 Ecology of the Agromyzidae (Diptera) associated with leguminous crops in India;Mem. Sch. Entomol. 8 128
Singh Santokh and Ipe I M 1973 The Agromyzidae from India;Mem. Sch. Entomol. 1 286
Spencer K A 1961 A synopsis of the Oriental Agromyzidae (Diptera);Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London 113 55–100
Spencer K A 1973Agromyzidae (Diptera) of economic importance series Entomologica (The Hague: Dr W Junk)
Spencer K A 1986 New Records of Agromyzidae (Diptera) from Southern India with revisionary notes on other Indian species;Colemania 3 1–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ipe, I.M. Biosystematic studies on Agromyzidae from India. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 96, 573–581 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179612
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03179612