Abstract
The purpose of this study was to measure skin dose using radiochromic film for two step-and-shoot IMRT fields and compare the results to the skin dose for a conventional open field. All exposures were made using a 6 MV photon beam produced by a Varian 21EX linear accelerator (Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) equipped with a Millennium 120 leaf MLC. Three different field configurations were used, these were an open field, a step-and-shoot IMRT field and a clinical IMRT field. The mean ratio of the skin dose to dose at dmax for an open 10×10 cm2 field at 100 cm SSD was 0.178±0.003. The step-and-shoot IMRT field consisted of 1 cm wide strips of decreasing intensity that were delivered using a step-and-shoot technique across a 10×10 cm2 field. The ratio of skin dose to dose at dmax ranged from 0.180 to 0.257, with the low intensity steps having a higher relative skin dose compared to the high intensity steps. A model was derived that attributed these variations to the electron contamination from both the adjacent and more distant high intensity steps. The clinical field consisted of a 25 segment 9.8×10.0 cm2 beam arrangement. The ratio of skin dose to dose at dmax for the clinical IMRT field ranged from 0.093 to 0.284. The results indicated that an IMRT field produced only minor changes in the relative skin dose, with variations potentially attributable to fluctuations in the electron contamination produced by neighbouring regions of different intensity. The use of an individual IMRT field does not significantly increase the skin dose above that of a conventional photon field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee, N., Chuang, C., Quivey, J., Phillips, T., Akazawa, P., Verhey, L., and Xia, P.,Skin toxicity due to intensitymodulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma, Int. J. Rad. Onc. Biol. Phys., 53(3): 630–637, 2002.
Dogan, N., and Glasgow, G.,Surface and build-up region dosimetry for obliquely incident intensity modulated radiotherapy 6 MV x rays, Med. Phys., 30(12): 3091–3096, 2003.
Thomas, S. J. and Hoole, A. C.,The effect of optimization on surface dose in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), Phys. Med. Biol., 49(21): 4919–28, 2004.
Paelinck, L., De Wagter, C., Van Esch, A., Duthoy, W., Depuydt, T., and De Neve, W.,Comparison of build-up dose between Elekta and Varian linear accelerators for highenergy photon beams using radiochromic film and clinical implications for IMRT head-and-neck treatments, Phys. Med. Biol., 50(3): 413–428, 2005.
Yokoyama, S., Roberson, P. L., Litzenberg, D. W., Moran, J. M. and Fraass, B. A.,Surface buildup dose dependence on photon field delivery technique for IMRT, J. Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 5(2): 71–81, 2004.
Butson, M., Yu, P., and Metcalfe, P.,Extrapolated surface dose measurements with radiochromic film, Med. Phys., 26(3): 485–488, 1999.
Cadman, P., McNutt, T., Bzdusek, K.,Validation of physics improvements for IMRT with a commercial treatment planning system, J Appl. Clin. Med. Phys., 6(2): 74–86, 2005.
Kim, J. O., Siebers, J. V., Keall, P. J., Arnfield, M. R. and Mohan R.A Monte Carlo study of radiation transport through multileaf collimators, Med. Phys 28(12): 2497–506, 2001.
Ding, G. X.,Energy spectra, angular spread, fluence profiles and dose distributions of 6 and 18 MV photon beams: results of Monte Carlo simulations for a Varian 2100EX accelerator, Phys. Med. Biol., 47(7):1025–46, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, S., Williams, M., Butson, M. et al. Comparison of skin dose between conventional radiotherapy and IMRT. Australas. Phys. Eng. Sci. Med. 29, 272–277 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178577
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178577