Skip to main content
Log in

Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers

  • Published:
European Journal of Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This review of the literature had four main aims: to examine several problems associated with usage of prior knowledge terminology; to explore key dimensions of prior knowledge referenced primarily by researchers in the field of cognitive psychology and artificial intelligence; to construct a conceptual map of prior knowledge terminology; and, to draw implications for future research and instructional practice. Overall, the complexity of the construct prior knowledge is articulated from a European and an American point of view and an argument is made for the more thoughtful communication of prior knowledge terminology in future studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving issues and emerging concerns.Educational Psychologist, 27, 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F.J.R.C. (1994). Adults’ views about knowing and believing. In R. Garner & P. A. Alexander (Eds.),Beliefs about text and about instruction with text (pp. 223–244). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Judy, J. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance.Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1992, April). Learning from physics text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Alexander, P. A., Kulikowich, J. M., & Schulze, S. K. (1992, April). How subject-matter knowledge affects recall and interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.

  • Alexander, P. A., Pate, E. P., Kulikowich, J. M., Farrell, D. M., & Wright, N. L. (1989). Domain-specific and strategic knowledge: Effects of training on students of differing ages or competence levels.Learning and Individual Differences, 1, 283–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, P. A., Schallert, D. L., & Hare, V. C. (1991). Coming to terms: How researchers in learning and literacy talk about knowledge.Review of Educational Research, 61, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. R. (1980).Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. (1977). The notion of schemata and the educational enterprise. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.),Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 415–431). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. (1984). Some reflections on the acquisition of knowledge.Educational Researcher, 13, 5–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Pichert, J. W., Goetz, E. T., Schallert, D. L., Stevens, K. V., & Trollip, S. R. (1976). Instantiation of general terms.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 667–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C., Reynolds, R. E., Schallert, D. L., & Goetz, E. T. (1977). Frameworks for comprehending.American Educational Research Journal, 14, 367–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman, C. (1985): What written knowledge does: Three examples of academic discourse.Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S. (1976).Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bransford, J. D. (1979).Human cognition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition: The development of selective attention strategies for learning from text. In M. L. Kamil (Ed.),Directions in reading: Reading and instruction (pp. 21–43). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & P. H. Kluwe (Eds.),Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Harris, G. (1978). Artificial intelligence and learning strategies. In H. O’Neil (Ed.),Learning strategies (pp. 107–139). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (1985).Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973).Perception in chess.Cognitive Psychology, 4, 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M. T., Glaser, R., & Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.),Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7–76). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G. (1983).The psychology of cognition. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. O. (1989). Fragments of an economic habitus. Conceptions of economic phenomena in freshmen and seniors.European Journal of Psychology of Education, 4, 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E. (1990). Acquiring and teaching cognitive skills: A state-of-the-art of theory and research. In P. J. Drenth, J. A. Sergeant, & R. J. Takens (Eds.),European perspectives in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 237–263). London: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., Lodewijks, H., Parmentier, R., & Span, P. (1987).Learning and instruction: European research in an international context. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (1987). Children’s problem solving skills and processes with respect to elementary arithmetic word problems. In E. De Corte, H. Lodewijks, R. Parmentier, & P. Span (Eds.),Learning and instruction: European research in an international context (Vol. 1, pp. 297–308). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1988).Variables influencing the indexation of the “prior knowledge state” concept and a conceptual model for research. Research Report 2.2. Heerlen: Centre for Educational Technology and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1990a). Instructional implications of recent research and empirically based theories on the effect of prior knowledge on learning. In J. M. Pieters, K., Breuer, & P. R. J. Simons (Eds.), Learning Environments. Recent research in Psychology (pp. 339–357). Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1990b).Mapping prior knowledge or expertise. OTIC Research Reports 28. Heerlen: Centre for Educational Technology and Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1992).Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. Utrecht, London: Lemma B.V., Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. (1994a). Investigating the use of knowledge profiles in a flexible learning environment: analysing students’ prior knowledge states. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.),Psychological and Educational Foundations of Technology-Based Learning Environments (pp. 182–189). NATO ASI Series F, Special Programme AET. Berlin, New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. (1994b). Prior knowledge and learning. In T. Husen & N. Postlethwait (Eds.),International Encyclopedia of Education (pp. 4698–4702). London, New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C., Kulikowich, J. M. Knowledge profiles of European and American students. Applications of profile analysis. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Dochy, F. J. R. C., & De Corte, E. Effects of prior knowledge on study results and learning processes within powerful learning environments. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Dochy, F., Valcke, M., & Wagemans, L. (1991). Learning economics in higher education: an investigation concerning the quality and impact of expertise.Higher Education in Europe, 4, 123–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1987, August). Research on students’ alternative frameworks in science-topics, theoretical frameworks, consequence for science teaching. Paper presented at the Second Conference of the European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction, Tubingen, Germany.

  • Ennis, R. (1989). Critical thinking and subject specificity.Educational Researcher, 18 (3), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ennis, R. (1990). The extent to which critical thinking is subject-specific: Further clarification.Educational Researcher, 19 (4), 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eylon, B., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Learning and instruction: An examination of four research perspectives in science education.Review of Educational Research, 58, 5–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falmagne, J. C. (1989). A latent trait theory via a stochastic learning theory for a knowledge space.Psychometrica, 54 (2), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1985).Cognitive development (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculation about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.),Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991).The unschooled mind: New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1987).Metacognition and reading comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings.Review of Educational Research, 60, 517–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.American Psychologist, 39, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., & De Corte, E. (1992). Preface to the assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning. In F. J. R. C. Dochy (Ed.),Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning (pp. 1–2). Utrecht, London: Lemma BV, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1980). Trends in the theory of knowledge for problem solving. In D.T. Tuma, & F. Reif (Eds.),Problem solving and education (pp. 9–25). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greeno, J. G. (1989). A perspective on thinking.American Psychologist, 44, 134–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hare, V. C. (1982). Preassessment of topical knowledge: A validation and an extension.Journal of Reading Behavior, 14, 77–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansweijer, W. N. H., Elshout, J., & Wielinga, B. J. (1985). Het leren van de beginnende probleemoplosser. In J. G. L. C. Lodewijks & P. R. J. Simons (Eds.),Zelfstandig leren (pp. 102–110). Lisse: Swets en Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, B., Marton, F., & Svensson, L. (1985). An approach to describing learning as a change between qualitatively different conceptions. In L. H. T. West, & A. L. Pines (Eds.),Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 88–96. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong, T., de (1986).Kennis en het oplossen van vakinhoudelijke problemen. Eindhoven: Proefschrift Technische Hogeschool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, J. A., & Nicholich, M. (1981). Prior knowledge and its relationship to comprehension.Journal of Reading Behavior, 13, 373–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. H. (1988).Cognition in practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesgold, A. M., Feltovich, P. J., Glaser, R., & Wang, Y. (1981).The acquisition of perceptual diagnosic skill in radiology. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodewijks, J. G. L. C. (1981).Leerstofsequenties van conceptueel netwerk naar cognitieve structuur. Dissertatie, Katholieke Hogeschool Tilburg. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F. (1988).Phenomenography and “the art of teaching all things to all men”. Gothenburg: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messick, S. (1984). The psychology of educational measurement.Journal of Educational Measurement.21, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettes, C. T. C. W. (1984). Probleemoplossen en onderwijs. In L. F. W. De Klerk & A. P. M. Knoers (Eds.),Onderwijspsychologisch onderzoek (pp. 206–219). Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1976).Cognition and reality. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G., Lipson, M. Y., & Wixson, K. K. (1983). Becoming a strategic reader.Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8, 293–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G. M. (1978, April). Cognitive science: Implications for curriculum research and development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto.

  • Posner, M. I., & McLeod, P. (1982). Information processing models, in search of elementary operations.Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 477–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prawat, R. S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis.Review of Educational Research, 59, 1–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1988). Delusions about performance on multiple choice comprehension tests.Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 454–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M., Goodchild, F., Fleet, J., Zajchowski, R., & Evans, E. D. (1989). The challenges of classroom strategy instruction.Elementary School Journal, 89, 301–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabinowitz, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1987). An interactive model of strategic processing. In S. J. Ceci (Ed.),Handbook of cognitive, social, and neuropsychological aspects of learning disabilities (pp. 83–102). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.),Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1988). Promoting conceptual change learning from science textbooks. In P. Ramsden (Ed.),Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 108–141). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. (1980). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.),Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1949).The concept of the mind. London: Hutchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallert, D. L. (1982). The significance of knowledge: A synthesis of research related to schema theory. In W. Otto & Y. S. White (Eds.),Reading expository material (pp. 13–48). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W. (1985). Developmental trends in the metamemory memory behavior relationship: An integrative review. In D. L. Forrest-Pressley, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.),Cognition, metacognition, and human performance (Vol. 1, pp. 110–126). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1983). Episodes and executive decisions in mathematical problem-solving. In R. Lesh & M. Landau (Eds.),Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 345–397). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schon, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types, and words.Designing Studies, 9, 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuell, T. J. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning.Review of Educational Research, 56, 411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuma, D. T., & Reif, F. (1980).Problem solving and education: Issues in teaching and research. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., Greene, T. R., Post, T. A., & Penner, B. C. (1983). Problem-solving skill in the social sciences. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 165–213). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. F., Blais, J., Means, M. L., Greene, T. R., & Ahwesh, E. (1986). Informal reasoning and subject matter knowledge in the solving of economics problems of naive and novice individuals.Cognition and Instruction, 3, 269–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagemans, L. J. J. M., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1991a). Principles in the use of experiential learning as a source of prior knowledge.Distance Education, 12, 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagemans, L. J. J. M., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1991b). Voorkennis en ervaringsleren in het onderwijs voor volwassenen.Vorming, vaktijdschrift voor volwasseneneducatie en sociaal-cultureel werk, 6, 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, C. H. (1987). Relative importance of domain knowledge and overall attitude on acquisition of domain-related information.Cognition and Instruction, 4, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, F. (1989). The impact of schooling on cognitive development: one hypothetical assumption, some empirical results, and many theoretical implications.EARLI news, (8), 3–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dochy, F.J.R.C., Alexander, P.A. Mapping prior knowledge: A framework for discussion among researchers. Eur J Psychol Educ 10, 225–242 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172918

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172918

Key words

Navigation