Skip to main content
Log in

Response by encapsulation of four mealybug species (homoptera: pseudococcidae) to parasitization byAnagyrus pseudococci

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Phytoparasitica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The frequency of encapsulation of eggs ofAnagyrus pseudococci (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) by four mealybug species:Planococcus citri (Risso),PL vovae (Nasonov),Pl. ficus (Signoret) andPseudococcus cryptus Hempel (=citriculus Green), was studied under controlled laboratory conditions. The aggregate percentage of encapsulated eggs (AE) and the percentage of efficient encapsulation (EE) (= percent parasitized mealybugs wherein encapsulation prevented the development of all parasitoid larvae) byPl. citri andPl. vovae did not differ significantly (39.0%vs 38.2% AE and 15.4%vs 17.6% EE, respectively), but was significantly higher than inPs. cryptus (16.2% AE and 5.4% EE). Encapsulation byPl. vovae was significantly higher than byPl. ficus (38.2%vs 20.1% AE and 17.6% vs 7.7% EE, respectively). Neither the host plant nor the rearing temperature significantly affected the incidence of parasitoid encapsulation. It is suggested thatA. pseudococci displays a relatively low physiological adaptation toPl. citri; thus, in a citrus grove, for example,ca 40% of the parasitoid eggs might be lost due to encapsulation. The question of a possible association between encapsulation and host—parasitoid relationships among the mealybugs studied andA. pseudococci, is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett, B.R. (1978) Pseudococcidae.in: Clausen, C.P. [Ed.] Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review.U.S. Dep. Agric. Agric. Handb. 480: 137–170.

  2. Bartlett, B.R. and Ball, J.C. (1966) The evolution of host suitability in a polyphagous parasite with special reference to the role of parasite egg encapsulation.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 59: 42–45.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Dov, Y. (1972) Life history ofTetrastichus ceroplastae (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae), a parasite of Florida wax scale,Ceroplastes floridensis Comstock (Homoptera: Coccidae) in Israel.J. Entomol. Soc. South. Afr. 35: 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Dov, Y. (1994) A Systematic Catalogue of the Mealybugs of the World (Insecta: Homoptera: Pseudococcidae and Putoidae) with Data on the Geographical Distribution, Host Plants, Biology, and Economic Importance. Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berlinger, M. (1977) The Mediterranean vine mealybug and its natural enemies in southern Israel.Phytoparasitica 5: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bess, H.A. (1939) Investigations on the resistance of mealybugs (Homoptera) to parasitization by internal hymenopterous parasites, with special reference to phagocytosis.Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 32: 189–226.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blumberg, D. (1977) Encapsulation of parasitoid eggs in soft scales (Homoptera: Coccidae).Ecol. Entomol. 2: 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blumberg, D. (1988) Encapsulation of eggs of the encyrtid wasp,Metaphycus swirskii, by the hemispherical scale,Saissetia coffeae: Effects of host age and rearing temperature.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 47: 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Blumberg, D. (1991) Seasonal variations in the encapsulation of eggs of the encyrtid parasitoidMetaphycus stanleyi by the pyriform scale,Protopulvinaria pyriformis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58: 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blumberg, D. and DeBach, P. (1981) Effects of temperature and host age upon the encapsulation ofMetaphycus stanleyi andMetaphycus helvolus eggs by brown soft scaleCoccus hesperidum.J. Invertebr. Pathol. 37: 73–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Compere, H. (1939) A second report on some miscellaneous African Encyrtidae in the British Museum.Bull. Entomol. Res. 30: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cox, J.M. (1989) The mealybug genusPlanococcus (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).Bull. Br. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Entomol. 58: 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dijkerman, H.J. (1990) Suitability of eightYponomeuta species as hosts ofDiadegma armillata.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 54: 173–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Giordanengo, P.L. and Nenon, J.P. (1990) Melanization and encapsulation of eggs and larvae ofEpidinocarsis lopezi by its hostPhenacoccus manihoti; effects of superparasitism and egg laying patterns.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 56: 155–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, M. (1994) Studies of the citrus mealybug,Planococcus citri (Risso): Dynamics of fruit infestation and biological control. M.Sc. thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Agriculture, Rehovot, Israel (Hebrew, with English summary).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mendel, Z., Blumberg, D. and Ishaaya, I. (1991) Effect of buprofezin onlcerya purchasi andPlanococcus citri.Phytoparasitica 19: 103–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Messenger, P.S. and van den Bosch, R. (1971) The adaptability of introduced biological control agents,in: Huffaker, C.B. [Ed.] Biological Control. Plenum Press, New York, NY. pp. 68–92.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Moore, D. (1988) Agents used for the biological control of mealybugs (Pseudococcidae).Biocontrol News Inf. 9: 209–225.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muldrew, J.A. (1953) The natural immunity of the larch sawflyPristiphora erichsonii (Htg.) to the introduced parasiteMesoleius tenthredinis Morely, in Manitoba and Saskatchewan.Can. J. Zool. 31:313–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nenon, J.P., Olivier, G. and Hemon, E. (1988) Encapsulation of eggs and larvae of the Hymenoptera EncyrtidaeEpidinocarsis (=Apoanagyrus)lopezi by its host PseudococcidaePhenacoccus manihoti: effect of temperature and superparasitism.C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris 306: 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prinsloo, G.L. (1984) An illustrated guide to the parasitic wasps associated with citrus pests in the Republic of South Africa.S. Afr. Dep. Agric. Sci. Bull 402: 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rivnay, E. (1968) Biological control of pests in Israel (a review 1905-1965).Isr. J. Entomol. 3: 1–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rosen, D. and Rossler, Y. (1966) Studies on an Israeli strain ofAnagyrus pseudococci (Girault) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). I. Morphology of the adults and developmental stages.Entomophaga 11:269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan, D.J. and Neuenschwander, P. (1988) Melanization of eggs and larvae of the parasitoidEpidinocarsis lopezi (De Santis) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae) by the cassava mealybug,Phenacoccus manihoti Matile-Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae).Can. Entomol. 120: 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. van Driesche, R.G., Belloti, A., Herrera, C.J. and Castillo, J.A. (1986) Encapsulation rates of two encyrtid parasitoids by twoPhenacoccus spp. of cassava mealybugs in Colombia.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 42: 79–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blumberg, D., Klein, M. & Mendel, Z. Response by encapsulation of four mealybug species (homoptera: pseudococcidae) to parasitization byAnagyrus pseudococci . Phytoparasitica 23, 157–163 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980975

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980975

key Words

Navigation