Abstract
Most instructional theories offer some unique and valuable suggestions related to the design of practice activities. However, no single theory or model is available which provides instructional designers with answers to many basic questions related to designing practice activities. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the strategies and suggestions offered by various prominent instructional theories and thereby provide a useful guide for designing the practice component of instruction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1976).Language, memory, and thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Anderson, J. R. (1980).Cognitive psychology and its implications. San Francisco: Freeman.
Atkinson, R. C., & Raugh, M. R. (1975). An application of the mnemonic keyword method to the acquisition of Russian vocabulary.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 104, 126–133.
Ausubel, D. P., & Youssef, M. (1965). The effect of spaced repetition on meaningful retention.Journal of General Psychology, 73, 147–150.
Beck, I. L., Perfetti, C. A., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). The effects of long-term vocabulary instruction on lexical access and reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 506–521.
Bower, G. H. (1970a). Analysis of a mnemonic device.American Scientist, 58, 496–510.
Bower, G. H. (1970b). Imagery as a relational organizer in associative learning.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 529–533.
Bower, G. H. (1970c). Organizational factors in memory.Cognitive psychology, 1, 18–46.
Bray, C. W. (1948).Psychology and military proficiency. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dansereau, D. (1978). The development of a learning strategies curriculum. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Learning Strategies (pp. 1–29). New York: Academic Press.
Gagne, R. M. (1984). Learning outcomes and their effects: Useful categories of human performance.American Psychologist, 39, 377–385.
Gagne, R. M. (1985).The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1979).Principles of instructional design. (2nd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Gay, I. R. (1973). Temporal position of reviews and its effect on the retention of mathematical rules.Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 171–182.
Gerlach, V. S. (1984). Trends in instructional technology research. In J. W. Brown (Ed.),Educational Media Yearbook 1984 (pp 24–33). Littleton, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
Gilbert, T. F. (1978).Human competence. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Gropper, G. L. (1973).A technology for developing instructional materials. Pittsburgh: American Institutes for Research.
Gropper, G. L. (1974).Instructional strategies. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Gropper, G. L. (1975).Diagnosis and revision in the development of instructional materials. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Gropper, G. L. (1983). A behavioral approach to instructional prescription. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 101–162). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hannum, W. H. (1973). A study of select factors influencing the retention of rules.Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 888A.
Higbee, K. (1977).Your memory: How it works and how to improve it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivational and instructional design: A theoretical perspective.Journal of Instructional Development, 2 (4), 26–34.
Keller, J. M. (1983). Motivational design of instruction. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 386–434). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Keller, J. M. (in press). Motivational design.Encyclopedia of educational media communications and technology. (2nd ed). Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
Lesgold, A. M. (1983). A rationale for computer-based reading instruction. In A. C. Wilkinson (Ed.),Classroom computers and cognitive science. New York: Academic Press.
Lesgold, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1982). How reading disabilities develop: Perspectives from a longitudinal study. In J. P. Das, R. Mulcahy, & A. E. Wall (Eds.),Theory and research in learning disability. New York: Plenum.
Madigan, S. A. (1969). Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 8, 828–835.
Merrill, M. D. (1983). Component display theory. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.),Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status (pp. 279–333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Merrill, M. D., Richards, R. E., Schmidt, R. V., & Wood, N. D. (1977).The instructional strategy diagnostic profile: Training manual. San Diego: Courseware, Inc.
Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. D. (1977).Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Merrill, P. F. (1981).The case against PILOT: The pros and cons of computer-assisted instruction computer languages and authoring systems. Paper presented at the annual meeting of The American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Peterson, H. A., Ellis, M., Toohill, N., & Koess, P. (1935). Some measurements of the effects of reviews.Journal of Educational Psychology, 26, 65–70.
Pompi, K. F., & Lachman, R. (1967). Surrogate processes in short-term retention of connected discourse.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 75, 143–150.
Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (1983).Instructional-design theories and models: An overview of their current status. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Reigeluth, C. M. (1985). Focus on tomorrow: The role of instructional design and development in guiding change.Proceedings of the 1985 Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Division of Instructional Development (pp.1–19). Anaheim, CA.
Resnick, L. B., & Ford, W. W. (1981).The psychology of mathematics for instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Saxon, J. (1981). The breakthrough in algebra.National Review, 1204–1206.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
Spelke, E., Hirst, W., & Neisser, U. (1976). Skills of divided attention.Cognition, 4, 215–130.
Tiedeman, H. R. (1948). A study of classroom learning.Journal of Educational Research, 41, 516–531.
Vaughn, E. (1981).Cognitive strategies: A review of some recent literature. (Contract No. DABT60-81-C-006). U.S. Army Training Support Center.
Wanner, H. E. (1968). On remembering, forgetting, and understanding sentences: A study of the deep structure hypothesis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.
Weinstein, C. (1978). Elaboration skills as a learning strategy. In H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Ed.),Learning Strategies (pp. 31–55). New York: Academic Press.
Weinstein, C. (1982). Learning strategies: The metacurriculum in community college teaching. Unpublished manuscript, the University of Texas at Austin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Salisbury, D.F., Richards, B.F. & Klein, J.D. Designing practice: A review of prescriptions and recommendations from instructional design theories. Journal of Instructional Development 8, 9–19 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906048
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02906048