Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of hair treatment on hair mercury—The best biomarker of methylmercury exposure?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine Aims and scope

Abstract

Objectives

Exposure misclassification is a major obstacle to obtain accurate dose-response relationships. In order to solve this problem, the impact of hair treatment on total mercury in hair was assessed in Japanese women.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was carried out among 327 women at age 24–49 years to determine hair mercury levels and estimate daily mercury intakes from seafood by using a food frequency questionnaire.

Results

Hair mercury levels in the women and daily mercury intake ranged from 0.11 to 6.86 (median 1.63) μg/g and from 0.77 to 144.9 (median 15.0) μg/day, respectively. The hair mercury was positively correlated with the daily mercury intake (p<0.001). When the women were divided into two subgroups based on artificial hair-waving, hair coloring/dyeing, residence (non-fishing and fishing areas), and working status, a significant difference in the hair mercury level was observed between the women with and without artificial hair-waving only (p<0.001). The multiple regression analysis showed that the log-transformed hair mercury level was significantly related to the log-transformed daily mercury intake (standardized regression coefficient βs=0.307) and artificial hair-waving (βs=−0.276); but not to hair coloring/dyeing, residence, working status or age. Permanent hair treatment was estimated to reduce total mercury in hair by approximately 30%, after adjusting for daily mercury intake and other possible factors.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that hair mercury is not the best biomarker of methylmercury exposure when a study population includes women with artificial hair-waving.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Yamaguchi S, Matsumoto H, Kaku S, Tateishi M, Shiramizu M. Factors affecting the amount of mercury in human scalp hair. Am J Public Health. 1975;65:484–488.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yamamoto R, Suzuki T. Effects of artificial hair-waving on hair mercury values. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1978; 42:1–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yasutake A, Matsumoto M, Yamaguchi M, Hachiya N. Current hair mercury levels in Japanese: survey in five districts. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2003;199:161–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Iwasaki Y, Sakamoto M, Nakai K, Oka T, Dakeishi M, Iwata T, Satoh H, Murata K. Estimation of daily mercury intake from seafood in Japanese women: Akita cross-sectional study. Tohoku J Exp Med 2003;200:67–73.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Grandjean P, Jørgensen PJ, Weihe P. Validity of mercury exposure biomarkers. In: Wilson SH, Suk WA, editors. Biomarkers of Environmentally Associated Disease. Boca Ration: CRC Press/Lewis; 2002. p. 235–247.

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Programme on Chemical Safety. Methylmercury (Environmental Health Criteria 101). Geneva: World Health Organization; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cernichiari E, Toribara TY, Liang L, Marsh DO, Berlin M, Myers GJ, Cox C, Shamlaye, CF, Choisy O, Davidson PW. The biological monitoring of mercury in the Seychelles study. Neurotoxicology. 1995; 16: 613–628.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grandjean P, Budtz-Jørgensen E, Keiding N, Weihe P. Underestimation of risk due to exposure misclassification. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2004; 17: 131–136.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Grandjean P, Weihe P, White RF, Debes F, Araki S, Yokoyama K, Murata K, Sørensen N, Dahl, R, Jørgensen PJ. Cognitive deficit in 7-year-old children with prenatal exposure to methylmercury. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1997; 19: 417–428.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidson PW, Myers GJ, Cox C, Axtell C, Shamlaye C, Sloane-Reeves J, Cernichiari E, Needham L, Choi A. Wang Y, Berlin M, Clarkson TW Effects of prenatal and postnatal methylmercury exposure from fish consumption on neurodevelopment: outcomes at 66 months of age in the Seychelles Child Development Study. JAMA. 1998; 280: 701–707.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Myers GJ, Davidson PW, Cox C, Shamlaye CF, Palumbo D, Cernichiari E, Sloane-Reeves J, Wilding GE, Kost J, Huang LS, Clarkson TW. Prenatal methylmercury exposure from ocean fish consumption in the Seychelles child development study. Lancet. 2003; 361: 1686–1692.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Murata K, Sakamoto M, Nakai K, Weihe P, Dakeishi M, Iwata T, Liu X-J, Ohno T, Kurosawa T, Kamiya K, Satoh H. Effects of methylmercury on neurodevelopment in Japanese children in relation to the Madeiran study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2004; 77: 571–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Akagi H, Nishimura H. Speciation of mercury in the environment. In: Suzuki T, Imura N, Clarkson TW, editors. Advances in Mercury Toxicology. New York: Plenum: 1991. p. 53–76.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakamoto M, Kubota M, Liu X-J, Murata K, Nakai K, Satoh H. Maternal and fetal mercury and n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids as a risk and benefit of fish consumption to fetus. Environ Sci Technol. 2004; 38: 3860–3863.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nakai K, Murata K, Suzuki K, Oka T, Sakamoto M, Yasutake A, Kameo S, Kurokawa N, Sugawara N, Satoh H. (2004) Methy lmercury exposure in the Tohoku pregnant women. RMZ-Materiali in Geookolje. 2004; 51: 485–487.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Date C, Yamaguchi M, Tanaka H. Development of a food frequency questionnaire in Japan. J Epidemiol. 1996; 6: S131–136.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamamoto I, Matsuda K, Sato C. Contents of Heavy Metals in Seafood along the Coast of Hokkaido. Sapporo: Hokkaido Institute of Public Health: 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakagawa R, Yumita Y, Hiromoto M. Total mercury intake from fish and shellfish. Chemosphere. 1997; 35: 2909–2913.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Murata K, Yano E. Medical Statistics for Evidence-Based Medicine with SPBS User’s Guide. Tokyo: Nankodo Publisher; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council Advice for Pregnant Women on Fish Consumption concerning Mercury Contamination. Tokyo: Ministry of Health. Labour and Wealth. (online), 2003.http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/other/councils/mercury/index.html (20 February 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ando T, Wakisaka I, Yanagihashi T, Tomari T, Hatano H. Mercury concentration in gray hair. Nippon Eiseigaku Zasshi 1989; 43: 1063–1068.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fuller WA. Measurement Error Models. New York: Wiley; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Budtz-Jørgensen E, Grandjean P, Jørgensen PJ, Weihe P, Keiding N. Association between mercury concentrations in blood and hair in methylmercury-exposed subjects at different ages. Environ Res. 2004; 95: 385–393.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Akagi H, Grandjean P, Takizawa Y, Weihe P. Methylmercury dose estimation from umbilical cord concentrations in patients with Minamata disease. Environ Res. 1998; 77: 98–103.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Grandjean P, Budtz-Jørgensen E, White RF, Jørgensen PJ, Weihe P, Debes F, Keiding N. Methylmercury exposure biomarkers as indicators of neruotoxicity in children aged 7 years. Am J Epidemiol. 1999; 150: 301–305.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuyuki Murata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dakeishi, M., Nakai, K., Sakamoto, M. et al. Effects of hair treatment on hair mercury—The best biomarker of methylmercury exposure?. Environ Health Prev Med 10, 208–212 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897712

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02897712

Key words

Navigation