Summary
Cytogenetic, flow cytometric, cytophotometric and morphometric analyses were performed on 22 previously untreated, primary solid breast carcinomas. Although the cell nuclei as the primary object of these studies were the same in all the tumors, distinct features were evaluated in each case to determine to what degree the results obtained by these techniques are comparable. From the cytogenetic viewpoint, six tumors had a modal number in the diploid range, seven were in the triploid range, and two in the tetraploid range; seven tumors had no modal number. These data correlate with the flow cytometry and cytophotometry results obtained, with DNA values slightly higher than their respective chromosomal modes. However, no correspondence between chromosomal modes and mean nuclear area was found. Chromosomal markers have been identified that particulary affect chromosomes 1 (p11, q21-qter), 11 and 16, although no common markers existed in all cases. Cytogenetics is the most sensitive technique, but the low yield (22 out of 140 tumors assayed) considerably restricts its value in any prospective breast cancer study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baak JPA, Dop HV, Kurver PHJ, Hermans J (1985) The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer. Cancer 56:374–382
Barlogie B, Hittelman W, Spitzer G, Trujillo JM, Hart JS, Smallwood L, Drewinko B (1977) Correlation of DNA distribution abnormalities with cytogenetic findings in human adult leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res 37:4400–4407
Bloom HJG, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Brit J Cancer 11:359–377
Black MM, Thomas H, Barclay C, Hankey BF (1975) Prognosis in breast cancer utilizing histologic characteristics of the primary tumor. Cancer 36:2048–2055
Bullerdiek J, Bartnitzke S, Kahsr E, Schloot W (1985) Further evidence for non-random chromosome changes in carcinoma cells. A report of 28 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 16:33–43
Callaghan RC, Barberá-Guillem E (1981) Método para la determinación citofotométrica de actividades deshidrogenásicas en células aisladas y cortes de tejido. Patologia 14:283–302
Christov K, Milev DA, Todorov V (1989) DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in breast tumors. Cancer 64:673–679
Deitch AD (1966) Cytophotometry of nucleic acids. In: Wied GL (ed) Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry. Academic Press, New York, London, pp 327–354
Dutrillaux B, Gerbault-Seureau M, Zafrani B (1990) Characterization of chromosomal anomalies in human breast cancer. A comparison of 30 paradiploid cases with few chromosome changes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 49:203–217
Fallenius AG, Auer GU, Carstensen JM (1988) Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients. Cancer 62:331–341
Ferti-Passantonopoulou AD, Panani AD (1987) Common cytogenetic findings in primary breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 27:289–298
Fisher ER, Redmond C, Fisher B (1983) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. VIII. Relationship of chemotherapeutic responsiveness to tumor differentiation. Cancer 51:181–191
Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B (1984) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Project for Breast Cancers (Protocol No. 4). X. Discriminants for tenth year treatment failure. Cancer 53:712–723
Gebhart E, Bruderlein S, Augustus M, Siebert E, Feldner J, Schmidt W (1986) Cytogenetic studies on human breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 8:125–138
Gibas LM, Gibas Z, Sandberg AA (1984) Technical aspects of cytogenetic analysis of human solid tumors. Karyogram 10:25–27
Hartmann WH, Jafarey NA, Llombart-Bosch A (1982) The World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors. Second edition. Am J Clin Pathol 78:806–816
Hill SM, Rodgers CS, Hulten MA (1987) Cytogenetic analysis in human breast carcinoma. II. Seven cases in the triploid/tetraploid range investigated using direct preparations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 24:45–62
Hulten MA, Rodgers CS, Hill SM (1984) Somatic gene mutation and breast carcinoma. Nature 310:103–104
ISCN (1985) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel
Kovacs G (1981) Preferential involvement of chromosome 1q in a primary breast carcinoma. Cancer GenetCCytogenet 3:125–129
Lelle RJ, Heidenreich W, Stauch G, Gerdes J (1987) The correlation of growth factors with histologic grading and lymph node status in human mammary carcinoma. Cancer 59:83–88
Mark J (1975) Two pseudodiploid human breast carcinomas studied with G-band technique. Europ J Cancer 11:815–819
Merkel DE, McGuire WL (1990) Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. Cancer 65:1194–1205
Nobby C, Mambo MB, Gallager S (1977) Carcinoma of the breast. The prognostic significance of extranodal extension of axillary disease. Cancer 39:2280–2285
Paulete-Vanrell J (1970) DNA content and chromosome number in twenty-five human carcinomas. Oncology 24:48–57
Petersen SE, Friedrich V (1986) A comparison between flow cytometric ploidy investigation and chromosome analysis of 32 human colorectal tumors. Cytometry 7:307–312
Remvikos Y, Gerbault-Seurreau M, Vielh P, Zafrani S, Magdelénat H, Dutrillaux B (1988) Relevance of DNA ploidy as a measure of genetic deviation: A comparison of flow cytometry and cytogenetics in 25 cases of human breast cancer. Cytometry 9:612–618
Rodgers CS, Hill SM, Hulten MA (1984) Cytogenetic analysis in human breast carcinoma. I. Nine cases in the diploid range investigated using direct preparations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 13:95–119
Sandberg AA, Turc-Carel C (1987) The cytogenetics of solid tumors. Relation to diagnosis, classification and pathology. Cancer 59:387–395
Sandberg AA (1990) The chromosomes in human cancer and leukemia. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Satya-Prakash KL, Pathak S, Hsu TC, Olive M, Cailleau R (1981) Cytogenetic analysis on eight human breast tumor cell lines: high frequencies of 1q, 11q and Hela-like marker chromosomes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 3:61–73
Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR (1984) Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stages I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy. Cancer 53:1049–1057
Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972
Tribukait B, Granberg-Ohman I, Wijkstron H (1986) Flow cytometric DNA and cytogenetic studies in human tumors: a comparison and discussion of the differences in modal values obtained by the two methods. Cytometry 7:194–199
Uyterlinde AM, Schipper NW, Baak JPA (1987) Comparison of extent of disease and morphometric and DNA flow cytometric prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 40:1432–1436
Wijkstrom H, Granberg-Ohman I, Tribukait B (1984) Chromosomal and DNA patterns in transitional cell bladder carcinoma: A comparative cytogenetic and flow-cytofluorometric DNA study. Cancer 58:1718–1723
Wolman SR, Smith HS, Stampfer M, Hackett AJ (1985) Growth of diploid cells from breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 16:49–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
López-Ginés, C., Callaghan, R.C., Ruiz, A. et al. Cytogenetics, flow cytometry, cytophotometry and morphometry of 22 cases of primary breast carcinoma. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol 61, 133–140 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890415
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890415