Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetics, flow cytometry, cytophotometry and morphometry of 22 cases of primary breast carcinoma

A comparative study

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Virchows Archiv B

Summary

Cytogenetic, flow cytometric, cytophotometric and morphometric analyses were performed on 22 previously untreated, primary solid breast carcinomas. Although the cell nuclei as the primary object of these studies were the same in all the tumors, distinct features were evaluated in each case to determine to what degree the results obtained by these techniques are comparable. From the cytogenetic viewpoint, six tumors had a modal number in the diploid range, seven were in the triploid range, and two in the tetraploid range; seven tumors had no modal number. These data correlate with the flow cytometry and cytophotometry results obtained, with DNA values slightly higher than their respective chromosomal modes. However, no correspondence between chromosomal modes and mean nuclear area was found. Chromosomal markers have been identified that particulary affect chromosomes 1 (p11, q21-qter), 11 and 16, although no common markers existed in all cases. Cytogenetics is the most sensitive technique, but the low yield (22 out of 140 tumors assayed) considerably restricts its value in any prospective breast cancer study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baak JPA, Dop HV, Kurver PHJ, Hermans J (1985) The value of morphometry to classic prognosticators in breast cancer. Cancer 56:374–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barlogie B, Hittelman W, Spitzer G, Trujillo JM, Hart JS, Smallwood L, Drewinko B (1977) Correlation of DNA distribution abnormalities with cytogenetic findings in human adult leukemia and lymphoma. Cancer Res 37:4400–4407

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom HJG, Richardson WW (1957) Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer. Brit J Cancer 11:359–377

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black MM, Thomas H, Barclay C, Hankey BF (1975) Prognosis in breast cancer utilizing histologic characteristics of the primary tumor. Cancer 36:2048–2055

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bullerdiek J, Bartnitzke S, Kahsr E, Schloot W (1985) Further evidence for non-random chromosome changes in carcinoma cells. A report of 28 cases. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 16:33–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan RC, Barberá-Guillem E (1981) Método para la determinación citofotométrica de actividades deshidrogenásicas en células aisladas y cortes de tejido. Patologia 14:283–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Christov K, Milev DA, Todorov V (1989) DNA aneuploidy and cell proliferation in breast tumors. Cancer 64:673–679

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deitch AD (1966) Cytophotometry of nucleic acids. In: Wied GL (ed) Introduction to quantitative cytochemistry. Academic Press, New York, London, pp 327–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutrillaux B, Gerbault-Seureau M, Zafrani B (1990) Characterization of chromosomal anomalies in human breast cancer. A comparison of 30 paradiploid cases with few chromosome changes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 49:203–217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fallenius AG, Auer GU, Carstensen JM (1988) Prognostic significance of DNA measurements in 409 consecutive breast cancer patients. Cancer 62:331–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferti-Passantonopoulou AD, Panani AD (1987) Common cytogenetic findings in primary breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 27:289–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ER, Redmond C, Fisher B (1983) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. VIII. Relationship of chemotherapeutic responsiveness to tumor differentiation. Cancer 51:181–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher ER, Sass R, Fisher B (1984) Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Project for Breast Cancers (Protocol No. 4). X. Discriminants for tenth year treatment failure. Cancer 53:712–723

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gebhart E, Bruderlein S, Augustus M, Siebert E, Feldner J, Schmidt W (1986) Cytogenetic studies on human breast carcinomas. Breast Cancer Res Treat 8:125–138

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibas LM, Gibas Z, Sandberg AA (1984) Technical aspects of cytogenetic analysis of human solid tumors. Karyogram 10:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann WH, Jafarey NA, Llombart-Bosch A (1982) The World Health Organization histological typing of breast tumors. Second edition. Am J Clin Pathol 78:806–816

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill SM, Rodgers CS, Hulten MA (1987) Cytogenetic analysis in human breast carcinoma. II. Seven cases in the triploid/tetraploid range investigated using direct preparations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 24:45–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hulten MA, Rodgers CS, Hill SM (1984) Somatic gene mutation and breast carcinoma. Nature 310:103–104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • ISCN (1985) An international system for human cytogenetic nomenclature. Karger, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs G (1981) Preferential involvement of chromosome 1q in a primary breast carcinoma. Cancer GenetCCytogenet 3:125–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lelle RJ, Heidenreich W, Stauch G, Gerdes J (1987) The correlation of growth factors with histologic grading and lymph node status in human mammary carcinoma. Cancer 59:83–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mark J (1975) Two pseudodiploid human breast carcinomas studied with G-band technique. Europ J Cancer 11:815–819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel DE, McGuire WL (1990) Ploidy, proliferative activity and prognosis. Cancer 65:1194–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobby C, Mambo MB, Gallager S (1977) Carcinoma of the breast. The prognostic significance of extranodal extension of axillary disease. Cancer 39:2280–2285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulete-Vanrell J (1970) DNA content and chromosome number in twenty-five human carcinomas. Oncology 24:48–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen SE, Friedrich V (1986) A comparison between flow cytometric ploidy investigation and chromosome analysis of 32 human colorectal tumors. Cytometry 7:307–312

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Remvikos Y, Gerbault-Seurreau M, Vielh P, Zafrani S, Magdelénat H, Dutrillaux B (1988) Relevance of DNA ploidy as a measure of genetic deviation: A comparison of flow cytometry and cytogenetics in 25 cases of human breast cancer. Cytometry 9:612–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers CS, Hill SM, Hulten MA (1984) Cytogenetic analysis in human breast carcinoma. I. Nine cases in the diploid range investigated using direct preparations. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 13:95–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AA, Turc-Carel C (1987) The cytogenetics of solid tumors. Relation to diagnosis, classification and pathology. Cancer 59:387–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg AA (1990) The chromosomes in human cancer and leukemia. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Satya-Prakash KL, Pathak S, Hsu TC, Olive M, Cailleau R (1981) Cytogenetic analysis on eight human breast tumor cell lines: high frequencies of 1q, 11q and Hela-like marker chromosomes. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 3:61–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitt SJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR (1984) Pathologic predictors of early local recurrence in stages I and II breast cancer treated by primary radiation therapy. Cancer 53:1049–1057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seabright M (1971) A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2:971–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tribukait B, Granberg-Ohman I, Wijkstron H (1986) Flow cytometric DNA and cytogenetic studies in human tumors: a comparison and discussion of the differences in modal values obtained by the two methods. Cytometry 7:194–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uyterlinde AM, Schipper NW, Baak JPA (1987) Comparison of extent of disease and morphometric and DNA flow cytometric prognostic factors in invasive ductal breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 40:1432–1436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wijkstrom H, Granberg-Ohman I, Tribukait B (1984) Chromosomal and DNA patterns in transitional cell bladder carcinoma: A comparative cytogenetic and flow-cytofluorometric DNA study. Cancer 58:1718–1723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman SR, Smith HS, Stampfer M, Hackett AJ (1985) Growth of diploid cells from breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 16:49–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

López-Ginés, C., Callaghan, R.C., Ruiz, A. et al. Cytogenetics, flow cytometry, cytophotometry and morphometry of 22 cases of primary breast carcinoma. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol 61, 133–140 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890415

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02890415

Key words

Navigation