Skip to main content
Log in

Social support and inmate rule violations: A multilevel analysis

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Social support theory is important in explaining inmate behavior within prison but has been largely ignored in the research. Using multilevel analysis, the study examined the effect of social support on inmate misconduct measured by disciplinary infractions in the 1997 Survey of Inmates of State Correctional Facilities in the United Slates. Findings indicate that several social support variables at both the inmate level and prison level affect inmate rule violations per month.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, K., Bennett, K.J., Flanagan, T.J., Marquart, J.W., Cuvelier, S.J., Fritsch, E., Gerber, J., Longmire, D.R., & Burton, Jr., V.S. (1994). A large-scale multidimen-sional test of the effect of prison education programs on offenders’ behavior.The Prison Journal, 74, 433–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, S. D., Gaes, G. G., Langan, N. P., & Saylor, W. G. (2003). The influence of prisons on inmate misconduct: A multilevel investigation.Justice Quarterly, 20, 501–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, L., Zhao, J., & Van Dine, S. (1997). Prison Disciplinary Tickets: A test of the deprivation and importation models.Journal of Criminal Justice, 25, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, B. E., & Cervera, N. (1992).Inmates and their wives, incarceration and family life. Westport, CT: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, M., Cullen, F. T., & Vander Ven, T. (2002). Coercion, social support, and crime: An emerging theoretical consensus.Criminology, 40, 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwell, B. (2003). The dynamic properties of social support: Decay, growth, and staticity, and their effects on adolescent depression.Social Forces, 81, 953–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology: Presidential address to the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.Justice Quarterly, 11, 527–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T., Wright, J. P., & Chamlin, M. B. (1999). Social support and social reform: A progressive crime control agenda.Crime & Delinquency, 45, 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. J. (1980). Time served and institutional misconduct: Patterns of involvement in disciplinary infractions among long-term and short-term inmates.Journal of Criminal Justice, 8, 357–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, T. J. (1983). Correlates of institutional misconduct among state prisoners.Criminology, 21, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetting, A., & Howsen, R. M. (1986). Correlates of prisoner misconduct.Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 2, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harlow, C. W., Snell, T. L., & Mumola, C. J. (1999).Survey of state and federal inmates, 1997. In Bureau of Justice Statistics (Ed.),Correctional populations in the United States, 1997 (pp. 47–70). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harer, M. D., & Steffensmeier, D. J. (1996). Race and prison violence.Criminology, 34, 323–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B. M. (2003). Administrative determinants of inmate violence: A multilevel analysis.Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S. (2005). The impact of substance use on inmate misconduct: A multilevel analysis.Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 153–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., & Fisher-Giorlando, M. (2002). Inmate misconduct: A test of the deprivation, importation, and situational models.The Prison Journal, 82, 335–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, S., & Winfree, T. Jr. (2006). Social support, gender and inmate adjustment to prison life: Insights from a national sample.The Prison Journal (forthcoming).

  • Johnson, R. (2002). Hard time: Understanding and reforming the prison. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomason Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998).Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. (1986). Conceptualizing social support. In N. Lin, A. Dean, and W. M. Ensel (eds.), Social support, life events, and depression (pp. 17–31). New York, NY: Academic Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N., Ye, X., and Ensel, W. M. (1997).Revisiting social support: Integration of its dimensions. Duke University: Unpublished transcript.

  • MacDonald, J. M. (1999). Violence and drug use in juvenile institutions.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. L. (1987). Age and adjustment to prison.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 14, 427–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B. (1998). “In the Mix”: Struggle and survival in a women’s prison. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterline, B. A., & Petersen, D. M. (1999). Structural and social psychological determinants of prisonization.Journal of Criminal Justice, 27, 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, J. M. (2002). Women prison and crime. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T. C., & Godsey, T. W. (2003). Social support, inequality, and homicide: A crossnational test of an integrated theoretical model.Criminology, 41, 611–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W. & Bryk, A. S. (2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldredge, J. D. (1991). Correlates of deviant behavior among inmates of U.S. correctional facilities.Journal of Crime & Justice, 14, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Pratt, T. (2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data.Justice Quarterly, 18, 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. P., Cullen, F. T., & Miller, J. T. (2001). The family social capital and delinquent involvement.Journal of Criminal Justice, 29, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. N. (1991). A study of individual, environmental, and interactive effects in explaining adjustment to prison.Justice Quarterly, 8, 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamble, E., & Porporino, F. J. (1988).Coping behavior and adaptation in prison inmates. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanhe Jiang Ph.D..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jiang, S., Fisher-Giorlando, M. & Mo, L. Social support and inmate rule violations: A multilevel analysis. Am J Crim Just 30, 71–86 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885882

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02885882

Keywords

Navigation