Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical aspects of graftage

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  1. Alderman, W. H. Grafting and budding. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Spec. Bull. 151. 1932.

  2. Amos, J. andWitt, A. W. Plum rootstocks: their varieties, and influence upon cultivated varieties worked thereon. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.7: 63–99. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —,et al. The nutrition of fruit trees. II. The response of apple trees on known rontstocks to applications of complete fertilizer. Ann. Appl. Biol.17: 657–674. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. -,et al. Studies in incompatibility of stock and scion. I. Information accumulated during twenty years of testing fruit tree rootstocks with various scion varieties at East Mailing. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1936: 81–99.

  5. Andrade, Ed. Navarro, De. (Grafting stocks for citrus). Bol. Agr. (São Paulo)31: 869–884. 1931. (Biol. Abst.7: 21865. 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anthony, R. D. andYerkes, G. E. The influence of clone roots on the variability of young apple trees. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.25: 169–171. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  7. —,et al. Orchard tests of Mazzard and Mabaleb cherry understocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 415–418. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Argles, G. K. A review of the literature on stock-scion incompatibility in fruit trees, with particular reference to pome and stone fruits. Imp. Bur. Fruit Prod., East Mailing, Tech. Commun. No.9: 5–115. 1937.

  9. Assejeva, T. Bud mutation in potato. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed.27: 135–217. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Avakian, A. A. andJastreb, M. G. Hybridization by grafting. Jarovizaloiia1: 50–77. 1941. (Biol. Abst.16: 3552. 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Babcock, E. B. andClausen, R. E. Genetics in relation to agriculture, pp. 356–371. 1927.

  12. Bailey, J. E. andWoodroof, J. G. Propagation of pecans. Ga.Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 172. 1932.

  13. Baker, R. E. Induced polyploid, periclinal chimeras inSolanum tuberosum. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 187–195. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baltet, C. L’art de greffer. 1902. [Eng. trans. 1923].

  15. Barker, B. T. P. The relations of scion and rootstock. Agr. &Hort. Res. Sta., Long Ashton, Ann. Rep.1927: 32–41.

  16. Batchelor, L. D. andWebber, H. J. Progress report of lemon rootstock experiments. Cal. Citrograph.24: 160–161. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bateson, W. Studies in variegation. Jour. Genet.8: 93–99. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  18. —. Root cuttings and chimeras. Jour. Genet.11: 91–97. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baur, E. Zur Aetiologie der infectiösen Panachierung. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.22: 453–460. 1904.

    Google Scholar 

  20. —, Das Wesen und die Erblichkeitsverhältnisse der “Varietätes albomarginatae Hort.” vonPelargonium zonale. Zeits. Ind. Abs. Vererb1: 330–351. 1909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. —, Pfropfbastarde. Bioj. Cent.30: 497–514. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Beakbane, A. Anatomical studies of stems and roots of hardy fruit trees. III. The anatomical structure of some clonal and seedling apple rootstocks stem- and root-grafted with a scion variety. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.18: 344–367. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  23. — andThompson, Eleanor C. Anatomical studies of stems and roots of hardy fruit trees. II. The internal structure of the roots of some vigorous and some dwarfing apple rootstocks, and the correlation of structure with vigor. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.17: 141–149. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  24. -,et al. Preliminary selection of apple rootstocks immune from wooly aphis based on certain anatomical differences in root structure. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1940: 32–36.

  25. Beckett, R. E. Budding and grafting trials with cotton and related plants. U. S. Dept. Agr., Circ. 267. 1933.

  26. Biffen, R. H. Note on some grafting experiments. Ann. Bot.16: 174–176. 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bioletti, F. T.et al. Phyloxera-resistant stocks. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 331. 1921.

  28. Blackman, G. H. Topworking pecan trees. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 170. 1924.

  29. Blackman, V. H. Some physiological considerations in horticulture. Proc. I. Imp. Hort. Conf.II. 37–41. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Blair, D. S. Rootstock and scion relationships in apple trees. Sci. Agr.19: 85–94. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  31. —. Present status of the apple rootstock and double-working trials in eastern Canada. Sci. Agr.20: 150–154. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Blakeslee, A. F. The present and potential service of chemistry to plant breeding. Am. Jour. Bot.26: 163–172. 1939.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. —. Effect of induced polyploidy in plants. Am. Nat.75: 117–135. 1941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. — andAvery, A. B. Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants. Jour. Hered28: 393–411. 1937.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bond, T. E. T.Phytophthora infestons (Mont.) de Bary andCladosporiutn fulvum Cooke on varieties of tomato and potato and on grafted Solanaceous plants. Ann. Appl. Biol.23: 11–29. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. —. Disease relationships in grafted plants and chimeras. Biol. Rev., Cambridge Philos. Soc.11: 269–285. 1936.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bonnett, L. O. Phylloxera resistant vineyards. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 288. 1925.

  38. Booth, N. O. Some investigations in grafting. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.10: 144–149. 1913

    Google Scholar 

  39. Borzini, G. (The cause of vine blight). Ball. R. Staz, Patol. Veg.18: 137–146. 1940. (Biol. Abst.16: 2926. 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bradford, F. C. andJoley, L. Infectious variegation of the apple. Jour. Agr. Res.46: 901–908. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  41. ——. Experiments in double working apple trees in the nursery. Proc. Am Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 360–365. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  42. - andSitton, G. B. Defective graft unions in the apple and the pear. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 99. 1929.

  43. Branas, M. Chlorose sur producteurs directs. Ann. Ecole Nat. Agr. Montpellier20: 58–62. (Biol. Abst.8: 12981. 1934.)

  44. Brase, K. D. Observations on Mazzard and Hahaleb seedlings benchgrafted to varieties of sweet and sour cherries. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 110–112. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brieger, F. G. andGurgel, J. T. A. (The influence of rootstock on the pollen fertility of scion in citrus). Bragantia1: 713–757. 1941. (Biol. Abst.17: 6827. 1943.)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Brooks, F. T. andBrenchley, G. H. A note on the recovery from silver-leaf disease of plum trees on common plum and Myrobolan stocks, respectively. Jour. Pom.13: 135–139. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brown, G. G. Yields from young apple trees topworked in Arkansas. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 141–142. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brown, W. R. The orange—A trial of stocks at Peshawar. Agr. Res. Inst. of Pusa (India), Bull.93: 1–6. 1920.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Bryant, L. R. Sour cherry rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 322–323. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Buder, J. Studien anLaburnum adami. II. Allgemeine anatomische Analyse den Mischlinge und seiner Stammpflanzen. Zeit. Ind. Abs. Ver.5: 209–284. 1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Bunyard, E. A. Columella on graft hybrids. Gard. Chron. III.49: 203. 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Burchardt, H. (Grafting and budding cacao.) Tropenpflanzen38: 239–245. 1935. (Hort. Abst.5: 699.)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cajlachjan, M. Ch. Motion of blossom hormone in girdled and grafted plants. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.18: 607–612. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  54. -. (The effect of girdling and transplantation on the flowering of plants.) Izv. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R. Biol. Ser. 5–6. 1249–1279. 1938. (Herb. Abst.9: 1571. 1939.)

  55. —. Translocation of flowering hormones in the plant as affected by temperature and narcotics. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.31: 949–952. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  56. — andJarkovaja, L. M. (The effect of the stock on the flowering of the scion inPcrilla.) Trudy Inst. Fiziol. Tumijazeu2: 133–144. 1938. (Herb Abst.8: 1351. 1938.)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Calvino, M. (A stock for dwarfing the olive tree.) Rep. IX Int. Hort. Congr. 252–254. 1930.

  58. Camp, A. F. Citrus propagation. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 227. 1931.

  59. —. The present status of rough lemon rootstock. Citrus Ind.22: 5–7, 9, 18. 1941. (Biol. Abst.15: 24228. 1941.)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Campbell, D. H. The nature of graft hybrids. Am. Nat.45: 41–53. 1911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Cardinell, H. A. andBradford, F. C. Grafting in the apple orchard. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Spec. Bull. 142. 1925.

  62. Casella, D. (Grafting of olive onSyringa vulgaris.) Ann. R. Staz. Sperim. Frutticolt. e. Agrumicolt. Acircale N. S.1: 211–214. 1934. (Biol. Abst.10: 19257. 1936.)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Caspary, R. Ueber Pfropfbastarde. Comp. Rend. Congr. Amsterdam. 65–80. 1865.

  64. Chang, W. T. Climatic influences on the affinity of pear grafts in Hangchow Res. Pap. Nat. Univ. Chekiang. P. 16. 1933. (Hort. Abst.5: 537. 1935.)

  65. —. Studies in incompatibility between stock and scion, with special reference to certain deciduous fruit trees. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.15: 267–325. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Chapin, W. S. Heredity in chimeras. Jour. Hered.5: 533–546. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Chester, K. S. Graft-blight:a disease of lilac related to the employment of certain understocks in propagation. Jour. Am. Arb.12: 79–146. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  68. —. Some notes on grafting. Canad. Hort.55: 265. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  69. —. Studies on the precipitin reaction in plants. I. The specificity of the normal precipitin reaction. Jour. Arn. Arb.13: 52–74. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  70. —. Studies on the precipitin reaction in plants. II. Preliminary report on the nature of the “normal precipitin reaction”. Jour. Am. Arb.13: 285–296. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. — andWhitaker, T. W. Studies on the precipitin reaction in plants. III. A biochemical analysis of the “normal precipitin reaction”. Jour. Arn. Arb.14: 118–197. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. —. Studies on precipitin reaction in plants. IV. The question of acquired reactions due to grafting. Am. Jour. Bot.20: 297–308. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Cholodny, N. G. The internal factors of flowering. Herb. Rev.7: 223–247. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Clausen, R. E. andGoodspeed, T. H. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacunt. III. The occurrence of two natural periclinal chimeras. Genetics8: 97–105. 1923.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Clos, M. Quelques mots sur la Greffe. Rev. Hort. p. 342. 1856.

  76. Colby, H. L. Stock-scion chemistry and the fruiting relationships in apple trees. Pl. Phys.10: 483–498. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Cooke, W. W. Plums and prunes on various rootstocks. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales39: 854–856. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  78. Crafts, A. S. Phloem anatomy in two species ofNicotiana, with notes on the interspecific graft union. Bot. Gaz.95: 592–608. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Crane, M. B.et al. Studies on the resistance and immunity of apples to the wooly aphis.Eriosoma Lanigerum (Hansen). Jour. Pom.14: 137–163. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  80. Cummings, M. B. andJenkins, E. W. First 20 years of a variety apple orchard: apple cion selection. Vt. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 255. 1926.

  81. Daniel, L. Recherches morphologiques et philogiques sur la Greffe. Rev. Gén. Bot.6: 5–21; 60–75. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  82. —. Sur quelques applications pratiques de la greffe herbaceé. Rev. Gén. Bot.6: 356–369. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  83. —. La hybridation asexuelle. Rev. Gén. Bot.26: 305–341. 1914;27: 22–29; 33–49. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  84. —. Nouvelles recherches sur la migration de l’inuline dans les greffes de composeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)177: 1135–1137. 1923.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. —. Nouvelles observations sur les hybrides de greffe et hérédité chez les plantes greffes. Rev. Bret. Bot.1924: 1–70. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  86. —. Sur deux greffes nouvelles. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)184: 1084–1085. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  87. —. Sur les variationes de la descendance des topinambours greffées. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)185: 968–970. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  88. —. Variations de l’appareil sécréteur chez diverses plantes greffeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)185: 1296–1298. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  89. —. Nouvelles observations sur les variations de la descendance de topinambours greffeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)186: 785–787. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  90. —. Sur les variations de l’oxalate de calcium chez certaines plantes greffeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)186: 1143–1144. 1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. —. Sur la formation des thylles chez les plantes greffeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)187: 58–60. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  92. —. The inheritance of acquired characters in grafted plants. Proc. Int. Congr. Pl. Sci., Ithaca, N. Y. 1926. Vol.2: 1024–1044. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  93. —. Nouvelles recherches sur la descendance de certaines composées greffeés. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)194: 1999–2002. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  94. —. Sur les curieuses variations des descendants de l’Helianthus dangeardi à la sixième génération. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)197: 725–727. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  95. —. Variations des plantules d’Helianthusdangeardi à la septième génération sexuée. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)198: 1962–1965. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  96. —. L’hérédité des monstruosités chez les descendants du topinambour greffé sur soleil annuel génération sexueé. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)201: 801–803. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  97. —. Sur un cas indiscutable d’hérédité de caractère acquis. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)206: 872–874. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Davis, L. D. andTufts, W. P. Black-end of pears. III. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 304–315. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  99. Davis, M. B. Possibility of the transmission by asexual propagation of the high yielding ability of individual apple trees. Sci. Agr.2: 120–124. 1921.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Dawson, R. F. The localization of the nicotine synthetic mechanism in the tobacco plant. Science94: 396–397. 1941.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. — Accumulation of nicotine in reciprocal grafts of tomato and tobacco. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 66–71. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. —. Nicotine synthesis in excised tobacco roots. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 813–815. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. —. Accumulation of anabasine in reciprocal grafts ofNicotiana glauca and tomato. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 351–355. 1944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. —. An experimental analysis of alkaloid production inNicotiana: The origin of nornicotine. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 416–423. 1945.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Day, L. H. Ripening dates of Grand Duke plums on various understocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.30: 357–360. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  106. —. The influence of seedlings of four peach varieties upon the growth of scions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 383–385. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  107. - andTufts, W. P. Nematode-resistant rootstocks for deciduous fruit trees. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 359. 1944.

  108. Derickson, S. H. A natural graft between unrelated species.Quercus rubra andPrunus avium. Proc. Penn. Acad. Sci.4: 27–29. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Derman, H. Colchicine polyploidy and technique. Bot. Rev.6: 599–635. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. de Ropp, R. S. The growth-promoting and tumefacient factors of bacteria-free crown-gall tumor tissue. Am. Jour. Bot.34: 248–261. 1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. Detjen, L. R. The influence of the rootstock on seeds and on seedling progenies of tomato grafts. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 147–148. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Eaton, F. M. andBlair, G. Y. Accumulation of boron by reciprocally grafted plants. Pl. Phys.10: 411–424. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Eigsti, O. J. A cytological study of colchicine effects in the induction of polyploidy of plants. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.24: 56–63. 1938.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Emon, J. Adaptation des porte-greffes aux différents terrains. Progr. Agr. Vitic.106: 521–524. 1936. (Hort. Abst.7: 48.)

    Google Scholar 

  115. Eseltine, G. P. van. Notes on the species of apples. I. The American crabapples. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 208. 1933.

  116. Evenari, M. andKonis, E. The effect of hetero-auxin on root formation of cuttings and on grafting. Part I. Palestine Jour. Bot (Jerusalem Ser.)1: 13–26. 1938. (Hort. Abst.9: 5.)

    Google Scholar 

  117. Featherby, H. G. Influence of stock on scion. Gard. Chron. 111: 80 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  118. Fikry, A. Nematode disease of stone fruits. Min. Agr. Egypt, Tech. & Sci. Serv., Bull. 217. 1939. (Biol. Abst.14: 3642. 1940.)

  119. Filewicz, W. The frost injury of fruit trees in Poland in 1928–1929. Proc. IX Int. Hort. Congr. 312–320. 1930.

  120. —. (Reinvigoration of orchard trees by bridge grafting and inarching.) (Eng. sum.) (Reprint in Ann. Sci. Hort.5: 35–140. 1939.)

    Google Scholar 

  121. — andModlibowaka, I. The influence of a scion variety on the resistance of the roots against frost. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 348–352. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Freeman, W. G. Vegetative propagation of cacao and West Indian citrus. Rep. IX Int. Hort. Cong. 348–357. 1930.

  123. Friedrich, G. (Chemical and physiological changes in grafted apple trees). (Reprint in Kühn-Arch.48: 191–233. 1939). (Hort. Abst.9: 1158).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Fudge, B. R. Factors that influence fruit quality. Citrus Grower2: 3–4. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  125. — andFehmerling, G. B. Some effects of soils and fertilizers on fruit composition. Citrus Ind.21: 6, 7, 11, 14, 15. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Funck, R. (Untersuchungen über heteroplastische Transplantationen bei Solanacien und Cactaceen. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen17: 404–468. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  127. Gardner, F. E. andLincoln, F. B. Factors influencing the variability of apple trees in the nursery row. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.29: 367–370. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Garner, R. J. Double-working and bridging incompatible combinations of pear and quince. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1943. 80–85. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Gasis, D. Ueber die Unterscheidung verschiedener Pflanzeneiweissarten mit Hilfe spezifischer Sera. Berliner Klin. Wochenschr.7: 358–360. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  130. Gladwin, F. E. Grafting American grapes on vigorous stocks. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 607. 1932.

  131. Goldschmidt, R. Einfuehrung in die Vererbungswissenschaft. Ed. 3. 1920.

  132. Goodale, S. L. Influence of the scion upon the stock. Horticulturist1: 290. 1846.

    Google Scholar 

  133. Goodspeed, T. H. andUber, F. M. Radiation and plant cytogenetics. Bot. Rev.5: 1–48. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  134. Gossard, A. C. Investigations on the congeniality of stock and scion. Master’s Thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, 1929.

  135. Green, F. The precipitin reaction in relation to grafting. Genetics11: 73–82. 1926.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  136. Greenleaf, W. H. Induction of polyploidy inNicotiana by heteroauxin treatment. Jour. Hered.29: 451–464. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  137. Griffen, E. Greffage et hybridation asexuelle. Conf. Int. Genet., Paris.1911: 164–196. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Grubb, N. H. Experiments with double-worked pears on quince stocks. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1927, II Suppl. 11–15.

  139. —. Cherry stocks at East Mailing. I. Stocks for Morello cherries. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.11: 276–304. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  140. —. Influence of the intermediate in double-worked apple trees; nursery trials of the “stem-builder” process at East Mailing. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.17: 1–19. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  141. Haas, A. R. C. andHalina, F. F. Chemical relationship between scion and stock in citrus. Pl. Phys.4: 113–121. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  142. Haberlandt, G. Ueber den Blattbau der Crataego-mespili von Bronvaux und ihrer Eltern. Sitzungbcr. Preuss. Akad. Wiss.17: 170–208. 1926. (Biol. Abst.1: 8565. 1927).

    Google Scholar 

  143. Hafekost, G. Über die Beziehungen zwischen Edelreis und Unterlage bei einigen Obstarten. Gartenbauwiss.7: 382–395. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Hall, E. G. Effects of stock on citrus fruit quality. Agr. Gaz. New South Wales54: 173–176. 1943. (Biol. Abst.18: 5262. 1944).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  145. Halma, F. F. An attempt to recover declined lemon trees by use of inarching. Cal. Citrograph.17: 349, 365–367. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  146. —. Scion influence in citrus. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.12: 99–104. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  147. Hamner, K. C. andBonner, J. Photoperiodism in relation to hormones as factors in floral initiation and development. Bot. Gaz.100: 388–431. 1938.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  148. Harris, R. V. Grafting as a method for investigating a possible virus disease of the strawberry. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.10: 35–41. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  149. - andWormald, H. Diseases of tree fruits. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1940: 23–24.

  150. Hatton, R. G. Paradise apple stocks: Their fruit and blossom described. Jour. Royal Hort. Soc.44: 89–94. 1919.

    Google Scholar 

  151. -. Apple root-stocks, their particular suitabilities for different soils, varieties and purposes. East Mailing Res. Station, Ann. Rep.1925: 45–52.

  152. —. The behavior of certain pears on various quince rootstocks. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.7: 216–233. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  153. -. The development of a research programme around the “build-up” of a fruit plant. Proc. Royal Hort. Soc. 245–251. London 1930.

  154. -. Rootstocks for pears. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1935: 75–86.

  155. —. Plum rootstock studies:Their effect on the vigor and cropping of the scion variety. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.14: 97–136. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  156. — andGrubb, N. H. Some factors influencing the period of blossoming of apples and plums. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.5: 210–215. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  157. —,Amos, J. andWitt, A.W. Plum rootstocks; their varieties, propagation and influence upon cultivated varieties worked thereon. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.7: 64–99. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  158. —et al. The effect of scion on root. II. Stem-worked apples. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.8: 248–258. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  159. Hayward, H. E. andLong, E. M. Vegetative responses of the Elberta peach and Lovell and Shalil root-stocks to high chloride and sulfate solutions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.41: 149–155. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. — andWent, F. W. Transplantation experiments with peas. II. Bot. Gaz.190: 788–801. 1939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Hearman, J. (Miss). The Northern Spy as a rootstock when compared with other standardized European rootstocks. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.14: 246–275. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  162. —et al. The reinvigoration of apple trees by the inarching of vigorous rootstocks. Jour. Pom.14: 376–390. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  163. Hendrick, U. P. Stocks for plums. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 498. 1923.

  164. Heinicke, A. J. Influence of scion leaves on the quality of apples borne by the stock. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.24: 143–146. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  165. —. To what extent is the Mclntosh apple influenced by the food materials synthesized by Northern Spy leaves. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 336–337. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  166. Heinze, P. H.et al. Floral initiation in Biloxi soybean as influenced by grafting. Bot. Gaz.103: 518–530. 1942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. Heppner, M. J. Pear black end and its relation to different rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.24: 139–142. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  168. - andMcCallum, R. D. Grafting affinities with special reference to plums. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 438. 1927.

  169. ——. Compatible and non-compatible graft unions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.24: 137–138. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  170. Herbert, D. A. Nutritional exchange between lianas and trees. Proc. Royal Sci. Soc. Queensland39: 115–118. 1927. (Biol. Abst.6: 18443. 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  171. Hewetson, F. N. Growth and yield of McIntosh apple trees as influenced by the use of various intermediate stem pieces. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.45: 181–186. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Hieke, K. Pflanzenphysiologische Untersuchungen über die Alkaloide. II. Zur Alkaloidführunden Pfropfpartner bei heteroplastischen Solanaceen Pfropfungen. Planta33: 185–205. 1942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Heuer, H. Ueber Pfropftbastarde zwischenSolatium Arten. Gartenflora59: 434–438. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  174. Hiesey, W. M. Environmental influence and transplant experiments. Bot. Rev.6: 181–203. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  175. Hilborn, M. T. andWaring, J. H. Terminal-shoot growth of apple varieties as apparently stimulated by Virginia Crab and Hibernal intermediate stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 316–320. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Himmelbaur, W. Der gegenwaertige Stand der Pfropfhybridenfrage. Mitt. Naturw. Ver. Univ. Wien.8: 105–127. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  177. Hirche, R. Pfropfhybriden bei Kartoffeln. Mitt. Deut. Landw. Ges.24: 442–444. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  178. Hoblyn, T. N. Manurial trials with apple trees at East Mailing 1920–39. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.18: 325–343. 1941.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  179. Hockey, J. F. Mosaic, false sting and flat limb of apple. Sci. Agr.23: 633–646. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Hodgson, R. W. Rootstocks for the oriental persimmon. Cal. Avocado Assoc, Yearbook 1940. 43–44. 1940. (Biol. Abst.15: 24258. 1941).

  181. — andEggers, E. R. Rootstock influence on the composition of citrus fruits. Cal. Citrograph.23: 499, 531. 1938. (Biol. Abst.13: 1244. 1939).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  182. Hofmann, F. W. Reciprocal effects from grafting. Jour. Agr. Res.34: 673–676. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  183. Hoop, D. J. N. van der andOstendorf, F. W. (Mutual influence of stock and scion inHcvea buddings). Arch. Rubbercult. Nederlandsch. Indie16: 392–409. 1932. (Biol. Abst.8: 14166. 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  184. Hoopes, J. Influence of the stock on the scion, and vice versa. Hort.28: 355. 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Hoser, P. (A graft-hybrid of lilacs). (Ann. Sci. Hort. [Warsaw]).1: 111–120. 1934. (Biol. Abst.10: 2617. 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  186. Howard, W. L. andHeppner, M. J. Graft affinity tests with peach on Myrobolan and Mariana plums. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.25: 178–180. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  187. Howe, G. H. Relative merits of Mazzard and Mahaleb root-stocks for cherries. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.23: 53–55. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  188. Hubbell, D. S. Causes of blind wood in roses. Pl. Phys.9: 261–282. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  189. Hume, M. On the presence of connecting threads in graft hybrids. New Phyt.12: 216–221. 1913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. Husmann, G. C. Grape investigations in the Vinifera regions of the United States with reference to resistant stocks, direct producers, and Viniferas. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bull. 172. 1910.

  191. -. Testing phyloxera-resistant grape stocks in the Vinifera regions of the United States. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bull. 146. 1930.

  192. Hutchins, L. M. Nematode-resistant peach root stock of superior vigor. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.34: 330–338. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Jacobs, H. E. Examples of incompatibility between grape varieties and rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.41: 201–203. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Jensen, C. A.et al. Behavior of different lemon bud and rootstock combinations at Limoneira. Cal. Citrograph.12: 234, 266–268. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Johnston, S. Bridge-grafting the peach. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Quart. Bull.19: 177–179. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  196. —.Prunus Mexicana andPrunus hortulana as rootstocks for peaches Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Quart. Bull.21: 17–18. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  197. Joley, L. E. Overgrowth produced by edible cherry on Sargent cherry (Prunus sargentii Rebd.). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.40: 277–278. 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  198. Jones, M. A. andCooper, W. C. The lack of scion effect on root quality ofDerris elliptica. Pl. Phys.21: 63–67. 1946.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  199. Jones, W. W. Plant chimeras and graft hybrids. 1934.

  200. —. Chimeras:a summary and some special aspects. Bot. Rev.3: 545–562. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  201. Jörgensen, C. A. The experimental formation of heteroploid plants in the genusSolanum. Jour. Genet.19: 133–211. 1927–8.

    Google Scholar 

  202. — andCrane, M. B. Formation and morphology ofSolanum chimeras. Jour. Genet.18: 247–273. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  203. Kác.V. (Grafting of fruit plants). (Biol. Abst.8: 11819. 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  204. Keitt, G. W. andClayton, C. N. A destructive bud-transmissible disease of sour cherry in Wisconsin. Phytopath.29: 821–822. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  205. Kemmer, E. Stand der Unterlagenforschung im Obstbau. Forschungsdienst1: 268–284. 1936. (Hort. Abst.6: 265).

    Google Scholar 

  206. Kench, J. E. The seasonal cycles of ash, carbohydrate and nitrogenous constituents in the terminal shoots of apple trees and the effects of five vegetatively propagated rootstocks on them. III. Nitrogenous constituents. Jour. Pom.16: 346–363. 1939.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  207. Kerr, W. L. A simple method of obtaining fruit trees on their own roots. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 355–357. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  208. Khosina, E. P. (Mme.) The change in the shape of fruit in the seed progeny of grafts. Jarovizatsiia1: 84–89. 1941. (Biol. Abst.16: 3573. 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  209. Knight, R. C. Preliminary observation on the causes of stock influences in apples. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1927. 13 II Suppl.: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  210. -. A note on the orientation of main branches and its relation to stock in some “double stock” apple trees. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1926/1927. I Suppl.: 11–30. 1928.

  211. -. Further observations on the parts played by root and stem in stock influence. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1934: 114–116.

  212. Kordes, H. Bedeutung der Wuchsstoffe für die vegetative Vermehrung der Rebe, insbesondere für die Rebenvermehrung. Ang. Bot.19: 543–544. 1937. (Hort. Abst.8: 62, 431)

    Google Scholar 

  213. Korshunov, K. N. (Sorbus as an understock for pears). (Biol. Abst.18: 1567. 1944)

    Google Scholar 

  214. Kostoff, D. Induced immunity in plants. Nat. Acad. Sci.14: 236–237. 1928.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  215. —. Studies on callus tissue. Am. Tour. Bot.15: 565–576. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  216. —. Acquired immunity in plants. Genetics14: 37–77; 1929.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  217. —. Chromosomal aberrants and gene mutations inNicotiana obtained by grafting. Jour. Genet.22: 399–418. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  218. —. (Biology of the callus). Univ. Sofia, Fac. Agron., Yearbook8: 297–316. 1929/30. (Biol. Abst.6: 4877. 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  219. —. (Studies on acquired immunity in plants. A contribution to methods of investigation of reciprocal activities between graft components.) Svedonia po Zemledelieto12: 47–68. 1931. (Biol. Abst.7: 354. 1933)

    Google Scholar 

  220. —. (Sterility, transplantation and immunity). Zemledelska Misai1: 5–38. 1931. (Biol. Abst.7: 341. 1933)

    Google Scholar 

  221. Kovalevskaya, P. J. (Grafting as a condition of form-forming in the sex hybrid of tomatoes.) Jarovisatsiia1: 118–121. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  222. Krajevoj, S. J. andNechaev, I. Atropine transference from stock (Datura stramonium) to scion (Solatium lycopersicum). Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.31: 36–71. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  223. Krenke, N. P. Wundkompensation, Transplantation und Chimären bei Pflanzen.In Monographien aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Physiologie der Pflanzen und der Tiere, Vol. 29. [Transl. from Russian by Busch, N.] 934 pp. 1933. (Biol. Abst.8: 17457. 1934)

  224. Kuijper, J. andWiersum, L. K. Occurrence and transport of a substance causing flowering in the Soya bean (Glycine Max L.) Proc. Royal Acad. Sci., Amsterdam.39: 1114–1122. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  225. Kunkel, L. O. Studies on aster yellows in some new host plants. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.3: 85–123. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  226. —. Contact periods in graft transmission of peach viruses. Phytopath.28: 491–497. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  227. Lagasse, F. S. A comparison of the top and root growth made by five varieties of apples on seedlings and scion roots during five years in the orchard. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 366–371. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  228. Lange, F. Vergleichende Untersuchungen über die Blattentwicklung einiger Solanum—Chimären und ihrer Eiterarten. Planta3: 181–281. 1927. (Biol. Abst.2: 13364. 1928)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  229. Largillier, H. J. Étude sur le greffage. Prog. Agr. Vit.106: 204–206. 1936. (Hort. Abst.6: 460.)

    Google Scholar 

  230. Laurent, C. Sur les variations de composition de certaines plantes alimentaires après greffage. Trans. Sci. Univ. Rennes5: 141–147. 1906.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  231. Lawson, W. A new orchard and garden. 1660.

  232. Lebedeva, S. P. Changing the nature of plants (melons) by grafting [Russian]. Nov. Sel. Khoz, Moscow No.16: 1–12. 1937. (Herb. Abst.8: 1827. 1938)

  233. Lincoln, F. B. Some apple tree stock relationships seen in New England after 1938 hurricane. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 102–109. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  234. —. Scion influence on nursery apple tree roots. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.39: 237–239. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  235. —. Evidence of scion influence on stock. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.39: 240–244. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  236. Lindemuth, H. Vegetative Bastarderzeugung durch Impfung (inoculation). Landw. Jahrb.7: 887–939. 1878.

    Google Scholar 

  237. —. Das Verhalten durch Copulation verbundener Pflanzenarten. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.19: 515–529. 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  238. —. Über angebliches Vorhandensein von Atropin in Kartoffelknollen infolge von Transplantation und über die Grenzen der Verwachsung nach dem Verwandschaftsgrade. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.24: 428–435. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  239. Long, E. M. The effect of salt additions to the substrate on intake of water and nutrients by roots of approach-grafted tomato plants. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 594–601. 1943.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  240. Loomis, N. H.et al. Further studies on the adaptability of some American grape varieties to southern conditions when grown on their own roots and on certain stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 391–394. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  241. Lugeon, A. R. Top-grafting cherries and plums. Gard. Chron.97: 98. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  242. Lynch, S. J. Some analytical studies of the Persian lime. Fla. Agr. Exp. Sta, Bul. 368. 1942.

  243. MacCallum, W. B. The reciprocal influence of scion and stock. Pl. World12: 281–286. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  244. MacDaniels, L. H. Tree bracing and wound treatment in the orchard. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 312. 1935.

  245. Magoon, C. A.et al. Investigations on the adaptability of grape root stocks to Gulf Coast conditions. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 466–470. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  246. —et al. A study of rootstocks of Concord, Ontario, and Delaware grapes. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.46: 222–226. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  247. Maney, T. J. Stock and scion relationships with reference to double worked apple stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 390–392. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  248. —. The growth and production of topworked apple varieties. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 287–290. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  249. —. Records on a full crop yield of apple varieties topworked on various hardy stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 345–347. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  250. Margar’yan, A. E. Vegetative propagation of the tung tree [Russian; Eng. sum.]. Soviet Subtropics No. 2(42): 10–21. 1938. (Hort. Abst.8: 822)

  251. Marloth, R. H. The citrus rootstock problem. Citrus-tree propagation. Farming in So. Africa.13: 226–231. 1938. (Biol Abst.14: 7461. 1940)

    Google Scholar 

  252. Marshall, T. H. Coffee grafting and budding. Trop. Agr.84: 93–96. 1935. (Hort. Abst.5: 285)

    Google Scholar 

  253. Martin, J. N. The development of new lateral roots in relation to the crown buds inMelilotus alba. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci.40: 79. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  254. Mattras, H. Expérience de surgreffage de la vigne dans le Gard. Prog. Agr. Vit.105: 200–202. 1936. (Hort. Abst.7: 47)

    Google Scholar 

  255. Matubara, S. (Experiments on the grafting of fruit trees and their anatomical and physiological observations in relation to its success). (Eng. sum.). (Bul. Miyazaki Coll. Agr. & For.3: 21–42. 1931). (Biol. Abst.6: 20015. 1932)

    Google Scholar 

  256. McClintock, J. A. Peach rosette, an infectious mosaic. Jour. Agr. Res.24: 307–315. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  257. —. Further evidence of uncongeniality in disease resistant stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.22: 231–232. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  258. —. American Mazzard cherry seedlings as rootstocks for cultivated cherries. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.26: 82–85. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  259. —. The affinity of varieties other than Grimes on Virginia Crab stocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 131–132. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  260. —. The effect of stocks on the yield of Grimes apples. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 369–371. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  261. —. Preliminary studies on adapting Virginia Crab to topworking with Stayman. Prop. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.45: 177–180. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  262. Melchers, G. Die Blühhormone. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.57: 29–48. 1939. (Herb. Abst.9: 1140. 1939)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  263. Mendel, K. The anatomy and histology of the bud-union in citrus. Palestine Jour. Bot. & Hort. Sci.1: 3–46. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  264. Meyer, A. andSchmidt, E. Über die gegenseitige Beeinflussung der Symbionten heteroplastischer Transplantionen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Wanderung der Alkaloide durch die Pfropfstellen. Flora100: 317–397. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  265. Milbrath, J. A. andZeller, S. M. Latent viruses in stone fruits. Science101: 114–115. 1945.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  266. Millner, M. E. Natural grafting inHedcra helix. New Phyt.31: 2–25. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  267. Mirov, N. T. Tested methods of grafting pines. Jour. For.38: 768–777. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  268. Mitchell, H. L. The development of a high-yielding strain of naval stores pine to increase the output of oleoresin per tree. Naval Stores Rev.52: 10, 12. 1942. (Biol. Abst.17: 17215. 1943)

    Google Scholar 

  269. Molotkovsky, G. Kh. Some results in changing the nature of plants by means of grafting. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.24: 602–604. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  270. Monakima, T. A. andSolovey, G. T. Grafting monocotyledonous bulbous plants. [Russian]. Vernalization No.4: 140–141. 1939. (Hort. Abst.10: 475).

  271. Moore, M. H. Spraying experiments on the control of pear scab at East Mailing. Jour. Min. Agr. (Gr. Brt.)40: 111–119. 1933. (Biol. Abst.9: 11069. 1935)

    Google Scholar 

  272. Moreira, S. (An interesting case of incongeniality in citrus grafts). Jour. Agron.1: 57–64. 1938. (Biol. Abst.12: 16676. 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  273. Moshkov, B. S. (Photoperiodic response of leaves and its utilization in grafting). Trudy Prikl. Bot. Genet, i. Selekcii. Ser. A. No. 19. 107–126. 1936. (Herb. Abst.7: 326. 1937)

  274. -. (Flowering of short-day plants under continuous day as a result of grafting). Trudy Prikl. Bot. Genet, i. Selekcii. Ser. A. No. 21. 145–156. 1937. (Herb. Abst.8: 634. 1938)

  275. —. Blooming of short-day plants in a condition of continuous illumination as a result of grafting. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed., A., Suppl.21: 145–146. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  276. —. Symbiosis of leguminous plants with nitrogen assimilating bacteria as determined by photoperiodism. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.22: 187–188. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  277. — andSmirnova, M. I. Grafting as a method of changing alkaloid content in plants. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.24: 88–90. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  278. —. Transfer of photoperiodic reaction from leaves to growing points. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.24: 489–491. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  279. Mottier, D. M. Plant chimeras and their relation to hereditary phenomena. Sch. Sci. & Math.15: 713–716. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  280. Müller-Stoll, W. R. Weitere Versuche über die Verwendbarkeit von Wuchsstoffen in der Rebenveredlung. Gartenbauwiss.14: 151–168. 1940. (Biol. Abst.15: 15537. 1941)

    Google Scholar 

  281. Namikawa, I. (On the chromosomes of the persimmon). Tottor Nogaku-Kwailo (Tottori Soc. Agr. Sci.)2: 145–148. 1930 (Biol. Abst.8: 105. 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  282. Nawaschin, M. Alten der Samen als Ursache von Chromosomenmutationen. Planta20: 233–243. 1933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  283. Nebel, B. R. andRuttle, M. L. The cytological and genetical significance of colchicine. Jour. Hered.29: 3–9. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  284. Neiman, N. F. (On the formation of irregular thickenings of the cell walls in graft unions of beet). Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Pl. Breed., A. Pl. Ind., U.S.S.R.5/6: 147–151. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  285. Neuwirth, Fr. Xr. (An interesting graft). Mykologia (Prague)3: 51. 1926. (Biol.Abst.2: 18673. 1928)

    Google Scholar 

  286. Nolle, F. Pfropf- und Verwachsungsversuche mit Siphoneen. Sitz. Niederr. Ges. Nat. u. Heil. 1897.

  287. Obsil, K. Zur Frage der Blühhormone. Planta29: 468–476. 1939. (Biol. Abst.13: 15, 713. 1939)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  288. Okanenko, A. S. andVandivk, N. V. Physiological basis of mutual influence between stock and scion of beet. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S.24: 807–811. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  289. Ohmann, M. Ueber die Art und der Zustandekommen des Wachsung zweier Pfropfsymbionten. Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. 2.21: 232–256; 318–329. 1908.

    Google Scholar 

  290. Ostendorf, F. W. (The growth of youngHevea buddings). 1933. (Biol. Abst.8: 14175. 1934)

    Google Scholar 

  291. Overholtzer, E. L.et al. Nursery fruit trees, dwarf and standard understocks, their handling and planting. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Pop. Bull. 170. 1943.

  292. Palmer, R. C. andHewetson, F. N. Stock and scion relationships in some four year old apple trees. Sci. Agr.17: 551–562. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  293. Pasinetti, L. (The death of grafted vinifera vines). Riv. Patol. Veg.28: 81–101. 1938. (Biol. Abst.12: 7512. 1938)

    Google Scholar 

  294. Paul, W. R. C. andGuneratuam, S. C. The propagation of the mango in Jaffua. Trop. Agriculturist88: 331–337. 1937. (Hort. Abst.8: 248)

    Google Scholar 

  295. Paulsen, F. andBerna, R. (Second note on the “Ciminnita” grape. Artificial pollination). Italia Agr.71: 117–9. 1934. (Biol. Abst.11: 6818. 1937.)

    Google Scholar 

  296. Pavskii, V. A. (Concerning apple understocks in the prikamsk portion of the Molotovsk province). (Biol. Abst.18: 7160. 1944.)

    Google Scholar 

  297. Peacock, S. M.et al. Alkaloid accumulation in reciprocal grafts ofDatura Stramonium with tobacco and tomato. Am. Jour. Bot.31: 463–466. 1944.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  298. Pearse, H. L. Water-culture studies with apple trees. II. The seasonal absorption of nitrogen and potassium by Cox’s Orange Pippin on Mailing rootstocks. Nos. IX and XII. Jour. Pom.17: 344–361. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  299. Peto, F. H. Genetical studies on mutants in the progeny of heat-treated barley. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 217–229. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  300. Pirschle, K. Über den Mineralsroffwechsel von homo- und heteroplastischen Pfropfungen mit Petunia D und d. Biol. Zentralbl.59: 123–157. 1939. (Biol. Abst.13: 10315. 1939)

    Google Scholar 

  301. Plotnikov, I. G. (Technique of grafting of grasses). Jarovizacija No. 3 63–65. 1939. (Herb. Abst.10: 619. 1940)

  302. -. (Grafting of graminaceous plants). Soc. Zern. Hoz. No.4: 109–117. 1939. (Herb. Abst.10: 775. 1940).

  303. Polishtshonk, A. D. (Influence of the original position of the scion used for grafting on the development of grafted apples). Doklady Usesoinznoi Akademii S.-Kh. Nauk.13: 14–18. 1940. (Bot. Abst.16: 16935. 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  304. Pope, W. T. andStory, W. B. Grafting tropical fruit trees in Hawaii. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ.6: 1933.

  305. Popeso, C. T. Effets d’un nouveau système de greffage chez leLycium vulgare placé sur la tomate. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)1943: 1129–1131. 1932. (Biol. Abst.8: 11834.1934)

    Google Scholar 

  306. Pound, F. J. The significances of budding and grafting cacao and of producing rooted cuttings. Proc. Agr. Soc. Trinidad & Tobago.43: 65–74. 1943. (Biol. Abst.17: 513. 1944)

    Google Scholar 

  307. Proebsting, E. L. Structural weakness in interspecific grafts ofPyrus. Bot. Gaz.82: 336–338. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  308. — andBarger, E. H. The precipitin reaction as a means of determining the congeniality of grafts. Science65: 573–574. 1927.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  309. —. Further observations on structural defects of the graft union. Bot. Gaz.86: 82–92. 1928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  310. — andHansen, C. J. Leaf scorch and die-back of apricots. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 270–274. 1943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  311. Provan, J. L. andGreatorex, F. J. Invigorating fruit trees by inarching. Jour. Dept. Agr. Victoria38: 366–368. 1940. (Biol. Abst.16: 5274. 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  312. Quinn, G. The influence of rootstocks on the texture and flavor of orange fruits. So. Australia Dept. Agr., Bull. 276. 1933.

  313. —. Rootstocks for cherry trees. Jour. Dept. Agr. So. Australia38: 1109–1124; 1245–1262. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  314. —. Rootstocks for peach trees. Jour. Dept. Agr. So. Australia38: 1509–1539. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  315. Raleigh, W. D. An abnormal graft reaction in potato resulting from a virus infection of a scion on a resistant stock. Phytopath.26: 795. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  316. Rao, Y. V. andBerry, W. E. The carbohydrate relations of a single scion variety grafted on Mailing rootstocks IX and XIII; a contribution to the physiology of dwarfing. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.18: 193–225. 1940.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  317. Ravaz, L. De l’influence spécifique réciproque du sujet et du greffon. Rep. IX Int. Hort. Congr. 255–263. 1930.

  318. Rawlins, T. E. andHome, W. T. “Buckskin”, a destructive graftinfectious disease of the cherry. Phytopath21: 331–335. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  319. — andParker, K. G. Influence of rootstock on susceptibility of sweet cherry to buckskin disease. Phytopath.24: 1029–1031. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  320. Razumov, V. I. (Behavior of individual plants of a pure line under varying day length). Jarovizacija No.2: 74–82. 1937. (Herb. Abst.8: 215. 1938).

  321. —. (The change of hereditary characteristics of potato by grafting). (Biol. Abst.14: 15693. 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  322. Reed, C. A. Nut-tree propagation. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bull. 1501. 1926.

  323. —. The present status of chestnut growing in the United States. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.39: 147–152. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  324. Reeves, E. L. Mottle-Leaf, a virus disease of cherries. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 555–572. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  325. Reimer, F. C. Blight resistance in pears and characteristics of pear species and stocks. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 214. 1925.

  326. Reynolds, H. andVaile, J. E. Effects of rootstock upon composition and quality of fruit of Concord, Campbell Early and Moore Early grapes. Ark. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 421. 1942.

  327. Richards, A. V. Studies on stock-scion interaction in citrus. I. Growth and development of seedling stocks and young grafts. Trop. Agr. (Ceylon)91: 12–24. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  328. —. Influence of rootstock on quality of citrus fruit. Trop. Agr. (Ceylon)94: 354–361. 1940. (Biol. Abst.16: 5286. 1942).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  329. —. Studies on propagation of seedless Tahiti lime. Trop. Agr. (Ceylon)98: 9–12. 1942. (Biol. Abst.18: 14397. 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  330. —. Studies in propagation of Sapodilla. Trop. Agr. (Ceylon)99: 78–82. 1943. (Biol. Abst.18: 14398. 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  331. Richmond, T. E. Legume inoculation as influenced by stock and scion. Bot. Gaz.82: 438–442. 1926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  332. Richter, O. Pfropfungen, Pfropfbastarde, und Pflanzenchimaeren. Lotos508: 1–22; 39–51. 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  333. Riker, A. J.et al. Antiseptic solutions and antiseptic adhesive tape in relation to control of hairy root, crown gall, and other growths on nursery apple trees. Phytopath.25: 192–207. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  334. Rives, L. Sur l’emploi du séro-diagnostic pour la détermination de l’affinité au greffage des hybrides de vigne. Prog. Agr. et Vit.79: 118–119. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  335. —. Nouvelle contribution à l’étude de l’affinité. Rev. Vit.71: 397–405. 1929. (Biol. Abst.5: 27160. 1931).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  336. Roach, W. A. Increased scion vigour induced by certain foreign rootstocks. Ann. Bot.44: 859–864. 1930. (Biol. Abst.7: 5276. 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  337. -. The chemistry of the rootstock-scion effect. I. The elements absorbed from the soil. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1928–1930. II Suppl. 101–104. 1931.

  338. - andBolas, B. D. Review of research. IV. Biochemistry. East. Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1944. 24–25.

  339. Roberts, R. H. Variation in growth of nursery grafts. Science62: 356. 1925.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  340. -. Factors affecting the variable growth of apple grafts in the nursery row. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull.77: 1927.

  341. -. Some stock and scion observations on apple trees. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 94. 1929.

  342. —. Two more season’s notes upon stock and scion relation. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.27: 102–105. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  343. —. Notes upon stock and scion relations in 1931. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.28: 470–472. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  344. —. Ring grafting and stock effect. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.32: 328–329. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  345. —. A further trial of ring grafting to produce stock effects. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 358–359. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  346. —. A third experience in producing stock effects with ring grafts. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.34: 296–297. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  347. -. Top and double-working trees. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 432. 1936.

  348. — andStruckmeyer, B. Esther. The point of origin of the blossom-inducing stimulus. Science90: 16. 1939.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  349. Rogers, W. S. Rootstock effect on colour and size of apples. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.13: 1927. 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  350. - andVyvyan, M. C. The root systems of some ten-year-old apple trees on two different rootstocks, and their relation to tree performance. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 1928. II Suppl. 31–43.

  351. —et al. The influence of “stem-builder” intermediates on apple root systems. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.17: 20–26. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  352. Rose, F. T. Root-grafting rhododendrons. Gard. Chron.99: 71. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  353. Roy, W. R. Studies of boron deficiency in grapefruit. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc.56: 38–43. 1943.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  354. Rusch, F. (Method of buddingHevea at the government coffee plantation “Bangelan”). Bergcultures13: 1233–1235. 1939. (Hort. Abst.9: 1415).

    Google Scholar 

  355. Sahut, F. De l’affinité spécifique entre le sujet et le greffon. Rev. Hort.57: 149–152. 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  356. Salmon, E. S. andWare, W. M. Interspecific grafting inHumulus. Gard. Chron. (London)83: 396. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  357. Sansome, F. W. Graft hybrids and induction of polyploids inSolanum. Rep. IX Int. Hort. Cong. 92–99. 1930.

  358. Sass, J. E. Formation of callus knots on apple grafts as related to the histology of graft union. Bot. Gaz.94: 364–380. 1932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  359. Satina, Sophie. Periclinal chimeras inDatura in relation to the development and structure of the ovule. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 72–81. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  360. —et al. Demonstration of the three germ layers in the shoot apex ofDatura by means of induced polyploidy in periclinal chimeras. Am. Jour. Bot.27: 895–905. 1940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  361. —et al. Periclinal chimeras inDatura in relation to the development of the carpel. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 453–462. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  362. Saunders, L. H. An experiment in the propagation of the kola. Trop. Agr. (Trinidad)18: 15. 1941. (Bio). Abst.15: 24, 265. 1941).

    Google Scholar 

  363. El Sawy, A. Characteristics of the main citrus stocks. Leafl. Hort. Sect. Egypt.50: 1–5, 1936. (Hort. Abst.7: 711. 1937).

    Google Scholar 

  364. Sax, K. The cause and permanence of size differences in apple trees. Me. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 310. 1923.

  365. Schmidt, A. Histologische Studien an phanerogamen Vegetationspunkten. Bot. Arch.8: 345–404. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  366. Schmuck, A. A.et al. Alteration in the alkaloid composition due to the influence of stock upon scion inNicotiana. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.25: 477–480. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  367. Schrader, A. L. andWhitehouse, W. E. The budding and grafting of fruit trees. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 278. 1925.

  368. Schuster, C. E. andMiller, P. W. A disorder of Persian (English) walnuts grafted on black-walnut stocks, resulting in girdling. Phytopath.23: 408–409. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  369. Schwartzman, M. The carob tree and its cultivation in Palestine. Palestine Dept. Agr. & For., Bull.1: 1–48. (Biol. Abst.10: 11656. 1936).

  370. Schweizer, J. (Mutual stock/scion effect inHevea). Bergcultures12: 773–778. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  371. Scott, L. E. A comparison of the performance of young Halehaven trees on Shalil and Carolina “natural” rootstocks. So. Car. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep.1942: 131–138.

  372. Sharrock, R. History of the propagation and improvement of vegetables. 1672.

  373. Shaw, J. K. An investigation of the interrelation of stock and scion in apples. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.14: 59–65. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  374. —. The Mailing clonal stocks in relation to Mclntosh and Wealthy. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.33: 346–349. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  375. —. Budding ornamentalMalus on the Mailing rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 661. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  376. — andSouthwick, L. A second report on some lethal rootstock-scion combinations. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.45: 198–202. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  377. Schmuck, A.et al. Formation of nicotine in plants grafted on tobacco. Compt. Rend. (Doklady) Acad. Sci. U. R. S. S.32: 365–368. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  378. Siegler, E. A. andBowman, J. J. Propagation of sour cherries by piece-root grafting to avoid spraying seedling stocks for leaf spot. Phytopath.30: 873–876. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  379. Silberschmidt, K. Studien zum Nachweis von Antikörpern in Pflanzen. Planta.13: 114–168. 1931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  380. —. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Stoffwechselgemeinschaft zwischen Pfropfparten. Planta19: 729–780. 1933. (Biol. Abst.9: 4702. 1935).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  381. —. Weitere Versuche über die N-Verteilung in Pfropfungen und Stecklingen. Planta22: 1–22. 1934. (Biol. Abst.11: 2984. 1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  382. —. Die Verteilung proteolytischer Aktivität in den Stengelteilen von normalen Pflanzen und Pfropfungen. Planta22: 313–367. 1934. (Biol. Abst.11: 3020. 1937).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  383. —. Die Abhängigkeit des Pfropferfolges von der systematischen Verwandtschaft der Partner. Zeit. Bot.29: 65–137. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  384. Simon, S. V. Transplantationsversuche zwischenSolanmn melongena undIresine lindeni. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.72: 137–160. 1930. (Biol. Abst.5: 27163. 1931).

    Google Scholar 

  385. Sinclair, W. B. andBartholomew, E. T. Effects of rootstock and environment on the composition of oranges and grapefruit. Hilgardia16: 125–175. 1944.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  386. Singh, S. The choice of rootstocks for blood-red orange. Punjab Fruit Jour.6: 1174–1175. 1942. (Biol. Abst.18: 20301. 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  387. Sitton, B. G. andDodge, F. N. Growth and fruiting of three varieties of pecans on different seedling rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 121–125. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  388. Skoog, Folke, andTsui, Cheng. Chemical control of growth and bud formation in tobacco stem segments and callus cultured in vitro. Am. Jour. Bot.35: 782–787. 1948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  389. Smirnov, V. andSmirnova, O. (Watermelons and melons for the north). Jarovizatsiia3: 66–70. 1939. (Biol. Abst.14: 15697. 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  390. Smith, C. O. The Japanese apricot as a root-stock. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.25: 183–187. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  391. Smith, W. W. Use of Mailing and other dwarf apple rootstocks. N. H. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 345. 1942.

  392. Smyth, Elsie S. The seasonal cycles of ash, carbohydrate and nitrogenous constituents in the terminal shoots of apple trees and the effects of five vegetatively propagated rootstocks on them. II. Carbohydrate fractions and lignin. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.18: 185–200. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  393. Snyder, E. andHarmon, F. N. Vinifera grape scion influence on Dog Ridge stock. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.22: 374–375. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  394. ——. Hastening the production of fruit in grape hybridizing work. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.34: 426–427. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  395. Southwick, L. andShaw, J. K. Further notes on the Malling clonal stocks in relation to Mclntosh and Wealthy. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 133–137. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  396. Spinks, G. T. Investigations on the variability of apple trees on seedling and on clone root-stocks. Long Ashton Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1936: 50–65.

  397. Strasburger, E. Ueber Verwachsungen und deren Folgen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.3: 34–40. 1885.

    Google Scholar 

  398. —. (Union of protoplasm). Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.36: 493. 1901.

    Google Scholar 

  399. —. Zu der Atropinnachweis in den Kartoffelnollen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.24: 599–600. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  400. —. Histologische Beitraege zur Vererbungsfrage. I. Typische und Allotypische Keimteilung. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.42: 1–71. 1906.

    Google Scholar 

  401. Sudds, R. H. The comparative performance of several standard apple varieties on certain rootstocks, principally the clones Mailing I, II, and XIII. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 311–318. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  402. — andMarth, R. C. The effect of the rootstocks on nine years growth and yield of four apple varieties. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 326–334. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  403. Summers, F. Improvement of yield in the para rubber tree. Rep. IX Int. Hort. Congr. 391–395. 1930.

  404. Swarbrick, T. Some preliminary observations upon the influence of scion variety upon the root growth of young apple trees. Long Ashton Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 42–49. 1927.

  405. -. The influence of the position of the top bud of the scion upon the stand of grafts. Long Ashton Res. Sta., Ann. Rep. 46–51. 1930.

  406. —. Rootstock and scion relationship. Some effects of scion variety upon the rootstock. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.8: 210–228. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  407. — andNaik, K. C. Factors governing fruit bud formation. IX. A study of the relation between leaf area and internode length in the shoots of Worcester Pearmain apple, as affected by six different vegetative rootstocks. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.10: 42–53. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  408. - andRuberts, R. H. The relation of scion variety to character of root growth in apple trees. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bull. 78. 1927.

  409. Swingle, C. F. Graft hybrids in plants. Jour. Hered.18: 73–94. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  410. —. Regeneration and vegetative propagation. Bot. Rev.6: 301–355. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  411. Tanaka, T. andTanaka, Y. (Propagation of citrus trees in Japan). (Studia Citrologica)3: 197–207. 1930. (Biol. Abst.6: 8000. 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  412. Thomas, H. E.et al. A transmissible leaf-casting yellows of peach. Phytopath.30: 322–328. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  413. Thomas, L. A. Stock and scion investigations. III. The root-systems of some own-rooted apple trees. Jour. Coun. Sci. & Ind. Res. Australia17: 167–178. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  414. Toenjes, W. Influence of some rootstocks on the Campbell Early grape. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Quart. Bull.26: 3–10. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  415. Toxopeus, H. J. Stock-scion incompatibility in citrus and its cause. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.14: 360–364. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  416. Traub, H. P. andAuchter, E. C. Sprouting and grafting fractional parts of avocado embryos with attached cotyledonous material. Science78: 389–390. 1933.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  417. Tufts, W. P. Correspondence, April 4, 1943.

  418. Tukey, H. B. The importance of stocks in Kieffer pear growing. Jour. Hered.19: 113–114. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  419. - andBrase, K. D. Influence of the scion and of an intermediate stem-piece upon the character and development of roots of young apple trees. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 218. 1933.

  420. ——. Trials with pear stocks in New York. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.30: 361–364. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  421. ——. Size relationships of trees of five varieties of apple on several clonal rootstocks. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 299–304. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  422. ——. Similarity in the nursery of several Malling Apple stock-and-scion combinations which differ in the orchard. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.39: 245–246. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  423. ——. The dwarfing effect of an intermediate stempiece of Mailing IX apple. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 357–364. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  424. ——. An incongeniality of the Mclntosh apple when topworked onto Virginia crab. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.43: 139–142. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  425. ——. Differences of congeniality of two sources of Mclntosh apple budwood propagated on rootstock U. S. D. A. 227. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.45: 190–194. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  426. ——. See differences in apple budwood. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Quart. Bull.11: 9, 11. 1945.

    Google Scholar 

  427. Tydeman, H. M. New varieties of rootstock for plums. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1934: 100–102.

  428. -. The wild fruit trees of the Caucasus and Turkestan:Their potentialities as rootstocks for apples and pears. I. A first report on some wild quince from the Caucasus. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1937: 103–116.

  429. —. Further studies on new varieties of apple rootstocks. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.20: 116–126. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  430. Uphof, J. C. T. Wissenschaftliche Beobachtungen und Versuche an Agrumen. VIII. Morphologische Studien an einem Pfropfbastard zwischen der Apfelsine Pineapple (Citrus sinensis Osbeck) und der Bigarde (C.aurantium L.) Gartenbauwiss.9: 421–426. 1935. (Hort. Abst.6: 133).

    Google Scholar 

  431. Upshall, W. H. Dwarf pear trees. Canad. Hort. & Home Mag.63: 36, 41–42. 1940.

    Google Scholar 

  432. —. Compatability of Bechtel’s Crab on some Mailing root stocks. Sci. Agr.21: 687–688. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  433. —. Mailing stocks and French crab seedlings as stocks for five varieties of apples. III. Sci. Agr.23: 537–545. 1943.

    Google Scholar 

  434. Vaidya, V. G. The seasonal cycles of ash, carbohydrate and nitrogenous constituents in the terminal shoots of apple trees and the effects of five vegetatively propagated rootstocks on them. I. Total ash and ash constituents, Jour. Pom.16: 101–126. 1938.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  435. Vaile, J. E. The influence of rootstocks on the yield and vigor of American grapes. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 471–474. 1937.

    Google Scholar 

  436. Van Kleef, A. Grafting rhododendrons. Florist’s Exchange51: 383. 1924.

    Google Scholar 

  437. Van Overbeck, J. andGregory, L. E. A physiological separation of two factors necessary for the formation of roots on cuttings. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 336–341. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  438. Varma, S. R. A novel mango graft. Punjab Fruit Jour.5: 957. 1941. (Biol. Abst.17: 2761. 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  439. Vöchting, H. Ueber Transplantation am Pflanzenkörper. 1892.

  440. —. Ueber die durch Pfropfen herbeigeführte Symbiose desHelianthus tuberosus undHelianthus annuus. Sitzber. Preus. Akad. Wiss. Berlin: 705–721. 1894.

    Google Scholar 

  441. Volk, A. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Wechselbeziehungen zwischen Kulturpflanzen, ihren Parasiten und der Umwelt. 4. Herausg. von E. Schaffnit. Einflüsse des Bodens, der Luft und des Lichtes auf die Empfänglichkeit der Pflanzen für Krankheiten. Phytopath. Zeits.3: 1–88. 1931. (Biol. Abst.7: 15354. 1933).

    Google Scholar 

  442. Von Wettstein, F. andPirschle, K. Über die Wirkung heteroplastischer Pfropfungen und die Übertragung eines Gen-bedingten Stoffes durch Pfropfung beiPetunia. Biol. Zentr.58: 123–142. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  443. Vyvyan, M. C. The effect of scion on root. III. Comparison of stem and root-worked trees. Jour. Pom.8: 259–282. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  444. -. The distribution of growth between roots, stems, and leaves in a young apple tree and its possible bearing on the problem of stock effect on tree vigour. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1933: 121–131.

  445. —. Relative influence of rootstock and of an immediate piece of stock stem in some double grafted apple trees. Jour. Pom.16: 251–273. 1938.

    Google Scholar 

  446. -. Notes on the effect of the variety of stock used to provide the intermediate stem-piece in some double-working of apple trees. East Mailing Res. Sta., Ann. Rep.1938: 148–456.

  447. Wagner, S. Ein Beitrag zur Züchtung des Topinambur und zur Kastration beiHelianthus. Zeits. Zücht. Reibe A, Pflanzenzücht.17: 563–582. 1932. (Biol. Abst.8: 6670. 1934).

    Google Scholar 

  448. Warne, L. G. G. andRaby, Jane. Water conductivity of the graft union in apple trees with special reference to Mailing rootstock No. IX. Jour. Pom.16: 389–399. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  449. — andWallace, T. The composition of terminal shoots and fruits of two varieties of apple in relation to rootstock effects. Jour. Pom.13: 1–31. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  450. Waugh, F. A. The graft union. Mass. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bull. 2. 1904.

  451. Webber, H. J. andBarrett, J. T. Root-stock influence in citrus. Rep. IX Int. Hort. Cong. 358–373. 1930.

  452. Webster, C. C. TopworkingAlcurites Montana. Nyasaland Agr. Quart. Jour.2: 10–15. 1942. (Biol. Abst.17: 14516. 1943).

    Google Scholar 

  453. Weimer, J. L. Alfalfa dwarf, a virus disease transmissible by grafting. Jour. Agr. Res.53: 333–347. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  454. Weinard, F. F. andDorner, H. B.Rosa odorata as a grafting stock for indoor roses. Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bull. 290. 1927.

  455. Weiss, F. E. The problem of graft hybrids and chimaeras. Biol. Rev.5: 231–271. 1930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  456. Went, F. W. Transplantation experiments with peas. III. Bot. Gaz.104: 460–474. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  457. Whitaker, T. W.et al. Studies on the precipitin reaction in plants. IV. The question of acquired reactions due to grafting. Am. Jour. Bot.20: 297–308. 1933.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  458. White, P. R. Developmental responses in isolated plant tissue systems. Growth6: 55–71. 1942.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  459. —. Metastatic (graft) tumors of bacteria-free crown-galls inVinca rosea. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 237–241. 1945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  460. Winkler, H. Ueber Pfropfbastarde und Pflanzliche Chimaeren. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.25: 568–576. 1907.

    Google Scholar 

  461. —.Solanum tubingcuse, ein echter Pfropfbastard zwischen Tomate und Nachtschatten. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.26a: 596–608. 1908. (Graft hybrids. Bot. Gaz47: 250. 1909. R. R. Gates).

    Google Scholar 

  462. —. Ueber die Nachkommenschaft der Solanum Pfropfbastarde und die Chromosomenzahlen ihrer Keimzellen. Zeits. Bot.2: 1–38. 1909.

    Google Scholar 

  463. -. Untersuchen ueber Pfropfbastarde. I. Die Unmittelbare Gegenseitige Beeinflussung der Pfropfsymbionten. 1912.

  464. -. Die Chimaerenforschung als Methode der Experimentellen Biologe. Sitz. Phys.-Med. Ges. Wurzburg 95–119. 1913.

  465. —. Transplantation Pfropfung. Pfropfbastarde. Handw. der Naturwissenschaften10: 18–29. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  466. —. Ueber die Experimentelle Erzeugung von Pflanzen mit Abweichenden Chromosomenzahlen. Zeits. Bot.8: 417–531. 1916.

    Google Scholar 

  467. —. Über zwei Solanum—Chimären mit Burdonenepidermis. Planta21: 613–656. 1934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  468. —. Chimaeren und Burdonen. Die Biologie9: 279–290. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  469. Withrow, Alice P. andWithrow, R. B. Translocation of the floral stimulus inXanthium. Bot. Gaz.104: 409–416. 1943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  470. Wright, J. S. Cell union in herbaceous grafting. Bot. Gaz.18: 285–293. 1893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  471. Yampolsky, C. Male-female grafts inMercurialis annua. Jour. Hered.21: 65–72. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  472. Yasudo, S. An experiment to graft the style upon the ovary inPetunia violacea. Proc. Imp. Acad. (Tokyo)7: 72–75. 1931. (Biol. Abst.6: 24551. 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  473. Yeager, A. F. Xylem formation from ring grafts. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.44: 221–222. 1944.

    Google Scholar 

  474. Yerkes, G. E. Bridge grafting. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bull. 1369. 1923.

  475. -. Propagation of trees and shrubs. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bull. 1567. 1929.

  476. —. Rose under-stock in a five-year test. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.27: 463–466. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  477. — andAnthony, R. D. Seedling apple stocks of known origin in nursery and orchard tests. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 331–335. 1941.

    Google Scholar 

  478. — andSudds, R. H. The effect of the stocks on seven years’ growth of four apple varieties. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 294–297. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  479. Zakharova, E. I. andPotapenko, Ya. I. Development of seedling scions grafted to the crown of bearing apple trees. [Russian]. Proc. Lenin Acad. Agr. Sci. Moscow14: 3–6. 1939.

    Google Scholar 

  480. Zebrak, A. R. (Grafting in genetically different pea lines). Trudy Timirjaze. Seljskohoz. Acad. I: 88–97. 1935. (Herb. Abst.7: 240. 1937).

    Google Scholar 

  481. -. (Grafting experiments with herbaceous plants). Bull. Vsesojuz. Akad. S-H Nauk. No.9: 17–22. 1936. (Herb. Abst.7: 240. 1937).

  482. —. (Intergeneric and interfamily grafting of herbaceous plants). Timirjazev Seljskohoz. Akad.2: 115–133. 1937. (Herb. Abst.9: 674. 1939).

    Google Scholar 

  483. Zimmerman, P. W. andConnard, Mary H. Reversal of direction of translocation of solutes in stems. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst.6: 297–302. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin, USA

    R. H. Roberts

Authors
  1. R. H. Roberts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roberts, R.H. Theoretical aspects of graftage. Bot. Rev 15, 423–463 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861676

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861676

Keywords

Search

Navigation