Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical vine killing of potatoes

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six chemical and mechanical vine killing methods were compared for their effects during tuber maturation and subsequent harvesting of commercially-produced Russet Burbank potatoes. Pulling of vines resulted in tuber specific gravities which were equal to those of other vine killing treatments even though pulling terminated plant growth more abruptly. Dehydration tests show no significant difference among treatments and that the tuber maturation period could be less than the customary 21 days. Overall results suggest that pulling of vines might be done several days later than for other vine killing methods. An experimental vine puller placed pulled vines between adjacent rows to entirely eliminate subsequent harvester pickup. Pulling increased the amount of vine fragments in the harvested tubers compared to chemical vine killing methods. The number of tubers exposed to light was greatest for the vine pulling treatments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Bouman, A. 1975. Development of a pulling-machine for potato haulms. Eur Assoc Pot Res Cong at Wageningen, Netherlands, p. 212–213.

  2. Bouman, A. and B.v.d. Weerd. 1976. Destruction of potato haulms. Publication 48, Institut Voor Mechanisatie, Wageningen, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouman, A. and J. Bouma. 1978. Potato haulm pulling. Landbouwmechanisatie 29: 291–293.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Halderson, J.L., L.C. Haderlie and D.L. Corsini. 1981. Potato vine kill: pulling, chemical killing and rolling effects on yield and quality of Russet Burbank. Am Potato J 62:281–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Halderson, J.L., D.L. Corsini and L.C. Haderlie. 1985. Potato vine kill: stem-end discoloration effects on Russet Burbank. Am Potato J 62:273–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Halderson, J.L. and L.C. Haderlie. 1986. Mechanical killing of potato vines.In: Engineering for Potatoes. (B.F. Cargill, Ed.). Amer Soc Agric Engr, St. Joseph, MI 49085.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter, J.A. 1957. The design and development of a mechanical vine puller for potatoes. M.S. thesis, Univ of Maine, Orono.

  8. Misner, G.C. and C.F. Everett. 1981. Vine pulling as a means of top killing potatoes. Am Potato J 58:103–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy, H.J. 1968. Potato vine killing. Am Potato J 45:472–478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Potato Handbook. 1986. Agric Publications Bldg, Univ of Idaho, Moscow 83843.

  11. Power Farming. 1982. Pre-harvest haulm puller, Sep, p. 15.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Approved for publication as paper No. 8731 of the Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Halderson, J.L., Haderlie, L.C. & Skrobacki, A. Mechanical vine killing of potatoes. American Potato Journal 65, 415–423 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852962

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02852962

Additional Key Words

Navigation