Abstract
The boards of ice hockey rinks are equipped with protective glass to prevent the spectators from being hit by the puck. According to international rules, the minimum height of the board with protective glass is 197 cm. This is not high enough to protect the spectators from puck-related injuries, and severe accidents have occurred in the past. This study investigates what increase in the height of the safety glass is necessary to reduce the risk of severe puck-related injuries to spectators.
Puck flights towards the safety board are simulated, based on initial take-off conditions of the puck, by top-level players. The simulations show that increasing the security glass from a board height without any protective glass of 117 cm to a total band height of 380 cm will lower the relative frequency of shots with a potential to hit a spectator by 80%. The maximum velocity of such dangerous shots was only slightly decreased from 28.4 m s−1 to 25.2 m s−1 for the same difference in band height. However, the reduced number of dangerous shots does not protect the spectators completely from injuries. The simulation model suggests that a safety wall height of 10.8 m leads to a 100% reduction in all outgoing shots.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bishop, P., Norman, R.W. & Pierrynowski, M.R. (1982) Puck impact response of ice hockey face masks.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,5, 209–214.
De Mestre, N. (1990)The Mathematics of Projectiles in Sport. Cambridge University Press, New York.
Gülich, H.-A. (1988) Biomechanische Belastungsgrenzen. Aktualisierte Literaturstudie zur Belastbarkeit des Menschen beim Aufprall, inBundesanstalt für Straβenwesen Bereich Unfallforschung, 35–53. Bergisch Gladbach.
Haug, E.J. (1989) Computer aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems. Allyn and Bacon Series inEngineering 1, Basic Methods, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
Hayes, D., Norman, R.W., Sze, Y. & Thompson, J.C. (1974) Relative impact-attenuating properties of face masks of ice hockey goaltenders.Biomechanics IV, s264–269.
Hildebrand F. (2001) Untersuchung zum Flugverhalten des Diskus,Zeitschrift für angewandte Trainingswissenschaft,8, 37–52.
Hummel, S.A. & Hubbard, M. (2002) Identification of Frisbee aerodynamic coefficients using flight data, in S. Ujihashi & S. Haake (eds)The Engineering of Sport, 4, 322–329. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Lindner, J.E. (2003) Gericht: Eishockey —Bande zu niedrig. Color-Line-Arena: Nach Puck-Treffer klagte Hamburgerin gegen Freezers auf Schmerzensgeld, Hamburger Abendblatt vom 07 November 2003.
Maier, K.D., Wank, V., Bartoniez, K. & Blickhahn, R. (2000) Neural network based models of javelin flight: prediction of flight distances and optimal release parameters.Sports Engineering,3, 57–63.
McElhaney, J., Melvin, J., Roberts, V. & Portnoy, H. (1973)Dynamic Characteristics of the Tissue of the Head. Perspectives of Biomedical Engineering. MacMillan Press, London.
Pearsall, D.J., Montgomery, D.L., Rothsching, N. & Turcotte, R.A. (1999) The influence of stick stiffness on the performance of ice hockey slap shots.Sports Engineering,2, 3–11.
Potts, J.R. & Crowther, W.J. (2000)The Flow Over a Rotating Disc-wing. RAeS Aerodynamics Research Conference, London, Apr.
Potts, J.R. & Crowther W.J. (2002) Disc-Wing UAV: A Feasibility Study in Aerodynamics and Control, CEAS,AARC,28, 1–13.
Roy, B. & Dore, R. (1976) Biomecanique des different types de tirs au hockey.Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences,1, 49–55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Böhm, H., Schwiewagner, C. & Senner, V. Simulation of puck flight to determine spectator safety for various ice hockey board heights. Sports Eng 10, 75–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844205
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02844205