Abstract
This study explored a number of questions related to multi-image presentation of information and acquisition of a concept — in this case, classifying plants in the subphylum Pteropsida. Of particular interest was whether redundancy (i.e., additional positive examples of plants in the classes) and an opportunity to view nonexamples as well as examples of classes would be helpful to the seventhgrade subjects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berliner, D. C., & Cahen, L. C. Trait-treatment interaction and learning. In F. N. Kerlinger (Ed.),Review of research in education (Vol. I). Itasca, I11.: Peacock, 1973.
Bourne, L. E., Goldstein, S., & Link, W. E. Concept learning as a function of availability of previously presented information.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1964,67, 439–448.
Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A.A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.
Burke, K. Multi-image research.Multi-Images,1977, 6–7.
Cahill, H. E., & Hovland, C. I. The role of memory in the acquisition of concepts.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1960,59, 137–144.
Clark, D. C. Teaching concepts in the classroom: A set of teaching prescriptions derived from experimental research.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1971,62, 253–278.
Cronbach, L. J., & Snow, R. E.Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Irvington, 1977.
Davis, J. K.Concept identification as a function of cognitive style, complexity, and training procedures (Tech. Rep. 32). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1967.
DeCecco, J.The psychology of learning and instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall, 1968.
Denny, D. R. The assessment of difference in conceptual style.Child Study Journal, 1971,1, 142–155.
Frederick, W. C.Information processing and concept learning at grades 6, 8, and 10 as a function of cognitive style (Tech. Rep. 44). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1968.
French, J. W., Ekstrom, R. B., & Price, L. A.Manual for kit of reference tests for cognitive factors. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1963.
Goldstein, E. G. The perception of multiple images.AV Communication Review, 1975,23, 34–68.
Gombrich, E. G. The visual image.Scientific American, 1972,227, 82–96.
Haber, R. How we remember what we see.Scientific American, 1970,222, 104–215.
Hartman, F. Recognition learning under multiple channel presentation and test conditions.AV Communication Review, 1961,9, 24–43.
Jackson, D. N., Messick, S., & Meyers, C. T. Evaluation of group and individual forms of embedded figures, measure of field dependence.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1964,24, 177–192.
Kagen, J. Development studies. In A. Kidd & J. Rivoire (Eds.),Perceptual and conceptual development in children. New York: International University Press, 1966.
Kagen, J., Moss, H. A., &Sigel, I. E. Psychological significance of styles of conceptualization. In J. C. Wright & J. Kagen (Eds.),Basic cognitive processes in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1963,28 (2, No. 86), 73–124.
Kates, S. L., & Yudin, L. Concept attainment and memory.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1964,55, 103–109.
Klausmeier, H. J., Ghatala, E. S., & Frayer, D. A.Concept learning and development: A cognitive view. New York: Academic, 1974.
Koran, J. J., Koran, M. L., & Freeman, P. Acquisition of a concept: Effects of mode of instruction and length of exposure to biology examples.AV Communication Review, 1976,24, 357–366.
Lee, L., Kagen, J., & Robson, A. The influence of a preference for analytic categorization upon concept acquisition.Child Development, 1963,34, 433–442.
Mechener, F. Behavioral analyses and instructional sequencing. In P. C. Lange (Ed.),Programmed Instruction (Vol. 66, Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Pt. 2). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
Merrill, M. D., & Tennyson, R. E.Teaching concepts: An instructional design guide. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Press, 1977.
Meyrowitz, J., & Fradkin, B.Design of multipleimage instructional presentations. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Dallas, April 13–17, 1975.
Nelson, B. A.Effects of the analytic-global wet reflective-impulsivity cognitive styles on the acquisition of geometry concepts presented through emphasis or no emphasis and discovery on expository lessons (Tech. Rep. 234). Madison: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, 1972.
Perrin, D.The use and development of simultaneous projected images in educational communication. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1969.
Salomon, G. Can we affect cognitive skills through visual media? An hypothesis and initial findings.AV Communication Review, 1972,20, 401–422.
Santostefano, S.A biodevelopmental approach to clinical child psychology: Cognitive controls and cognitive control therapy. New York: Wiley, 1978.
Santostefano, S., & Paley, E. Development of cognitive controls in children.Child Development, 1964,35, 939–949.
Santostefano, S., & Rutledge, L. Cognitive styles and reading disabilities.Psychology in Schools, 1965,2, 57–62.
Severin, W. Another look at cue summation.AV Communication Review, 1967,15, 233–246.
Trohanis, P. L. Information learning and retention with multiple images and audio: A classroom experiment.AV Communication Review, 1975,23, 395–414.
Tukey, J. W.The problem of multiple comparisons. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University, 1956.
Witkin, H. A. Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures.Journal of Personality, 1950,19, 1–15.
Yudin, L., & Kates, S. L. Concept attainment and adolescent development.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1963,54, 177–182.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This study was funded by a Research Council grant, University of North Carolina at Greensboro. The author is grateful to Virginia Henry, Jamestown (N.C.) Junior High School, for her effort and to Douglas Denny, University of Kansas, for his informative cooperation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jonassen, D.H. Implications of multi-image for concept acquisition. ECTJ 27, 291–302 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02791456
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02791456